EFFICACY COMPARISON OF ACARICIDES ON FIELD TESTS WITH THE IMMERSION TIME “IN VITRO”
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2004 |
Other Authors: | , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | por |
Source: | Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) |
Download full: | https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5418 |
Summary: | The aim of this study was to verify by tests “in vitro” the immersion time of engorged female that showed better correlation with the efficacy of the acaricides on field tests. The following acaricides were used: 0,025% amitraz, 0,01% cypermethrin, 0,005% alfamethrin, and 0,0025% deltamethrin in different immersion times (2,5; 5; 10 minutes). For the field test, engorged female collected from bovine one hour after dipping them with the acaricides were used (except amitraz, that was 30 minutes). The data were analyzed statistically using the Kruskal- Wallis test at 0.05% of significance. The average percentage of efficiency was: amitraz 99.47%, 98.86%, and 99.34%; cypermethrin 67.70%, 82.64%, 84.95%, and 70.16%; alfamethrin 97.24%, 100%, 99.98%, and 92.68%, deltamethrin 99.89%, 100%, 99.73%, and 70.10%; respectively, to the immersion time of 2.5, 5, 10 minutes and the field test. There was no statistic difference between the immersion times of 5 and 10 minutes in all the four acaricides. There was difference between 2.5 and 10 minutes for cypermethrin. The comparison between field test efficiency and “in vitro” immersion time test” showed differences in at least one of them, for all the acaricides. |
id |
UDESC-10_039f98cce524b9e984687abe88f2b40c |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai::article/5418 |
network_acronym_str |
UDESC-10 |
network_name_str |
Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
EFFICACY COMPARISON OF ACARICIDES ON FIELD TESTS WITH THE IMMERSION TIME “IN VITRO”COMPARAÇÃO DA EFICÁCIA DE CARRAPATICIDAS EM TESTES A CAMPO COM O TEMPO DE IMERSÃO “IN VITRO”Boophilus micropluseficácia de carrapaticidas.Boophilus microplusacaricides efficiency.The aim of this study was to verify by tests “in vitro” the immersion time of engorged female that showed better correlation with the efficacy of the acaricides on field tests. The following acaricides were used: 0,025% amitraz, 0,01% cypermethrin, 0,005% alfamethrin, and 0,0025% deltamethrin in different immersion times (2,5; 5; 10 minutes). For the field test, engorged female collected from bovine one hour after dipping them with the acaricides were used (except amitraz, that was 30 minutes). The data were analyzed statistically using the Kruskal- Wallis test at 0.05% of significance. The average percentage of efficiency was: amitraz 99.47%, 98.86%, and 99.34%; cypermethrin 67.70%, 82.64%, 84.95%, and 70.16%; alfamethrin 97.24%, 100%, 99.98%, and 92.68%, deltamethrin 99.89%, 100%, 99.73%, and 70.10%; respectively, to the immersion time of 2.5, 5, 10 minutes and the field test. There was no statistic difference between the immersion times of 5 and 10 minutes in all the four acaricides. There was difference between 2.5 and 10 minutes for cypermethrin. The comparison between field test efficiency and “in vitro” immersion time test” showed differences in at least one of them, for all the acaricides.Neste trabalho procurou-se verificar o tempo de imersão de teleóginas em testes “in vitro”, que apresentava melhor correlação com a eficácia dos carrapaticidas a campo. Foram utilizados os carrapaticidas: amitraz a 0,025%, cipermetrina a 0,01%, alfametrina a 0,005% e deltametrina a 0,0025% em diferentes tempos de imersão (2,5, 5 e 10 minutos). Para o teste a campo, foram utilizadas teleóginas coletadas de bovinos uma hora após o banho com os carrapaticidas (exceto amitraz que foi de 30 minutos). Os dados foram analisados estatisticamente através do teste de Kruskal-Wallis a 0,05% de significância. As percentagens médias de eficácia foram: do amitraz, 99,47%, 98,86%, 99,95% e 95,34%; da cipermetrina, 67,70%, 82,64%, 84,95%, e 70,16%; da alfametrina, 97,24%, 100%, 99,98% e 92,68% da deltametrina, 99,89%, 100%, 99,73% e 70,10%, respectivamente para os tempos de imersão de 2,5, 5, 10 minutos e no teste a campo. Não se evidenciou diferença estatística entre os tempos de imersão de 5 e 10 minutos nos quatro carrapaticidas. Houve diferença entre 2,5 e 10 minutos para a cipermetrina. Na comparação da eficácia do teste de campo com os tempos do teste de imersão “in vitro” verificou-se diferença em pelo menos um deles, em todos os carrapaticidas.Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina2004-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5418Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2004); 131-134Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; v. 3 n. 2 (2004); 131-1342238-1171reponame:Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online)instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)instacron:UDESCporhttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5418/3618Souza, Antonio Pereira deBellato, ValdomiroSartor, Amélia AparecidaKolling, Alexandroinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-07-01T14:19:38Zoai::article/5418Revistahttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/PUBhttps://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/oairca.cav@udesc.br | portal.periodicos@udesc.brhttps://doi.org/10.5965/223811712238-11711676-9732opendoar:2022-07-01T14:19:38Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
EFFICACY COMPARISON OF ACARICIDES ON FIELD TESTS WITH THE IMMERSION TIME “IN VITRO” COMPARAÇÃO DA EFICÁCIA DE CARRAPATICIDAS EM TESTES A CAMPO COM O TEMPO DE IMERSÃO “IN VITRO” |
title |
EFFICACY COMPARISON OF ACARICIDES ON FIELD TESTS WITH THE IMMERSION TIME “IN VITRO” |
spellingShingle |
EFFICACY COMPARISON OF ACARICIDES ON FIELD TESTS WITH THE IMMERSION TIME “IN VITRO” Souza, Antonio Pereira de Boophilus microplus eficácia de carrapaticidas. Boophilus microplus acaricides efficiency. |
title_short |
EFFICACY COMPARISON OF ACARICIDES ON FIELD TESTS WITH THE IMMERSION TIME “IN VITRO” |
title_full |
EFFICACY COMPARISON OF ACARICIDES ON FIELD TESTS WITH THE IMMERSION TIME “IN VITRO” |
title_fullStr |
EFFICACY COMPARISON OF ACARICIDES ON FIELD TESTS WITH THE IMMERSION TIME “IN VITRO” |
title_full_unstemmed |
EFFICACY COMPARISON OF ACARICIDES ON FIELD TESTS WITH THE IMMERSION TIME “IN VITRO” |
title_sort |
EFFICACY COMPARISON OF ACARICIDES ON FIELD TESTS WITH THE IMMERSION TIME “IN VITRO” |
author |
Souza, Antonio Pereira de |
author_facet |
Souza, Antonio Pereira de Bellato, Valdomiro Sartor, Amélia Aparecida Kolling, Alexandro |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Bellato, Valdomiro Sartor, Amélia Aparecida Kolling, Alexandro |
author2_role |
author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souza, Antonio Pereira de Bellato, Valdomiro Sartor, Amélia Aparecida Kolling, Alexandro |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Boophilus microplus eficácia de carrapaticidas. Boophilus microplus acaricides efficiency. |
topic |
Boophilus microplus eficácia de carrapaticidas. Boophilus microplus acaricides efficiency. |
description |
The aim of this study was to verify by tests “in vitro” the immersion time of engorged female that showed better correlation with the efficacy of the acaricides on field tests. The following acaricides were used: 0,025% amitraz, 0,01% cypermethrin, 0,005% alfamethrin, and 0,0025% deltamethrin in different immersion times (2,5; 5; 10 minutes). For the field test, engorged female collected from bovine one hour after dipping them with the acaricides were used (except amitraz, that was 30 minutes). The data were analyzed statistically using the Kruskal- Wallis test at 0.05% of significance. The average percentage of efficiency was: amitraz 99.47%, 98.86%, and 99.34%; cypermethrin 67.70%, 82.64%, 84.95%, and 70.16%; alfamethrin 97.24%, 100%, 99.98%, and 92.68%, deltamethrin 99.89%, 100%, 99.73%, and 70.10%; respectively, to the immersion time of 2.5, 5, 10 minutes and the field test. There was no statistic difference between the immersion times of 5 and 10 minutes in all the four acaricides. There was difference between 2.5 and 10 minutes for cypermethrin. The comparison between field test efficiency and “in vitro” immersion time test” showed differences in at least one of them, for all the acaricides. |
publishDate |
2004 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2004-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5418 |
url |
https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5418 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://periodicos.udesc.br/index.php/agroveterinaria/article/view/5418/3618 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; Vol. 3 No. 2 (2004); 131-134 Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias; v. 3 n. 2 (2004); 131-134 2238-1171 reponame:Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) instname:Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) instacron:UDESC |
instname_str |
Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) |
instacron_str |
UDESC |
institution |
UDESC |
reponame_str |
Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) |
collection |
Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista de Ciências Agroveterinárias (Online) - Universidade do Estado de Santa Catarina (UDESC) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
rca.cav@udesc.br | portal.periodicos@udesc.br |
_version_ |
1842261010616942592 |