Conservation of 'carola' roses using substances with biocide potential

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bastos F.E.A.*
Publication Date: 2016
Other Authors: Stanger M.C.*, Allebrandt R.*, Steffens, Cristiano Andre, Kretzschmar, Aike Anneliese, Rufato, Leo
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da Udesc
dARK ID: ark:/33523/001300000k498
Download full: https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/7697
Summary: Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of different preservative solutions on maintaining postharvest quality of red roses cultivar 'Carola'. The treatments evaluated in both experiments were five preservative solutions: (S) sucrose (1%) (SAC) sucrose (1%) + citric acid (0.2 g L-1), (SACH) sucrose (1 %) + citric acid (0.2 g L-1) + sodium hypochlorite (1%) (SACA) sucrose (1%) + citric acid (0.2 g L-1) + rosemary oil (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) (100 uL L-1), (SACG) sucrose (1%) + citric acid (0.2 g L-1) + Oil Ginger (Zingiber officinale) (100 uL L-1). In the first experiment the rods were maintained for 10 days in refrigerator at 3 ± 1 °C and in the second experiment were maintained for five days in refrigerator (3 ± 1 °C) and five days at ambient conditions (19 ± 1 °C). The variables evaluated were swelling, curvature of the floral stalk, browning petals, floral opening and colored petals, in both experiments, and coloring of the petals in the second experiment. The evaluations were performed every two days during the storage period in experiment 1, and daily during the shelf period in experiment 2. The experimental design in both experiments was a randomized complete block design with four replications and two branches each. In the first experiment, the use of sucrose was shown to be as effective as the other preservative solutions, preserving the roses up to 10 days in cold storage at 3 ± 1° C. In the second experiment, for the solution containing sucrose alone, the use of sodium hypochlorite, rosemary oil, and ginger oil showed the best results in maintaining the quality of the rods, and essential oils gave better preservation of roses.
id UDESC-2_e7e427079ea6e9354f1e0eb8c9a29a99
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/7697
network_acronym_str UDESC-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository_id_str 6391
spelling Conservation of 'carola' roses using substances with biocide potentialTwo experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of different preservative solutions on maintaining postharvest quality of red roses cultivar 'Carola'. The treatments evaluated in both experiments were five preservative solutions: (S) sucrose (1%) (SAC) sucrose (1%) + citric acid (0.2 g L-1), (SACH) sucrose (1 %) + citric acid (0.2 g L-1) + sodium hypochlorite (1%) (SACA) sucrose (1%) + citric acid (0.2 g L-1) + rosemary oil (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) (100 uL L-1), (SACG) sucrose (1%) + citric acid (0.2 g L-1) + Oil Ginger (Zingiber officinale) (100 uL L-1). In the first experiment the rods were maintained for 10 days in refrigerator at 3 ± 1 °C and in the second experiment were maintained for five days in refrigerator (3 ± 1 °C) and five days at ambient conditions (19 ± 1 °C). The variables evaluated were swelling, curvature of the floral stalk, browning petals, floral opening and colored petals, in both experiments, and coloring of the petals in the second experiment. The evaluations were performed every two days during the storage period in experiment 1, and daily during the shelf period in experiment 2. The experimental design in both experiments was a randomized complete block design with four replications and two branches each. In the first experiment, the use of sucrose was shown to be as effective as the other preservative solutions, preserving the roses up to 10 days in cold storage at 3 ± 1° C. In the second experiment, for the solution containing sucrose alone, the use of sodium hypochlorite, rosemary oil, and ginger oil showed the best results in maintaining the quality of the rods, and essential oils gave better preservation of roses.2024-12-06T13:48:43Z2016info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlep. 107 - 1132447-536X10.14295/oh.v22i1.806https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/7697ark:/33523/001300000k498Ornamental Horticulture221Bastos F.E.A.*Stanger M.C.*Allebrandt R.*Steffens, Cristiano AndreKretzschmar, Aike AnnelieseRufato, Leoengreponame:Repositório Institucional da Udescinstname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-12-07T20:55:05Zoai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/7697Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://pergamumweb.udesc.br/biblioteca/index.phpPRIhttps://repositorio-api.udesc.br/server/oai/requestri@udesc.bropendoar:63912024-12-07T20:55:05Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Conservation of 'carola' roses using substances with biocide potential
title Conservation of 'carola' roses using substances with biocide potential
spellingShingle Conservation of 'carola' roses using substances with biocide potential
Bastos F.E.A.*
title_short Conservation of 'carola' roses using substances with biocide potential
title_full Conservation of 'carola' roses using substances with biocide potential
title_fullStr Conservation of 'carola' roses using substances with biocide potential
title_full_unstemmed Conservation of 'carola' roses using substances with biocide potential
title_sort Conservation of 'carola' roses using substances with biocide potential
author Bastos F.E.A.*
author_facet Bastos F.E.A.*
Stanger M.C.*
Allebrandt R.*
Steffens, Cristiano Andre
Kretzschmar, Aike Anneliese
Rufato, Leo
author_role author
author2 Stanger M.C.*
Allebrandt R.*
Steffens, Cristiano Andre
Kretzschmar, Aike Anneliese
Rufato, Leo
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bastos F.E.A.*
Stanger M.C.*
Allebrandt R.*
Steffens, Cristiano Andre
Kretzschmar, Aike Anneliese
Rufato, Leo
description Two experiments were conducted to evaluate the effect of different preservative solutions on maintaining postharvest quality of red roses cultivar 'Carola'. The treatments evaluated in both experiments were five preservative solutions: (S) sucrose (1%) (SAC) sucrose (1%) + citric acid (0.2 g L-1), (SACH) sucrose (1 %) + citric acid (0.2 g L-1) + sodium hypochlorite (1%) (SACA) sucrose (1%) + citric acid (0.2 g L-1) + rosemary oil (Rosmarinus officinalis L.) (100 uL L-1), (SACG) sucrose (1%) + citric acid (0.2 g L-1) + Oil Ginger (Zingiber officinale) (100 uL L-1). In the first experiment the rods were maintained for 10 days in refrigerator at 3 ± 1 °C and in the second experiment were maintained for five days in refrigerator (3 ± 1 °C) and five days at ambient conditions (19 ± 1 °C). The variables evaluated were swelling, curvature of the floral stalk, browning petals, floral opening and colored petals, in both experiments, and coloring of the petals in the second experiment. The evaluations were performed every two days during the storage period in experiment 1, and daily during the shelf period in experiment 2. The experimental design in both experiments was a randomized complete block design with four replications and two branches each. In the first experiment, the use of sucrose was shown to be as effective as the other preservative solutions, preserving the roses up to 10 days in cold storage at 3 ± 1° C. In the second experiment, for the solution containing sucrose alone, the use of sodium hypochlorite, rosemary oil, and ginger oil showed the best results in maintaining the quality of the rods, and essential oils gave better preservation of roses.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016
2024-12-06T13:48:43Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv 2447-536X
10.14295/oh.v22i1.806
https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/7697
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/33523/001300000k498
identifier_str_mv 2447-536X
10.14295/oh.v22i1.806
ark:/33523/001300000k498
url https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/7697
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Ornamental Horticulture
22
1
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv p. 107 - 113
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Udesc
instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron:UDESC
instname_str Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron_str UDESC
institution UDESC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
collection Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ri@udesc.br
_version_ 1842258140673867776