Evaluating the effectiveness of neurofeedback in chronic pain management: a narrative review

• Main Author: Diotaiuti P.
• Publication Date: 2024
• Other Authors: Corrado S., Tosti B., Spica G., Di Libero T., D'Oliveira A.*, Zanon A., Rodio A., Mancone S., Andrade, Alexandro
• Language: eng
• Source: Repositório Institucional da Udesc
• dARK ID: ark:/33523/001300000k4rb
• Download full: https://repositorio.udesc.br/handle/UDESC/1969

Copyright © 2024 Diotaiuti, Corrado, Tosti, Spica, Di Libero, D’Oliveira, Zanon, Rodio, Andrade and Mancone.The prevalence and impact of chronic pain in individuals worldwide necessitate effective management strategies. This narrative review specifically aims to assess the effectiveness of neurofeedback, an emerging non-pharmacological intervention, on the management of chronic pain. The methodology adopted for this review involves a meticulous search across various scientific databases. The search was designed to capture a broad range of studies related to neurofeedback and chronic pain management. To ensure the quality and relevance of the included studies, strict inclusion and exclusion criteria were applied. These criteria focused on the study design, population, intervention type, and reported outcomes. The review synthesizes the findings from a diverse array of studies, including randomized controlled trials, observational studies, and case reports. Key aspects evaluated include the types of neurofeedback used (such as EEG biofeedback), the various chronic pain conditions addressed (like fibromyalgia, neuropathic pain, and migraines), and the methodologies employed in these studies. The review highlights the underlying mechanisms by which neurofeedback may influence pain perception and management, exploring theories related to neural plasticity, pain modulation, and psychological factors. The results of the review reveal a positive correlation between neurofeedback interventions and improved pain management. Several studies report significant reductions on pain intensity, improved quality of life, and decreased reliance on medication following neurofeedback therapy. The review also notes variations in the effectiveness of different neurofeedback protocols and individual responses to treatment. Despite the promising results, the conclusion of the review emphasizes the need for further research. It calls for larger, well-designed clinical trials to validate the findings, to understand the long-term implications of neurofeedback therapy, and to optimize treatment protocols for individual patients.