Export Ready — 

Twelve-month follow-up of dexamethasone implants for macular edema from various diseases in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Novais, Eduardo A. [UNIFESP]
Publication Date: 2016
Other Authors: Maia, Mauricio [UNIFESP], de Arruda Mello Filho, Paulo Augusto [UNIFESP], de Oliveira Dias, Joao Rafael [UNIFESP], Garcia, Jose Mauricio B. B., de Andrade, Gabriel C. [UNIFESP], Louzada, Ricardo N., Avila, Marcos, Maia, Andre [UNIFESP], Arevalo, J. Fernando, Wu, Lihteh, Berrocal, Maria, Badaro, Emmerson [UNIFESP], Farah, Michel [UNIFESP]
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
Download full: http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7984576
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/49391
Summary: Purpose. To evaluate the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and the number of dexamethasone implants needed to treat cystoid macular edema (CME) from various etiologies over 12 months in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes. Methods. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 112 patients with CME secondary to retinal diseases treated pro re nata (PRN) with a 0.7 mg intravitreal dexamethasone implant for 12 months. The BCVA, CRT, adverse events, safety data, and number of implants were recorded. Results. Vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes received means of three implants and one implant, respectively, over 12 months (p < 0.001). The mean BCVA of all patients improved from 0.13 at baseline to 0.33 (p < 0.001) 12 months after one (p = 0.001), two (p = 0.041), and three (p < 0.001) implants but not four implants (p = 0.068). The mean baseline CRT decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from 463 to 254 microns after 12 months with one (p < 0.001), two (p = 0.002), and three (p = 0.001) implants but not with four implants (p = 0.114). The anatomic and functional outcomes were not significantly different between vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes. Increased IOP was the most common adverse event (23.2%). Conclusions. Dexamethasone implant administered PRN improved VA and decreased CRT in CME, with possible long-term clinically relevant benefits for treating CME from various etiologies. Vitrectomized eyes needed more implants compared with nonvitrectomized eyes.
id UFSP_8ef6a62f3ecf6cb6bcb8a38d0096c7ac
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/49391
network_acronym_str UFSP
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository_id_str 3465
spelling Twelve-month follow-up of dexamethasone implants for macular edema from various diseases in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyesRetinal Vein OcclusionIntravitreal ImplantNoninfectious UveitisPharmacokineticsBevacizumabRanibizumabPurpose. To evaluate the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and the number of dexamethasone implants needed to treat cystoid macular edema (CME) from various etiologies over 12 months in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes. Methods. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 112 patients with CME secondary to retinal diseases treated pro re nata (PRN) with a 0.7 mg intravitreal dexamethasone implant for 12 months. The BCVA, CRT, adverse events, safety data, and number of implants were recorded. Results. Vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes received means of three implants and one implant, respectively, over 12 months (p < 0.001). The mean BCVA of all patients improved from 0.13 at baseline to 0.33 (p < 0.001) 12 months after one (p = 0.001), two (p = 0.041), and three (p < 0.001) implants but not four implants (p = 0.068). The mean baseline CRT decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from 463 to 254 microns after 12 months with one (p < 0.001), two (p = 0.002), and three (p = 0.001) implants but not with four implants (p = 0.114). The anatomic and functional outcomes were not significantly different between vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes. Increased IOP was the most common adverse event (23.2%). Conclusions. Dexamethasone implant administered PRN improved VA and decreased CRT in CME, with possible long-term clinically relevant benefits for treating CME from various etiologies. Vitrectomized eyes needed more implants compared with nonvitrectomized eyes.Department of Ophthalmology, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilBrazilian Institute of Fighting Against Blindness (INBRACE), Assis/Presidente Prudente, SP, BrazilFederal University of Goias, Goiania, GO, BrazilWilmer Eye Institute, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD, USAAsociados de Macula Vitreo y Retina de Costa Rica, San Jose, Costa RicaUniversity of Puerto Rico, San Juan, PR, USADepartment of Ophthalmology, Federal University of Sao Paulo, Sao Paulo, SP, BrazilWeb of ScienceCAPES Foundation Ministry of Education of BrazilCNPq (Brazilian National Council of Research), Brasilia, DF, BrazilHindawi Ltd2019-01-21T10:29:47Z2019-01-21T10:29:47Z2016info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7984576Journal Of Ophthalmology. London, 2016.10.1155/2016/7984576WOS000385088500001.pdf2090-004Xhttp://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/49391WOS:000385088500001engJournal Of Ophthalmologyinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNovais, Eduardo A. [UNIFESP]Maia, Mauricio [UNIFESP]de Arruda Mello Filho, Paulo Augusto [UNIFESP]de Oliveira Dias, Joao Rafael [UNIFESP]Garcia, Jose Mauricio B. B.de Andrade, Gabriel C. [UNIFESP]Louzada, Ricardo N.Avila, MarcosMaia, Andre [UNIFESP]Arevalo, J. FernandoWu, LihtehBerrocal, MariaBadaro, Emmerson [UNIFESP]Farah, Michel [UNIFESP]reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESPinstname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)instacron:UNIFESP2024-08-10T01:34:49Zoai:repositorio.unifesp.br/:11600/49391Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttp://www.repositorio.unifesp.br/oai/requestbiblioteca.csp@unifesp.bropendoar:34652024-08-10T01:34:49Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Twelve-month follow-up of dexamethasone implants for macular edema from various diseases in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes
title Twelve-month follow-up of dexamethasone implants for macular edema from various diseases in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes
spellingShingle Twelve-month follow-up of dexamethasone implants for macular edema from various diseases in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes
Novais, Eduardo A. [UNIFESP]
Retinal Vein Occlusion
Intravitreal Implant
Noninfectious Uveitis
Pharmacokinetics
Bevacizumab
Ranibizumab
title_short Twelve-month follow-up of dexamethasone implants for macular edema from various diseases in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes
title_full Twelve-month follow-up of dexamethasone implants for macular edema from various diseases in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes
title_fullStr Twelve-month follow-up of dexamethasone implants for macular edema from various diseases in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes
title_full_unstemmed Twelve-month follow-up of dexamethasone implants for macular edema from various diseases in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes
title_sort Twelve-month follow-up of dexamethasone implants for macular edema from various diseases in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes
author Novais, Eduardo A. [UNIFESP]
author_facet Novais, Eduardo A. [UNIFESP]
Maia, Mauricio [UNIFESP]
de Arruda Mello Filho, Paulo Augusto [UNIFESP]
de Oliveira Dias, Joao Rafael [UNIFESP]
Garcia, Jose Mauricio B. B.
