Export Ready — 

Pure robotic retrocaval ureter repair

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Hemal,Ashok k.
Publication Date: 2008
Other Authors: Rao,Ranjit, Sharma,Sachit, Clement,Rhys G. E.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: International Braz J Urol (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000600008
Summary: PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of pure robotic retrocaval ureter repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 33 year old female presented with right loin pain and obstruction on intravenous urography with the classical "fish-hook" appearance. She was counseled on the various methods of repair and elected to have a robot assisted repair. The following steps are performed during a pure robotic retrocaval ureter repair. The patient is placed in a modified flank position, pneumoperitoneum created and ports inserted. The colon is mobilized to expose the retroperitoneal structures: inferior vena cava, right gonadal vein, right ureter, and duodenum. The renal pelvis and ureter are mobilized and the renal pelvis transected. The ureter is transposed anterior to the inferior vena cava and a pyelopyelostomy is performed over a JJ stent. RESULTS: This patient was discharged on postoperative day 3. The catheter and drain tube were removed on day 1. Her JJ stent was removed at 6 weeks postoperatively. The postoperative intravenous urography at 3 months confirmed normal drainage of contrast medium. CONCLUSION: Pure robotic retrocaval ureter is a feasible procedure; however, there does not appear to be any great advantage over pure laparoscopy, apart from the ergonomic ease for the surgeon as well the simpler intracorporeal suturing.
id SBU-1_9c500d7f446bc6843ca43f30d7dcadba
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1677-55382008000600008
network_acronym_str SBU-1
network_name_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Pure robotic retrocaval ureter repairuretervena cavaabnormalitieslaparoscopyroboticsPURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of pure robotic retrocaval ureter repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 33 year old female presented with right loin pain and obstruction on intravenous urography with the classical "fish-hook" appearance. She was counseled on the various methods of repair and elected to have a robot assisted repair. The following steps are performed during a pure robotic retrocaval ureter repair. The patient is placed in a modified flank position, pneumoperitoneum created and ports inserted. The colon is mobilized to expose the retroperitoneal structures: inferior vena cava, right gonadal vein, right ureter, and duodenum. The renal pelvis and ureter are mobilized and the renal pelvis transected. The ureter is transposed anterior to the inferior vena cava and a pyelopyelostomy is performed over a JJ stent. RESULTS: This patient was discharged on postoperative day 3. The catheter and drain tube were removed on day 1. Her JJ stent was removed at 6 weeks postoperatively. The postoperative intravenous urography at 3 months confirmed normal drainage of contrast medium. CONCLUSION: Pure robotic retrocaval ureter is a feasible procedure; however, there does not appear to be any great advantage over pure laparoscopy, apart from the ergonomic ease for the surgeon as well the simpler intracorporeal suturing.Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia2008-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000600008International braz j urol v.34 n.6 2008reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)instacron:SBU10.1590/S1677-55382008000600008info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessHemal,Ashok k.Rao,RanjitSharma,SachitClement,Rhys G. E.eng2009-02-04T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1677-55382008000600008Revistahttp://www.brazjurol.com.br/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br1677-61191677-5538opendoar:2009-02-04T00:00International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Pure robotic retrocaval ureter repair
title Pure robotic retrocaval ureter repair
spellingShingle Pure robotic retrocaval ureter repair
Hemal,Ashok k.
ureter
vena cava
abnormalities
laparoscopy
robotics
title_short Pure robotic retrocaval ureter repair
title_full Pure robotic retrocaval ureter repair
title_fullStr Pure robotic retrocaval ureter repair
title_full_unstemmed Pure robotic retrocaval ureter repair
title_sort Pure robotic retrocaval ureter repair
author Hemal,Ashok k.
author_facet Hemal,Ashok k.
Rao,Ranjit
Sharma,Sachit
Clement,Rhys G. E.
author_role author
author2 Rao,Ranjit
Sharma,Sachit
Clement,Rhys G. E.
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Hemal,Ashok k.
Rao,Ranjit
Sharma,Sachit
Clement,Rhys G. E.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv ureter
vena cava
abnormalities
laparoscopy
robotics
topic ureter
vena cava
abnormalities
laparoscopy
robotics
description PURPOSE: To demonstrate the feasibility of pure robotic retrocaval ureter repair. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 33 year old female presented with right loin pain and obstruction on intravenous urography with the classical "fish-hook" appearance. She was counseled on the various methods of repair and elected to have a robot assisted repair. The following steps are performed during a pure robotic retrocaval ureter repair. The patient is placed in a modified flank position, pneumoperitoneum created and ports inserted. The colon is mobilized to expose the retroperitoneal structures: inferior vena cava, right gonadal vein, right ureter, and duodenum. The renal pelvis and ureter are mobilized and the renal pelvis transected. The ureter is transposed anterior to the inferior vena cava and a pyelopyelostomy is performed over a JJ stent. RESULTS: This patient was discharged on postoperative day 3. The catheter and drain tube were removed on day 1. Her JJ stent was removed at 6 weeks postoperatively. The postoperative intravenous urography at 3 months confirmed normal drainage of contrast medium. CONCLUSION: Pure robotic retrocaval ureter is a feasible procedure; however, there does not appear to be any great advantage over pure laparoscopy, apart from the ergonomic ease for the surgeon as well the simpler intracorporeal suturing.
publishDate 2008
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2008-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000600008
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1677-55382008000600008
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/S1677-55382008000600008
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv International braz j urol v.34 n.6 2008
reponame:International Braz J Urol (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron:SBU
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
instacron_str SBU
institution SBU
reponame_str International Braz J Urol (Online)
collection International Braz J Urol (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv International Braz J Urol (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Urologia (SBU)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||brazjurol@brazjurol.com.br
_version_ 1750318070929293312