BRAZILIAN BONAPARTISM: ABSENT DEMOCRACY AND THE PATHS OF THE STATE OF EXCEPTION IN BRAZIL (2016-2022)
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2024 |
Format: | preprint |
Language: | por |
Source: | SciELO Preprints |
Download full: | https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/10503 |
Summary: | The 2016 soft coup d'état forged a particular type of State of Exception that partially suspended the civil, political and social rights of large, super-impoverished population groups and their classist representations. It was a complex process of generalized legal uncertainty and, therefore, of crisis and deepening of institutional instability, in such a way as to put two issues of the Fourth Republic (1988-2016) on the agenda: Military (internal war and doctrine of national security) and judiciary (lawfare). Both ideologies forged by European and American capital-imperialism, with their particular expressions in the binomial colonialism-slavery.This process deepened with the atypical election and the autocratic government of Jair Messias Bolsonaro (2019-2022), marked by the militarization of political institutions, control of institutions of coercion, strengthening and expansion of militias (paramilitary groups) and constant threat of self-coup. Thus, the social phenomenon of Bolsonarism strengthened the military issue and raised it to the status of a Military Party. Faced with the advance of socio-cultural and political-economic militarization, the Judiciary – which had been fundamental for the execution of the Coup d’état – was forced to defend democracy, under penalty of extinction of both Parliament and the Judiciary itself, if it remained in the coup camp. In a typical electoral process, elections would simply demarcate the governmental succession. However, the 2022 presidential elections placed Brazil at a crossroads: the deepening of the State of Exception, via a particular type of Bolsonarist bonapartism or the opening of a potential process of (re)democratization, however, subject by the Judiciary. |
id |
SCI-1_c163d357d30192fb1af2fae0e164ed01 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/10503 |
network_acronym_str |
SCI-1 |
network_name_str |
SciELO Preprints |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
BRAZILIAN BONAPARTISM: ABSENT DEMOCRACY AND THE PATHS OF THE STATE OF EXCEPTION IN BRAZIL (2016-2022)BONAPARTISMO BRASILEÑO: LA DEMOCRACIA AUSENTE Y LOS CAMINOS DEL ESTADO DE EXCEPCIÓN EN BRASIL (2016-2022)BONAPARTISMO À BRASILEIRA: DEMOCRACIA AUSENTE E AS VIAS DO ESTADO DE EXCEÇÃO NO BRASIL (2016-2022)Golpe de EstadoEstado de ExceçãoBonapartismo BolsonaristaCoup d'étatState of ExceptionBolsonarista BonapartismGolpe de EstadoEstado de ExcepciónBonapartismo bolsonaristaThe 2016 soft coup d'état forged a particular type of State of Exception that partially suspended the civil, political and social rights of large, super-impoverished population groups and their classist representations. It was a complex process of generalized legal uncertainty and, therefore, of crisis and deepening of institutional instability, in such a way as to put two issues of the Fourth Republic (1988-2016) on the agenda: Military (internal war and doctrine of national security) and judiciary (lawfare). Both ideologies forged by European and American capital-imperialism, with their particular expressions in the binomial colonialism-slavery.This process deepened with the atypical election and the autocratic government of Jair Messias Bolsonaro (2019-2022), marked by the militarization of political institutions, control of institutions of coercion, strengthening and expansion of militias (paramilitary groups) and constant threat of self-coup. Thus, the social phenomenon of Bolsonarism strengthened the military issue and raised it to the status of a Military Party. Faced with the advance of socio-cultural and political-economic militarization, the Judiciary – which had been fundamental for the execution of the Coup d’état – was forced to defend democracy, under penalty of extinction of both Parliament and the Judiciary itself, if it remained in the coup camp. In a typical electoral process, elections would simply demarcate the governmental succession. However, the 2022 presidential elections placed Brazil at a crossroads: the deepening of the State of Exception, via a particular type of Bolsonarist bonapartism or the opening of a potential process of (re)democratization, however, subject by the Judiciary.El golpe de Estado blando de 2016 forjó un tipo particular de Estado de Excepción que suspendió parcialmente los derechos civiles, políticos y sociales de