Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions?
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2024 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositório Institucional da Udesc |
dARK ID: | ark:/33523/001300000tcjk |
Download full: | https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/1970 |
Summary: | © 2024 Federal University ofPiauI. All rights reserved.This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and selectivity of the herbicides pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin for transplanted onion, which currently do not have registration for this crop in Brazil. The experiment was conducted in two commercial crops in Imbuia and Curitibanos, SC, Brazil, with four replications. The herbicides application was carried out pre-emergence of weeds, after onion transplanting in both experiments. The Imbuia experiment had eight treatments: T1: diuron (D) + pyroxasulfone (PYR) (500 + 50 g ha-1), T2: D + PYR (500 + 75 g ha-1), T3: D + PYR (500 + 100 g ha-1), T4: D + PYR + flumioxazin (FLU) [500 + (60 + 40 g ha-1)], T5: D + PYR + FLU [500 + (75 + 50 g ha-1)], T6: D + PYR + FLU [500 + (90 + 60 g ha-1)], T7: Weed free check, and T8: Control. In Curitibanos, had an additional treatment, with application of diuron (500 g ha-1). Evaluation consisted of identification and weed control, crop phytotoxicity, onion stand, and diameter and yield of bulbs. Pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin, with diuron, were effective in control of Polygonum persicaria, Galinsoga parviflora, and Coronopus didymus, regardless of the dose used. Diuron with pyroxasulfone at a dose of 100 g ha-1 and with pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin (60 + 40.75 + 50, and 90 + 60 g ha-1) were effective in Raphanus spp. control in boths experiments. The control showed losses in its total yield compared to the weed free check, decreasing by 81.7% in Imbuia and 90,3% in Curitibanos. The herbicides used were selective and are importante tools for weed management in transplanted onion. |
id |
UDESC-2_a22c871b3540ebb65ff8e34926cacd40 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/1970 |
network_acronym_str |
UDESC-2 |
network_name_str |
Repositório Institucional da Udesc |
repository_id_str |
6391 |
spelling |
Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions?© 2024 Federal University ofPiauI. All rights reserved.This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and selectivity of the herbicides pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin for transplanted onion, which currently do not have registration for this crop in Brazil. The experiment was conducted in two commercial crops in Imbuia and Curitibanos, SC, Brazil, with four replications. The herbicides application was carried out pre-emergence of weeds, after onion transplanting in both experiments. The Imbuia experiment had eight treatments: T1: diuron (D) + pyroxasulfone (PYR) (500 + 50 g ha-1), T2: D + PYR (500 + 75 g ha-1), T3: D + PYR (500 + 100 g ha-1), T4: D + PYR + flumioxazin (FLU) [500 + (60 + 40 g ha-1)], T5: D + PYR + FLU [500 + (75 + 50 g ha-1)], T6: D + PYR + FLU [500 + (90 + 60 g ha-1)], T7: Weed free check, and T8: Control. In Curitibanos, had an additional treatment, with application of diuron (500 g ha-1). Evaluation consisted of identification and weed control, crop phytotoxicity, onion stand, and diameter and yield of bulbs. Pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin, with diuron, were effective in control of Polygonum persicaria, Galinsoga parviflora, and Coronopus didymus, regardless of the dose used. Diuron with pyroxasulfone at a dose of 100 g ha-1 and with pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin (60 + 40.75 + 50, and 90 + 60 g ha-1) were effective in Raphanus spp. control in boths experiments. The control showed losses in its total yield compared to the weed free check, decreasing by 81.7% in Imbuia and 90,3% in Curitibanos. The herbicides used were selective and are importante tools for weed management in transplanted onion.2024-12-05T13:42:00Z2024info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/article2176-907910.14295/CS.v15.4266https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/1970ark:/33523/001300000tcjkComunicata Scientiae15Bordignon L.Amler D.A.Dalmas A.D.Pazinato R.Schelter M.L.*Guerra N.Oliveira Neto, Antonio Mendes Deengreponame:Repositório Institucional da Udescinstname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-12-07T20:37:24Zoai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/1970Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://pergamumweb.udesc.br/biblioteca/index.phpPRIhttps://repositorio-api.udesc.br/server/oai/requestri@udesc.bropendoar:63912024-12-07T20:37:24Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions? |
title |
Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions? |
spellingShingle |
Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions? Bordignon L. |
title_short |
Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions? |
title_full |
Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions? |
title_fullStr |
Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions? |
title_sort |
Are pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin options for application in transplanted onions? |
author |
Bordignon L. |
author_facet |
Bordignon L. Amler D.A. Dalmas A.D. Pazinato R. Schelter M.L.* Guerra N. Oliveira Neto, Antonio Mendes De |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Amler D.A. Dalmas A.D. Pazinato R. Schelter M.L.* Guerra N. Oliveira Neto, Antonio Mendes De |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Bordignon L. Amler D.A. Dalmas A.D. Pazinato R. Schelter M.L.* Guerra N. Oliveira Neto, Antonio Mendes De |
description |
© 2024 Federal University ofPiauI. All rights reserved.This study aimed to evaluate the efficiency and selectivity of the herbicides pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin for transplanted onion, which currently do not have registration for this crop in Brazil. The experiment was conducted in two commercial crops in Imbuia and Curitibanos, SC, Brazil, with four replications. The herbicides application was carried out pre-emergence of weeds, after onion transplanting in both experiments. The Imbuia experiment had eight treatments: T1: diuron (D) + pyroxasulfone (PYR) (500 + 50 g ha-1), T2: D + PYR (500 + 75 g ha-1), T3: D + PYR (500 + 100 g ha-1), T4: D + PYR + flumioxazin (FLU) [500 + (60 + 40 g ha-1)], T5: D + PYR + FLU [500 + (75 + 50 g ha-1)], T6: D + PYR + FLU [500 + (90 + 60 g ha-1)], T7: Weed free check, and T8: Control. In Curitibanos, had an additional treatment, with application of diuron (500 g ha-1). Evaluation consisted of identification and weed control, crop phytotoxicity, onion stand, and diameter and yield of bulbs. Pyroxasulfone and pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin, with diuron, were effective in control of Polygonum persicaria, Galinsoga parviflora, and Coronopus didymus, regardless of the dose used. Diuron with pyroxasulfone at a dose of 100 g ha-1 and with pyroxasulfone plus flumioxazin (60 + 40.75 + 50, and 90 + 60 g ha-1) were effective in Raphanus spp. control in boths experiments. The control showed losses in its total yield compared to the weed free check, decreasing by 81.7% in Imbuia and 90,3% in Curitibanos. The herbicides used were selective and are importante tools for weed management in transplanted onion. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-12-05T13:42:00Z 2024 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
2176-9079 10.14295/CS.v15.4266 https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/1970 |
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv |
ark:/33523/001300000tcjk |
identifier_str_mv |
2176-9079 10.14295/CS.v15.4266 ark:/33523/001300000tcjk |
url |
https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/1970 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
Comunicata Scientiae 15 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositório Institucional da Udesc instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) instacron:UDESC |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) |
instacron_str |
UDESC |
institution |
UDESC |
reponame_str |
Repositório Institucional da Udesc |
collection |
Repositório Institucional da Udesc |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
ri@udesc.br |
_version_ |
1842258174142316544 |