Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions?

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Bordignon L.
Publication Date: 2024
Other Authors: Amler D.A., Dalmas A.D., Pazinato R., Schelter M.L.*, Guerra N., Oliveira Neto, Antonio Mendes De
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da Udesc
dARK ID: ark:/33523/001300000tcjk
Download full: https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/1970
Summary: © 2024 Federal University ofPiauI. All rights reserved.This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and selectivity of the herbicides pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin for transplanted onion, which currently do not have registration for this crop in Brazil. The experiment was conducted in two commercial crops in Imbuia and Curitibanos, SC, Brazil, with four replications. The herbicides application was carried out pre-emergence of weeds, after onion transplanting in both experiments. The Imbuia experiment had eight treatments: T1: diuron (D) + pyroxasulfone (PYR) (500 + 50 g ha-1), T2: D + PYR (500 + 75 g ha-1), T3: D + PYR (500 + 100 g ha-1), T4: D + PYR + flumioxazin (FLU) [500 + (60 + 40 g ha-1)], T5: D + PYR + FLU [500 + (75 + 50 g ha-1)], T6: D + PYR + FLU [500 + (90 + 60 g ha-1)], T7: Weed free check, and T8: Control. In Curitibanos, had an additional treatment, with application of diuron (500 g ha-1). Evaluation consisted of identification and weed control, crop phytotoxicity, onion stand, and diameter and yield of bulbs. Pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin, with diuron, were effective in control of Polygonum persicaria, Galinsoga parviflora, and Coronopus didymus, regardless of the dose used. Diuron with pyroxasulfone at a dose of 100 g ha-1 and with pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin (60 + 40.75 + 50, and 90 + 60 g ha-1) were effective in Raphanus spp. control in boths experiments. The control showed losses in its total yield compared to the weed free check, decreasing by 81.7% in Imbuia and 90,3% in Curitibanos. The herbicides used were selective and are importante tools for weed management in transplanted onion.
id UDESC-2_a22c871b3540ebb65ff8e34926cacd40
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/1970
network_acronym_str UDESC-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository_id_str 6391
spelling Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions?© 2024 Federal University ofPiauI. All rights reserved.This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and selectivity of the herbicides pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin for transplanted onion, which currently do not have registration for this crop in Brazil. The experiment was conducted in two commercial crops in Imbuia and Curitibanos, SC, Brazil, with four replications. The herbicides application was carried out pre-emergence of weeds, after onion transplanting in both experiments. The Imbuia experiment had eight treatments: T1: diuron (D) + pyroxasulfone (PYR) (500 + 50 g ha-1), T2: D + PYR (500 + 75 g ha-1), T3: D + PYR (500 + 100 g ha-1), T4: D + PYR + flumioxazin (FLU) [500 + (60 + 40 g ha-1)], T5: D + PYR + FLU [500 + (75 + 50 g ha-1)], T6: D + PYR + FLU [500 + (90 + 60 g ha-1)], T7: Weed free check, and T8: Control. In Curitibanos, had an additional treatment, with application of diuron (500 g ha-1). Evaluation consisted of identification and weed control, crop phytotoxicity, onion stand, and diameter and yield of bulbs. Pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin, with diuron, were effective in control of Polygonum persicaria, Galinsoga parviflora, and Coronopus didymus, regardless of the dose used. Diuron with pyroxasulfone at a dose of 100 g ha-1 and with pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin (60 + 40.75 + 50, and 90 + 60 g ha-1) were effective in Raphanus spp. control in boths experiments. The control showed losses in its total yield compared to the weed free check, decreasing by 81.7% in Imbuia and 90,3% in Curitibanos. The herbicides used were selective and are importante tools for weed management in transplanted onion.2024-12-05T13:42:00Z2024info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article2176-907910.14295/CS.v15.4266https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/1970ark:/33523/001300000tcjkComunicata Scientiae15Bordignon L.Amler D.A.Dalmas A.D.Pazinato R.Schelter M.L.*Guerra N.Oliveira Neto, Antonio Mendes Deengreponame:Repositório Institucional da Udescinstname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-12-07T20:37:24Zoai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/1970Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://pergamumweb.udesc.br/biblioteca/index.phpPRIhttps://repositorio-api.udesc.br/server/oai/requestri@udesc.bropendoar:63912024-12-07T20:37:24Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions?
title Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions?
spellingShingle Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions?
Bordignon L.
title_short Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions?
title_full Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions?
title_fullStr Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions?
title_full_unstemmed Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions?
title_sort Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions?
author Bordignon L.
author_facet Bordignon L.
Amler D.A.
Dalmas A.D.
Pazinato R.
Schelter M.L.*
Guerra N.
Oliveira Neto, Antonio Mendes De
author_role author
author2 Amler D.A.
Dalmas A.D.
Pazinato R.
Schelter M.L.*
Guerra N.
Oliveira Neto, Antonio Mendes De
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Bordignon L.
Amler D.A.
Dalmas A.D.
Pazinato R.
Schelter M.L.*
Guerra N.
Oliveira Neto, Antonio Mendes De
description © 2024 Federal University ofPiauI. All rights reserved.This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and selectivity of the herbicides pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin for transplanted onion, which currently do not have registration for this crop in Brazil. The experiment was conducted in two commercial crops in Imbuia and Curitibanos, SC, Brazil, with four replications. The herbicides application was carried out pre-emergence of weeds, after onion transplanting in both experiments. The Imbuia experiment had eight treatments: T1: diuron (D) + pyroxasulfone (PYR) (500 + 50 g ha-1), T2: D + PYR (500 + 75 g ha-1), T3: D + PYR (500 + 100 g ha-1), T4: D + PYR + flumioxazin (FLU) [500 + (60 + 40 g ha-1)], T5: D + PYR + FLU [500 + (75 + 50 g ha-1)], T6: D + PYR + FLU [500 + (90 + 60 g ha-1)], T7: Weed free check, and T8: Control. In Curitibanos, had an additional treatment, with application of diuron (500 g ha-1). Evaluation consisted of identification and weed control, crop phytotoxicity, onion stand, and diameter and yield of bulbs. Pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin, with diuron, were effective in control of Polygonum persicaria, Galinsoga parviflora, and Coronopus didymus, regardless of the dose used. Diuron with pyroxasulfone at a dose of 100 g ha-1 and with pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin (60 + 40.75 + 50, and 90 + 60 g ha-1) were effective in Raphanus spp. control in boths experiments. The control showed losses in its total yield compared to the weed free check, decreasing by 81.7% in Imbuia and 90,3% in Curitibanos. The herbicides used were selective and are importante tools for weed management in transplanted onion.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-12-05T13:42:00Z
2024
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv 2176-9079
10.14295/CS.v15.4266
https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/1970
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/33523/001300000tcjk
identifier_str_mv 2176-9079
10.14295/CS.v15.4266
ark:/33523/001300000tcjk
url https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/1970
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Comunicata Scientiae
15
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Udesc
instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron:UDESC
instname_str Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron_str UDESC
institution UDESC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
collection Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ri@udesc.br
_version_ 1842258174142316544