grandes grupos de población superempobrecidos y sus representaciones clasistas. Fue un proceso complejo de inseguridad jurídica generalizada y, por tanto, de crisis y profundización de la inestabilidad institucional, de tal manera que se pusieron en agenda dos temas de la Cuarta República (1988-2016): Militar (guerra interna y doctrina de seguridad nacional) y judicial (lawfare). Ambas ideologías forjadas por el capital-imperialismo europeo y americano, con sus expresiones particulares en el binomio colonialismo-esclavitud. Este proceso se profundizó con la elección atípica y el gobierno autocrático de Jair Messias Bolsonaro (2019-2022), marcado por la militarización de las instituciones políticas, el control de las instituciones de coerción, el fortalecimiento y expansión de las milicias (grupos paramilitares) y la constante amenaza de autodefensa. golpe. Así, el fenómeno social del bolsonarismo fortaleció la cuestión militar y la elevó a la categoría de Partido Militar. Ante el avance de la militarización sociocultural y político-económica, el Poder Judicial -que había sido fundamental para la ejecución del Golpe de Estado- se vio obligado a defender la democracia, so pena de extinción tanto del Parlamento como del propio Poder Judicial, si permaneció en el campo golpista. En un proceso electoral típico, las elecciones simplemente demarcarían la sucesión gubernamental. Sin embargo, las elecciones presidenciales de 2022 colocaron a Brasil en una encrucijada: la profundización del Estado de Excepción, vía un particular tipo de bonapartismo bolsonarista o la apertura de un potencial proceso de (re)democratización, sin embargo, sujeto el Poder Judicial.O Golpe de Estado soft de 2016 forjou um tipo particular de Estado de Exceção que suspendeu parcialmente os direitos civis, políticos e sociais de grandes contingentes populacionais superempobrecidos e suas representações classistas. Tratou-se de um processo complexo de insegurança jurídica generalizada e, portanto, de crise e aprofundamento da instabilidade institucional, de tal forma a colocar na ordem do dia duas questões da quarta República (1988-2016): Militar (guerra interna e doutrina da segurança nacional) e Judiciário (lawfare). Ambas as ideologias forjadas pelo capital-imperialismo europeu e estadunidense, com suas expressões particulares no binômio colonialismo-escravismo. Tal processo se aprofundou com a eleição atípica e o governo autocrático de Jair Messias Bolsonaro (2019-2022), marcado pela militarização das instituições políticas, controle das instituições de coerção, fortalecimento e expansão das milícias (grupos paramilitares) e ameaça constante de autogolpe. Assim, o fenômeno social do bolsonarismo potencializou a questão militar e a elevou a condição de Partido Militar. Frente ao avanço da militarização sociocultural e político-econômica, o Judiciário – que havia sido fundamental para a efetivação do Golpe de Estado – foi forçado a defender a democracia, sob pena de extinção tanto do Parlamento quanto do próprio Judiciário, caso permanecesse no campo golpista. Em um processo eleitoral típico, as eleições demarcariam simplesmente a sucessão governamental. Todavia, as eleições presidenciais de 2022 colocou o Brasil em uma encruzilhada: o aprofundamento do Estado de Exceção, pela via de um tipo particular de bonapartismo bolsonarista ou a abertura de um potencial processo de (re)democratização, todavia, tutelado pelo Judiciário.SciELO PreprintsSciELO PreprintsSciELO Preprints2024-12-02info:eu-repo/semantics/preprintinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/1050310.1590/SciELOPreprints.10503porhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/10503/19211Copyright (c) 2024 Marcelo Silvahttps://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessSilva, Marceloreponame:SciELO Preprintsinstname:Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)instacron:SCI2024-11-19T15:49:01Zoai:ops.preprints.scielo.org:preprint/10503Servidor de preprintshttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scieloONGhttps://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/oaiscielo.submission@scielo.orgopendoar:2024-11-19T15:49:01SciELO Preprints - Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
BRAZILIAN BONAPARTISM: ABSENT DEMOCRACY AND THE PATHS OF THE STATE OF EXCEPTION IN BRAZIL (2016-2022) BONAPARTISMO BRASILEÑO: LA DEMOCRACIA AUSENTE Y LOS CAMINOS DEL ESTADO DE EXCEPCIÓN EN BRASIL (2016-2022) BONAPARTISMO À BRASILEIRA: DEMOCRACIA AUSENTE E AS VIAS DO ESTADO DE EXCEÇÃO NO BRASIL (2016-2022) |
title |
BRAZILIAN BONAPARTISM: ABSENT DEMOCRACY AND THE PATHS OF THE STATE OF EXCEPTION IN BRAZIL (2016-2022) |
