Bilateral capacity is related to bilateral upper limb use after stroke: a study by behavioral maps, accelerometers and perceived amount of use

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Vier C.*
Publication Date: 2022
Other Authors: Mochizuki L., Gomes R.P.*, Rodrigues L.C.*, Demartino A.M.*, Michaelsen S.M.*
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositório Institucional da Udesc
dARK ID: ark:/33523/0013000002bnq
Download full: https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/3460
Summary: © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.Purpose: This study aimed to assess the following in individuals after stroke: (1) relationship between upper limb (UL) use by direct observation at home with use perceived and measured by accelerometers; (2) complementarity of these three measurements; and (3) relationship between UL bilateral capacity and bilateral use. Materials and methods: Thirty-one individuals with chronic hemiparesis participated in this cross-sectional study. UL use was assessed using a behavioral map (BM), the Motor Activity Log-Amount of Use (MAL-AOU), and accelerometers, while UL capacity was assessed using the Test d'Evaluation des Membres Supérieurs des Personnes Âgées (TEMPA). Results: The BM was strongly correlated with perceived use (MAL-AOU, ρ = 0.76) and accelerometer (ρ = 0.70). Bilateral UL use (BM) was moderately (ρ = 0.65) correlated with bilateral MAL-AOU and bilateral use by accelerometers (ρ = 0.62). The BM aided our understanding of how the paretic UL was used. The correlation between bilateral capacity (TEMPA bilateral) and bilateral use (BM) was significant (ρ = 0.49), while that with bilateral MAL-AOU and accelerometer were ρ = 0.68 and ρ = 0.50, respectively. Conclusion: A BM is a valid way to quantify UL use and can complement information assessed regarding perceived use and by accelerometers.Implications for rehabilitation Behavioral maps may be valuable to complement information assessed by perceived UL use and accelerometers. Quantifying bilateral capacity will reflect in a better understanding of actual paretic UL use after stroke. Accelerometers can underestimate the amount of paretic UL use in asymmetrical bilateral tasks.
id UDESC-2_41a387710d956f02fe51ac06a47d91eb
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/3460
network_acronym_str UDESC-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository_id_str 6391
spelling Bilateral capacity is related to bilateral upper limb use after stroke: a study by behavioral maps, accelerometers and perceived amount of use© 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.Purpose: This study aimed to assess the following in individuals after stroke: (1) relationship between upper limb (UL) use by direct observation at home with use perceived and measured by accelerometers; (2) complementarity of these three measurements; and (3) relationship between UL bilateral capacity and bilateral use. Materials and methods: Thirty-one individuals with chronic hemiparesis participated in this cross-sectional study. UL use was assessed using a behavioral map (BM), the Motor Activity Log-Amount of Use (MAL-AOU), and accelerometers, while UL capacity was assessed using the Test d'Evaluation des Membres Supérieurs des Personnes Âgées (TEMPA). Results: The BM was strongly correlated with perceived use (MAL-AOU, ρ = 0.76) and accelerometer (ρ = 0.70). Bilateral UL use (BM) was moderately (ρ = 0.65) correlated with bilateral MAL-AOU and bilateral use by accelerometers (ρ = 0.62). The BM aided our understanding of how the paretic UL was used. The correlation between bilateral capacity (TEMPA bilateral) and bilateral use (BM) was significant (ρ = 0.49), while that with bilateral MAL-AOU and accelerometer were ρ = 0.68 and ρ = 0.50, respectively. Conclusion: A BM is a valid way to quantify UL use and can complement information assessed regarding perceived use and by accelerometers.Implications for rehabilitation Behavioral maps may be valuable to complement information assessed by perceived UL use and accelerometers. Quantifying bilateral capacity will reflect in a better understanding of actual paretic UL use after stroke. Accelerometers can underestimate the amount of paretic UL use in asymmetrical bilateral tasks.2024-12-05T23:12:22Z2022info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlep. 2258 - 22661464-516510.1080/09638288.2020.1825838https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/3460ark:/33523/0013000002bnqDisability and Rehabilitation4411Vier C.*Mochizuki L.Gomes R.P.*Rodrigues L.C.*Demartino A.M.*Michaelsen S.M.*engreponame:Repositório Institucional da Udescinstname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-12-07T20:41:46Zoai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/3460Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://pergamumweb.udesc.br/biblioteca/index.phpPRIhttps://repositorio-api.udesc.br/server/oai/requestri@udesc.bropendoar:63912024-12-07T20:41:46Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bilateral capacity is related to bilateral upper limb use after stroke: a study by behavioral maps, accelerometers and perceived amount of use
