Evaluation of methodologies for equine biometry

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: dos Santos M.R.*
Publication Date: 2017
Other Authors: Freiberger G.*, Bottin F.*, Chiocca M.*, Zampar, Aline, Cucco, Diego De Cordova
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da Udesc
dARK ID: ark:/33523/001300000706j
Download full: https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/6719
Summary: © 2017 Elsevier B.V.Equines have some peculiarities of zootechnical interests that differ from other species, mainly due to their motor capacity to perform work or sporting functions. For that reason, body dimensions and proportions are extremely important in horse selection and breeding, and morphological characteristics such as length, height, width and angular measurements may influence the quality of movement and physical structure of the animal. In this way, this work aimed to evaluate the biometric data of equines, obtained by the traditional method of body measurement and photogrammetry technique using ImageJ® software. In addition, the methods were correlated and the limitations and advantages of each one were shown. The effect of evaluators for both methods was verified to demonstrate the efficiency of the procedures. Three trained evaluators took body measurements, each performing four replications per horse. A total of 10,944 biometric measurements were taken on twenty-four adult horses. The data was collected from 19 biometric measurements, and photographic images were captured with the purpose of performing measurements in these same anatomical points through the software. The results of this work demonstrated that there is a very high correlation between biometric measurements and photogrammetry for four metric measurements with values between 0.90 and 0.95 and for six measures of high correlation (0.73–0.86). Angular measurements showed the largest differences, with correlations ranging from negligible to high (0.29–0.81). It was concluded that the ImageJ® software is an alternative that can be used to obtain equine morphological data, due to the easy execution of data collection, as well as the fact that the software is free. Thus, this strategy can be used mainly by breeders who seek to form a database with zoometric information that is essential for equine genetic improvement.
id UDESC-2_b22dd0303f8ae726d85141ff05be2582
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/6719
network_acronym_str UDESC-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository_id_str 6391
spelling Evaluation of methodologies for equine biometry© 2017 Elsevier B.V.Equines have some peculiarities of zootechnical interests that differ from other species, mainly due to their motor capacity to perform work or sporting functions. For that reason, body dimensions and proportions are extremely important in horse selection and breeding, and morphological characteristics such as length, height, width and angular measurements may influence the quality of movement and physical structure of the animal. In this way, this work aimed to evaluate the biometric data of equines, obtained by the traditional method of body measurement and photogrammetry technique using ImageJ® software. In addition, the methods were correlated and the limitations and advantages of each one were shown. The effect of evaluators for both methods was verified to demonstrate the efficiency of the procedures. Three trained evaluators took body measurements, each performing four replications per horse. A total of 10,944 biometric measurements were taken on twenty-four adult horses. The data was collected from 19 biometric measurements, and photographic images were captured with the purpose of performing measurements in these same anatomical points through the software. The results of this work demonstrated that there is a very high correlation between biometric measurements and photogrammetry for four metric measurements with values between 0.90 and 0.95 and for six measures of high correlation (0.73–0.86). Angular measurements showed the largest differences, with correlations ranging from negligible to high (0.29–0.81). It was concluded that the ImageJ® software is an alternative that can be used to obtain equine morphological data, due to the easy execution of data collection, as well as the fact that the software is free. Thus, this strategy can be used mainly by breeders who seek to form a database with zoometric information that is essential for equine genetic improvement.2024-12-06T13:09:43Z2017info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlep. 24 - 271871-141310.1016/j.livsci.2017.10.009https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/6719ark:/33523/001300000706jLivestock Science206dos Santos M.R.*Freiberger G.*Bottin F.*Chiocca M.*Zampar, AlineCucco, Diego De Cordovaengreponame:Repositório Institucional da Udescinstname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-12-07T20:51:50Zoai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/6719Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://pergamumweb.udesc.br/biblioteca/index.phpPRIhttps://repositorio-api.udesc.br/server/oai/requestri@udesc.bropendoar:63912024-12-07T20:51:50Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Evaluation of methodologies for equine biometry
title Evaluation of methodologies for equine biometry
spellingShingle Evaluation of methodologies for equine biometry
dos Santos M.R.*
title_short Evaluation of methodologies for equine biometry
title_full Evaluation of methodologies for equine biometry
title_fullStr Evaluation of methodologies for equine biometry
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of methodologies for equine biometry
title_sort Evaluation of methodologies for equine biometry
author dos Santos M.R.*
author_facet dos Santos M.R.*
Freiberger G.*
Bottin F.*
Chiocca M.*
Zampar, Aline
Cucco, Diego De Cordova
author_role author
author2 Freiberger G.*
Bottin F.*
Chiocca M.*
Zampar, Aline
Cucco, Diego De Cordova
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv dos Santos M.R.*
Freiberger G.*
Bottin F.*
Chiocca M.*
Zampar, Aline
Cucco, Diego De Cordova
description © 2017 Elsevier B.V.Equines have some peculiarities of zootechnical interests that differ from other species, mainly due to their motor capacity to perform work or sporting functions. For that reason, body dimensions and proportions are extremely important in horse selection and breeding, and morphological characteristics such as length, height, width and angular measurements may influence the quality of movement and physical structure of the animal. In this way, this work aimed to evaluate the biometric data of equines, obtained by the traditional method of body measurement and photogrammetry technique using ImageJ® software. In addition, the methods were correlated and the limitations and advantages of each one were shown. The effect of evaluators for both methods was verified to demonstrate the efficiency of the procedures. Three trained evaluators took body measurements, each performing four replications per horse. A total of 10,944 biometric measurements were taken on twenty-four adult horses. The data was collected from 19 biometric measurements, and photographic images were captured with the purpose of performing measurements in these same anatomical points through the software. The results of this work demonstrated that there is a very high correlation between biometric measurements and photogrammetry for four metric measurements with values between 0.90 and 0.95 and for six measures of high correlation (0.73–0.86). Angular measurements showed the largest differences, with correlations ranging from negligible to high (0.29–0.81). It was concluded that the ImageJ® software is an alternative that can be used to obtain equine morphological data, due to the easy execution of data collection, as well as the fact that the software is free. Thus, this strategy can be used mainly by breeders who seek to form a database with zoometric information that is essential for equine genetic improvement.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017
2024-12-06T13:09:43Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv 1871-1413
10.1016/j.livsci.2017.10.009
https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/6719
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/33523/001300000706j
identifier_str_mv 1871-1413
10.1016/j.livsci.2017.10.009
ark:/33523/001300000706j
url https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/6719
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Livestock Science
206
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv p. 24 - 27
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Udesc
instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron:UDESC
instname_str Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron_str UDESC
institution UDESC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
collection Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ri@udesc.br
_version_ 1842258095413133312