Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritis
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2013 |
Other Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10183/96787 |
Summary: | Previous reports proposed that the IgM anti-dsDNA antibody is protective for lupus nephritis. In this crosssectional study, we aimed to compare clinical features of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients positive for IgG anti-dsDNA alone with those presenting both IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA. Anti-dsDNA antibodies, urinary examination and complement levels were assessed in the day of appointment. IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected by indirect immunofluorescence. Fifty-eight SLE patients (93.1% female, 81% European-derived, mean age 42.8±14.7 years, mean duration of disease 10.9±8 years) positive for IgG anti-dsDNA entered the study. Of those, 15 were also positive for the IgM anti-dsDNA isotype. The group with both isotypes showed significant less frequency of active nephritis (sediment changes and proteinuria) when compared to patients with IgG anti-dsDNA alone (6.7% versus 34.9%, p=0.046). These data suggest a nephroprotective role for IgM anti-dsDNA and a distinct biologic behavior for this isotype in SLE. |
id |
UFRGS-2_f509bcc28ef6a9b5eb643d8c5cc25fcb |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/96787 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRGS-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Keiserman, BrieleRonchetti, Maria RitaMonticielo, Odirlei AndréKeiserman, Mauro WaldemarStaub, Henrique Luiz2014-06-21T02:07:20Z20131874-3129http://hdl.handle.net/10183/96787000914511Previous reports proposed that the IgM anti-dsDNA antibody is protective for lupus nephritis. In this crosssectional study, we aimed to compare clinical features of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients positive for IgG anti-dsDNA alone with those presenting both IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA. Anti-dsDNA antibodies, urinary examination and complement levels were assessed in the day of appointment. IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected by indirect immunofluorescence. Fifty-eight SLE patients (93.1% female, 81% European-derived, mean age 42.8±14.7 years, mean duration of disease 10.9±8 years) positive for IgG anti-dsDNA entered the study. Of those, 15 were also positive for the IgM anti-dsDNA isotype. The group with both isotypes showed significant less frequency of active nephritis (sediment changes and proteinuria) when compared to patients with IgG anti-dsDNA alone (6.7% versus 34.9%, p=0.046). These data suggest a nephroprotective role for IgM anti-dsDNA and a distinct biologic behavior for this isotype in SLE.application/pdfengOpen rheumatology journal. Hilversum. Vol. 7 (Nov. 2013), p. 101-104Lupus eritematoso sistêmicoNefrite lúpicaSystemic lupus erythematosusLupus nephritisIgG and IgM anti-dsDNA antibodiesConcomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritisEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000914511.pdf000914511.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf203205http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/96787/1/000914511.pdf731ff096d5b5d23eb3553b3eeb192496MD51TEXT000914511.pdf.txt000914511.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain19049http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/96787/2/000914511.pdf.txt1cd50ca2e25414346ee53178c9365a59MD52THUMBNAIL000914511.pdf.jpg000914511.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2550http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/96787/3/000914511.pdf.jpg31ef9a45011bccd6cbda6b4110dfaafdMD5310183/967872018-10-18 08:31:53.082oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/96787Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestlume@ufrgs.bropendoar:2018-10-18T11:31:53Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false |
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritis |
title |
Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritis |
spellingShingle |
Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritis Keiserman, Briele Lupus eritematoso sistêmico Nefrite lúpica Systemic lupus erythematosus Lupus nephritis IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies |
title_short |
Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritis |
title_full |
Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritis |
title_fullStr |
Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritis |
title_full_unstemmed |
Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritis |
title_sort |
Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritis |
author |
Keiserman, Briele |
author_facet |
Keiserman, Briele Ronchetti, Maria Rita Monticielo, Odirlei André Keiserman, Mauro Waldemar Staub, Henrique Luiz |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ronchetti, Maria Rita Monticielo, Odirlei André Keiserman, Mauro Waldemar Staub, Henrique Luiz |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Keiserman, Briele Ronchetti, Maria Rita Monticielo, Odirlei André Keiserman, Mauro Waldemar Staub, Henrique Luiz |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Lupus eritematoso sistêmico Nefrite lúpica |
topic |
Lupus eritematoso sistêmico Nefrite lúpica Systemic lupus erythematosus Lupus nephritis IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies |
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv |
Systemic lupus erythematosus Lupus nephritis IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies |
description |
Previous reports proposed that the IgM anti-dsDNA antibody is protective for lupus nephritis. In this crosssectional study, we aimed to compare clinical features of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients positive for IgG anti-dsDNA alone with those presenting both IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA. Anti-dsDNA antibodies, urinary examination and complement levels were assessed in the day of appointment. IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected by indirect immunofluorescence. Fifty-eight SLE patients (93.1% female, 81% European-derived, mean age 42.8±14.7 years, mean duration of disease 10.9±8 years) positive for IgG anti-dsDNA entered the study. Of those, 15 were also positive for the IgM anti-dsDNA isotype. The group with both isotypes showed significant less frequency of active nephritis (sediment changes and proteinuria) when compared to patients with IgG anti-dsDNA alone (6.7% versus 34.9%, p=0.046). These data suggest a nephroprotective role for IgM anti-dsDNA and a distinct biologic behavior for this isotype in SLE. |
publishDate |
2013 |
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv |
2013 |
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv |
2014-06-21T02:07:20Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
Estrangeiro info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/96787 |
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
1874-3129 |
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
000914511 |
identifier_str_mv |
1874-3129 000914511 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10183/96787 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv |
Open rheumatology journal. Hilversum. Vol. 7 (Nov. 2013), p. 101-104 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) instacron:UFRGS |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
instacron_str |
UFRGS |
institution |
UFRGS |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS |
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv |
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/96787/1/000914511.pdf http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/96787/2/000914511.pdf.txt http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/96787/3/000914511.pdf.jpg |
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv |
731ff096d5b5d23eb3553b3eeb192496 1cd50ca2e25414346ee53178c9365a59 31ef9a45011bccd6cbda6b4110dfaafd |
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv |
MD5 MD5 MD5 |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
lume@ufrgs.br |
_version_ |
1834472402350768128 |