Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranes

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Maria de Sousa, Efigênia
Publication Date: 2021
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
Download full: http://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/88923
Summary: Fish farming by-products could represent large-scale raw materials for xenogeneic implants that could be used forbone regeneration. The objective of this research was to analyze the biocompatibility and biodegradation of gelatin (G) and apatite (A)membranes from Nile tilapia. Adult male Swiss mice underwent subcutaneous implantation of biocomposites derived from skins andscales in different concentrations: 60%G:40%A (G1), 70%G:30%A (G2) and 80%G:20%A (G3). Commercial collagen membrane (C+) orimplantless surgery (C–) were used as controls. Euthanasia was performed at 1, 3 or 9 weeks for histological analysis of the infl ammatoryand repair criteria as well as the integrity of each material. The statistical analysis of non-parametric data was performed using the KruskalWallis test and post-hoc Dunn test, with p < 0.05. In vivo results during the experimental period demonstrated progressive improvement inbiocompatibility, with G1 and G2 being slightly irritating and G3 non-irritating, just like C+. There were signifi cant differences betweentest and control groups regarding the presence of neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, foreign body giant cells, neovascularizationand connective tissue. There was also a decrease in the integrity of the implants, where G1 maintained greater stability than G3 and G2,but less than C+. All biocomposites proved to be biocompatible and partially biodegradable. G1 suggests greater potential for use as anosteopromoting membrane, with its biological performance associated with higher mineral concentration compared to the organic phase.Future long-term orthotopic studies will be conducted to investigate its osteopromoting action.
id UFC-2_ab83ff9df564d0e01aea4f889d200687
oai_identifier_str oai:periodicos.ufc:article/88923
network_acronym_str UFC-2
network_name_str Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranesGelatin. Apatites. Biocompatible materials. Absorbable implants.Fish farming by-products could represent large-scale raw materials for xenogeneic implants that could be used forbone regeneration. The objective of this research was to analyze the biocompatibility and biodegradation of gelatin (G) and apatite (A)membranes from Nile tilapia. Adult male Swiss mice underwent subcutaneous implantation of biocomposites derived from skins andscales in different concentrations: 60%G:40%A (G1), 70%G:30%A (G2) and 80%G:20%A (G3). Commercial collagen membrane (C+) orimplantless surgery (C–) were used as controls. Euthanasia was performed at 1, 3 or 9 weeks for histological analysis of the infl ammatoryand repair criteria as well as the integrity of each material. The statistical analysis of non-parametric data was performed using the KruskalWallis test and post-hoc Dunn test, with p < 0.05. In vivo results during the experimental period demonstrated progressive improvement inbiocompatibility, with G1 and G2 being slightly irritating and G3 non-irritating, just like C+. There were signifi cant differences betweentest and control groups regarding the presence of neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, foreign body giant cells, neovascularizationand connective tissue. There was also a decrease in the integrity of the implants, where G1 maintained greater stability than G3 and G2,but less than C+. All biocomposites proved to be biocompatible and partially biodegradable. G1 suggests greater potential for use as anosteopromoting membrane, with its biological performance associated with higher mineral concentration compared to the organic phase.Future long-term orthotopic studies will be conducted to investigate its osteopromoting action.Revista Ciência Agronômica2021-10-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/88923Revista Ciência Agronômica; v. 53 (2022); 1-91806-66900045-6888reponame:Revista ciência agronômica (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCenghttp://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/88923/242277Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Ciência Agronômicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaria de Sousa, Efigênia2023-07-10T11:17:08Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/88923Revistahttps://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/oai||alekdutra@ufc.br|| ccarev@ufc.br1806-66900045-6888opendoar:2023-07-10T11:17:08Revista ciência agronômica (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranes
title Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranes
spellingShingle Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranes
Maria de Sousa, Efigênia
Gelatin. Apatites. Biocompatible materials. Absorbable implants.
title_short Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranes
title_full Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranes
title_fullStr Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranes
title_full_unstemmed Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranes
title_sort Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranes
author Maria de Sousa, Efigênia
author_facet Maria de Sousa, Efigênia
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Maria de Sousa, Efigênia
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Gelatin. Apatites. Biocompatible materials. Absorbable implants.
topic Gelatin. Apatites. Biocompatible materials. Absorbable implants.
description Fish farming by-products could represent large-scale raw materials for xenogeneic implants that could be used forbone regeneration. The objective of this research was to analyze the biocompatibility and biodegradation of gelatin (G) and apatite (A)membranes from Nile tilapia. Adult male Swiss mice underwent subcutaneous implantation of biocomposites derived from skins andscales in different concentrations: 60%G:40%A (G1), 70%G:30%A (G2) and 80%G:20%A (G3). Commercial collagen membrane (C+) orimplantless surgery (C–) were used as controls. Euthanasia was performed at 1, 3 or 9 weeks for histological analysis of the infl ammatoryand repair criteria as well as the integrity of each material. The statistical analysis of non-parametric data was performed using the KruskalWallis test and post-hoc Dunn test, with p < 0.05. In vivo results during the experimental period demonstrated progressive improvement inbiocompatibility, with G1 and G2 being slightly irritating and G3 non-irritating, just like C+. There were signifi cant differences betweentest and control groups regarding the presence of neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, foreign body giant cells, neovascularizationand connective tissue. There was also a decrease in the integrity of the implants, where G1 maintained greater stability than G3 and G2,but less than C+. All biocomposites proved to be biocompatible and partially biodegradable. G1 suggests greater potential for use as anosteopromoting membrane, with its biological performance associated with higher mineral concentration compared to the organic phase.Future long-term orthotopic studies will be conducted to investigate its osteopromoting action.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021-10-16
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/88923
url http://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/88923
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv http://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/88923/242277
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Ciência Agronômica
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Ciência Agronômica
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ciência Agronômica
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ciência Agronômica
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ciência Agronômica; v. 53 (2022); 1-9
1806-6690
0045-6888
reponame:Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron:UFC
instname_str Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
instacron_str UFC
institution UFC
reponame_str Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
collection Revista ciência agronômica (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista ciência agronômica (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||alekdutra@ufc.br|| ccarev@ufc.br
_version_ 1826232468302200832