Export Ready — 

Sampling Alternatives for Eucalyptus Trees in Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forest System

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tonini,Helio
Publication Date: 2019
Other Authors: Wink,Charlote, Silva,Andrey Gregory da Mota Ferreira e
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Floresta e Ambiente
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872019000300106
Summary: ABSTRACT The aim of this paper was to compare methods and sampling procedures applied to eucalyptus grown under different spatial arrangements in an integrated crop-livestock-forest system (ICLF). The study was carried out in Sinop county, Mato Grosso state, Brazil. Arrangements combining fixed and variable area methods to simple random and systematic sampling were tested. Precision, accuracy, efficiency, and diameter-distribution measurements were used for selection of the best sampling arrangement. The sampling intensity, sample unit optimal size and the relative efficiency have been changed depending on the spatial arrangement for 10% sampling error and 95% probability level. The fixed area method based on systematic sampling, as well as smaller sample units with eight to nine plants (48 m2 to 54 m2) were the most accurate; however, larger plots (192 m2 to 216 m2) were more efficient. All sample units size provided good estimates on the number of trees by diameter classes.
id UFRJ-3_8b15c64c3ee58d811b5dfca84745c212
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2179-80872019000300106
network_acronym_str UFRJ-3
network_name_str Floresta e Ambiente
repository_id_str
spelling Sampling Alternatives for Eucalyptus Trees in Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forest Systemforest inventoryEucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophyllaagroforestry systemsABSTRACT The aim of this paper was to compare methods and sampling procedures applied to eucalyptus grown under different spatial arrangements in an integrated crop-livestock-forest system (ICLF). The study was carried out in Sinop county, Mato Grosso state, Brazil. Arrangements combining fixed and variable area methods to simple random and systematic sampling were tested. Precision, accuracy, efficiency, and diameter-distribution measurements were used for selection of the best sampling arrangement. The sampling intensity, sample unit optimal size and the relative efficiency have been changed depending on the spatial arrangement for 10% sampling error and 95% probability level. The fixed area method based on systematic sampling, as well as smaller sample units with eight to nine plants (48 m2 to 54 m2) were the most accurate; however, larger plots (192 m2 to 216 m2) were more efficient. All sample units size provided good estimates on the number of trees by diameter classes.Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro2019-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872019000300106Floresta e Ambiente v.26 n.3 2019reponame:Floresta e Ambienteinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)instacron:UFRJ10.1590/2179-8087.089317info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTonini,HelioWink,CharloteSilva,Andrey Gregory da Mota Ferreira eeng2019-05-10T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2179-80872019000300106Revistahttps://www.floram.org/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpfloramjournal@gmail.com||floram@ufrrj.br||2179-80871415-0980opendoar:2019-05-10T00:00Floresta e Ambiente - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sampling Alternatives for Eucalyptus Trees in Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forest System
title Sampling Alternatives for Eucalyptus Trees in Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forest System
spellingShingle Sampling Alternatives for Eucalyptus Trees in Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forest System
Tonini,Helio
forest inventory
Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla
agroforestry systems
title_short Sampling Alternatives for Eucalyptus Trees in Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forest System
title_full Sampling Alternatives for Eucalyptus Trees in Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forest System
title_fullStr Sampling Alternatives for Eucalyptus Trees in Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forest System
title_full_unstemmed Sampling Alternatives for Eucalyptus Trees in Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forest System
title_sort Sampling Alternatives for Eucalyptus Trees in Integrated Crop-Livestock-Forest System
author Tonini,Helio
author_facet Tonini,Helio
Wink,Charlote
Silva,Andrey Gregory da Mota Ferreira e
author_role author
author2 Wink,Charlote
Silva,Andrey Gregory da Mota Ferreira e
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tonini,Helio
Wink,Charlote
Silva,Andrey Gregory da Mota Ferreira e
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv forest inventory
Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla
agroforestry systems
topic forest inventory
Eucalyptus grandis × Eucalyptus urophylla
agroforestry systems
description ABSTRACT The aim of this paper was to compare methods and sampling procedures applied to eucalyptus grown under different spatial arrangements in an integrated crop-livestock-forest system (ICLF). The study was carried out in Sinop county, Mato Grosso state, Brazil. Arrangements combining fixed and variable area methods to simple random and systematic sampling were tested. Precision, accuracy, efficiency, and diameter-distribution measurements were used for selection of the best sampling arrangement. The sampling intensity, sample unit optimal size and the relative efficiency have been changed depending on the spatial arrangement for 10% sampling error and 95% probability level. The fixed area method based on systematic sampling, as well as smaller sample units with eight to nine plants (48 m2 to 54 m2) were the most accurate; however, larger plots (192 m2 to 216 m2) were more efficient. All sample units size provided good estimates on the number of trees by diameter classes.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872019000300106
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2179-80872019000300106
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/2179-8087.089317
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Instituto de Florestas da Universidade Federal Rural do Rio de Janeiro
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Floresta e Ambiente v.26 n.3 2019
reponame:Floresta e Ambiente
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron:UFRJ
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
instacron_str UFRJ
institution UFRJ
reponame_str Floresta e Ambiente
collection Floresta e Ambiente
repository.name.fl_str_mv Floresta e Ambiente - Universidade Federal do Rio de Janeiro (UFRJ)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv floramjournal@gmail.com||floram@ufrrj.br||
_version_ 1750128142812446720