Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranes
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2021 |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Revista ciência agronômica (Online) |
Download full: | http://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/88923 |
Summary: | Fish farming by-products could represent large-scale raw materials for xenogeneic implants that could be used forbone regeneration. The objective of this research was to analyze the biocompatibility and biodegradation of gelatin (G) and apatite (A)membranes from Nile tilapia. Adult male Swiss mice underwent subcutaneous implantation of biocomposites derived from skins andscales in different concentrations: 60%G:40%A (G1), 70%G:30%A (G2) and 80%G:20%A (G3). Commercial collagen membrane (C+) orimplantless surgery (C–) were used as controls. Euthanasia was performed at 1, 3 or 9 weeks for histological analysis of the infl ammatoryand repair criteria as well as the integrity of each material. The statistical analysis of non-parametric data was performed using the KruskalWallis test and post-hoc Dunn test, with p < 0.05. In vivo results during the experimental period demonstrated progressive improvement inbiocompatibility, with G1 and G2 being slightly irritating and G3 non-irritating, just like C+. There were signifi cant differences betweentest and control groups regarding the presence of neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, foreign body giant cells, neovascularizationand connective tissue. There was also a decrease in the integrity of the implants, where G1 maintained greater stability than G3 and G2,but less than C+. All biocomposites proved to be biocompatible and partially biodegradable. G1 suggests greater potential for use as anosteopromoting membrane, with its biological performance associated with higher mineral concentration compared to the organic phase.Future long-term orthotopic studies will be conducted to investigate its osteopromoting action. |
id |
UFC-2_ab83ff9df564d0e01aea4f889d200687 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:periodicos.ufc:article/88923 |
network_acronym_str |
UFC-2 |
network_name_str |
Revista ciência agronômica (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranesGelatin. Apatites. Biocompatible materials. Absorbable implants.Fish farming by-products could represent large-scale raw materials for xenogeneic implants that could be used forbone regeneration. The objective of this research was to analyze the biocompatibility and biodegradation of gelatin (G) and apatite (A)membranes from Nile tilapia. Adult male Swiss mice underwent subcutaneous implantation of biocomposites derived from skins andscales in different concentrations: 60%G:40%A (G1), 70%G:30%A (G2) and 80%G:20%A (G3). Commercial collagen membrane (C+) orimplantless surgery (C–) were used as controls. Euthanasia was performed at 1, 3 or 9 weeks for histological analysis of the infl ammatoryand repair criteria as well as the integrity of each material. The statistical analysis of non-parametric data was performed using the KruskalWallis test and post-hoc Dunn test, with p < 0.05. In vivo results during the experimental period demonstrated progressive improvement inbiocompatibility, with G1 and G2 being slightly irritating and G3 non-irritating, just like C+. There were signifi cant differences betweentest and control groups regarding the presence of neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, foreign body giant cells, neovascularizationand connective tissue. There was also a decrease in the integrity of the implants, where G1 maintained greater stability than G3 and G2,but less than C+. All biocomposites proved to be biocompatible and partially biodegradable. G1 suggests greater potential for use as anosteopromoting membrane, with its biological performance associated with higher mineral concentration compared to the organic phase.Future long-term orthotopic studies will be conducted to investigate its osteopromoting action.Revista Ciência Agronômica2021-10-16info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/88923Revista Ciência Agronômica; v. 53 (2022); 1-91806-66900045-6888reponame:Revista ciência agronômica (Online)instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)instacron:UFCenghttp://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/88923/242277Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Ciência Agronômicainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMaria de Sousa, Efigênia2023-07-10T11:17:08Zoai:periodicos.ufc:article/88923Revistahttps://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomicaPUBhttps://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/oai||alekdutra@ufc.br|| ccarev@ufc.br1806-66900045-6888opendoar:2023-07-10T11:17:08Revista ciência agronômica (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranes |
title |
Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranes |
spellingShingle |
Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranes Maria de Sousa, Efigênia Gelatin. Apatites. Biocompatible materials. Absorbable implants. |
title_short |
Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranes |
title_full |
Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranes |
title_fullStr |
Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranes |
title_full_unstemmed |
Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranes |
title_sort |
Biocompatibility and biodegradation analysis of Nile Tilapia gelatin and apatite membranes |
author |
Maria de Sousa, Efigênia |
author_facet |
Maria de Sousa, Efigênia |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Maria de Sousa, Efigênia |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Gelatin. Apatites. Biocompatible materials. Absorbable implants. |
topic |
Gelatin. Apatites. Biocompatible materials. Absorbable implants. |
description |
Fish farming by-products could represent large-scale raw materials for xenogeneic implants that could be used forbone regeneration. The objective of this research was to analyze the biocompatibility and biodegradation of gelatin (G) and apatite (A)membranes from Nile tilapia. Adult male Swiss mice underwent subcutaneous implantation of biocomposites derived from skins andscales in different concentrations: 60%G:40%A (G1), 70%G:30%A (G2) and 80%G:20%A (G3). Commercial collagen membrane (C+) orimplantless surgery (C–) were used as controls. Euthanasia was performed at 1, 3 or 9 weeks for histological analysis of the infl ammatoryand repair criteria as well as the integrity of each material. The statistical analysis of non-parametric data was performed using the KruskalWallis test and post-hoc Dunn test, with p < 0.05. In vivo results during the experimental period demonstrated progressive improvement inbiocompatibility, with G1 and G2 being slightly irritating and G3 non-irritating, just like C+. There were signifi cant differences betweentest and control groups regarding the presence of neutrophils, lymphocytes, macrophages, foreign body giant cells, neovascularizationand connective tissue. There was also a decrease in the integrity of the implants, where G1 maintained greater stability than G3 and G2,but less than C+. All biocomposites proved to be biocompatible and partially biodegradable. G1 suggests greater potential for use as anosteopromoting membrane, with its biological performance associated with higher mineral concentration compared to the organic phase.Future long-term orthotopic studies will be conducted to investigate its osteopromoting action. |
publishDate |
2021 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2021-10-16 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/88923 |
url |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/88923 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
http://periodicos.ufc.br/revistacienciaagronomica/article/view/88923/242277 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Ciência Agronômica info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Revista Ciência Agronômica |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Ciência Agronômica |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Ciência Agronômica |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Ciência Agronômica; v. 53 (2022); 1-9 1806-6690 0045-6888 reponame:Revista ciência agronômica (Online) instname:Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) instacron:UFC |
instname_str |
Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
instacron_str |
UFC |
institution |
UFC |
reponame_str |
Revista ciência agronômica (Online) |
collection |
Revista ciência agronômica (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista ciência agronômica (Online) - Universidade Federal do Ceará (UFC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||alekdutra@ufc.br|| ccarev@ufc.br |
_version_ |
1826232468302200832 |