Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Santos, Rodrigo Souza
Data de Publicação: 2009
Outros Autores: Freitas, Sérgio de, Silva, Joaquim Manoel da
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online)
Texto Completo: https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5313
Resumo: The egg parasitoid Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Soares) is one of the main natural enemies of lace bug Leptopharsa heveae Drake & Poor (Hemiptera: Tingidae), together with the green lacewings and the fungus Sporothrix insectorum (Hoog e Evans). Studies about insect-pest distribution and their natural enemies in rubber tree are scarce. The objective of this research was to verify the sazonal horizontal distribution and population fluctuation of the parasitoid E. tingitiphagus in commercial blocks of rubber tree of the clones RRIM 600, PR 255, PB 217, PB 235 and GT 1, from october of 2005 to february of 2006, period of occurrence of L. heveae in the studied area. The samplings were performed in the North, South, East and West quadrants of five blocks, Ripe leaves of the inferior third of the canopy of five marked trees, from the edge towards the interior of the blocks, were collected. The leaves were taken to the laboratory, washed in sodium hypochlorite solution (1.5%), rinsed and dried under absorbent paper. The petioles of each leaflet were inserted in plastic tubes containing water, sealed, conditioned in identified plastic bags (12 x 30 cm), filled with an air compressor and closed in electric stamp. The material was suspended in clothes lines in an acclimatized room at 25 ± 1 ºC and 12 hours of photoperiod. After five days, the bags and leaflets were observed under stereoscopic microscope, to verify the parasitoids emergence. The data were normalized and submitted to the variance analysis (ANOVA) and their averages were compared by the Tukey’s test (5%). An equal distribution of the parasitoid was verified, varying on average for the five clones from 2.59 (South) to 2.82 (West). There was a tendency of the parasitoid to concentrate inside the rubber tree blocks. The clones that presented the largest and smallest parasitoids number were PR 255 and PB 235, respectively. In the studied areas, the population peaks of the parasitoid occurred in November for all the clones, except for PR 255, which had its peak in December.
id UDESC-10_4d7d77d1b4bfda8a3855379a64c55dd7
oai_identifier_str oai::article/5313
network_acronym_str UDESC-10
network_name_str Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantationDistribuição horizontal sazonal de Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) em plantios de seringueiraChalcidoideaHevea brasiliensisHemipteraheveiculturaparasitóide.ChalcidoideaHevea brasiliensisHemipteraheveicultureparasitoid.The egg parasitoid Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Soares) is one of the main natural enemies of lace bug Leptopharsa heveae Drake & Poor (Hemiptera: Tingidae), together with the green lacewings and the fungus Sporothrix insectorum (Hoog e Evans). Studies about insect-pest distribution and their natural enemies in rubber tree are scarce. The objective of this research was to verify the sazonal horizontal distribution and population fluctuation of the parasitoid E. tingitiphagus in commercial blocks of rubber tree of the clones RRIM 600, PR 255, PB 217, PB 235 and GT 1, from october of 2005 to february of 2006, period of occurrence of L. heveae in the studied area. The samplings were performed in the North, South, East and West quadrants of five blocks, Ripe leaves of the inferior third of the canopy of five marked trees, from the edge towards the interior of the blocks, were collected. The leaves were taken to the laboratory, washed in sodium hypochlorite solution (1.5%), rinsed and dried under absorbent paper. The petioles of each leaflet were inserted in plastic tubes containing water, sealed, conditioned in identified plastic bags (12 x 30 cm), filled with an air compressor and closed in electric stamp. The material was suspended in clothes lines in an acclimatized room at 25 ± 1 ºC and 12 hours of photoperiod. After five days, the bags and leaflets were observed under stereoscopic microscope, to verify the parasitoids emergence. The data were normalized and submitted to the variance analysis (ANOVA) and their averages were compared by the Tukey’s test (5%). An equal distribution of the parasitoid was verified, varying on average for the five clones from 2.59 (South) to 2.82 (West). There was a tendency of the parasitoid to concentrate inside the rubber tree blocks. The clones that presented the largest and smallest parasitoids number were PR 255 and PB 235, respectively. In the studied areas, the population peaks of the parasitoid occurred in November for all the clones, except for PR 255, which had its peak in December.O parasitóide de ovos Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Soares) é um dos principais inimigos naturais do percevejo-de-renda, Leptopharsa heveae Drake e Poor (Hemiptera: Tingidae), juntamente com os crisopídeos e o fungo Sporothrix insectorum (Hoog e Evans). Estudos sobre a distribuição de insetospraga e seus inimigos naturais em seringueira são escassos. Neste sentido, o objetivo desta pesquisa foi verificar a distribuição horizontal sazonal e a flutuação populacional do parasitóide E. tingitiphagus em talhões comerciais dos clones de seringueira RRIM 600, PR 255, PB 217, PB 235 e GT 1, no período de outubro de 2005 a fevereiro de 2006, período de ocorrência de L.heveae na região estudada. As amostragens foram realizadas nos quadrantes Norte, Sul, Leste e Oeste de cinco talhões, em folhas maduras coletadas no terço inferior da copa de cinco árvores marcadas, da bordadura em direção ao interior dos talhões. As folhas foram levadas ao laboratório, lavadas em solução de hipoclorito de sódio (1,5%), enxaguadas e secadas sobre papel absorvente. Os pecíolos de cada folíolo foram inseridos em tubos plásticos contendo água, lacrados, acondicionados em sacos plásticos (12 x 30 cm) identificados, inflados com auxílio de um compressor de ar e fechados em seladora elétrica. O material foi pendurado em varais em sala climatizada a 25 ± 1 ºC com fotofase de 12 horas. Após cinco dias, os sacos e folíolos foram observados sob microscópio estereoscópico para verificar a emergência de parasitóides. Os dados foram normalizados e submetidos à análise de variância (ANOVA) e suas médias comparadas pelo teste de Tukey (5%). Verificou-se uma distribuição equitativa do parasitóide, com médias variando de 2,59 (Sul) a 2,82 (Oeste) nos cinco clones, e uma tendência do parasitóide se concentrar no interior dos talhões de seringueira. Os clones que apresentaram o maior e o menor número de parasitóides foram o PR 255 e o PB 235, respectivamente. Nas áreas estudadas, o pico populacional do paritóide ocorreu em novembro para todos os clones, exceto para PR 255, em que o pico foi em dezembro.Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina2009-04-10info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5313Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2009); 53-61Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; v. 8 n. 1 (2009); 53-612238-1171reponame:Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online)instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCporhttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5313/3519Santos, Rodrigo SouzaFreitas, Sérgio deSilva, Joaquim Manoel dainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-07-01T14:54:53Zoai::article/5313Revistahttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/PUBhttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/oairca.cav@udesc.br | portal.periodicos@udesc.brhttps://doi.org/10.5965/223811712238-11711676-9732opendoar:2022-07-01T14:54:53Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantation
Distribuição horizontal sazonal de Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) em plantios de seringueira
title Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantation
spellingShingle Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantation
Santos, Rodrigo Souza
Chalcidoidea
Hevea brasiliensis
Hemiptera
heveicultura
parasitóide.
Chalcidoidea
Hevea brasiliensis
Hemiptera
heveiculture
parasitoid.
title_short Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantation
title_full Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantation
title_fullStr Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantation
title_full_unstemmed Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantation
title_sort Sazonal horizontal distribution of Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Hymenoptera: Mymaridae) in the rubber tree plantation
author Santos, Rodrigo Souza
author_facet Santos, Rodrigo Souza
Freitas, Sérgio de
Silva, Joaquim Manoel da
author_role author
author2 Freitas, Sérgio de
Silva, Joaquim Manoel da
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Santos, Rodrigo Souza
Freitas, Sérgio de
Silva, Joaquim Manoel da
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Chalcidoidea
Hevea brasiliensis
Hemiptera
heveicultura
parasitóide.
Chalcidoidea
Hevea brasiliensis
Hemiptera
heveiculture
parasitoid.
topic Chalcidoidea
Hevea brasiliensis
Hemiptera
heveicultura
parasitóide.
Chalcidoidea
Hevea brasiliensis
Hemiptera
heveiculture
parasitoid.
description The egg parasitoid Erythmelus tingitiphagus (Soares) is one of the main natural enemies of lace bug Leptopharsa heveae Drake & Poor (Hemiptera: Tingidae), together with the green lacewings and the fungus Sporothrix insectorum (Hoog e Evans). Studies about insect-pest distribution and their natural enemies in rubber tree are scarce. The objective of this research was to verify the sazonal horizontal distribution and population fluctuation of the parasitoid E. tingitiphagus in commercial blocks of rubber tree of the clones RRIM 600, PR 255, PB 217, PB 235 and GT 1, from october of 2005 to february of 2006, period of occurrence of L. heveae in the studied area. The samplings were performed in the North, South, East and West quadrants of five blocks, Ripe leaves of the inferior third of the canopy of five marked trees, from the edge towards the interior of the blocks, were collected. The leaves were taken to the laboratory, washed in sodium hypochlorite solution (1.5%), rinsed and dried under absorbent paper. The petioles of each leaflet were inserted in plastic tubes containing water, sealed, conditioned in identified plastic bags (12 x 30 cm), filled with an air compressor and closed in electric stamp. The material was suspended in clothes lines in an acclimatized room at 25 ± 1 ºC and 12 hours of photoperiod. After five days, the bags and leaflets were observed under stereoscopic microscope, to verify the parasitoids emergence. The data were normalized and submitted to the variance analysis (ANOVA) and their averages were compared by the Tukey’s test (5%). An equal distribution of the parasitoid was verified, varying on average for the five clones from 2.59 (South) to 2.82 (West). There was a tendency of the parasitoid to concentrate inside the rubber tree blocks. The clones that presented the largest and smallest parasitoids number were PR 255 and PB 235, respectively. In the studied areas, the population peaks of the parasitoid occurred in November for all the clones, except for PR 255, which had its peak in December.
publishDate 2009
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2009-04-10
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5313
url https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5313
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5313/3519
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; Vol. 8 No. 1 (2009); 53-61
Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; v. 8 n. 1 (2009); 53-61
2238-1171
reponame:Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online)
instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron:UDESC
instname_str Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
instacron_str UDESC
institution UDESC
reponame_str Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online)
collection Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv rca.cav@udesc.br | portal.periodicos@udesc.br
_version_ 1842261010085314560