de Andrade, Gabriel C. [UNIFESP]
Louzada, Ricardo N.
Avila, Marcos
Maia, Andre [UNIFESP]
Arevalo, J. Fernando
Wu, Lihteh
Berrocal, Maria
Badaro, Emmerson [UNIFESP]
Farah, Michel [UNIFESP]
author_role author
author2 Maia, Mauricio [UNIFESP]
de Arruda Mello Filho, Paulo Augusto [UNIFESP]
de Oliveira Dias, Joao Rafael [UNIFESP]
Garcia, Jose Mauricio B. B.
de Andrade, Gabriel C. [UNIFESP]
Louzada, Ricardo N.
Avila, Marcos
Maia, Andre [UNIFESP]
Arevalo, J. Fernando
Wu, Lihteh
Berrocal, Maria
Badaro, Emmerson [UNIFESP]
Farah, Michel [UNIFESP]
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Novais, Eduardo A. [UNIFESP]
Maia, Mauricio [UNIFESP]
de Arruda Mello Filho, Paulo Augusto [UNIFESP]
de Oliveira Dias, Joao Rafael [UNIFESP]
Garcia, Jose Mauricio B. B.
de Andrade, Gabriel C. [UNIFESP]
Louzada, Ricardo N.
Avila, Marcos
Maia, Andre [UNIFESP]
Arevalo, J. Fernando
Wu, Lihteh
Berrocal, Maria
Badaro, Emmerson [UNIFESP]
Farah, Michel [UNIFESP]
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Retinal Vein Occlusion
Intravitreal Implant
Noninfectious Uveitis
Pharmacokinetics
Bevacizumab
Ranibizumab
topic Retinal Vein Occlusion
Intravitreal Implant
Noninfectious Uveitis
Pharmacokinetics
Bevacizumab
Ranibizumab
description Purpose. To evaluate the best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), central retinal thickness (CRT), and the number of dexamethasone implants needed to treat cystoid macular edema (CME) from various etiologies over 12 months in vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes. Methods. This multicenter retrospective cohort study included 112 patients with CME secondary to retinal diseases treated pro re nata (PRN) with a 0.7 mg intravitreal dexamethasone implant for 12 months. The BCVA, CRT, adverse events, safety data, and number of implants were recorded. Results. Vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes received means of three implants and one implant, respectively, over 12 months (p < 0.001). The mean BCVA of all patients improved from 0.13 at baseline to 0.33 (p < 0.001) 12 months after one (p = 0.001), two (p = 0.041), and three (p < 0.001) implants but not four implants (p = 0.068). The mean baseline CRT decreased significantly (p < 0.001) from 463 to 254 microns after 12 months with one (p < 0.001), two (p = 0.002), and three (p = 0.001) implants but not with four implants (p = 0.114). The anatomic and functional outcomes were not significantly different between vitrectomized and nonvitrectomized eyes. Increased IOP was the most common adverse event (23.2%). Conclusions. Dexamethasone implant administered PRN improved VA and decreased CRT in CME, with possible long-term clinically relevant benefits for treating CME from various etiologies. Vitrectomized eyes needed more implants compared with nonvitrectomized eyes.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
2019-01-21T10:29:47Z
2019-01-21T10:29:47Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7984576
Journal Of Ophthalmology. London, 2016.
10.1155/2016/7984576
WOS000385088500001.pdf
2090-004X
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/49391
WOS:000385088500001
url http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2016/7984576
http://repositorio.unifesp.br/handle/11600/49391
identifier_str_mv Journal Of Ophthalmology. London, 2016.
10.1155/2016/7984576
WOS000385088500001.pdf
2090-004X
WOS:000385088500001
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal Of Ophthalmology
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hindawi Ltd
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Hindawi Ltd
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
instname:Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron:UNIFESP
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
instacron_str UNIFESP
institution UNIFESP
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
collection Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UNIFESP - Universidade Federal de São Paulo (UNIFESP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv biblioteca.csp@unifesp.br
_version_ 1841453419721654272