Estudo Comparativo da Resistência ao Desgaste Abrasivo de Revestimentos Duros dos Tipos FeCrC, FeMn, FeTiCW e FeNbC

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Teodoro, Maicon Roberto
Data de Publicação: 2021
Tipo de documento: Dissertação
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
Texto Completo: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/15687
Resumo: This paper evaluated the resistance to abrasive wear of four types of hard coatings applied by welding to steel used in the sugar and ethanol and mining sectors that can coat defriber hammers, sugarcane chopping knives or loader teeth, in order to increase the service life of the parts and reduce the time of maintenance stops, which optimizes the production system. The coatings evaluated were manganese austenitic (FeMn), FeCrC with high chromium content, FeTiCW containing mixed tungsten-titanium carbide and FeNbC with niobium carbide. The coatings were deposited by the electric arc welding process on a 1020 steel substrate. The characterizations of the coatings were carried out by metallography, energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis to identify the chemical elements present in the precipitates formed and Vickers microhardness test. The coatings were submitted to two types of tests to evaluate the abrasive wear resistance of the coatings studied. The fixed ball micro-wear test was performed using 4N, 8N and 12N loads. The rubber wheel test, standardized by ASTM G65:2016, was performed with stops every 10 minutes until completing 30 minutes, and in continuous test of 30 minutes, whose wear resistance was determined volumetric loss by weighing the samples. As a result, the presence of (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbide was observed in the FeTiCW, FeCrC and FeNbC coatings. The hard ternary WTiC carbides formed in the FeTiCW coating adhered and distributed in a martensitic matrix provided the highest hardness among all the coatings studied. The microstructure of the FeNbC coating was characterized by the formation of (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides adhered to the eutectic matrix (austenite and chromium carbides) with lower hardness than that of the FeCrC coating containing only polygonal (Fe,Cr)7C3 chromium carbides, which are smaller and homogeneously distributed in the eutectic matrix. The FeMn coating showed an austenitic matrix with micropores from the welding process with the lowest hardness among the coatings studied. The results of the fixed ball wear test demonstrated that the 8N load is more severe than the test performed with 12N loads, which due to the large contact load prevents the abrasive from being transported between the sample and the ball. In the rubber wheel wear test, it was observed that the cumulative rate of volumetric loss is maintained with increasing test time, obtaining percentage deviations below 15%. However, the allowable error calculations were below 5%, showing that both tests demonstrate repeatability and reliability above 95%, evidencing that the increase in procedure B time, which is specified in 10 minutes, is ideal, and does not require an increase in test time to evaluate the coatings. In the comparative analysis of the results obtained in the micro wear and rubber wheel test, it was observed that the FeNbC coating was more wear resistant in both tests, followed by the FeCrC coating and FeTiCW coating, with the FeMn coating being the least wear resistant. For the FeMn coating, it was observed that for the fixed ball micro-wear test, increasing the test load provided improvement in wear resistance, evidencing that the mechanical maceration mechanism increases wear resistance as the coating is subjected to the work. It was concluded that higher hardness does not always determine higher wear resistance, since the FeNbC coating with the lowest hardness (569 HV) among the carbide-forming coatings was the most wear resistant, while the FeCrC coating (630 HV) showed higher wear resistance than the FeTiCW coating that has harder WTiC carbides (669 HV), which showed the lowest resistance among the coatings due to the high hardness and brittleness of the carbides, and its wear resistance was higher only than the FeMn coating (261HV).
