Export Ready — 

Comparação entre sistemas de contenção de subsolo: parede diafragma e estacas justapostas

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Lima, Wilton de Oliveira
Publication Date: 2021
Format: Bachelor thesis
Language: por
Source: Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
Download full: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/13696
Summary: The process of choosing a soil retaining system for underground buildings is based on techniques and economics parameters. There are two very common soil retaining systems in Brazil: Diaphragm Walls and Bored Pile Walls. A bad choosing of that kind of solution can provoke, therefore, building pathology’s and waste. Thereby, the elaboration of a choosing directrix can be very helpful as a source of comparison between these two solutions based on representative technique parameters of the two methods. In this project, the most important technique parameters of the choosing a soil remaining system were studied and, more deeply, the construction processes of Diaphragm Walls and Bored Pile Walls. As result, this study led to the conclusion of a better viability for using Diaphragm Walls when water is present, but specially was observed the importance of knowing and considering all the parameters found.
id SCAR_77b034b7b8b55ea9ee7eb2f07f28e64a
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.ufscar.br:20.500.14289/13696
network_acronym_str SCAR
network_name_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
repository_id_str 4322
spelling Lima, Wilton de OliveiraAlmeida Filho, Fernando Menezes dehttp://lattes.cnpq.br/0447825383222965http://lattes.cnpq.br/8421747725686243b53df17a-45c3-4d6f-a9f8-07dd9fb809e62021-01-15T12:07:12Z2021-01-15T12:07:12Z2021-01-05LIMA, Wilton de Oliveira. Comparação entre sistemas de contenção de subsolo: parede diafragma e estacas justapostas. 2021. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Engenharia Civil) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2021. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/13696.https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/13696The process of choosing a soil retaining system for underground buildings is based on techniques and economics parameters. There are two very common soil retaining systems in Brazil: Diaphragm Walls and Bored Pile Walls. A bad choosing of that kind of solution can provoke, therefore, building pathology’s and waste. Thereby, the elaboration of a choosing directrix can be very helpful as a source of comparison between these two solutions based on representative technique parameters of the two methods. In this project, the most important technique parameters of the choosing a soil remaining system were studied and, more deeply, the construction processes of Diaphragm Walls and Bored Pile Walls. As result, this study led to the conclusion of a better viability for using Diaphragm Walls when water is present, but specially was observed the importance of knowing and considering all the parameters found.A escolha de um sistema de contenção para subsolos de edifícios é pautada sob critérios econômicos e técnicos. Entre esses sistemas de contenção estão dois muito utilizados no Brasil: parede diafragma e estacas justapostas. A escolha mal feita do sistema de contenção de subsolos pode gerar, portanto, patologias à edificação e onerosidade da obra. Desse modo, a elaboração de uma diretriz de escolha viria a calhar como um recurso de comparação entre essas duas soluções fundamentada em condicionantes técnicas representativas dos métodos. Neste projeto, foram estudados os fatores mais importantes na escolha de um sistema de contenção e, mais profundamente, os processos executivos e particularidades das estacas justapostas e das paredes diafragma. Como resultado, observou-se a melhor viabilidade na implantação das paredes diafragma quando há presença de água, porém, observou-se sobretudo a importância de se conhecer e considerar todos os condicionantes levantadosNão recebi financiamentoporUniversidade Federal de São CarlosCâmpus São CarlosEngenharia Civil - ECivUFSCarAttribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilhttp://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessParede-diafragmaEstacas justapostasContençãoDiaphragm WallsBored Pile WallsSoil retainingENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL::ESTRUTURASComparação entre sistemas de contenção de subsolo: parede diafragma e estacas justapostasComparison between underground soil retaining systems: diaphragm wall and bored pile wallsinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis60060077f25346-bc48-49b3-a3e1-bf4b0e0fab52reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCARinstname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)instacron:UFSCARORIGINALEntrega Final- TCC - Wilton.pdfEntrega Final- TCC - Wilton.pdfTexto completo do Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso.application/pdf2791463https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/4541cd81-696d-4ac8-90cd-f3363b63dc45/download6c0b84fd14199e755282404896274efeMD51trueAnonymousREADCC-LICENSElicense_rdflicense_rdfapplication/rdf+xml; charset=utf-8811https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/3907dbc8-6dce-4db7-807e-c138687a103d/downloade39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34MD52falseAnonymousREADTEXTEntrega Final- TCC - Wilton.pdf.txtEntrega Final- TCC - Wilton.pdf.txtExtracted texttext/plain101241https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/b7c391af-328f-4814-94fe-939dff14f373/download2142fcd1c6c11272d5557739bb131c35MD55falseAnonymousREADTHUMBNAILEntrega Final- TCC - Wilton.pdf.jpgEntrega Final- TCC - Wilton.pdf.jpgIM Thumbnailimage/jpeg8441https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/62410a1e-552d-417f-91e1-963608829ead/download65f43fc2e1e61ae73498c17ee73633dfMD56falseAnonymousREAD20.500.14289/136962025-02-05 18:44:34.767http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazilopen.accessoai:repositorio.ufscar.br:20.500.14289/13696https://repositorio.ufscar.brRepositório InstitucionalPUBhttps://repositorio.ufscar.br/oai/requestrepositorio.sibi@ufscar.bropendoar:43222025-02-05T21:44:34Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)false