spellingShingle |
BRAZILIAN BONAPARTISM: ABSENT DEMOCRACY AND THE PATHS OF THE STATE OF EXCEPTION IN BRAZIL (2016-2022) Silva, Marcelo Golpe de Estado Estado de Exceção Bonapartismo Bolsonarista Coup d'état State of Exception Bolsonarista Bonapartism Golpe de Estado Estado de Excepción Bonapartismo bolsonarista |
title_short |
BRAZILIAN BONAPARTISM: ABSENT DEMOCRACY AND THE PATHS OF THE STATE OF EXCEPTION IN BRAZIL (2016-2022) |
title_full |
BRAZILIAN BONAPARTISM: ABSENT DEMOCRACY AND THE PATHS OF THE STATE OF EXCEPTION IN BRAZIL (2016-2022) |
title_fullStr |
BRAZILIAN BONAPARTISM: ABSENT DEMOCRACY AND THE PATHS OF THE STATE OF EXCEPTION IN BRAZIL (2016-2022) |
title_full_unstemmed |
BRAZILIAN BONAPARTISM: ABSENT DEMOCRACY AND THE PATHS OF THE STATE OF EXCEPTION IN BRAZIL (2016-2022) |
title_sort |
BRAZILIAN BONAPARTISM: ABSENT DEMOCRACY AND THE PATHS OF THE STATE OF EXCEPTION IN BRAZIL (2016-2022) |
author |
Silva, Marcelo |
author_facet |
Silva, Marcelo |
author_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Silva, Marcelo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Golpe de Estado Estado de Exceção Bonapartismo Bolsonarista Coup d'état State of Exception Bolsonarista Bonapartism Golpe de Estado Estado de Excepción Bonapartismo bolsonarista |
topic |
Golpe de Estado Estado de Exceção Bonapartismo Bolsonarista Coup d'état State of Exception Bolsonarista Bonapartism Golpe de Estado Estado de Excepción Bonapartismo bolsonarista |
description |
The 2016 soft coup d'état forged a particular type of State of Exception that partially suspended the civil, political and social rights of large, super-impoverished population groups and their classist representations. It was a complex process of generalized legal uncertainty and, therefore, of crisis and deepening of institutional instability, in such a way as to put two issues of the Fourth Republic (1988-2016) on the agenda: Military (internal war and doctrine of national security) and judiciary (lawfare). Both ideologies forged by European and American capital-imperialism, with their particular expressions in the binomial colonialism-slavery.This process deepened with the atypical election and the autocratic government of Jair Messias Bolsonaro (2019-2022), marked by the militarization of political institutions, control of institutions of coercion, strengthening and expansion of militias (paramilitary groups) and constant threat of self-coup. Thus, the social phenomenon of Bolsonarism strengthened the military issue and raised it to the status of a Military Party. Faced with the advance of socio-cultural and political-economic militarization, the Judiciary – which had been fundamental for the execution of the Coup d’état – was forced to defend democracy, under penalty of extinction of both Parliament and the Judiciary itself, if it remained in the coup camp. In a typical electoral process, elections would simply demarcate the governmental succession. However, the 2022 presidential elections placed Brazil at a crossroads: the deepening of the State of Exception, via a particular type of Bolsonarist bonapartism or the opening of a potential process of (re)democratization, however, subject by the Judiciary. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-12-02 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/preprint info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
preprint |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/10503 10.1590/SciELOPreprints.10503 |
url |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/10503 |
identifier_str_mv |
10.1590/SciELOPreprints.10503 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
language |
por |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://preprints.scielo.org/index.php/scielo/preprint/view/10503/19211 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Marcelo Silva https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Marcelo Silva https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0 |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints SciELO Preprints |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:SciELO Preprints instname:Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO) instacron:SCI |
instname_str |
Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO) |
instacron_str |
SCI |
institution |
SCI |
reponame_str |
SciELO Preprints |
collection |
SciELO Preprints |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
SciELO Preprints - Scientific Electronic Library Online (SCIELO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
scielo.submission@scielo.org |
_version_ |
1831964360523644928 |