id SCAR_c1c37cb84b262fc44f8e52d456ff4986
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:20.500.14289/15687
network_acronym_str SCAR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
repository_id_str 4322
spelling Teodoro, Maicon RobertoRossino, Luciana Sgarbihttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0139027055418391http://lattes.cnpq.br/5240597958499075753bd468-0a0d-429b-857e-0c1a9cb947112022-03-09T11:17:27Z2022-03-09T11:17:27Z2021-12-15TEODORO, Maicon Roberto. Estudo Comparativo da Resistência ao Desgaste Abrasivo de Revestimentos Duros dos Tipos FeCrC, FeMn, FeTiCW e FeNbC. 2021. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência dos Materiais) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Sorocaba, 2021. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/15687.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/15687This paper evaluated the resistance to abrasive wear of four types of hard coatings applied by welding to steel used in the sugar and ethanol and mining sectors that can coat defriber hammers, sugarcane chopping knives or loader teeth, in order to increase the service life of the parts and reduce the time of maintenance stops, which optimizes the production system. The coatings evaluated were manganese austenitic (FeMn), FeCrC with high chromium content, FeTiCW containing mixed tungsten-titanium carbide and FeNbC with niobium carbide. The coatings were deposited by the electric arc welding process on a 1020 steel substrate. The characterizations of the coatings were carried out by metallography, energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis to identify the chemical elements present in the precipitates formed and Vickers microhardness test. The coatings were submitted to two types of tests to evaluate the abrasive wear resistance of the coatings studied. The fixed ball micro-wear test was performed using 4N, 8N and 12N loads. The rubber wheel test, standardized by ASTM G65:2016, was performed with stops every 10 minutes until completing 30 minutes, and in continuous test of 30 minutes, whose wear resistance was determined volumetric loss by weighing the samples. As a result, the presence of (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbide was observed in the FeTiCW, FeCrC and FeNbC coatings. The hard ternary WTiC carbides formed in the FeTiCW coating adhered and distributed in a martensitic matrix provided the highest hardness among all the coatings studied. The microstructure of the FeNbC coating was characterized by the formation of (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides adhered to the eutectic matrix (austenite and chromium carbides) with lower hardness than that of the FeCrC coating containing only polygonal (Fe,Cr)7C3 chromium carbides, which are smaller and homogeneously distributed in the eutectic matrix. The FeMn coating showed an austenitic matrix with micropores from the welding process with the lowest hardness among the coatings studied. The results of the fixed ball wear test demonstrated that the 8N load is more severe than the test performed with 12N loads, which due to the large contact load prevents the abrasive from being transported between the sample and the ball. In the rubber wheel wear test, it was observed that the cumulative rate of volumetric loss is maintained with increasing test time, obtaining percentage deviations below 15%. However, the allowable error calculations were below 5%, showing that both tests demonstrate repeatability and reliability above 95%, evidencing that the increase in procedure B time, which is specified in 10 minutes, is ideal, and does not require an increase in test time to evaluate the coatings. In the comparative analysis of the results obtained in the micro wear and rubber wheel test, it was observed that the FeNbC coating was more wear resistant in both tests, followed by the FeCrC coating and FeTiCW coating, with the FeMn coating being the least wear resistant. For the FeMn coating, it was observed that for the fixed ball micro-wear test, increasing the test load provided improvement in wear resistance, evidencing that the mechanical maceration mechanism increases wear resistance as the coating is subjected to the work. It was concluded that higher hardness does not always determine higher wear resistance, since the FeNbC coating with the lowest hardness (569 HV) among the carbide-forming coatings was the most wear resistant, while the FeCrC coating (630 HV) showed higher wear resistance than the FeTiCW coating that has harder WTiC carbides (669 HV), which showed the lowest resistance among the coatings due to the high hardness and brittleness of the carbides, and its wear resistance was higher only than the FeMn coating (261HV).O presente trabalho avaliou a resistência ao desgaste abrasivo de quatro tipos de revestimentos duros aplicados por soldagem em aço utilizados nos setores sucroalcooleiro e de mineração, que podem revestir martelos desfribiladores, facas picadoras de cana-de-açúcar ou dentes de carregadeiras, a fim de aumentar o tempo de vida útil das peças e diminuir o tempo de paradas para manutenção, otimizando o sistema produtivo. Os revestimentos avaliados foram o aço austenítico ao manganês (FeMn), o FeCrC com