Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systems

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bartz M.L.C.
Publication Date: 2014
Other Authors: Fachini I.*, Baretta, Dilmar, Anselmi R.*, Zortea T.*, Baretta C.R.D.M.*
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da Udesc
dARK ID: ark:/33523/0013000000mv1
Download full: https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/8542
Summary: The present study aims to generate knowledge about the soil fauna, its relation to other explanatory environmental variables, and, besides it, to select edaphic indicators that more contribute to separate the land use systems (LUS). Five different LUS were chosen: conventional tillage with crop rotation (CTCR); no-tillage with crop rotation (NTCR); conventional tillage with crop succession (CTCS); no-tillage with crop succession (NTCS) and minimum tillage with crop succession (MTCS). The samples were made in the counties Chapecó, Xanxerê and Ouro Verde located in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil, and were considered the true replicates of the LUS. In each site, nine points were sampled in a sampling grid of 3 x 3. At the same points, soil was sampled for the physical, chemical and biological attributes (environmental variables). Pitfall traps were used to evaluate the soil fauna. Data were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical discriminant analysis (CDA). The soil fauna presented potential to be used as indictors of soil quality, since some groups proved to be sensible to changes of the environmental variables and to soil management and tillage. The soil management using crop rotation (NTCR and CTCR) presented higher diversity, compared to the systems using crop succession (NTCS, MTCS and NTCS), evidencing the importance of the soil tillage, independent of the season (summer or winter). The variable that better contributed to explain these changes were the chemical variables (potassium, pH, calcium, organic matter, available phosphorus, potential acidity), and biological variables (Shannon diversity index, Collembola, Pielou equitability index and microbial biomass carbon), respectively.
id UDESC-2_b9b1960cf0d1d03ef1dc728268bdf4a0
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/8542
network_acronym_str UDESC-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository_id_str 6391
spelling Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systemsThe present study aims to generate knowledge about the soil fauna, its relation to other explanatory environmental variables, and, besides it, to select edaphic indicators that more contribute to separate the land use systems (LUS). Five different LUS were chosen: conventional tillage with crop rotation (CTCR); no-tillage with crop rotation (NTCR); conventional tillage with crop succession (CTCS); no-tillage with crop succession (NTCS) and minimum tillage with crop succession (MTCS). The samples were made in the counties Chapecó, Xanxerê and Ouro Verde located in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil, and were considered the true replicates of the LUS. In each site, nine points were sampled in a sampling grid of 3 x 3. At the same points, soil was sampled for the physical, chemical and biological attributes (environmental variables). Pitfall traps were used to evaluate the soil fauna. Data were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical discriminant analysis (CDA). The soil fauna presented potential to be used as indictors of soil quality, since some groups proved to be sensible to changes of the environmental variables and to soil management and tillage. The soil management using crop rotation (NTCR and CTCR) presented higher diversity, compared to the systems using crop succession (NTCS, MTCS and NTCS), evidencing the importance of the soil tillage, independent of the season (summer or winter). The variable that better contributed to explain these changes were the chemical variables (potassium, pH, calcium, organic matter, available phosphorus, potential acidity), and biological variables (Shannon diversity index, Collembola, Pielou equitability index and microbial biomass carbon), respectively.2024-12-06T14:09:20Z2014info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlep. 871 - 8791806-669010.1590/s1806-66902014000500002https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/8542ark:/33523/0013000000mv1Revista Ciencia Agronomica455Bartz M.L.C.Fachini I.*Baretta, DilmarAnselmi R.*Zortea T.*Baretta C.R.D.M.*engreponame:Repositório Institucional da Udescinstname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-12-07T20:57:51Zoai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/8542Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://pergamumweb.udesc.br/biblioteca/index.phpPRIhttps://repositorio-api.udesc.br/server/oai/requestri@udesc.bropendoar:63912024-12-07T20:57:51Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systems
title Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systems
spellingShingle Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systems
Bartz M.L.C.
title_short Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systems
title_full Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systems
title_fullStr Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systems
title_full_unstemmed Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systems
title_sort Soil fauna and its relation with environmental variables in soil management systems
author Bartz M.L.C.
author_facet Bartz M.L.C.
Fachini I.*
Baretta, Dilmar
Anselmi R.*
Zortea T.*
Baretta C.R.D.M.*
author_role author
author2 Fachini I.*
Baretta, Dilmar
Anselmi R.*
Zortea T.*
Baretta C.R.D.M.*
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bartz M.L.C.
Fachini I.*
Baretta, Dilmar
Anselmi R.*
Zortea T.*
Baretta C.R.D.M.*
description The present study aims to generate knowledge about the soil fauna, its relation to other explanatory environmental variables, and, besides it, to select edaphic indicators that more contribute to separate the land use systems (LUS). Five different LUS were chosen: conventional tillage with crop rotation (CTCR); no-tillage with crop rotation (NTCR); conventional tillage with crop succession (CTCS); no-tillage with crop succession (NTCS) and minimum tillage with crop succession (MTCS). The samples were made in the counties Chapecó, Xanxerê and Ouro Verde located in the state of Santa Catarina, Brazil, and were considered the true replicates of the LUS. In each site, nine points were sampled in a sampling grid of 3 x 3. At the same points, soil was sampled for the physical, chemical and biological attributes (environmental variables). Pitfall traps were used to evaluate the soil fauna. Data were analyzed using principal component analysis (PCA) and canonical discriminant analysis (CDA). The soil fauna presented potential to be used as indictors of soil quality, since some groups proved to be sensible to changes of the environmental variables and to soil management and tillage. The soil management using crop rotation (NTCR and CTCR) presented higher diversity, compared to the systems using crop succession (NTCS, MTCS and NTCS), evidencing the importance of the soil tillage, independent of the season (summer or winter). The variable that better contributed to explain these changes were the chemical variables (potassium, pH, calcium, organic matter, available phosphorus, potential acidity), and biological variables (Shannon diversity index, Collembola, Pielou equitability index and microbial biomass carbon), respectively.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014
2024-12-06T14:09:20Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv 1806-6690
10.1590/s1806-66902014000500002
https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/8542
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/33523/0013000000mv1
identifier_str_mv 1806-6690
10.1590/s1806-66902014000500002
ark:/33523/0013000000mv1
url https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/8542
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Revista Ciencia Agronomica
45
5
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv p. 871 - 879
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Udesc
instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron:UDESC
instname_str Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron_str UDESC
institution UDESC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
collection Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ri@udesc.br
_version_ 1842258071346216960