Export Ready — 

Processing, products, and food safety: Trimming and washing poultry carcass to reduce microbial contamination: A comparative study

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Backes R.G.*
Publication Date: 2014
Other Authors: Faria G.A., Stefani, Lenita De Cassia Moura, De Almeida J.M.*, Da Silva H.K.*, Das Neves G.B.*, Langaro A.*, Biffi, Claudia Pies
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da Udesc
dARK ID: ark:/33523/001300000v5v6
Download full: https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/8479
Summary: © 2014 Poultry Science Association Inc.The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of washing and trimming broiler carcasses to reduce bacterial contamination. At the postevisceration site, 100 broiler carcasses were collected during 4 visits to a slaughterhouse in Santa Catarina State, Brazil. Birds were from the same flock, age, and approximately 2.4 kg of weight. Groups were as follows: group 1, with fecal contamination; group 2, without fecal contamination; group 3, with fecal contamination and trimmed; group 4, with fecal contamination and washed; group 5, with fecal contamination, and washed and trimmed. Carcass washings were performed with at least 1.5 L/bird of potable water (0.5 to 1 mg/kg of residual chlorine) at room temperature (20-25°C) using spray cabinets with 44 spray nozzles distributed into 2 chambers (pressure of 2 kgf/cm2 and 4 kgf/cm2). Washed carcasses (trimmed or not) showed significantly (P < 0.05) lower counts of aerobic mesophiles (plate count agar) on the third evaluation, and even lower (P < 0.01) counts for total coliforms (CT) and fecal coliforms (Escherichia coli). Trimmed carcasses showed significantly lower counts (P < 0.05) for plate count agar; however, we observed higher counts for E. coli (P < 0.05). The association of both treatments (washing and trimming) showed significantly higher (P < 0.05) counts for coliforms (CT and E. coli). We can conclude that the washing method is overall more efficient than the trimming method to decontaminate chicken carcasses at the postevisceration site. Hopefully, our findings can help poultry companies to minimize production costs by applying the washing method for carcass decontamination.
id UDESC-2_81ccc93251cf3ae04c4753f49d04de7b
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/8479
network_acronym_str UDESC-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository_id_str 6391
spelling Processing, products, and food safety: Trimming and washing poultry carcass to reduce microbial contamination: A comparative study© 2014 Poultry Science Association Inc.The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of washing and trimming broiler carcasses to reduce bacterial contamination. At the postevisceration site, 100 broiler carcasses were collected during 4 visits to a slaughterhouse in Santa Catarina State, Brazil. Birds were from the same flock, age, and approximately 2.4 kg of weight. Groups were as follows: group 1, with fecal contamination; group 2, without fecal contamination; group 3, with fecal contamination and trimmed; group 4, with fecal contamination and washed; group 5, with fecal contamination, and washed and trimmed. Carcass washings were performed with at least 1.5 L/bird of potable water (0.5 to 1 mg/kg of residual chlorine) at room temperature (20-25°C) using spray cabinets with 44 spray nozzles distributed into 2 chambers (pressure of 2 kgf/cm2 and 4 kgf/cm2). Washed carcasses (trimmed or not) showed significantly (P < 0.05) lower counts of aerobic mesophiles (plate count agar) on the third evaluation, and even lower (P < 0.01) counts for total coliforms (CT) and fecal coliforms (Escherichia coli). Trimmed carcasses showed significantly lower counts (P < 0.05) for plate count agar; however, we observed higher counts for E. coli (P < 0.05). The association of both treatments (washing and trimming) showed significantly higher (P < 0.05) counts for coliforms (CT and E. coli). We can conclude that the washing method is overall more efficient than the trimming method to decontaminate chicken carcasses at the postevisceration site. Hopefully, our findings can help poultry companies to minimize production costs by applying the washing method for carcass decontamination.2024-12-06T14:07:47Z2014info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlep. 3119 - 31221525-317110.3382/ps.2013-03383https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/8479ark:/33523/001300000v5v6Poultry Science9312Backes R.G.*Faria G.A.Stefani, Lenita De Cassia MouraDe Almeida J.M.*Da Silva H.K.*Das Neves G.B.*Langaro A.*Biffi, Claudia Piesengreponame:Repositório Institucional da Udescinstname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-12-07T20:57:38Zoai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/8479Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://pergamumweb.udesc.br/biblioteca/index.phpPRIhttps://repositorio-api.udesc.br/server/oai/requestri@udesc.bropendoar:63912024-12-07T20:57:38Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Processing, products, and food safety: Trimming and washing poultry carcass to reduce microbial contamination: A comparative study
