Marginal microleakage in Bulk Fill resins
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2016 |
Other Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Revista de Odontologia da UNESP |
Download full: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772016000600327 |
Summary: | Abstract Introduction Despite advances and innovations in restorative dentistry, microleakage remains one of the main problems in this area. Objective To evaluate in vitro marginal microleakage of Bulk Fill resins in class II cavities, with cervical termination in the dentin. Material and method Cavities, standardized on the mesial and distal surfaces, were prepared in forty top molars and randomly assigned to four groups (n = 10), according to the resin used. G1 (control): Filtek Z350 (3M/ESPE); G2: Filtek Bulk Fill flow (3M/ESPE); G3: Surefill SDR (Dentsply); G4: X-tra (Voco). These were further subdivided into subgroups according to the strategy used to apply the adhesive (self-etch technique and conventional). After storage for 24 hours in an oven (37 °C), the samples were submitted to the thermocycling test (500 cycles: 5 °C/55 °C). They were later waterproofed, immersed in Basic Fuchsin (0.5%) and sectioned in the mesial-distal direction for evaluation using a stereo magnifying glass at 40X (Coleman) Scores from 0 to 3 were assigned according to the microinfiltration observed. The Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests, with a significance level of 5%, were used for statistical analysis. Result There was no statistically significant difference between the Bulk Fill resins when the total acid-etching technique was used. Only the Filtek Bulk fill flow resin presented statistically significant results when the application of the adhesive system strategy was considered, with worse results, in relation to other groups, when it the self-etching strategy was considered. Conclusion The degree of leakage of the bulk fill resins studied, in class II cavities, was not influenced by the method of application of the adhesive system (conventional or two-step self-etching bonding agent), except for the Filtek Bulk fill flow. |
id |
UNESP-16_dc9ef0cc8f5463300beaafad3c7fbfbe |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1807-25772016000600327 |
network_acronym_str |
UNESP-16 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Marginal microleakage in Bulk Fill resinsComposite resinsadhesiveleakageAbstract Introduction Despite advances and innovations in restorative dentistry, microleakage remains one of the main problems in this area. Objective To evaluate in vitro marginal microleakage of Bulk Fill resins in class II cavities, with cervical termination in the dentin. Material and method Cavities, standardized on the mesial and distal surfaces, were prepared in forty top molars and randomly assigned to four groups (n = 10), according to the resin used. G1 (control): Filtek Z350 (3M/ESPE); G2: Filtek Bulk Fill flow (3M/ESPE); G3: Surefill SDR (Dentsply); G4: X-tra (Voco). These were further subdivided into subgroups according to the strategy used to apply the adhesive (self-etch technique and conventional). After storage for 24 hours in an oven (37 °C), the samples were submitted to the thermocycling test (500 cycles: 5 °C/55 °C). They were later waterproofed, immersed in Basic Fuchsin (0.5%) and sectioned in the mesial-distal direction for evaluation using a stereo magnifying glass at 40X (Coleman) Scores from 0 to 3 were assigned according to the microinfiltration observed. The Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests, with a significance level of 5%, were used for statistical analysis. Result There was no statistically significant difference between the Bulk Fill resins when the total acid-etching technique was used. Only the Filtek Bulk fill flow resin presented statistically significant results when the application of the adhesive system strategy was considered, with worse results, in relation to other groups, when it the self-etching strategy was considered. Conclusion The degree of leakage of the bulk fill resins studied, in class II cavities, was not influenced by the method of application of the adhesive system (conventional or two-step self-etching bonding agent), except for the Filtek Bulk fill flow.Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho2016-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772016000600327Revista de Odontologia da UNESP v.45 n.6 2016reponame:Revista de Odontologia da UNESPinstname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)instacron:UNESP10.1590/1807-2577.08316info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNASCIMENTO,Armiliana SoaresLIMA,Eliane Alves deDURÃO,Márcia de AlmeidaSOUSA,Yasmine de CarvalhoCORREIA,Tereza CristinaBRAZ,Rodivaneng2016-12-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1807-25772016000600327Revistahttps://www.revodontolunesp.com.br/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||adriana@foar.unesp.br1807-25770101-1774opendoar:2016-12-13T00:00Revista de Odontologia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Marginal microleakage in Bulk Fill resins |
title |
Marginal microleakage in Bulk Fill resins |
spellingShingle |
Marginal microleakage in Bulk Fill resins NASCIMENTO,Armiliana Soares Composite resins adhesive leakage |
title_short |
Marginal microleakage in Bulk Fill resins |
title_full |
Marginal microleakage in Bulk Fill resins |
title_fullStr |
Marginal microleakage in Bulk Fill resins |
title_full_unstemmed |
Marginal microleakage in Bulk Fill resins |
title_sort |
Marginal microleakage in Bulk Fill resins |
author |
NASCIMENTO,Armiliana Soares |
author_facet |
NASCIMENTO,Armiliana Soares LIMA,Eliane Alves de DURÃO,Márcia de Almeida SOUSA,Yasmine de Carvalho CORREIA,Tereza Cristina BRAZ,Rodivan |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
LIMA,Eliane Alves de DURÃO,Márcia de Almeida SOUSA,Yasmine de Carvalho CORREIA,Tereza Cristina BRAZ,Rodivan |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
NASCIMENTO,Armiliana Soares LIMA,Eliane Alves de DURÃO,Márcia de Almeida SOUSA,Yasmine de Carvalho CORREIA,Tereza Cristina BRAZ,Rodivan |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Composite resins adhesive leakage |
topic |
Composite resins adhesive leakage |
description |
Abstract Introduction Despite advances and innovations in restorative dentistry, microleakage remains one of the main problems in this area. Objective To evaluate in vitro marginal microleakage of Bulk Fill resins in class II cavities, with cervical termination in the dentin. Material and method Cavities, standardized on the mesial and distal surfaces, were prepared in forty top molars and randomly assigned to four groups (n = 10), according to the resin used. G1 (control): Filtek Z350 (3M/ESPE); G2: Filtek Bulk Fill flow (3M/ESPE); G3: Surefill SDR (Dentsply); G4: X-tra (Voco). These were further subdivided into subgroups according to the strategy used to apply the adhesive (self-etch technique and conventional). After storage for 24 hours in an oven (37 °C), the samples were submitted to the thermocycling test (500 cycles: 5 °C/55 °C). They were later waterproofed, immersed in Basic Fuchsin (0.5%) and sectioned in the mesial-distal direction for evaluation using a stereo magnifying glass at 40X (Coleman) Scores from 0 to 3 were assigned according to the microinfiltration observed. The Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests, with a significance level of 5%, were used for statistical analysis. Result There was no statistically significant difference between the Bulk Fill resins when the total acid-etching technique was used. Only the Filtek Bulk fill flow resin presented statistically significant results when the application of the adhesive system strategy was considered, with worse results, in relation to other groups, when it the self-etching strategy was considered. Conclusion The degree of leakage of the bulk fill resins studied, in class II cavities, was not influenced by the method of application of the adhesive system (conventional or two-step self-etching bonding agent), except for the Filtek Bulk fill flow. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772016000600327 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1807-25772016000600327 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/1807-2577.08316 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Estadual Paulista Júlio de Mesquita Filho |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP v.45 n.6 2016 reponame:Revista de Odontologia da UNESP instname:Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) instacron:UNESP |
instname_str |
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
instacron_str |
UNESP |
institution |
UNESP |
reponame_str |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP |
collection |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Odontologia da UNESP - Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||adriana@foar.unesp.br |
_version_ |
1748958559866978304 |