Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantation
Autor(a) principal: | |
---|---|
Data de Publicação: | 2009 |
Outros Autores: | , |
Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
Idioma: | por |
Título da fonte: | Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) |
Texto Completo: | https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5313 |
Resumo: | The egg parasitoid Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Soares) is one of the main natural enemies of lace bug Leptopharsa heveae Drake & Poor (Hemiptera: Tingidae), together with the green lacewings and the fungus Sporothrix insectorum (Hoog e Evans). Studies about insect-pest distribution and their natural enemies in rubber tree are scarce. The objective of this research was to verify the sazonal horizontal distribution and population fluctuation of the parasitoid E. tingitiphagus in commercial blocks of rubber tree of the clones RRIM 600, PR 255, PB 217, PB 235 and GT 1, from october of 2005 to february of 2006, period of occurrence of L. heveae in the studied area. The samplings were performed in the North, South, East and West quadrants of five blocks, Ripe leaves of the inferior third of the canopy of five marked trees, from the edge towards the interior of the blocks, were collected. The leaves were taken to the laboratory, washed in sodium hypochlorite solution (1.5%), rinsed and dried under absorbent paper. The petioles of each leaflet were inserted in plastic tubes containing water, sealed, conditioned in identified plastic bags (12 x 30 cm), filled with an air compressor and closed in electric stamp. The material was suspended in clothes lines in an acclimatized room at 25 ± 1 ºC and 12 hours of photoperiod. After five days, the bags and leaflets were observed under stereoscopic microscope, to verify the parasitoids emergence. The data were normalized and submitted to the variance analysis (ANOVA) and their averages were compared by the Tukey’s test (5%). An equal distribution of the parasitoid was verified, varying on average for the five clones from 2.59 (South) to 2.82 (West). There was a tendency of the parasitoid to concentrate inside the rubber tree blocks. The clones that presented the largest and smallest parasitoids number were PR 255 and PB 235, respectively. In the studied areas, the population peaks of the parasitoid occurred in November for all the clones, except for PR 255, which had its peak in December. |
id |
UDESC-10_4d7d77d1b4bfda8a3855379a64c55dd7 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai::article/5313 |
network_acronym_str |
UDESC-10 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantationDistribuição horizontal sazonal de Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) em plantios de seringueiraChalcidoideaHevea brasiliensisHemipteraheveiculturaparasitóide.ChalcidoideaHevea brasiliensisHemipteraheveicultureparasitoid.The egg parasitoid Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Soares) is one of the main natural enemies of lace bug Leptopharsa heveae Drake & Poor (Hemiptera: Tingidae), together with the green lacewings and the fungus Sporothrix insectorum (Hoog e Evans). Studies about insect-pest distribution and their natural enemies in rubber tree are scarce. The objective of this research was to verify the sazonal horizontal distribution and population fluctuation of the parasitoid E. tingitiphagus in commercial blocks of rubber tree of the clones RRIM 600, PR 255, PB 217, PB 235 and GT 1, from october of 2005 to february of 2006, period of occurrence of L. heveae in the studied area. The samplings were performed in the North, South, East and West quadrants of five blocks, Ripe leaves of the inferior third of the canopy of five marked trees, from the edge towards the interior of the blocks, were collected. The leaves were taken to the laboratory, washed in sodium hypochlorite solution (1.5%), rinsed and dried under absorbent paper. The petioles of each leaflet were inserted in plastic tubes containing water, sealed, conditioned in identified plastic bags (12 x 30 cm), filled with an air compressor and closed in electric stamp. The material was suspended in clothes lines in an acclimatized room at 25 ± 1 ºC and 12 hours of photoperiod. After five days, the bags and leaflets were observed under stereoscopic microscope, to verify the parasitoids emergence. The data were normalized and submitted to the variance analysis (ANOVA) and their averages were compared by the Tukey’s test (5%). An equal distribution of the parasitoid was verified, varying on average for the five clones from 2.59 (South) to 2.82 (West). There was a tendency of the parasitoid to concentrate inside the rubber tree blocks. The clones that presented the largest and smallest parasitoids number were PR 255 and PB 235, respectively. In the studied areas, the population peaks of the parasitoid occurred in November for all the clones, except for PR 255, which had its peak in December.O parasitóide de ovos Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Soares) é um dos principais inimigos naturais do percevejo-de-renda, Leptopharsa heveae Drake e Poor (Hemiptera: Tingidae), juntamente com os crisopídeos e o fungo Sporothrix insectorum (Hoog e Evans). Estudos sobre a distribuição de insetospraga e seus inimigos naturais em seringueira são escassos. Neste sentido, o objetivo desta pesquisa foi verificar a distribuição horizontal sazonal e a flutuação populacional do parasitóide E. tingitiphagus em talhões comerciais dos clones de seringueira RRIM 600, PR 255, PB 217, PB 235 e GT 1, no período de outubro de 2005 a fevereiro de 2006, período de ocorrência de L.heveae na região estudada. As amostragens foram realizadas nos quadrantes Norte, Sul, Leste e Oeste de cinco talhões, em folhas maduras coletadas no terço inferior da copa de cinco árvores marcadas, da bordadura em direção ao interior dos talhões. As folhas foram levadas ao laboratório, lavadas em solução de hipoclorito de sódio (1,5%), enxaguadas e secadas sobre papel absorvente. Os pecíolos de cada folíolo foram inseridos em tubos plásticos contendo água, lacrados, acondicionados em sacos plásticos (12 x 30 cm) identificados, inflados com auxílio de um compressor de ar e fechados em seladora elétrica. O material foi pendurado em varais em sala climatizada a 25 ± 1 ºC com fotofase de 12 horas. Após cinco dias, os sacos e folíolos foram observados sob microscópio estereoscópico para verificar a emergência de parasitóides. Os dados foram normalizados e submetidos à análise de variância (ANOVA) e suas médias comparadas pelo teste de Tukey (5%). Verificou-se uma distribuição equitativa do parasitóide, com médias variando de 2,59 (Sul) a 2,82 (Oeste) nos cinco clones, e uma tendência do parasitóide se concentrar no interior dos talhões de seringueira. Os clones que apresentaram o maior e o menor número de parasitóides foram o PR 255 e o PB 235, respectivamente. Nas áreas estudadas, o pico populacional do paritóide ocorreu em novembro para todos os clones, exceto para PR 255, em que o pico foi em dezembro.Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina2009-04-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5313Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2009); 53-61Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; v. 8 n. 1 (2009); 53-612238-1171reponame:Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online)instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCporhttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5313/3519Santos, Rodrigo SouzaFreitas, Sérgio deSilva, Joaquim Manoel dainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-07-01T14:54:53Zoai::article/5313Revistahttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/PUBhttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/oairca.cav@udesc.br | portal.periodicos@udesc.brhttps://doi.org/10.5965/223811712238-11711676-9732opendoar:2022-07-01T14:54:53Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantation Distribuição horizontal sazonal de Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) em plantios de seringueira |
title |
Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantation |
spellingShingle |
Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantation Santos, Rodrigo Souza Chalcidoidea Hevea brasiliensis Hemiptera heveicultura parasitóide. Chalcidoidea Hevea brasiliensis Hemiptera heveiculture parasitoid. |
title_short |
Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantation |
title_full |
Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantation |
title_fullStr |
Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantation |
title_full_unstemmed |
Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantation |
title_sort |
Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantation |
author |
Santos, Rodrigo Souza |
author_facet |
Santos, Rodrigo Souza Freitas, Sérgio de Silva, Joaquim Manoel da |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Freitas, Sérgio de Silva, Joaquim Manoel da |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Santos, Rodrigo Souza Freitas, Sérgio de Silva, Joaquim Manoel da |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Chalcidoidea Hevea brasiliensis Hemiptera heveicultura parasitóide. Chalcidoidea Hevea brasiliensis Hemiptera heveiculture parasitoid. |
topic |
Chalcidoidea Hevea brasiliensis Hemiptera heveicultura parasitóide. Chalcidoidea Hevea brasiliensis Hemiptera heveiculture parasitoid. |
description |
The egg parasitoid Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Soares) is one of the main natural enemies of lace bug Leptopharsa heveae Drake & Poor (Hemiptera: Tingidae), together with the green lacewings and the fungus Sporothrix insectorum (Hoog e Evans). Studies about insect-pest distribution and their natural enemies in rubber tree are scarce. The objective of this research was to verify the sazonal horizontal distribution and population fluctuation of the parasitoid E. tingitiphagus in commercial blocks of rubber tree of the clones RRIM 600, PR 255, PB 217, PB 235 and GT 1, from october of 2005 to february of 2006, period of occurrence of L. heveae in the studied area. The samplings were performed in the North, South, East and West quadrants of five blocks, Ripe leaves of the inferior third of the canopy of five marked trees, from the edge towards the interior of the blocks, were collected. The leaves were taken to the laboratory, washed in sodium hypochlorite solution (1.5%), rinsed and dried under absorbent paper. The petioles of each leaflet were inserted in plastic tubes containing water, sealed, conditioned in identified plastic bags (12 x 30 cm), filled with an air compressor and closed in electric stamp. The material was suspended in clothes lines in an acclimatized room at 25 ± 1 ºC and 12 hours of photoperiod. After five days, the bags and leaflets were observed under stereoscopic microscope, to verify the parasitoids emergence. The data were normalized and submitted to the variance analysis (ANOVA) and their averages were compared by the Tukey’s test (5%). An equal distribution of the parasitoid was verified, varying on average for the five clones from 2.59 (South) to 2.82 (West). There was a tendency of the parasitoid to concentrate inside the rubber tree blocks. The clones that presented the largest and smallest parasitoids number were PR 255 and PB 235, respectively. In the studied areas, the population peaks of the parasitoid occurred in November for all the clones, except for PR 255, which had its peak in December. |
publishDate |
2009 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2009-04-10 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5313 |
url |
https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5313 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5313/3519 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2009); 53-61 Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; v. 8 n. 1 (2009); 53-61 2238-1171 reponame:Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) instacron:UDESC |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) |
instacron_str |
UDESC |
institution |
UDESC |
reponame_str |
Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) |
collection |
Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rca.cav@udesc.br | portal.periodicos@udesc.br |
_version_ |
1842261010085314560 |