alto teor de cromo, o FeTiCW, que contém carbonetos mistos complexo de tungstênio e titânio e o FeNbC com carboneto complexo de nióbio. Os revestimentos foram depositados pelo processo de soldagem a arco elétrico em substrato de aço SAE/AISI 1020. As caracterizações dos revestimentos foram realizadas por metalografia, análise por espectroscopia por energia dispersiva (EDS) para identificar os elementos químicos presentes nos precipitados formados em cada revestimento e ensaio de microdureza Vickers. Submeteram-se os revestimentos a dois tipos de ensaio para a avaliação da resistência ao desgaste abrasivo dos revestimentos estudados. O ensaio de microdesgaste por esfera fixa foi realizado, utilizando cargas de 4N, 8N e 12N. Para o ensaio roda de borracha, normalizado pela ASTM G65:2016, realizaram-se paradas de 10 em 10 minutos até completar 30 minutosde ensaio, e ensaio contínuo de 30 minutos, cuja resistência ao desgaste foi determinada pela perda volumétrica ajustada. Como resultado, observou-se a presença de carboneto (Fe,Cr)7C3 nos revestimentos FeTiCW, FeCrC e FeNbC. Os duros carbonetos ternários WTiC, formados no revestimento FeTiCW aderidos e distribuídos em uma matriz martensítica, propiciou a maior dureza dentre todos os revestimentos estudados. A microestrutura do revestimento FeNbC caracterizou-se pela formação de carbonetos do tipo (Fe,Cr)7C3 aderidos na matriz eutética (austenita e carbonetos de cromo), com dureza menor que a do revestimento FeCrC, que contém somente carbonetos de cromo (Fe,Cr)7C3 poligonais, que são menores e, homogeneamente, distribuídos na matriz eutética. O revestimento de FeMn apresentou matriz austenítica com microporos provenientes do processo de soldagem com a menor dureza entre os revestimentos estudados. Os resultados do ensaio de microdesgaste abrasivo por esfera fixa demostrou que a carga de 8N é mais efetiva que o ensaio realizado com cargas de 12N, e, devido a maior carga de contato, impede que o abrasivo distribua-se entre a amostra e a esfera. No ensaio de desgaste por roda de borracha, observou-se que a taxa acumulada da perda volumétrica se mantém com o aumento do tempo de ensaio, ficando abaixo de 15%. Porém, os cálculos de erro admissível ficaram abaixo de 5%, evidenciando que ambos os ensaios representam uma repetibilidade e confiabilidade acima de 95%, evidenciando que o aumento do tempo, do procedimento B, especificado em 10 minutos, é o ideal, não necessitando do aumento de tempo do ensaio para avaliação dos revestimentos. Na análise comparativa dos resultados obtidos no ensaio de microdesgaste e roda de borracha, observou-se que o revestimento de FeNbC foi o mais resistente ao desgaste, em ambos os ensaios, seguido do revestimento FeCrC e do revestimento FeTiCW, sendo o menos resistente ao desgaste o revestimento FeMn. Para o revestimento FeMn, observou-se que, para o ensaio de microdesgaste por esfera fixa, o aumento na carga de ensaio proporcionou melhora na resistência ao desgaste, evidenciando que o mecanismo de maclação mecânica aumenta a resistência ao desgaste conforme o revestimento vai sendo submetido ao trabalho. Conclui-se neste trabalho que nem sempre a maior dureza determina uma maior resistência ao desgaste, uma vez que o revestimento FeNbC com menor dureza (569 HV), dentre os revestimentos formadores de carboneto, foi o mais resistente ao desgaste; enquanto o revestimento FeCrC (630 HV) apresentou maior resistência que o revestimento FeTiCW, o qual possui carbonetos WTiC mais duros (669 HV), apresentando a menor resistência ao desgaste entre os revestimentos estudados, devido à grande dureza e fragilidade dos carbonetos, sendo somente superior ao revestimento FeMn (261HV).Não recebi financiamentoporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosCâmpus SorocabaPrograma de Pós-Graduação em Ciência dos Materiais - PPGCM-SoUFSCarAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCarbonetos ternáriosMicrodesgaste abrasivoCarbonetos de cromoCarbonetos complexosProcedimento B ASTM G65Roda de borrachaTernary carbidesMicro abrasive wearChromium carbideComplex carbidesProcedure B ASTM G 65Rubber wheelCIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO::ENSINO-APRENDIZAGEMEstudo Comparativo da Resistência ao Desgaste Abrasivo de Revestimentos Duros dos Tipos FeCrC, FeMn, FeTiCW e FeNbCComparative Study of Abrasive Wear Resistance of Hard Coatings of FeCrC, FeMn, FeTiCW and FeNbC Typesinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis6006002e0ccbe4-239e-4ea0-8af9-1795e5947e1breponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINALDisertação Maicon.pdfDisertação Maicon.pdfArtigo principal"application/pdf15767434https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/dc9805dd-0596-4e95-8fc0-6e30e12b5330/download1f5a49885a23304deaa597fdb4641d64MD51trueAnonymousREADCarta comprovante.pdfCarta comprovante.pdfapplication/pdf145258https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/cf4db924-8fb2-468d-9bb1-aa3aa64f2027/downloadefd521b7d985202a07a5202e0bbcd8d5MD53falseCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8811https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/4437dbf3-57aa-4eba-9d78-08d4dd63ae59/downloade39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34MD54falseAnonymousREADTEXTDisertação Maicon.pdf.txtDisertação Maicon.