Avaliação de trigo de duplo propósito inoculado com Azospirillum brasilense

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Quatrin, Mauricio Pase
Publication Date: 2020
Format: Doctoral thesis
Language: por
Source: Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
dARK ID: ark:/26339/001300000j8v4
Download full: http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/21519
Summary: The use of dual-purpose wheat genotypes is one alternative to minimize the impact of forage lack and even to produce grains. However, to maximize forage yield and grains yield are used highs doses nitrogen fertilizer. This practice increased costs and environmental impacts. Thus, the use of biostimulants based diazotrofic bacteria Azospirillum brasilense is able to be an alternative to reduce the costs and impacts. This study evaluated the forage yield and grain yield of “BRS Tarumã” dual-purpose wheat genotype inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense and fertilized with different doses of nitrogen subjected to cuts and grazing with lactation cows. Initial study was performed under cuts conditions in years 2016 and 2017 evaluating the forage yield and grain yield. In this study the trial was carried out in a completely randomized block design with four replicates, using a 2 (qualitative) x 4 (quantitative) factorial arrangement. The qualitative and quantitative factors corresponded to the use or not of inoculation and N rates (0, 50, 100 and 150 kg of N ha-1), respectively. In 2017, a second study was conducted under grazing conditions with lactating cows. This study evaluated the 100 kg N ha-1 been associated with inoculation (100+I) and fertilization with 150 kg N ha-1 (150+I). These treatments were chosen based on the results of the initial study. In this condition were evaluated forage yield, grain yield, pasture characteristics and responses of lactating cows. In the study under cuts, there was no difference forage yield between treatments with inoculation +100 kg N ha-1 and without inoculation + 150 kg N ha-1 (4.7 vs. 4.1 t de MS ha-1), respectively. There was no effect of inoculation on grain yield. In the study under grazing, forage mass, structural compositions, daily accumulation rate of forage and leaf blade, forage yield and leaf blade biomass yield, stocking rate, forage allowance and leaf blade allowance, grazing efficiency, forage intake, grain yield. No difference were obtained forage yield, leaf blade yield and stocking rate, grain yield and hectoliter weight with mean values of 3.6 t MS ha-1, 3.4 t MS ha-1 , 1.95 UA ha-1 dia-1, 75 kg hl-1 and 0.9 t ha-1. Significant difference was found in grazing efficiency (50.5% vs 36.6%) in third grazing cycle for wheat inoculated and fertilized with 100 kg de N ha-1. Under cutting conditions, the inoculation use increase forage yield and straw yield. The inoculation no influence in grain yield. Under grazing conditions, the fertilization with 100 kg N ha-1 associated with inoculation is equivalent fertilization with 150 kg N ha-1 without inoculation for the pastures response and grain yield.
id UFSM_acc46a7f388e3b57135f6ea9d617c1a1
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/21519
network_acronym_str UFSM
network_name_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository_id_str
spelling Avaliação de trigo de duplo propósito inoculado com Azospirillum brasilenseEvaluation of dual-purpose wheat inoculated with Azospirillum brasilenseBRS TarumãFixação biológica de NProdução de forragemTriticum aestivumBiological fixation of NForage yieldCNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIAThe use of dual-purpose wheat genotypes is one alternative to minimize the impact of forage lack and even to produce grains. However, to maximize forage yield and grains yield are used highs doses nitrogen fertilizer. This practice increased costs and environmental impacts. Thus, the use of biostimulants based diazotrofic bacteria Azospirillum brasilense is able to be an alternative to reduce the costs and impacts. This study evaluated the forage yield and grain yield of “BRS Tarumã” dual-purpose wheat genotype inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense and fertilized with different doses of nitrogen subjected to cuts and grazing with lactation cows. Initial study was performed under cuts conditions in years 2016 and 2017 evaluating the forage yield and grain yield. In this study the trial was carried out in a completely randomized block design with four replicates, using a 2 (qualitative) x 4 (quantitative) factorial arrangement. The qualitative and quantitative factors corresponded to the use or not of inoculation and N rates (0, 50, 100 and 150 kg of N ha-1), respectively. In 2017, a second study was conducted under grazing conditions with lactating cows. This study evaluated the 100 kg N ha-1 been associated with inoculation (100+I) and fertilization with 150 kg N ha-1 (150+I). These treatments were chosen based on the results of the initial study. In this condition were evaluated forage yield, grain yield, pasture characteristics and responses of lactating cows. In the study under cuts, there was no difference forage yield