275 million migraine sufferers without preventive treatment worldwide: distribution among gbd superregions: English
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2024 |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Revista Headache Medicine (Online) |
Download full: | https://headachemedicine.com.br/index.php/hm/article/view/1286 |
Summary: | Background Migraine is a prevalent neurological disease impacting around one billion people globally. According to the Global Burden of Diseases 2021, it is the third leading cause of disability among central nervous system disorders. Despite its significant impact, there are substantial gaps in the optimal management of preventive migraine therapy within global health systems. Objective The objective of this study was to review the patterns of access to healthcare treatment for preventive migraine medication among individuals diagnosed with migraine in various GBD regions. Methods A search of PubMed for articles published between January 1, 2000, and June 25, 2024, was conducted. Studies included those that reported on healthcare resource utilization, treatment access, unmet needs, and undertreatment of migraines. The American Headache Society (AHS) 2021 Consensus Statement algorithm was used to determine candidacy for preventive treatment. Results Out of 587 publications retrieved, 80 met the inclusion criteria. These included 56 from High-Income regions, 14 from South-East Asia, East Asia, and Oceania, 4 from Central Europe, Eastern Europe & Central Asia, 2 from Sub-Saharan Africa, 1 from Latin America & Caribbean, 1 from South Asia, and 2 from North Africa & Middle East. The prevalence of preventive treatment in the migraine population ranged from 0% in Nigeria to 36.2% in Japan, with a global 1-year-age adjusted prevalence of 17.8%. Based on the AHS consensus statement algorithm, approximately 38.7% of the global migraine population would qualify for preventive treatment. However, around 79.8% of these candidates are not receiving preventive treatment, equating to approximately 275 million people globally. Conclusions There are significant gaps and a lack of recent information in the literature regarding the preventive treatment of migraines. More recent, population-based studies are necessary to assess the recognition of migraine preventive candidates and those undergoing preventive treatment, to inform better public health strategies for migraine diagnosis and treatment. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. |
id |
SBC_a1b6b13173f25cb41c4f742d108b8ecd |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1286 |
network_acronym_str |
SBC |
network_name_str |
Revista Headache Medicine (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
275 million migraine sufferers without preventive treatment worldwide: distribution among gbd superregions: EnglishEnglish English: EnglishmigrainePreventive treatmentBackground Migraine is a prevalent neurological disease impacting around one billion people globally. According to the Global Burden of Diseases 2021, it is the third leading cause of disability among central nervous system disorders. Despite its significant impact, there are substantial gaps in the optimal management of preventive migraine therapy within global health systems. Objective The objective of this study was to review the patterns of access to healthcare treatment for preventive migraine medication among individuals diagnosed with migraine in various GBD regions. Methods A search of PubMed for articles published between January 1, 2000, and June 25, 2024, was conducted. Studies included those that reported on healthcare resource utilization, treatment access, unmet needs, and undertreatment of migraines. The American Headache Society (AHS) 2021 Consensus Statement algorithm was used to determine candidacy for preventive treatment. Results Out of 587 publications retrieved, 80 met the inclusion criteria. These included 56 from High-Income regions, 14 from South-East Asia, East Asia, and Oceania, 4 from Central Europe, Eastern Europe & Central Asia, 2 from Sub-Saharan Africa, 1 from Latin America & Caribbean, 1 from South Asia, and 2 from North Africa & Middle East. The prevalence of preventive treatment in the migraine population ranged from 0% in Nigeria to 36.2% in Japan, with a global 1-year-age adjusted prevalence of 17.8%. Based on the AHS consensus statement algorithm, approximately 38.7% of the global migraine population would qualify for preventive treatment. However, around 79.8% of these candidates are not receiving preventive treatment, equating to approximately 275 million people globally. Conclusions There are significant gaps and a lack of recent information in the literature regarding the preventive treatment of migraines. More recent, population-based studies are necessary to assess the recognition of migraine preventive candidates and those undergoing preventive treatment, to inform better public health strategies for migraine diagnosis and treatment. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.Sociedade Brasileira de Cefaleia2024-08-15info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://headachemedicine.com.br/index.php/hm/article/view/1286Headache Medicine; Volume 15 - Supplement (2024): Abstracts from the Congresso Cefaleia 2024; 143Headache Medicine; Volume 15 - Suplemento (2024): Resumos do Congresso Cefaleia 2024; 1432763-6178reponame:Revista Headache Medicine (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cefaleiainstacron:SBCenghttps://headachemedicine.com.br/index.php/hm/article/view/1286/1815Copyright (c) 2024 Ivy Liger, Mario Peres (Author)https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.ptinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLiger, IvyPeres, Mario2024-10-01T01:01:09Zoai:ojs.pkp.sfu.ca:article/1286Revistahttp://headachemedicine.com.brPRIhttps://headachemedicine.com.br/index.php/hm/oaimmvalenca@yahoo.com.br | support@headachemedicine.com.br2763-61782178-7468opendoar:2024-10-01T01:01:09Revista Headache Medicine (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cefaleiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