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain184790https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/92c5aeee-4bef-4917-a628-eaff8b751854/downloadf5305b26408e3450448cdbab9827528eMD55falseAnonymousREADCarta comprovante.pdf.txtCarta comprovante.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain1447https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/d7da45f6-65fc-493c-b61c-0eb448b437b1/download762cfaeabb91d7dfc06a369b8a7a8c87MD57falseTHUMBNAILDisertação Maicon.pdf.jpgDisertação Maicon.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg6836https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/2833ea4c-792f-4f35-8f20-729b92f0ce23/downloadc4a687227eeea3440d9f0b5bd14bae19MD56falseAnonymousREADCarta comprovante.pdf.jpgCarta comprovante.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg7473https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/48bb5309-80d4-4f30-83e7-f8bda33ff5d4/download6d24c8ec29746404677db88bd2c2e3f9MD58false20.500.14289/156872025-02-05 20:57:27.931http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilopen.accessoai:repositorio.ufscar.br:20.500.14289/15687https://repositorio.ufscar.brRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestrepositorio.sibi@ufscar.bropendoar:43222025-02-05T23:57:27Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Estudo Comparativo da Resistência ao Desgaste Abrasivo de Revestimentos Duros dos Tipos FeCrC, FeMn, FeTiCW e FeNbC
dc.title.alternative.eng.fl_str_mv Comparative Study of Abrasive Wear Resistance of Hard Coatings of FeCrC, FeMn, FeTiCW and FeNbC Types
title Estudo Comparativo da Resistência ao Desgaste Abrasivo de Revestimentos Duros dos Tipos FeCrC, FeMn, FeTiCW e FeNbC
spellingShingle Estudo Comparativo da Resistência ao Desgaste Abrasivo de Revestimentos Duros dos Tipos FeCrC, FeMn, FeTiCW e FeNbC
Teodoro, Maicon Roberto
Carbonetos ternários
Microdesgaste abrasivo
Carbonetos de cromo
Carbonetos complexos
Procedimento B ASTM G65
Roda de borracha
Ternary carbides
Micro abrasive wear
Chromium carbide
Complex carbides
Procedure B ASTM G 65
Rubber wheel
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO::ENSINO-APRENDIZAGEM
title_short Estudo Comparativo da Resistência ao Desgaste Abrasivo de Revestimentos Duros dos Tipos FeCrC, FeMn, FeTiCW e FeNbC
title_full Estudo Comparativo da Resistência ao Desgaste Abrasivo de Revestimentos Duros dos Tipos FeCrC, FeMn, FeTiCW e FeNbC
title_fullStr Estudo Comparativo da Resistência ao Desgaste Abrasivo de Revestimentos Duros dos Tipos FeCrC, FeMn, FeTiCW e FeNbC
title_full_unstemmed Estudo Comparativo da Resistência ao Desgaste Abrasivo de Revestimentos Duros dos Tipos FeCrC, FeMn, FeTiCW e FeNbC
title_sort Estudo Comparativo da Resistência ao Desgaste Abrasivo de Revestimentos Duros dos Tipos FeCrC, FeMn, FeTiCW e FeNbC
author Teodoro, Maicon Roberto
author_facet Teodoro, Maicon Roberto
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/5240597958499075
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Teodoro, Maicon Roberto
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Rossino, Luciana Sgarbi
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0139027055418391
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv 753bd468-0a0d-429b-857e-0c1a9cb94711
contributor_str_mv Rossino, Luciana Sgarbi
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Carbonetos ternários
Microdesgaste abrasivo
Carbonetos de cromo
Carbonetos complexos
Procedimento B ASTM G65
Roda de borracha
topic Carbonetos ternários
Microdesgaste abrasivo
Carbonetos de cromo
Carbonetos complexos
Procedimento B ASTM G65
Roda de borracha
Ternary carbides
Micro abrasive wear
Chromium carbide
Complex carbides
Procedure B ASTM G 65
Rubber wheel
CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO::ENSINO-APRENDIZAGEM
dc.subject.eng.fl_str_mv Ternary carbides
Micro abrasive wear
Chromium carbide
Complex carbides
Procedure B ASTM G 65
Rubber wheel
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv CIENCIAS HUMANAS::EDUCACAO::ENSINO-APRENDIZAGEM
description This paper evaluated the resistance to abrasive wear of four types of hard coatings applied by welding to steel used in the sugar and ethanol and mining sectors that can coat defriber hammers, sugarcane chopping knives or loader teeth, in order to increase the service life of the parts and reduce the time of maintenance stops, which optimizes the production system. The coatings evaluated were manganese austenitic (FeMn), FeCrC with high chromium content, FeTiCW containing mixed tungsten-titanium carbide and FeNbC with niobium carbide. The coatings were deposited by the electric arc welding process on a 1020 steel substrate. The characterizations of the coatings were carried out by metallography, energy dispersive spectroscopy (EDS) analysis to identify the chemical elements present in the precipitates formed and Vickers microhardness test. The coatings were submitted to two types of tests to evaluate the abrasive wear resistance of the coatings studied. The fixed ball micro-wear test was performed using 4N, 8N and 12N loads. The rubber wheel test, standardized by ASTM G65:2016, was performed with stops every 10 minutes until completing 30 minutes, and