Effect of myofascial release techniques on internal biomechanics and their resultant application to sports: A systematic review

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Duarte Franca M.E.*
Publication Date: 2024
Other Authors: Botti M.D.S.A.*, Ide F.C.*, Sinhorim L., Santos, Gilmar Moraes, Nascimento, Iramar Baptistella Do
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da Udesc
dARK ID: ark:/33523/0013000007kp6
Download full: https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/1534
Summary: © 2024 Elsevier LtdObjective: To investigate the influence of myofascial release (MFR) techniques on biomechanical parameters, including force, speed, Range of Motion (ROM), and flexibility in athletes. Method: This is a systematic review conducted on the databases United States National Library of Medicine (PubMed), Scopus, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); LILACS, and Embase. The PRISMA guidelines – 2020 were followed, and bias risk analysis was performed using the Cochrane Handbook tool (RoB2). Results: Sixteen studies were included for qualitative analysis. Techniques using MFR applied or self-applied to improve strength, speed, ROM and flexibility, have no consensus regarding the period of their applicability, due to difficulties in identifying the ideal load of applied tension, temperature level, and viscoelastic properties during the release of the deep fascia. However, improvements in oxygenation, reorganization of piezoelectricity, and normalization of fascial tension became evident after MFR. Conclusion: Regarding strength, speed, and range of motion (ROM), instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization performed in isolation and self-applied techniques combined with other methods emerged as favorable predictors for lower limb outcomes. However, isolated self-myofascial release requires further investigation. Regarding flexibility, there is a contrast in results between the use of self-applied foam rolling in isolation, which seems to prevent densification but suggests improvements in muscle strength acquisition without compromising flexibility. Applied MRF provided a more flexible quality for scapular mobilization, both in isolation and in combination with other techniques, but its best indication and/or specific applicability is for pain reduction.
id UDESC-2_779ed3d33d7a36b881f0799777593e10
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/1534
network_acronym_str UDESC-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository_id_str 6391
spelling Effect of myofascial release techniques on internal biomechanics and their resultant application to sports: A systematic review© 2024 Elsevier LtdObjective: To investigate the influence of myofascial release (MFR) techniques on biomechanical parameters, including force, speed, Range of Motion (ROM), and flexibility in athletes. Method: This is a systematic review conducted on the databases United States National Library of Medicine (PubMed), Scopus, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); LILACS, and Embase. The PRISMA guidelines – 2020 were followed, and bias risk analysis was performed using the Cochrane Handbook tool (RoB2). Results: Sixteen studies were included for qualitative analysis. Techniques using MFR applied or self-applied to improve strength, speed, ROM and flexibility, have no consensus regarding the period of their applicability, due to difficulties in identifying the ideal load of applied tension, temperature level, and viscoelastic properties during the release of the deep fascia. However, improvements in oxygenation, reorganization of piezoelectricity, and normalization of fascial tension became evident after MFR. Conclusion: Regarding strength, speed, and range of motion (ROM), instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization performed in isolation and self-applied techniques combined with other methods emerged as favorable predictors for lower limb outcomes. However, isolated self-myofascial release requires further investigation. Regarding flexibility, there is a contrast in results between the use of self-applied foam rolling in isolation, which seems to prevent densification but suggests improvements in muscle strength acquisition without compromising flexibility. Applied MRF provided a more flexible quality for scapular mobilization, both in isolation and in combination with other techniques, but its best indication and/or specific applicability is for pain reduction.2024-12-05T13:15:50Z2024Artigo de revisãoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionp. 525 - 5331532-928310.1016/j.jbmt.2024.05.003https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/1534ark:/33523/0013000007kp6Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies40Duarte Franca M.E.*Botti M.D.S.A.*Ide F.C.*Sinhorim L.Santos, Gilmar MoraesNascimento, Iramar Baptistella Doengreponame:Repositório Institucional da Udescinstname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-12-07T20:36:05Zoai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/1534Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://pergamumweb.udesc.br/biblioteca/index.phpPRIhttps://repositorio-api.udesc.br/server/oai/requestri@udesc.bropendoar:63912024-12-07T20:36:05Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Effect of myofascial release techniques on internal biomechanics and their resultant application to sports: A systematic review
title Effect of myofascial release techniques on internal biomechanics and their resultant application to sports: A systematic review
spellingShingle Effect of myofascial release techniques on internal biomechanics and their resultant application to sports: A systematic review
Duarte Franca M.E.*
title_short Effect of myofascial release techniques on internal biomechanics and their resultant application to sports: A systematic review
title_full Effect of myofascial release techniques on internal biomechanics and their resultant application to sports: A systematic review
title_fullStr Effect of myofascial release techniques on internal biomechanics and their resultant application to sports: A systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Effect of myofascial release techniques on internal biomechanics and their resultant application to sports: A systematic review
title_sort Effect of myofascial release techniques on internal biomechanics and their resultant application to sports: A systematic review
author Duarte Franca M.E.*
author_facet Duarte Franca M.E.*
Botti M.D.S.A.*
Ide F.C.*
Sinhorim L.
Santos, Gilmar Moraes
Nascimento, Iramar Baptistella Do
author_role author
author2 Botti M.D.S.A.*
Ide F.C.*
Sinhorim L.
Santos, Gilmar Moraes
Nascimento, Iramar Baptistella Do
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Duarte Franca M.E.*
Botti M.D.S.A.*
Ide F.C.*
Sinhorim L.
Santos, Gilmar Moraes
Nascimento, Iramar Baptistella Do
description © 2024 Elsevier LtdObjective: To investigate the influence of myofascial release (MFR) techniques on biomechanical parameters, including force, speed, Range of Motion (ROM), and flexibility in athletes. Method: This is a systematic review conducted on the databases United States National Library of Medicine (PubMed), Scopus, Scientific Electronic Library Online (SciELO); LILACS, and Embase. The PRISMA guidelines – 2020 were followed, and bias risk analysis was performed using the Cochrane Handbook tool (RoB2). Results: Sixteen studies were included for qualitative analysis. Techniques using MFR applied or self-applied to improve strength, speed, ROM and flexibility, have no consensus regarding the period of their applicability, due to difficulties in identifying the ideal load of applied tension, temperature level, and viscoelastic properties during the release of the deep fascia. However, improvements in oxygenation, reorganization of piezoelectricity, and normalization of fascial tension became evident after MFR. Conclusion: Regarding strength, speed, and range of motion (ROM), instrument-assisted soft tissue mobilization performed in isolation and self-applied techniques combined with other methods emerged as favorable predictors for lower limb outcomes. However, isolated self-myofascial release requires further investigation. Regarding flexibility, there is a contrast in results between the use of self-applied foam rolling in isolation, which seems to prevent densification but suggests improvements in muscle strength acquisition without compromising flexibility. Applied MRF provided a more flexible quality for scapular mobilization, both in isolation and in combination with other techniques, but its best indication and/or specific applicability is for pain reduction.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-12-05T13:15:50Z
2024
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv Artigo de revisão
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv 1532-9283
10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.05.003
https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/1534
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/33523/0013000007kp6
identifier_str_mv 1532-9283
10.1016/j.jbmt.2024.05.003
ark:/33523/0013000007kp6
url https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/1534
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Bodywork and Movement Therapies
40
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv p. 525 - 533
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Udesc
instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron:UDESC
instname_str Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron_str UDESC
institution UDESC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
collection Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ri@udesc.br
_version_ 1842258098191859712