title Bilateral capacity is related to bilateral upper limb use after stroke: a study by behavioral maps, accelerometers and perceived amount of use
spellingShingle Bilateral capacity is related to bilateral upper limb use after stroke: a study by behavioral maps, accelerometers and perceived amount of use
Vier C.*
title_short Bilateral capacity is related to bilateral upper limb use after stroke: a study by behavioral maps, accelerometers and perceived amount of use
title_full Bilateral capacity is related to bilateral upper limb use after stroke: a study by behavioral maps, accelerometers and perceived amount of use
title_fullStr Bilateral capacity is related to bilateral upper limb use after stroke: a study by behavioral maps, accelerometers and perceived amount of use
title_full_unstemmed Bilateral capacity is related to bilateral upper limb use after stroke: a study by behavioral maps, accelerometers and perceived amount of use
title_sort Bilateral capacity is related to bilateral upper limb use after stroke: a study by behavioral maps, accelerometers and perceived amount of use
author Vier C.*
author_facet Vier C.*
Mochizuki L.
Gomes R.P.*
Rodrigues L.C.*
Demartino A.M.*
Michaelsen S.M.*
author_role author
author2 Mochizuki L.
Gomes R.P.*
Rodrigues L.C.*
Demartino A.M.*
Michaelsen S.M.*
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Vier C.*
Mochizuki L.
Gomes R.P.*
Rodrigues L.C.*
Demartino A.M.*
Michaelsen S.M.*
description © 2020 Informa UK Limited, trading as Taylor & Francis Group.Purpose: This study aimed to assess the following in individuals after stroke: (1) relationship between upper limb (UL) use by direct observation at home with use perceived and measured by accelerometers; (2) complementarity of these three measurements; and (3) relationship between UL bilateral capacity and bilateral use. Materials and methods: Thirty-one individuals with chronic hemiparesis participated in this cross-sectional study. UL use was assessed using a behavioral map (BM), the Motor Activity Log-Amount of Use (MAL-AOU), and accelerometers, while UL capacity was assessed using the Test d'Evaluation des Membres Supérieurs des Personnes Âgées (TEMPA). Results: The BM was strongly correlated with perceived use (MAL-AOU, ρ = 0.76) and accelerometer (ρ = 0.70). Bilateral UL use (BM) was moderately (ρ = 0.65) correlated with bilateral MAL-AOU and bilateral use by accelerometers (ρ = 0.62). The BM aided our understanding of how the paretic UL was used. The correlation between bilateral capacity (TEMPA bilateral) and bilateral use (BM) was significant (ρ = 0.49), while that with bilateral MAL-AOU and accelerometer were ρ = 0.68 and ρ = 0.50, respectively. Conclusion: A BM is a valid way to quantify UL use and can complement information assessed regarding perceived use and by accelerometers.Implications for rehabilitation Behavioral maps may be valuable to complement information assessed by perceived UL use and accelerometers. Quantifying bilateral capacity will reflect in a better understanding of actual paretic UL use after stroke. Accelerometers can underestimate the amount of paretic UL use in asymmetrical bilateral tasks.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022
2024-12-05T23:12:22Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv 1464-5165
10.1080/09638288.2020.1825838
https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/3460
dc.identifier.dark.fl_str_mv ark:/33523/0013000002bnq
identifier_str_mv 1464-5165
10.1080/09638288.2020.1825838
ark:/33523/0013000002bnq
url https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/3460
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Disability and Rehabilitation
44
11
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv p. 2258 - 2266
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Udesc
instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron:UDESC
instname_str Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron_str UDESC
institution UDESC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
collection Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ri@udesc.br
_version_ 1842258077712121856