in continuous test of 30 minutes, whose wear resistance was determined volumetric loss by weighing the samples. As a result, the presence of (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbide was observed in the FeTiCW, FeCrC and FeNbC coatings. The hard ternary WTiC carbides formed in the FeTiCW coating adhered and distributed in a martensitic matrix provided the highest hardness among all the coatings studied. The microstructure of the FeNbC coating was characterized by the formation of (Fe,Cr)7C3 carbides adhered to the eutectic matrix (austenite and chromium carbides) with lower hardness than that of the FeCrC coating containing only polygonal (Fe,Cr)7C3 chromium carbides, which are smaller and homogeneously distributed in the eutectic matrix. The FeMn coating showed an austenitic matrix with micropores from the welding process with the lowest hardness among the coatings studied. The results of the fixed ball wear test demonstrated that the 8N load is more severe than the test performed with 12N loads, which due to the large contact load prevents the abrasive from being transported between the sample and the ball. In the rubber wheel wear test, it was observed that the cumulative rate of volumetric loss is maintained with increasing test time, obtaining percentage deviations below 15%. However, the allowable error calculations were below 5%, showing that both tests demonstrate repeatability and reliability above 95%, evidencing that the increase in procedure B time, which is specified in 10 minutes, is ideal, and does not require an increase in test time to evaluate the coatings. In the comparative analysis of the results obtained in the micro wear and rubber wheel test, it was observed that the FeNbC coating was more wear resistant in both tests, followed by the FeCrC coating and FeTiCW coating, with the FeMn coating being the least wear resistant. For the FeMn coating, it was observed that for the fixed ball micro-wear test, increasing the test load provided improvement in wear resistance, evidencing that the mechanical maceration mechanism increases wear resistance as the coating is subjected to the work. It was concluded that higher hardness does not always determine higher wear resistance, since the FeNbC coating with the lowest hardness (569 HV) among the carbide-forming coatings was the most wear resistant, while the FeCrC coating (630 HV) showed higher wear resistance than the FeTiCW coating that has harder WTiC carbides (669 HV), which showed the lowest resistance among the coatings due to the high hardness and brittleness of the carbides, and its wear resistance was higher only than the FeMn coating (261HV).
publishDate 2021
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021-12-15
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2022-03-09T11:17:27Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2022-03-09T11:17:27Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/masterThesis
format masterThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv TEODORO, Maicon Roberto. Estudo Comparativo da Resistência ao Desgaste Abrasivo de Revestimentos Duros dos Tipos FeCrC, FeMn, FeTiCW e FeNbC. 2021. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência dos Materiais) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Sorocaba, 2021. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/15687.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/15687
identifier_str_mv TEODORO, Maicon Roberto. Estudo Comparativo da Resistência ao Desgaste Abrasivo de Revestimentos Duros dos Tipos FeCrC, FeMn, FeTiCW e FeNbC. 2021. Dissertação (Mestrado em Ciência dos Materiais) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, Sorocaba, 2021. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/15687.
url https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/15687
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv 2e0ccbe4-239e-4ea0-8af9-1795e5947e1b
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus Sorocaba
dc.publisher.program.fl_str_mv Programa de Pós-Graduação em Ciência dos Materiais - PPGCM-So
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSCar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus Sorocaba
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/dc9805dd-0596-4e95-8fc0-6e30e12b5330/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/cf4db924-8fb2-468d-9bb1-aa3aa64f2027/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/4437dbf3-57aa-4eba-9d78-08d4dd63ae59/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/92c5aeee-4bef-4917-a628-eaff8b751854/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/d7da45f6-65fc-493c-b61c-0eb448b437b1/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/2833ea4c-792f-4f35-8f20-729b92f0ce23/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/48bb5309-80d4-4f30-83e7-f8bda33ff5d4/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 1f5a49885a23304deaa597fdb4641d64
efd521b7d985202a07a5202e0bbcd8d5
e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34
f5305b26408e3450448cdbab9827528e
762cfaeabb91d7dfc06a369b8a7a8c87
c4a687227eeea3440d9f0b5bd14bae19
6d24c8ec29746404677db88bd2c2e3f9
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.sibi@ufscar.br
_version_ 1834469068565905408