Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle Administração epidural de ropivacaína isolada ou associada à xilazina em bovinos

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: De Moraes A.N.*
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Regalin D.*, Dos Santos M.A., Da Costa B.D.*, Flores F.N., Oleskovicz, Nilson
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da Udesc
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/8547
Resumo: Epidural protocols are commonly used in cattle, enabling surgical procedures with the animal in standing position, however, problems such as paresis and recumbency beyond that, blocking/recovery times are important factors in protocol choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate time and quality of block and systemic effects of two epidural protocols in cattle. Fourteen crossbred cows with 350 ± 170 kg of body weight were allocated in two groups with 7 animals each: ropivacaine (GR) they received epidural injection of ropivacaine (0.1 mg.kg-1), and ropivacaine/xylazine (GRX) that received ropivacaine and xylazine (0.075 mg.kg-1and 0.05 mg.kg-1 respectively) in the same route. The following parameters were evaluated, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), mean blood pressure (MBP), ruminal movements (RM), rectal temperature (RT), durations of epidural block (DB), quality of block (QB), response to nociceptive stimulus by clamping perineal region, degree of paresis (DP) and hemogasometric evaluation. They were evaluated until 420 minutes after epidural. HR, pH, RR, PaCO2, Na+, Ca++, HCO3- and Base Excess (BE) did not differ between groups. It was observed a slight decrease for RM, and an increase for PaO2and RT in GRX comparing with GR. Both protocols were effective producing a long lasting sensitive block (6 hours in GR, and 7 hours in GRX). In both groups using nociceptive stimuli, the quality of block was considered good/excellent (66% of animals in GR at M360 and 71% of animals in GRX at M420). The animals of GRX showed mild to severe paresis from M15 to M240. We concluded that both protocols can be used by epidural route, and ropivacaine associated with xylazine administered by epidural route presents a longer sensitive block than isolated, but causes paresis as a side effect.
id UDESC-2_2eaadc95b1cf75ec5fc56fbe5c2e5d0d
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/8547
network_acronym_str UDESC-2
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository_id_str 6391
spelling Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle Administração epidural de ropivacaína isolada ou associada à xilazina em bovinosEpidural protocols are commonly used in cattle, enabling surgical procedures with the animal in standing position, however, problems such as paresis and recumbency beyond that, blocking/recovery times are important factors in protocol choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate time and quality of block and systemic effects of two epidural protocols in cattle. Fourteen crossbred cows with 350 ± 170 kg of body weight were allocated in two groups with 7 animals each: ropivacaine (GR) they received epidural injection of ropivacaine (0.1 mg.kg-1), and ropivacaine/xylazine (GRX) that received ropivacaine and xylazine (0.075 mg.kg-1and 0.05 mg.kg-1 respectively) in the same route. The following parameters were evaluated, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), mean blood pressure (MBP), ruminal movements (RM), rectal temperature (RT), durations of epidural block (DB), quality of block (QB), response to nociceptive stimulus by clamping perineal region, degree of paresis (DP) and hemogasometric evaluation. They were evaluated until 420 minutes after epidural. HR, pH, RR, PaCO2, Na+, Ca++, HCO3- and Base Excess (BE) did not differ between groups. It was observed a slight decrease for RM, and an increase for PaO2and RT in GRX comparing with GR. Both protocols were effective producing a long lasting sensitive block (6 hours in GR, and 7 hours in GRX). In both groups using nociceptive stimuli, the quality of block was considered good/excellent (66% of animals in GR at M360 and 71% of animals in GRX at M420). The animals of GRX showed mild to severe paresis from M15 to M240. We concluded that both protocols can be used by epidural route, and ropivacaine associated with xylazine administered by epidural route presents a longer sensitive block than isolated, but causes paresis as a side effect.2024-12-06T14:09:28Z2014info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlep. 2481 - 24901679-035910.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n4Supl1p2481https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/8547Semina:Ciencias Agrarias354De Moraes A.N.*Regalin D.*Dos Santos M.A.Da Costa B.D.*Flores F.N.Oleskovicz, Nilsonengreponame:Repositório Institucional da Udescinstname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-12-07T20:57:52Zoai:repositorio.udesc.br:UDESC/8547Biblioteca Digital de Teses e Dissertaçõeshttps://pergamumweb.udesc.br/biblioteca/index.phpPRIhttps://repositorio-api.udesc.br/server/oai/requestri@udesc.bropendoar:63912024-12-07T20:57:52Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle Administração epidural de ropivacaína isolada ou associada à xilazina em bovinos
title Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle Administração epidural de ropivacaína isolada ou associada à xilazina em bovinos
spellingShingle Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle Administração epidural de ropivacaína isolada ou associada à xilazina em bovinos
De Moraes A.N.*
title_short Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle Administração epidural de ropivacaína isolada ou associada à xilazina em bovinos
title_full Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle Administração epidural de ropivacaína isolada ou associada à xilazina em bovinos
title_fullStr Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle Administração epidural de ropivacaína isolada ou associada à xilazina em bovinos
title_full_unstemmed Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle Administração epidural de ropivacaína isolada ou associada à xilazina em bovinos
title_sort Epidural administration of ropivacaine or ropivacaine and xylazine in cattle Administração epidural de ropivacaína isolada ou associada à xilazina em bovinos
author De Moraes A.N.*
author_facet De Moraes A.N.*
Regalin D.*
Dos Santos M.A.
Da Costa B.D.*
Flores F.N.
Oleskovicz, Nilson
author_role author
author2 Regalin D.*
Dos Santos M.A.
Da Costa B.D.*
Flores F.N.
Oleskovicz, Nilson
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv De Moraes A.N.*
Regalin D.*
Dos Santos M.A.
Da Costa B.D.*
Flores F.N.
Oleskovicz, Nilson
description Epidural protocols are commonly used in cattle, enabling surgical procedures with the animal in standing position, however, problems such as paresis and recumbency beyond that, blocking/recovery times are important factors in protocol choice. The aim of this study was to evaluate time and quality of block and systemic effects of two epidural protocols in cattle. Fourteen crossbred cows with 350 ± 170 kg of body weight were allocated in two groups with 7 animals each: ropivacaine (GR) they received epidural injection of ropivacaine (0.1 mg.kg-1), and ropivacaine/xylazine (GRX) that received ropivacaine and xylazine (0.075 mg.kg-1and 0.05 mg.kg-1 respectively) in the same route. The following parameters were evaluated, heart rate (HR), respiratory rate (RR), mean blood pressure (MBP), ruminal movements (RM), rectal temperature (RT), durations of epidural block (DB), quality of block (QB), response to nociceptive stimulus by clamping perineal region, degree of paresis (DP) and hemogasometric evaluation. They were evaluated until 420 minutes after epidural. HR, pH, RR, PaCO2, Na+, Ca++, HCO3- and Base Excess (BE) did not differ between groups. It was observed a slight decrease for RM, and an increase for PaO2and RT in GRX comparing with GR. Both protocols were effective producing a long lasting sensitive block (6 hours in GR, and 7 hours in GRX). In both groups using nociceptive stimuli, the quality of block was considered good/excellent (66% of animals in GR at M360 and 71% of animals in GRX at M420). The animals of GRX showed mild to severe paresis from M15 to M240. We concluded that both protocols can be used by epidural route, and ropivacaine associated with xylazine administered by epidural route presents a longer sensitive block than isolated, but causes paresis as a side effect.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014
2024-12-06T14:09:28Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv 1679-0359
10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n4Supl1p2481
https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/8547
identifier_str_mv 1679-0359
10.5433/1679-0359.2014v35n4Supl1p2481
url https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/8547
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Semina:Ciencias Agrarias
35
4
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv p. 2481 - 2490
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da Udesc
instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron:UDESC
instname_str Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron_str UDESC
institution UDESC
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da Udesc
collection Repositório Institucional da Udesc
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da Udesc - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ri@udesc.br
_version_ 1848168387096608768