Over a undertanding irational
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2015 |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
DOI: | 10.31977/grirfi.v12i2.663 |
Download full: | http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/663 |
Summary: | Present here that Schopenhauer understands nature as a concept built by man, abstract and conceptual: a word. Schopenhauer reformulated transcendental idealism of Kant to the concepts of understanding did not make reference to sensitivity, because animals have experience of the phenomenal world, contrary to what Kant's theory leads us to believe. After all, in Kant, animals would have to deal with concepts to represent objects, which Schopenhauer denies. In Schopenhauer's theory our perceptions do not need the categories of understanding (concepts, language) to draw the object of possible experience and become representation. The Kantian understanding will be shown as a hybrid object: through representation, middle thing-in-itself, as Kant mixed thinking and intuition, making the experience and the dependent objective world of understanding (conceptual). But for Schopenhauer the individual object, perceptions are independent of abstract thought. The thought engages with concepts and abstract what is common objects, causing them. But the understanding is irrational, intuitive and perceptive. |
id |
UFRB-4_5d0d88241436f6415bcdd9b78de01cb6 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/663 |
network_acronym_str |
UFRB-4 |
network_name_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
spelling |
Over a undertanding irationalSobre um entendimento irracionalSchopenhauer; Kant; Intuição; Entendimento; Razão.Schopenhauer ; Kant ; Intuition ; Understanding; ReasonPresent here that Schopenhauer understands nature as a concept built by man, abstract and conceptual: a word. Schopenhauer reformulated transcendental idealism of Kant to the concepts of understanding did not make reference to sensitivity, because animals have experience of the phenomenal world, contrary to what Kant's theory leads us to believe. After all, in Kant, animals would have to deal with concepts to represent objects, which Schopenhauer denies. In Schopenhauer's theory our perceptions do not need the categories of understanding (concepts, language) to draw the object of possible experience and become representation. The Kantian understanding will be shown as a hybrid object: through representation, middle thing-in-itself, as Kant mixed thinking and intuition, making the experience and the dependent objective world of understanding (conceptual). But for Schopenhauer the individual object, perceptions are independent of abstract thought. The thought engages with concepts and abstract what is common objects, causing them. But the understanding is irrational, intuitive and perceptive.Apresento aqui por que Schopenhauer entende a natureza como um conceito construído pelo homem, abstrata e conceitual: uma palavra. Schopenhauer reformulou o idealismo transcendental de Kant para que os conceitos do entendimento não fizessem referência à sensibilidade, porque animais tem experiência do mundo fenomênico, ao contrário do que a teoria kantiana nos leva a crer. Afinal, em Kant, animais teriam de lidar com conceitos para representar objetos, o que Schopenhauer nega. Na teoria schopenhaueriana nossas percepções não necessitam das categorias do entendimento (conceitos, linguagem) para elaborar o objeto da experiência possível e tornar-se representação. O entendimento kantiano será mostrado como um objeto híbrido: meio representação, meio coisa-em-si, pois Kant misturou o pensar e o intuir, tornado a experiência e o mundo objetivo dependentes do entendimento (conceitual). Porém, para Schopenhauer o objeto individual, as percepções são independentes do pensamento abstrato. O pensamento se envolve com conceitos e abstrai o que é comum dos objetos, originando-os. Já o entendimento é irracional, intuitivo e perceptivo.Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia2015-12-18info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionPeer-ReviewedEvaluados por los paresAvaliados pelos paresapplication/pdfhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/66310.31977/grirfi.v12i2.663Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 12 n. 2 (2015); 160-1732178-1036reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofiainstname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)instacron:UFRBporhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/663/379Copyright (c) 2015 Márcio Francisco Rodrigues Filhoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessFilho, Márcio Francisco Rodrigues2020-06-30T18:17:05Zoai:seer.www.ufrb.edu.br:article/663Revistahttp://www.ufrb.edu.br/griot/PUBhttp://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/oai||griotrevista@gmail.com2178-10362178-1036opendoar:2020-06-30T18:17:05Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Over a undertanding irational Sobre um entendimento irracional |
title |
Over a undertanding irational |
spellingShingle |
Over a undertanding irational Over a undertanding irational Filho, Márcio Francisco Rodrigues Schopenhauer; Kant; Intuição; Entendimento; Razão. Schopenhauer ; Kant ; Intuition ; Understanding; Reason Filho, Márcio Francisco Rodrigues Schopenhauer; Kant; Intuição; Entendimento; Razão. Schopenhauer ; Kant ; Intuition ; Understanding; Reason |
title_short |
Over a undertanding irational |
title_full |
Over a undertanding irational |
title_fullStr |
Over a undertanding irational Over a undertanding irational |
title_full_unstemmed |
Over a undertanding irational Over a undertanding irational |
title_sort |
Over a undertanding irational |
author |
Filho, Márcio Francisco Rodrigues |
author_facet |
Filho, Márcio Francisco Rodrigues Filho, Márcio Francisco Rodrigues |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Filho, Márcio Francisco Rodrigues |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Schopenhauer; Kant; Intuição; Entendimento; Razão. Schopenhauer ; Kant ; Intuition ; Understanding; Reason |
topic |
Schopenhauer; Kant; Intuição; Entendimento; Razão. Schopenhauer ; Kant ; Intuition ; Understanding; Reason |
description |
Present here that Schopenhauer understands nature as a concept built by man, abstract and conceptual: a word. Schopenhauer reformulated transcendental idealism of Kant to the concepts of understanding did not make reference to sensitivity, because animals have experience of the phenomenal world, contrary to what Kant's theory leads us to believe. After all, in Kant, animals would have to deal with concepts to represent objects, which Schopenhauer denies. In Schopenhauer's theory our perceptions do not need the categories of understanding (concepts, language) to draw the object of possible experience and become representation. The Kantian understanding will be shown as a hybrid object: through representation, middle thing-in-itself, as Kant mixed thinking and intuition, making the experience and the dependent objective world of understanding (conceptual). But for Schopenhauer the individual object, perceptions are independent of abstract thought. The thought engages with concepts and abstract what is common objects, causing them. But the understanding is irrational, intuitive and perceptive. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-12-18 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion Peer-Reviewed Evaluados por los pares Avaliados pelos pares |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/663 10.31977/grirfi.v12i2.663 |
url |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/663 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v12i2.663 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://www3.ufrb.edu.br/seer/index.php/griot/article/view/663/379 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Márcio Francisco Rodrigues Filho info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2015 Márcio Francisco Rodrigues Filho |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo da Bahia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia; v. 12 n. 2 (2015); 160-173 2178-1036 reponame:Griot : Revista de Filosofia instname:Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) instacron:UFRB |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
instacron_str |
UFRB |
institution |
UFRB |
reponame_str |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
collection |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Griot : Revista de Filosofia - Universidade Federal do Recôncavo na Bahia (UFRB) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||griotrevista@gmail.com |
_version_ |
1822164706819833856 |
dc.identifier.doi.none.fl_str_mv |
10.31977/grirfi.v12i2.663 |