Volume of water added to crushed ice affects the efficacy of cryotherapy: a randomised, single-blind, crossover trial

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: de Estefani D.
Publication Date: 2020
Other Authors: Ruschel C.*, Beninca I.L., dos Santos Haupenthal D.P., de Avelar N.C.P., Haupenthal A.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da Udesc
dARK ID: ark:/33523/001300000s3pt
Download full: https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/4629
Summary: © 2019 Chartered Society of PhysiotherapyObjective: To compare the effects of different cryotherapeutic preparations. Design: Randomised, single-blind, crossover trial. Setting: University laboratory. Participants: Sixteen healthy women. Interventions: Participants were randomised to receive three cryotherapeutic preparations: pure ice (500 g), watered ice (500 g of ice in 500 ml of water) and wetted ice (500 g of ice in 50 ml of water). Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was skin surface temperature after cryotherapy, measured at the central point of application, and the minimum temperature of the region of interest (ROI). The secondary outcome was the surface area cooled to <13.6 °C, which is the recommended temperature to achieve therapeutic effects. Results: After application of ice, mean skin surface temperature at the central point was 4.6 [standard deviation (SD) 1.9] °C for the pure ice preparation, 4.9 (SD 2.5) °C for the wetted ice preparation, and 9.6 (SD 1.8) °C for the watered ice preparation. When compared with the watered ice preparation, this represented a mean difference (MD) of 5.0 °C for the pure ice preparation [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0 to 6.0; P < 0.001] and an MD of 4.7 °C for the wetted ice preparation (95% CI 2.5 to 6.8; P < 0.001). The minimum temperatures in the ROI were also lower for the pure ice preparation 3.0 (SD 0.9) °C and the wetted ice preparation 2.8 (SD 0.6) °C than the watered ice preparation 7.9 (SD 1.5) °C. This represented an MD of 4.8 °C for the pure ice preparation (95% CI 4.0 to 5.7; P < 0.001) and 5.1 °C for the wetted ice preparation (95% CI 4.0 to 6.2; P < 0.001]. Conclusions: Application of pure ice or wetted ice led to a greater decrease in skin surface temperature compared with watered ice. For clinical purposes, combining equal parts of water and ice could decrease this effect. Clinical trial registration number: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03414346).
id UDESC-2_bbc18b3a2977c7e797f09419e49f7c5c
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/4629
network_acronym_str UDESC-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository_id_str 6391
spelling Volume of water added to crushed ice affects the efficacy of cryotherapy: a randomised, single-blind, crossover trial© 2019 Chartered Society of PhysiotherapyObjective: To compare the effects of different cryotherapeutic preparations. Design: Randomised, single-blind, crossover trial. Setting: University laboratory. Participants: Sixteen healthy women. Interventions: Participants were randomised to receive three cryotherapeutic preparations: pure ice (500 g), watered ice (500 g of ice in 500 ml of water) and wetted ice (500 g of ice in 50 ml of water). Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was skin surface temperature after cryotherapy, measured at the central point of application, and the minimum temperature of the region of interest (ROI). The secondary outcome was the surface area cooled to <13.6 °C, which is the recommended temperature to achieve therapeutic effects. Results: After application of ice, mean skin surface temperature at the central point was 4.6 [standard deviation (SD) 1.9] °C for the pure ice preparation, 4.9 (SD 2.5) °C for the wetted ice preparation, and 9.6 (SD 1.8) °C for the watered ice preparation. When compared with the watered ice preparation, this represented a mean difference (MD) of 5.0 °C for the pure ice preparation [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0 to 6.0; P < 0.001] and an MD of 4.7 °C for the wetted ice preparation (95% CI 2.5 to 6.8; P < 0.001). The minimum temperatures in the ROI were also lower for the pure ice preparation 3.0 (SD 0.9) °C and the wetted ice preparation 2.8 (SD 0.6) °C than the watered ice preparation 7.9 (SD 1.5) °C. This represented an MD of 4.8 °C for the pure ice preparation (95% CI 4.0 to 5.7; P < 0.001) and 5.1 °C for the wetted ice preparation (95% CI 4.0 to 6.2; P < 0.001]. Conclusions: Application of pure ice or wetted ice led to a greater decrease in skin surface temperature compared with watered ice. For clinical purposes, combining equal parts of water and ice could decrease this effect. Clinical trial registration number: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03414346).2024-12-06T11:58:02Z2020info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlep. 81 - 871873-146510.1016/j.physio.2019.12.005https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/4629ark:/33523/001300000s3ptPhysiotherapy (United Kingdom)107de Estefani D.Ruschel C.*Beninca I.L.dos Santos Haupenthal D.P.de Avelar N.C.P.Haupenthal A.engreponame:Repositório Institucional da Udescinstname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-12-07T20:45:13Zoai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/4629Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://pergamumweb.udesc.br/biblioteca/index.phpPRIhttps://repositorio-api.udesc.br/server/oai/requestri@udesc.bropendoar:63912024-12-07T20:45:13Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Volume of water added to crushed ice affects the efficacy of cryotherapy: a randomised, single-blind, crossover trial
title Volume of water added to crushed ice affects the efficacy of cryotherapy: a randomised, single-blind, crossover trial
spellingShingle Volume of water added to crushed ice affects the efficacy of cryotherapy: a randomised, single-blind, crossover trial
de Estefani D.