275 million migraine sufferers without preventive treatment worldwide: distribution among gbd superregions: English English English: English |
title |
275 million migraine sufferers without preventive treatment worldwide: distribution among gbd superregions: English |
spellingShingle |
275 million migraine sufferers without preventive treatment worldwide: distribution among gbd superregions: English Liger, Ivy migraine Preventive treatment |
title_short |
275 million migraine sufferers without preventive treatment worldwide: distribution among gbd superregions: English |
title_full |
275 million migraine sufferers without preventive treatment worldwide: distribution among gbd superregions: English |
title_fullStr |
275 million migraine sufferers without preventive treatment worldwide: distribution among gbd superregions: English |
title_full_unstemmed |
275 million migraine sufferers without preventive treatment worldwide: distribution among gbd superregions: English |
title_sort |
275 million migraine sufferers without preventive treatment worldwide: distribution among gbd superregions: English |
author |
Liger, Ivy |
author_facet |
Liger, Ivy Peres, Mario |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Peres, Mario |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Liger, Ivy Peres, Mario |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
migraine Preventive treatment |
topic |
migraine Preventive treatment |
description |
Background Migraine is a prevalent neurological disease impacting around one billion people globally. According to the Global Burden of Diseases 2021, it is the third leading cause of disability among central nervous system disorders. Despite its significant impact, there are substantial gaps in the optimal management of preventive migraine therapy within global health systems. Objective The objective of this study was to review the patterns of access to healthcare treatment for preventive migraine medication among individuals diagnosed with migraine in various GBD regions. Methods A search of PubMed for articles published between January 1, 2000, and June 25, 2024, was conducted. Studies included those that reported on healthcare resource utilization, treatment access, unmet needs, and undertreatment of migraines. The American Headache Society (AHS) 2021 Consensus Statement algorithm was used to determine candidacy for preventive treatment. Results Out of 587 publications retrieved, 80 met the inclusion criteria. These included 56 from High-Income regions, 14 from South-East Asia, East Asia, and Oceania, 4 from Central Europe, Eastern Europe & Central Asia, 2 from Sub-Saharan Africa, 1 from Latin America & Caribbean, 1 from South Asia, and 2 from North Africa & Middle East. The prevalence of preventive treatment in the migraine population ranged from 0% in Nigeria to 36.2% in Japan, with a global 1-year-age adjusted prevalence of 17.8%. Based on the AHS consensus statement algorithm, approximately 38.7% of the global migraine population would qualify for preventive treatment. However, around 79.8% of these candidates are not receiving preventive treatment, equating to approximately 275 million people globally. Conclusions There are significant gaps and a lack of recent information in the literature regarding the preventive treatment of migraines. More recent, population-based studies are necessary to assess the recognition of migraine preventive candidates and those undergoing preventive treatment, to inform better public health strategies for migraine diagnosis and treatment. This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024-08-15 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://headachemedicine.com.br/index.php/hm/article/view/1286 |
url |
https://headachemedicine.com.br/index.php/hm/article/view/1286 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://headachemedicine.com.br/index.php/hm/article/view/1286/1815 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Ivy Liger, Mario Peres (Author) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2024 Ivy Liger, Mario Peres (Author) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/deed.pt |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cefaleia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cefaleia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Headache Medicine; Volume 15 - Supplement (2024): Abstracts from the Congresso Cefaleia 2024; 143 Headache Medicine; Volume 15 - Suplemento (2024): Resumos do Congresso Cefaleia 2024; 143 2763-6178 reponame:Revista Headache Medicine (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cefaleia instacron:SBC |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Cefaleia |
instacron_str |
SBC |
institution |
SBC |
reponame_str |
Revista Headache Medicine (Online) |
collection |
Revista Headache Medicine (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Headache Medicine (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cefaleia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
mmvalenca@yahoo.com.br | support@headachemedicine.com.br |
_version_ |
1838629562918895616 |