Animal welfare in experimental orthopedic surgery of dogs: an analysis of the Brazilian view

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Sugauara,Rosângela Rumi
Publication Date: 2018
Other Authors: Sugauara,Elisângela Yumi, Kazue Otutumi,Luciana, Germano,Ricardo de Melo, Sugauara,Elaine Yae Yamashita, Quessada,Ana Maria
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Ciência Rural
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782018000800601
Summary: ABSTRACT: The aim of this paper was to conduct a bibliometry search about Brazilian scientific publications that describe experimental orthopedic surgeries in dogs. It was analyzed 14 publications, and there was wide variation in the number of experimental animals, showing that there is no consensus on the appropriate number for science experiment with dogs. Most articles had been reviewed by an ethics committee (13/14, 92.85%) and only two articles (2/14; 14.28%) did not report the use of analgesic protocol. Among analgesics, morphine was the most widely used, noted in seven studies (7/14; 42.85%). In six of the articles (6/14; 42.85%), the final destination of animals was not informed, but in four experiments (4/14; 28.57%) the dogs were euthanized. In four studies (4/14; 28.57%) the animals were sent for adoption. In conclusion, the ethics in animal research in Brazil has advanced, but is necessary proper planning in sample size.
id UFSM-2_40ff41a92ba855ce444d77b23fdb60fc
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0103-84782018000800601
network_acronym_str UFSM-2
network_name_str Ciência rural (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Animal welfare in experimental orthopedic surgery of dogs: an analysis of the Brazilian viewanalgesiaanimal experimentationethics committeesurgical orthopedic.ABSTRACT: The aim of this paper was to conduct a bibliometry search about Brazilian scientific publications that describe experimental orthopedic surgeries in dogs. It was analyzed 14 publications, and there was wide variation in the number of experimental animals, showing that there is no consensus on the appropriate number for science experiment with dogs. Most articles had been reviewed by an ethics committee (13/14, 92.85%) and only two articles (2/14; 14.28%) did not report the use of analgesic protocol. Among analgesics, morphine was the most widely used, noted in seven studies (7/14; 42.85%). In six of the articles (6/14; 42.85%), the final destination of animals was not informed, but in four experiments (4/14; 28.57%) the dogs were euthanized. In four studies (4/14; 28.57%) the animals were sent for adoption. In conclusion, the ethics in animal research in Brazil has advanced, but is necessary proper planning in sample size.Universidade Federal de Santa Maria2018-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782018000800601Ciência Rural v.48 n.8 2018reponame:Ciência Ruralinstname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)instacron:UFSM10.1590/0103-8478cr20180013info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSugauara,Rosângela RumiSugauara,Elisângela YumiKazue Otutumi,LucianaGermano,Ricardo de MeloSugauara,Elaine Yae YamashitaQuessada,Ana Mariaeng2018-07-18T00:00:00ZRevista
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Animal welfare in experimental orthopedic surgery of dogs: an analysis of the Brazilian view
title Animal welfare in experimental orthopedic surgery of dogs: an analysis of the Brazilian view
spellingShingle Animal welfare in experimental orthopedic surgery of dogs: an analysis of the Brazilian view
Sugauara,Rosângela Rumi
analgesia
animal experimentation
ethics committee
surgical orthopedic.
title_short Animal welfare in experimental orthopedic surgery of dogs: an analysis of the Brazilian view
title_full Animal welfare in experimental orthopedic surgery of dogs: an analysis of the Brazilian view
title_fullStr Animal welfare in experimental orthopedic surgery of dogs: an analysis of the Brazilian view
title_full_unstemmed Animal welfare in experimental orthopedic surgery of dogs: an analysis of the Brazilian view
title_sort Animal welfare in experimental orthopedic surgery of dogs: an analysis of the Brazilian view
author Sugauara,Rosângela Rumi
author_facet Sugauara,Rosângela Rumi
Sugauara,Elisângela Yumi
Kazue Otutumi,Luciana
Germano,Ricardo de Melo
Sugauara,Elaine Yae Yamashita
Quessada,Ana Maria
author_role author
author2 Sugauara,Elisângela Yumi
Kazue Otutumi,Luciana
Germano,Ricardo de Melo
Sugauara,Elaine Yae Yamashita
Quessada,Ana Maria
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Sugauara,Rosângela Rumi
Sugauara,Elisângela Yumi
Kazue Otutumi,Luciana
Germano,Ricardo de Melo
Sugauara,Elaine Yae Yamashita
Quessada,Ana Maria
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv analgesia
animal experimentation
ethics committee
surgical orthopedic.
topic analgesia
animal experimentation
ethics committee
surgical orthopedic.
description ABSTRACT: The aim of this paper was to conduct a bibliometry search about Brazilian scientific publications that describe experimental orthopedic surgeries in dogs. It was analyzed 14 publications, and there was wide variation in the number of experimental animals, showing that there is no consensus on the appropriate number for science experiment with dogs. Most articles had been reviewed by an ethics committee (13/14, 92.85%) and only two articles (2/14; 14.28%) did not report the use of analgesic protocol. Among analgesics, morphine was the most widely used, noted in seven studies (7/14; 42.85%). In six of the articles (6/14; 42.85%), the final destination of animals was not informed, but in four experiments (4/14; 28.57%) the dogs were euthanized. In four studies (4/14; 28.57%) the animals were sent for adoption. In conclusion, the ethics in animal research in Brazil has advanced, but is necessary proper planning in sample size.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782018000800601
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-84782018000800601
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/0103-8478cr20180013
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de Santa Maria
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Ciência Rural v.48 n.8 2018
reponame:Ciência Rural
instname:Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron:UFSM
instname_str Universidade Federal de Santa Maria (UFSM)
instacron_str UFSM
institution UFSM
reponame_str Ciência Rural
collection Ciência Rural
repository.name.fl_str_mv
repository.mail.fl_str_mv
_version_ 1749140552927936512