dc.title.por.fl_str_mv Comparação entre sistemas de contenção de subsolo: parede diafragma e estacas justapostas
dc.title.alternative.por.fl_str_mv Comparison between underground soil retaining systems: diaphragm wall and bored pile walls
title Comparação entre sistemas de contenção de subsolo: parede diafragma e estacas justapostas
spellingShingle Comparação entre sistemas de contenção de subsolo: parede diafragma e estacas justapostas
Lima, Wilton de Oliveira
Parede-diafragma
Estacas justapostas
Contenção
Diaphragm Walls
Bored Pile Walls
Soil retaining
ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL::ESTRUTURAS
title_short Comparação entre sistemas de contenção de subsolo: parede diafragma e estacas justapostas
title_full Comparação entre sistemas de contenção de subsolo: parede diafragma e estacas justapostas
title_fullStr Comparação entre sistemas de contenção de subsolo: parede diafragma e estacas justapostas
title_full_unstemmed Comparação entre sistemas de contenção de subsolo: parede diafragma e estacas justapostas
title_sort Comparação entre sistemas de contenção de subsolo: parede diafragma e estacas justapostas
author Lima, Wilton de Oliveira
author_facet Lima, Wilton de Oliveira
author_role author
dc.contributor.authorlattes.por.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/8421747725686243
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Lima, Wilton de Oliveira
dc.contributor.advisor1.fl_str_mv Almeida Filho, Fernando Menezes de
dc.contributor.advisor1Lattes.fl_str_mv http://lattes.cnpq.br/0447825383222965
dc.contributor.authorID.fl_str_mv b53df17a-45c3-4d6f-a9f8-07dd9fb809e6
contributor_str_mv Almeida Filho, Fernando Menezes de
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Parede-diafragma
Estacas justapostas
Contenção
Diaphragm Walls
Bored Pile Walls
Soil retaining
topic Parede-diafragma
Estacas justapostas
Contenção
Diaphragm Walls
Bored Pile Walls
Soil retaining
ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL::ESTRUTURAS
dc.subject.cnpq.fl_str_mv ENGENHARIAS::ENGENHARIA CIVIL::ESTRUTURAS
description The process of choosing a soil retaining system for underground buildings is based on techniques and economics parameters. There are two very common soil retaining systems in Brazil: Diaphragm Walls and Bored Pile Walls. A bad choosing of that kind of solution can provoke, therefore, building pathology’s and waste. Thereby, the elaboration of a choosing directrix can be very helpful as a source of comparison between these two solutions based on representative technique parameters of the two methods. In this project, the most important technique parameters of the choosing a soil remaining system were studied and, more deeply, the construction processes of Diaphragm Walls and Bored Pile Walls. As result, this study led to the conclusion of a better viability for using Diaphragm Walls when water is present, but specially was observed the importance of knowing and considering all the parameters found.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.accessioned.fl_str_mv 2021-01-15T12:07:12Z
dc.date.available.fl_str_mv 2021-01-15T12:07:12Z
dc.date.issued.fl_str_mv 2021-01-05
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/bachelorThesis
format bachelorThesis
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.citation.fl_str_mv LIMA, Wilton de Oliveira. Comparação entre sistemas de contenção de subsolo: parede diafragma e estacas justapostas. 2021. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Engenharia Civil) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2021. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/13696.
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/13696
identifier_str_mv LIMA, Wilton de Oliveira. Comparação entre sistemas de contenção de subsolo: parede diafragma e estacas justapostas. 2021. Trabalho de Conclusão de Curso (Graduação em Engenharia Civil) – Universidade Federal de São Carlos, São Carlos, 2021. Disponível em: https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/13696.
url https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/20.500.14289/13696
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.confidence.fl_str_mv 600
600
dc.relation.authority.fl_str_mv 77f25346-bc48-49b3-a3e1-bf4b0e0fab52
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Brazil
http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/3.0/br/
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus São Carlos
Engenharia Civil - ECiv
dc.publisher.initials.fl_str_mv UFSCar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Universidade Federal de São Carlos
Câmpus São Carlos
Engenharia Civil - ECiv
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
instname:Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron:UFSCAR
instname_str Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
instacron_str UFSCAR
institution UFSCAR
reponame_str Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
collection Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR
bitstream.url.fl_str_mv https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/4541cd81-696d-4ac8-90cd-f3363b63dc45/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/3907dbc8-6dce-4db7-807e-c138687a103d/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/b7c391af-328f-4814-94fe-939dff14f373/download
https://repositorio.ufscar.br/bitstreams/62410a1e-552d-417f-91e1-963608829ead/download
bitstream.checksum.fl_str_mv 6c0b84fd14199e755282404896274efe
e39d27027a6cc9cb039ad269a5db8e34
2142fcd1c6c11272d5557739bb131c35
65f43fc2e1e61ae73498c17ee73633df
bitstream.checksumAlgorithm.fl_str_mv MD5
MD5
MD5
MD5
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositório Institucional da UFSCAR - Universidade Federal de São Carlos (UFSCAR)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv repositorio.sibi@ufscar.br
_version_ 1834469026204483584