between treatments with inoculation +100 kg N ha-1 and without inoculation + 150 kg N ha-1 (4.7 vs. 4.1 t de MS ha-1), respectively. There was no effect of inoculation on grain yield. In the study under grazing, forage mass, structural compositions, daily accumulation rate of forage and leaf blade, forage yield and leaf blade biomass yield, stocking rate, forage allowance and leaf blade allowance, grazing efficiency, forage intake, grain yield. No difference were obtained forage yield, leaf blade yield and stocking rate, grain yield and hectoliter weight with mean values of 3.6 t MS ha-1, 3.4 t MS ha-1 , 1.95 UA ha-1 dia-1, 75 kg hl-1 and 0.9 t ha-1. Significant difference was found in grazing efficiency (50.5% vs 36.6%) in third grazing cycle for wheat inoculated and fertilized with 100 kg de N ha-1. Under cutting conditions, the inoculation use increase forage yield and straw yield. The inoculation no influence in grain yield. Under grazing conditions, the fertilization with 100 kg N ha-1 associated with inoculation is equivalent fertilization with 150 kg N ha-1 without inoculation for the pastures response and grain yield.Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior - CAPESO uso de genótipos de trigo de duplo propósito é uma das alternativas para minimizar o impacto da escassez de forragem, e ainda produzir grãos. Entretanto, para maximizar a produtividade de forragem e grãos são utilizadas elevadas doses de fertilizante nitrogenado, aumentando custos de produção e impactos ambientais. Dessa forma, o uso de bioestimulantes à base de bactérias diazotróficas como Azospirillum brasilense pode contribuir com a redução das quantidades de N utilizadas e consequentemente dos custos de produção. Assim, o objetivo desta pesquisa foi avaliar o genótipo de trigo de duplo propósito BRS Tarumã submetido à inoculação com Azospirillum brasilense e distintas doses de N. Inicialmente foi realizado um estudo sob condições de corte nos anos de 2016 e 2017. Nesse estudo o delineamento experimental foi o de blocos ao acaso em esquema fatorial 2 (qualitativo) x 4 (quantitativo) com quatro repetições. Os fatores qualitativo e quantitativo corresponderam ao uso ou não da inoculação e às doses de N (0, 50, 100 e 150 kg de N ha-1), respectivamente. No ano de 2017 foi realizado um segundo estudo em condições de pastejo com vacas em lactação. Nesse estudo, testou-se a inoculação das sementes combinada com a dose de 100 kg de N ha-1 (IN+100) e ausência de inoculação associada à fertilização com a dose de 150 kg de N ha-1 (NI+150). Os tratamentos foram escolhidos tendo como base os resultados do ano de 2016. No estudo sob regime de corte a produção de forragem não diferiu entre os tratamentos com inoculação + 100 kg de N ha-1 e sem inoculação + 150 kg de N ha-1 (4,7 vs. 4,1 t de MS ha-1), respectivamente. Não houve efeito da inoculação sobre o rendimento de grãos. Para o estudo sob regime de pastejo avaliou-se a massa de forragem e a composição estrutural dos trigos, as produções de forragem e de biomassa de lâminas foliares, as taxas de acúmulo diário de forragem e de lâminas foliares, a taxa de lotação, as ofertas de forragem e de lâminas foliares, a eficiência de pastejo, o consumo aparente e a produção de grãos. Não houve diferença para a produção de forragem, de lâminas foliares, taxa de lotação, rendimento de grãos e peso do hectolitro com valores médios de 3,6 t MS ha-1, 3,4 t MS ha-1, 1,95 UA ha-1 dia-1, 0,9 t ha-1 e 75 kg hl-1, respectivamente. Houve diferença para a eficiência de pastejo (50,5% vs. 36,6) no terceiro ciclo para o trigo inoculado e fertilizado com 100 kg de N ha-1. Em condições de corte, o uso da inoculação incrementa a produção de forragem e de palha, não interferindo na produção de grãos. Sob condições de pastejo, a fertilização com 100 kg de N ha-1 mais inoculação, se equivale à adubação com 150 kg de N ha-1 para a produção de forragem e grãos.Universidade Federal de Santa MariaBrasilZootecniaUFSMPrograma de Pós-Graduação em ZootecniaCentro de Ciências RuraisOlivo, Clair Jorgehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/7352405107578701Fontaneli, Renato SerenaQuadros, Fernando Luiz Ferreira dePötter, LucianaMeinerz, Gilmar RobertoQuatrin, Mauricio Pase2021-07-19T18:46:38Z2021-07-19T18:46:38Z2020-02-13info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesisapplication/pdfhttp://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/21519ark:/26339/001300000j8v4porAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 Internationalinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSMinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM2021-07-20T06:04:04Zoai:repositorio.ufsm.br:1/21519Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/PUBhttps://repositorio.ufsm.br/oai/requestatendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com||manancial@ufsm.bropendoar:2021-07-20T06:04:04Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Avaliação de trigo de duplo propósito inoculado com Azospirillum brasilense
Evaluation of dual-purpose wheat inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense
title Avaliação de trigo de duplo propósito inoculado com Azospirillum brasilense
