Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritis

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Keiserman, Briele
Publication Date: 2013
Other Authors: Ronchetti, Maria Rita, Monticielo, Odirlei André, Keiserman, Mauro Waldemar, Staub, Henrique Luiz
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10183/96787
Summary: Previous reports proposed that the IgM anti-dsDNA antibody is protective for lupus nephritis. In this crosssectional study, we aimed to compare clinical features of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients positive for IgG anti-dsDNA alone with those presenting both IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA. Anti-dsDNA antibodies, urinary examination and complement levels were assessed in the day of appointment. IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected by indirect immunofluorescence. Fifty-eight SLE patients (93.1% female, 81% European-derived, mean age 42.8±14.7 years, mean duration of disease 10.9±8 years) positive for IgG anti-dsDNA entered the study. Of those, 15 were also positive for the IgM anti-dsDNA isotype. The group with both isotypes showed significant less frequency of active nephritis (sediment changes and proteinuria) when compared to patients with IgG anti-dsDNA alone (6.7% versus 34.9%, p=0.046). These data suggest a nephroprotective role for IgM anti-dsDNA and a distinct biologic behavior for this isotype in SLE.
id UFRGS-2_f509bcc28ef6a9b5eb643d8c5cc25fcb
oai_identifier_str oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/96787
network_acronym_str UFRGS-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
repository_id_str
spelling Keiserman, BrieleRonchetti, Maria RitaMonticielo, Odirlei AndréKeiserman, Mauro WaldemarStaub, Henrique Luiz2014-06-21T02:07:20Z20131874-3129http://hdl.handle.net/10183/96787000914511Previous reports proposed that the IgM anti-dsDNA antibody is protective for lupus nephritis. In this crosssectional study, we aimed to compare clinical features of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients positive for IgG anti-dsDNA alone with those presenting both IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA. Anti-dsDNA antibodies, urinary examination and complement levels were assessed in the day of appointment. IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected by indirect immunofluorescence. Fifty-eight SLE patients (93.1% female, 81% European-derived, mean age 42.8±14.7 years, mean duration of disease 10.9±8 years) positive for IgG anti-dsDNA entered the study. Of those, 15 were also positive for the IgM anti-dsDNA isotype. The group with both isotypes showed significant less frequency of active nephritis (sediment changes and proteinuria) when compared to patients with IgG anti-dsDNA alone (6.7% versus 34.9%, p=0.046). These data suggest a nephroprotective role for IgM anti-dsDNA and a distinct biologic behavior for this isotype in SLE.application/pdfengOpen rheumatology journal. Hilversum. Vol. 7 (Nov. 2013), p. 101-104Lupus eritematoso sistêmicoNefrite lúpicaSystemic lupus erythematosusLupus nephritisIgG and IgM anti-dsDNA antibodiesConcomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritisEstrangeiroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGSinstname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)instacron:UFRGSORIGINAL000914511.pdf000914511.pdfTexto completo (inglês)application/pdf203205http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/96787/1/000914511.pdf731ff096d5b5d23eb3553b3eeb192496MD51TEXT000914511.pdf.txt000914511.pdf.txtExtracted Texttext/plain19049http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/96787/2/000914511.pdf.txt1cd50ca2e25414346ee53178c9365a59MD52THUMBNAIL000914511.pdf.jpg000914511.pdf.jpgGenerated Thumbnailimage/jpeg2550http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/96787/3/000914511.pdf.jpg31ef9a45011bccd6cbda6b4110dfaafdMD5310183/967872018-10-18 08:31:53.082oai:www.lume.ufrgs.br:10183/96787Repositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://lume.ufrgs.br/oai/requestlume@ufrgs.bropendoar:2018-10-18T11:31:53Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)false
dc.title.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritis
title Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritis
spellingShingle Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritis
Keiserman, Briele
Lupus eritematoso sistêmico
Nefrite lúpica
Systemic lupus erythematosus
Lupus nephritis
IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies
title_short Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritis
title_full Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritis
title_fullStr Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritis
title_full_unstemmed Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritis
title_sort Concomitance of IgM and IgG anti-dsDNA antibodies does not appear to associate to active lupus nephritis
author Keiserman, Briele
author_facet Keiserman, Briele
Ronchetti, Maria Rita
Monticielo, Odirlei André
Keiserman, Mauro Waldemar
Staub, Henrique Luiz
author_role author
author2 Ronchetti, Maria Rita
Monticielo, Odirlei André
Keiserman, Mauro Waldemar
Staub, Henrique Luiz
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Keiserman, Briele
Ronchetti, Maria Rita
Monticielo, Odirlei André
Keiserman, Mauro Waldemar
Staub, Henrique Luiz
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Lupus eritematoso sistêmico
Nefrite lúpica
topic Lupus eritematoso sistêmico
Nefrite lúpica
Systemic lupus erythematosus
Lupus nephritis
IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Systemic lupus erythematosus
Lupus nephritis
IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies
description Previous reports proposed that the IgM anti-dsDNA antibody is protective for lupus nephritis. In this crosssectional study, we aimed to compare clinical features of systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) patients positive for IgG anti-dsDNA alone with those presenting both IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA. Anti-dsDNA antibodies, urinary examination and complement levels were assessed in the day of appointment. IgG and IgM anti-dsDNA antibodies were detected by indirect immunofluorescence. Fifty-eight SLE patients (93.1% female, 81% European-derived, mean age 42.8±14.7 years, mean duration of disease 10.9±8 years) positive for IgG anti-dsDNA entered the study. Of those, 15 were also positive for the IgM anti-dsDNA isotype. The group with both isotypes showed significant less frequency of active nephritis (sediment changes and proteinuria) when compared to patients with IgG anti-dsDNA alone (6.7% versus 34.9%, p=0.046). These data suggest a nephroprotective role for IgM anti-dsDNA and a distinct biologic behavior for this isotype in SLE.
publishDate 2013
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2013
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2014-06-21T02:07:20Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Estrangeiro
info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10183/96787
dc.identifier.issn.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 1874-3129
dc.identifier.nrb.pt_BR.fl_str_mv 000914511
identifier_str_mv 1874-3129
000914511
url http://hdl.handle.net/10183/96787
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.ispartof.pt_BR.fl_str_mv Open rheumatology journal. Hilversum. Vol. 7 (Nov. 2013), p. 101-104
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
instname:Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron:UFRGS
instname_str Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
instacron_str UFRGS
institution UFRGS
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
collection Repositório Institucional da UFRGS
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/96787/1/000914511.pdf
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/96787/2/000914511.pdf.txt
http://www.lume.ufrgs.br/bitstream/10183/96787/3/000914511.pdf.jpg
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 731ff096d5b5d23eb3553b3eeb192496
1cd50ca2e25414346ee53178c9365a59
31ef9a45011bccd6cbda6b4110dfaafd
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFRGS - Universidade Federal do Rio Grande do Sul (UFRGS)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv lume@ufrgs.br
_version_ 1834472402350768128