Performance of an agricultural engine using blends of diesel and ethanol
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2016 |
Other Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Ciência Rural |
Download full: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016000701200 |
Summary: | ABSTRACT: This research evaluated the performance of a diesel engine in an agricultural tractor, using Diesel S500 (B5) and mixture with 3% (ED3), 6% (ED6), 9% (ED9), 12% (ED12) and 15% (ED15) of hydrous ethanol. Variables evaluated were the power, torque, specific fuel consumption, torque reserve, speed reserve and elasticity index of engine. Results indicated that using B5 and ED3 the values of torque and engine power not differ, in addition, with the ED3 the fuel consumption was lower than 5.92%. Using ED12, power has reduced in 2.97%, compared with B5, while their fuel consumption had no difference. With ED15, the power was lower 6.30% and the fuel consumption increase 3.77%, both compared with B5. Torque reserve value was increased with increasing the ethanol content in B5, reducing the speed reserve and elasticity index of engine. Ethanol in Diesel S500 (B5) can be used as an alternative fuel in agricultural tractor engines without presenting high changes in the performance, since the ethanol content is at low percentages, up to 12%. |
id |
UFSM-2_487fb474f22f8a86efd2f7fbb79a8034 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-84782016000701200 |
network_acronym_str |
UFSM-2 |
network_name_str |
Ciência rural (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Performance of an agricultural engine using blends of diesel and ethanolbiofueldiesel cycleagricultural tractorbrake dynamometerABSTRACT: This research evaluated the performance of a diesel engine in an agricultural tractor, using Diesel S500 (B5) and mixture with 3% (ED3), 6% (ED6), 9% (ED9), 12% (ED12) and 15% (ED15) of hydrous ethanol. Variables evaluated were the power, torque, specific fuel consumption, torque reserve, speed reserve and elasticity index of engine. Results indicated that using B5 and ED3 the values of torque and engine power not differ, in addition, with the ED3 the fuel consumption was lower than 5.92%. Using ED12, power has reduced in 2.97%, compared with B5, while their fuel consumption had no difference. With ED15, the power was lower 6.30% and the fuel consumption increase 3.77%, both compared with B5. Torque reserve value was increased with increasing the ethanol content in B5, reducing the speed reserve and elasticity index of engine. Ethanol in Diesel S500 (B5) can be used as an alternative fuel in agricultural tractor engines without presenting high changes in the performance, since the ethanol content is at low percentages, up to 12%.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2016-07-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016000701200Ciência Rural v.46 n.7 2016reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20150469info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessEstrada,Javier SolisSchlosser,José FernandoFarias,Marcelo Silveira deRodrigues,Fabrício AzevedoMartini,Alfran TellecheaSantos,Gustavo Oliveira doseng2016-05-03T00:00:00ZRevista |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Performance of an agricultural engine using blends of diesel and ethanol |
title |
Performance of an agricultural engine using blends of diesel and ethanol |
spellingShingle |
Performance of an agricultural engine using blends of diesel and ethanol Estrada,Javier Solis biofuel diesel cycle agricultural tractor brake dynamometer |
title_short |
Performance of an agricultural engine using blends of diesel and ethanol |
title_full |
Performance of an agricultural engine using blends of diesel and ethanol |
title_fullStr |
Performance of an agricultural engine using blends of diesel and ethanol |
title_full_unstemmed |
Performance of an agricultural engine using blends of diesel and ethanol |
title_sort |
Performance of an agricultural engine using blends of diesel and ethanol |
author |
Estrada,Javier Solis |
author_facet |
Estrada,Javier Solis Schlosser,José Fernando Farias,Marcelo Silveira de Rodrigues,Fabrício Azevedo Martini,Alfran Tellechea Santos,Gustavo Oliveira dos |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Schlosser,José Fernando Farias,Marcelo Silveira de Rodrigues,Fabrício Azevedo Martini,Alfran Tellechea Santos,Gustavo Oliveira dos |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Estrada,Javier Solis Schlosser,José Fernando Farias,Marcelo Silveira de Rodrigues,Fabrício Azevedo Martini,Alfran Tellechea Santos,Gustavo Oliveira dos |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
biofuel diesel cycle agricultural tractor brake dynamometer |
topic |
biofuel diesel cycle agricultural tractor brake dynamometer |
description |
ABSTRACT: This research evaluated the performance of a diesel engine in an agricultural tractor, using Diesel S500 (B5) and mixture with 3% (ED3), 6% (ED6), 9% (ED9), 12% (ED12) and 15% (ED15) of hydrous ethanol. Variables evaluated were the power, torque, specific fuel consumption, torque reserve, speed reserve and elasticity index of engine. Results indicated that using B5 and ED3 the values of torque and engine power not differ, in addition, with the ED3 the fuel consumption was lower than 5.92%. Using ED12, power has reduced in 2.97%, compared with B5, while their fuel consumption had no difference. With ED15, the power was lower 6.30% and the fuel consumption increase 3.77%, both compared with B5. Torque reserve value was increased with increasing the ethanol content in B5, reducing the speed reserve and elasticity index of engine. Ethanol in Diesel S500 (B5) can be used as an alternative fuel in agricultural tractor engines without presenting high changes in the performance, since the ethanol content is at low percentages, up to 12%. |
publishDate |
2016 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2016-07-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016000701200 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782016000701200 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/0103-8478cr20150469 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Ciência Rural v.46 n.7 2016 reponame:Ciência Rural instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) instacron:UFSM |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM) |
instacron_str |
UFSM |
institution |
UFSM |
reponame_str |
Ciência Rural |
collection |
Ciência Rural |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
|
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
|
_version_ |
1749140549392138240 |