title Processing, products, and food safety: Trimming and washing poultry carcass to reduce microbial contamination: A comparative study
spellingShingle Processing, products, and food safety: Trimming and washing poultry carcass to reduce microbial contamination: A comparative study
Backes R.G.*
title_short Processing, products, and food safety: Trimming and washing poultry carcass to reduce microbial contamination: A comparative study
title_full Processing, products, and food safety: Trimming and washing poultry carcass to reduce microbial contamination: A comparative study
title_fullStr Processing, products, and food safety: Trimming and washing poultry carcass to reduce microbial contamination: A comparative study
title_full_unstemmed Processing, products, and food safety: Trimming and washing poultry carcass to reduce microbial contamination: A comparative study
title_sort Processing, products, and food safety: Trimming and washing poultry carcass to reduce microbial contamination: A comparative study
author Backes R.G.*
author_facet Backes R.G.*
Faria G.A.
Stefani, Lenita De Cassia Moura
De Almeida J.M.*
Da Silva H.K.*
Das Neves G.B.*
Langaro A.*
Biffi, Claudia Pies
author_role author
author2 Faria G.A.
Stefani, Lenita De Cassia Moura
De Almeida J.M.*
Da Silva H.K.*
Das Neves G.B.*
Langaro A.*
Biffi, Claudia Pies
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Backes R.G.*
Faria G.A.
Stefani, Lenita De Cassia Moura
De Almeida J.M.*
Da Silva H.K.*
Das Neves G.B.*
Langaro A.*
Biffi, Claudia Pies
description © 2014 Poultry Science Association Inc.The objective of this study was to compare the efficiency of washing and trimming broiler carcasses to reduce bacterial contamination. At the postevisceration site, 100 broiler carcasses were collected during 4 visits to a slaughterhouse in Santa Catarina State, Brazil. Birds were from the same flock, age, and approximately 2.4 kg of weight. Groups were as follows: group 1, with fecal contamination; group 2, without fecal contamination; group 3, with fecal contamination and trimmed; group 4, with fecal contamination and washed; group 5, with fecal contamination, and washed and trimmed. Carcass washings were performed with at least 1.5 L/bird of potable water (0.5 to 1 mg/kg of residual chlorine) at room temperature (20-25°C) using spray cabinets with 44 spray nozzles distributed into 2 chambers (pressure of 2 kgf/cm2 and 4 kgf/cm2). Washed carcasses (trimmed or not) showed significantly (P < 0.05) lower counts of aerobic mesophiles (plate count agar) on the third evaluation, and even lower (P < 0.01) counts for total coliforms (CT) and fecal coliforms (Escherichia coli). Trimmed carcasses showed significantly lower counts (P < 0.05) for plate count agar; however, we observed higher counts for E. coli (P < 0.05). The association of both treatments (washing and trimming) showed significantly higher (P < 0.05) counts for coliforms (CT and E. coli). We can conclude that the washing method is overall more efficient than the trimming method to decontaminate chicken carcasses at the postevisceration site. Hopefully, our findings can help poultry companies to minimize production costs by applying the washing method for carcass decontamination.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014
2024-12-06T14:07:47Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv 1525-3171
10.3382/ps.2013-03383
https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/8479
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/33523/001300000v5v6
identifier_str_mv 1525-3171
10.3382/ps.2013-03383
ark:/33523/001300000v5v6
url https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/8479
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Poultry Science
93
12
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv p. 3119 - 3122
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Udesc
instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron:UDESC
instname_str Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron_str UDESC
institution UDESC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
collection Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ri@udesc.br
_version_ 1842258177650851840