title_short Volume of water added to crushed ice affects the efficacy of cryotherapy: a randomised, single-blind, crossover trial
title_full Volume of water added to crushed ice affects the efficacy of cryotherapy: a randomised, single-blind, crossover trial
title_fullStr Volume of water added to crushed ice affects the efficacy of cryotherapy: a randomised, single-blind, crossover trial
title_full_unstemmed Volume of water added to crushed ice affects the efficacy of cryotherapy: a randomised, single-blind, crossover trial
title_sort Volume of water added to crushed ice affects the efficacy of cryotherapy: a randomised, single-blind, crossover trial
author de Estefani D.
author_facet de Estefani D.
Ruschel C.*
Beninca I.L.
dos Santos Haupenthal D.P.
de Avelar N.C.P.
Haupenthal A.
author_role author
author2 Ruschel C.*
Beninca I.L.
dos Santos Haupenthal D.P.
de Avelar N.C.P.
Haupenthal A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv de Estefani D.
Ruschel C.*
Beninca I.L.
dos Santos Haupenthal D.P.
de Avelar N.C.P.
Haupenthal A.
description © 2019 Chartered Society of PhysiotherapyObjective: To compare the effects of different cryotherapeutic preparations. Design: Randomised, single-blind, crossover trial. Setting: University laboratory. Participants: Sixteen healthy women. Interventions: Participants were randomised to receive three cryotherapeutic preparations: pure ice (500 g), watered ice (500 g of ice in 500 ml of water) and wetted ice (500 g of ice in 50 ml of water). Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was skin surface temperature after cryotherapy, measured at the central point of application, and the minimum temperature of the region of interest (ROI). The secondary outcome was the surface area cooled to <13.6 °C, which is the recommended temperature to achieve therapeutic effects. Results: After application of ice, mean skin surface temperature at the central point was 4.6 [standard deviation (SD) 1.9] °C for the pure ice preparation, 4.9 (SD 2.5) °C for the wetted ice preparation, and 9.6 (SD 1.8) °C for the watered ice preparation. When compared with the watered ice preparation, this represented a mean difference (MD) of 5.0 °C for the pure ice preparation [95% confidence interval (CI) 4.0 to 6.0; P < 0.001] and an MD of 4.7 °C for the wetted ice preparation (95% CI 2.5 to 6.8; P < 0.001). The minimum temperatures in the ROI were also lower for the pure ice preparation 3.0 (SD 0.9) °C and the wetted ice preparation 2.8 (SD 0.6) °C than the watered ice preparation 7.9 (SD 1.5) °C. This represented an MD of 4.8 °C for the pure ice preparation (95% CI 4.0 to 5.7; P < 0.001) and 5.1 °C for the wetted ice preparation (95% CI 4.0 to 6.2; P < 0.001]. Conclusions: Application of pure ice or wetted ice led to a greater decrease in skin surface temperature compared with watered ice. For clinical purposes, combining equal parts of water and ice could decrease this effect. Clinical trial registration number: Clinicaltrials.gov (NCT03414346).
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020
2024-12-06T11:58:02Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv 1873-1465
10.1016/j.physio.2019.12.005
https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/4629
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/33523/001300000s3pt
identifier_str_mv 1873-1465
10.1016/j.physio.2019.12.005
ark:/33523/001300000s3pt
url https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/4629
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Physiotherapy (United Kingdom)
107
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv p. 81 - 87
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Udesc
instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron:UDESC
instname_str Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron_str UDESC
institution UDESC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
collection Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ri@udesc.br
_version_ 1842258168025972736