spellingShingle Avaliação de trigo de duplo propósito inoculado com Azospirillum brasilense
Quatrin, Mauricio Pase
BRS Tarumã
Fixação biológica de N
Produção de forragem
Triticum aestivum
Biological fixation of N
Forage yield
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
title_short Avaliação de trigo de duplo propósito inoculado com Azospirillum brasilense
title_full Avaliação de trigo de duplo propósito inoculado com Azospirillum brasilense
title_fullStr Avaliação de trigo de duplo propósito inoculado com Azospirillum brasilense
title_full_unstemmed Avaliação de trigo de duplo propósito inoculado com Azospirillum brasilense
title_sort Avaliação de trigo de duplo propósito inoculado com Azospirillum brasilense
author Quatrin, Mauricio Pase
author_facet Quatrin, Mauricio Pase
author_role author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Olivo, Clair Jorge
http://lattes.cnpq.br/7352405107578701
Fontaneli, Renato Serena
Quadros, Fernando Luiz Ferreira de
Pötter, Luciana
Meinerz, Gilmar Roberto
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Quatrin, Mauricio Pase
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv BRS Tarumã
Fixação biológica de N
Produção de forragem
Triticum aestivum
Biological fixation of N
Forage yield
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
topic BRS Tarumã
Fixação biológica de N
Produção de forragem
Triticum aestivum
Biological fixation of N
Forage yield
CNPQ::CIENCIAS AGRARIAS::ZOOTECNIA
description The use of dual-purpose wheat genotypes is one alternative to minimize the impact of forage lack and even to produce grains. However, to maximize forage yield and grains yield are used highs doses nitrogen fertilizer. This practice increased costs and environmental impacts. Thus, the use of biostimulants based diazotrofic bacteria Azospirillum brasilense is able to be an alternative to reduce the costs and impacts. This study evaluated the forage yield and grain yield of “BRS Tarumã” dual-purpose wheat genotype inoculated with Azospirillum brasilense and fertilized with different doses of nitrogen subjected to cuts and grazing with lactation cows. Initial study was performed under cuts conditions in years 2016 and 2017 evaluating the forage yield and grain yield. In this study the trial was carried out in a completely randomized block design with four replicates, using a 2 (qualitative) x 4 (quantitative) factorial arrangement. The qualitative and quantitative factors corresponded to the use or not of inoculation and N rates (0, 50, 100 and 150 kg of N ha-1), respectively. In 2017, a second study was conducted under grazing conditions with lactating cows. This study evaluated the 100 kg N ha-1 been associated with inoculation (100+I) and fertilization with 150 kg N ha-1 (150+I). These treatments were chosen based on the results of the initial study. In this condition were evaluated forage yield, grain yield, pasture characteristics and responses of lactating cows. In the study under cuts, there was no difference forage yield between treatments with inoculation +100 kg N ha-1 and without inoculation + 150 kg N ha-1 (4.7 vs. 4.1 t de MS ha-1), respectively. There was no effect of inoculation on grain yield. In the study under grazing, forage mass, structural compositions, daily accumulation rate of forage and leaf blade, forage yield and leaf blade biomass yield, stocking rate, forage allowance and leaf blade allowance, grazing efficiency, forage intake, grain yield. No difference were obtained forage yield, leaf blade yield and stocking rate, grain yield and hectoliter weight with mean values of 3.6 t MS ha-1, 3.4 t MS ha-1 , 1.95 UA ha-1 dia-1, 75 kg hl-1 and 0.9 t ha-1. Significant difference was found in grazing efficiency (50.5% vs 36.6%) in third grazing cycle for wheat inoculated and fertilized with 100 kg de N ha-1. Under cutting conditions, the inoculation use increase forage yield and straw yield. The inoculation no influence in grain yield. Under grazing conditions, the fertilization with 100 kg N ha-1 associated with inoculation is equivalent fertilization with 150 kg N ha-1 without inoculation for the pastures response and grain yield.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-02-13
2021-07-19T18:46:38Z
2021-07-19T18:46:38Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/doctoralThesis
format doctoralThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/21519
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/26339/001300000j8v4
url http://repositorio.ufsm.br/handle/1/21519
identifier_str_mv ark:/26339/001300000j8v4
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Zootecnia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia
Centro de Ciências Rurais
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
Brasil
Zootecnia
UFSM
Programa de Pós-Graduação em Zootecnia
Centro de Ciências Rurais
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
collection Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM
repository.name.fl_str_mv Manancial - Repositório Digital da UFSM - Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv atendimento.sib@ufsm.br||tedebc@gmail.com||manancial@ufsm.br
_version_ 1847103521248247808