Export Ready — 

Estimation methods of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for Uberlândia -MG

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: LACERDA,ZILDA C. DE
Publication Date: 2015
Other Authors: TURCO,JOSÉ E. P.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Engenharia Agrícola
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162015000100027
Summary: One approach to verify the adequacy of estimation methods of reference evapotranspiration is the comparison with the Penman-Monteith method, recommended by the United Nations of Food and Agriculture Organization - FAO, as the standard method for estimating ET0. This study aimed to compare methods for estimating ET0, Makkink (MK), Hargreaves (HG) and Solar Radiation (RS), with Penman-Monteith (PM). For this purpose, we used daily data of global solar radiation, air temperature, relative humidity and wind speed for the year 2010, obtained through the automatic meteorological station, with latitude 18° 91' 66" S, longitude 48° 25' 05" W and altitude of 869m, at the National Institute of Meteorology situated in the Campus of Federal University of Uberlandia - MG, Brazil. Analysis of results for the period were carried out in daily basis, using regression analysis and considering the linear model y = ax, where the dependent variable was the method of Penman-Monteith and the independent, the estimation of ET0 by evaluated methods. Methodology was used to check the influence of standard deviation of daily ET0 in comparison of methods. The evaluation indicated that methods of Solar Radiation and Penman-Monteith cannot be compared, yet the method of Hargreaves indicates the most efficient adjustment to estimate ETo.
id SBEA-1_a384b494319fc7a3cb3cc57c43062a33
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0100-69162015000100027
network_acronym_str SBEA-1
network_name_str Engenharia Agrícola
repository_id_str
spelling Estimation methods of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for Uberlândia -MGpenman-monteithhargreavesmakkinksolar radiationOne approach to verify the adequacy of estimation methods of reference evapotranspiration is the comparison with the Penman-Monteith method, recommended by the United Nations of Food and Agriculture Organization - FAO, as the standard method for estimating ET0. This study aimed to compare methods for estimating ET0, Makkink (MK), Hargreaves (HG) and Solar Radiation (RS), with Penman-Monteith (PM). For this purpose, we used daily data of global solar radiation, air temperature, relative humidity and wind speed for the year 2010, obtained through the automatic meteorological station, with latitude 18° 91' 66" S, longitude 48° 25' 05" W and altitude of 869m, at the National Institute of Meteorology situated in the Campus of Federal University of Uberlandia - MG, Brazil. Analysis of results for the period were carried out in daily basis, using regression analysis and considering the linear model y = ax, where the dependent variable was the method of Penman-Monteith and the independent, the estimation of ET0 by evaluated methods. Methodology was used to check the influence of standard deviation of daily ET0 in comparison of methods. The evaluation indicated that methods of Solar Radiation and Penman-Monteith cannot be compared, yet the method of Hargreaves indicates the most efficient adjustment to estimate ETo.Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola2015-02-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162015000100027Engenharia Agrícola v.35 n.1 2015reponame:Engenharia Agrícolainstname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)instacron:SBEA10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v35n1p27-38/2015info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLACERDA,ZILDA C. DETURCO,JOSÉ E. P.eng2016-07-13T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0100-69162015000100027Revistahttp://www.engenhariaagricola.org.br/ORGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phprevistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br1809-44300100-6916opendoar:2016-07-13T00:00Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Estimation methods of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for Uberlândia -MG
title Estimation methods of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for Uberlândia -MG
spellingShingle Estimation methods of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for Uberlândia -MG
LACERDA,ZILDA C. DE
penman-monteith
hargreaves
makkink
solar radiation
title_short Estimation methods of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for Uberlândia -MG
title_full Estimation methods of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for Uberlândia -MG
title_fullStr Estimation methods of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for Uberlândia -MG
title_full_unstemmed Estimation methods of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for Uberlândia -MG
title_sort Estimation methods of reference evapotranspiration (ETo) for Uberlândia -MG
author LACERDA,ZILDA C. DE
author_facet LACERDA,ZILDA C. DE
TURCO,JOSÉ E. P.
author_role author
author2 TURCO,JOSÉ E. P.
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv LACERDA,ZILDA C. DE
TURCO,JOSÉ E. P.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv penman-monteith
hargreaves
makkink
solar radiation
topic penman-monteith
hargreaves
makkink
solar radiation
description One approach to verify the adequacy of estimation methods of reference evapotranspiration is the comparison with the Penman-Monteith method, recommended by the United Nations of Food and Agriculture Organization - FAO, as the standard method for estimating ET0. This study aimed to compare methods for estimating ET0, Makkink (MK), Hargreaves (HG) and Solar Radiation (RS), with Penman-Monteith (PM). For this purpose, we used daily data of global solar radiation, air temperature, relative humidity and wind speed for the year 2010, obtained through the automatic meteorological station, with latitude 18° 91' 66" S, longitude 48° 25' 05" W and altitude of 869m, at the National Institute of Meteorology situated in the Campus of Federal University of Uberlandia - MG, Brazil. Analysis of results for the period were carried out in daily basis, using regression analysis and considering the linear model y = ax, where the dependent variable was the method of Penman-Monteith and the independent, the estimation of ET0 by evaluated methods. Methodology was used to check the influence of standard deviation of daily ET0 in comparison of methods. The evaluation indicated that methods of Solar Radiation and Penman-Monteith cannot be compared, yet the method of Hargreaves indicates the most efficient adjustment to estimate ETo.
publishDate 2015
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2015-02-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162015000100027
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0100-69162015000100027
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/1809-4430-Eng.Agric.v35n1p27-38/2015
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola v.35 n.1 2015
reponame:Engenharia Agrícola
instname:Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
instacron:SBEA
instname_str Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
instacron_str SBEA
institution SBEA
reponame_str Engenharia Agrícola
collection Engenharia Agrícola
repository.name.fl_str_mv Engenharia Agrícola - Associação Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola (SBEA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv revistasbea@sbea.org.br||sbea@sbea.org.br
_version_ 1752126272021987328