Export Ready — 

Prognosis in colorectal cancer beyond TNM

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Neves,Ana Lídia Ferreira
Publication Date: 2020
Other Authors: Barbosa,Laura Elisabete Ribeiro, Teixeira,João Paulo Meireles de Araújo
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632020000400404
Summary: ABSTRACT Introduction: Colorectal cancer is one of the neoplasms with the greatest social impact. Given the great molecular heterogeneity and diversity of pathophysiological mechanisms, it is difficult to define prognostic factors that could guide therapy. Objectives: To identify the molecular prognostic factors that may be of interest in clinical practice and to synthesize the existing evidence. Material and methods: The search for the articles was carried out using the PubMed platform and the keywords “sporadic colorectal cancer and prognosis”, for articles published between 2014 and 2019. We selected all articles published on studies in humans and written in English or Portuguese. Of the 215 articles found, 35 articles were selected to perform this review. Results: Current evidence supports the use of four molecular markers in clinical practice − KRAS, NRAS and BRAF (EGFR signalling pathway) and the mismatch repair status. Conclusion: The use of molecular biomarkers in clinical practice to define prognosis is still little supported by the existent evidence. The studies are slightly contradictory, so new projects and international collaborations must be carried out in this area to obtain more robust evidence.
id SBCP-1_18968c8218b3a397a8562f35eea751e3
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S2237-93632020000400404
network_acronym_str SBCP-1
network_name_str Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Prognosis in colorectal cancer beyond TNMColorectal cancerPrognosisMicrosatellite instabilityChromosomal instabilityBiomarkersABSTRACT Introduction: Colorectal cancer is one of the neoplasms with the greatest social impact. Given the great molecular heterogeneity and diversity of pathophysiological mechanisms, it is difficult to define prognostic factors that could guide therapy. Objectives: To identify the molecular prognostic factors that may be of interest in clinical practice and to synthesize the existing evidence. Material and methods: The search for the articles was carried out using the PubMed platform and the keywords “sporadic colorectal cancer and prognosis”, for articles published between 2014 and 2019. We selected all articles published on studies in humans and written in English or Portuguese. Of the 215 articles found, 35 articles were selected to perform this review. Results: Current evidence supports the use of four molecular markers in clinical practice − KRAS, NRAS and BRAF (EGFR signalling pathway) and the mismatch repair status. Conclusion: The use of molecular biomarkers in clinical practice to define prognosis is still little supported by the existent evidence. The studies are slightly contradictory, so new projects and international collaborations must be carried out in this area to obtain more robust evidence.Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia2020-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632020000400404Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.40 n.4 2020reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)instacron:SBCP10.1016/j.jcol.2020.06.010info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessNeves,Ana Lídia FerreiraBarbosa,Laura Elisabete RibeiroTeixeira,João Paulo Meireles de Araújoeng2020-12-03T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S2237-93632020000400404Revistahttp://www.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_serial&pid=2237-9363&lng=pt&nrm=isohttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sbcp@sbcp.org.br2317-64232237-9363opendoar:2020-12-03T00:00Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Prognosis in colorectal cancer beyond TNM
title Prognosis in colorectal cancer beyond TNM
spellingShingle Prognosis in colorectal cancer beyond TNM
Neves,Ana Lídia Ferreira
Colorectal cancer
Prognosis
Microsatellite instability
Chromosomal instability
Biomarkers
title_short Prognosis in colorectal cancer beyond TNM
title_full Prognosis in colorectal cancer beyond TNM
title_fullStr Prognosis in colorectal cancer beyond TNM
title_full_unstemmed Prognosis in colorectal cancer beyond TNM
title_sort Prognosis in colorectal cancer beyond TNM
author Neves,Ana Lídia Ferreira
author_facet Neves,Ana Lídia Ferreira
Barbosa,Laura Elisabete Ribeiro
Teixeira,João Paulo Meireles de Araújo
author_role author
author2 Barbosa,Laura Elisabete Ribeiro
Teixeira,João Paulo Meireles de Araújo
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Neves,Ana Lídia Ferreira
Barbosa,Laura Elisabete Ribeiro
Teixeira,João Paulo Meireles de Araújo
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Colorectal cancer
Prognosis
Microsatellite instability
Chromosomal instability
Biomarkers
topic Colorectal cancer
Prognosis
Microsatellite instability
Chromosomal instability
Biomarkers
description ABSTRACT Introduction: Colorectal cancer is one of the neoplasms with the greatest social impact. Given the great molecular heterogeneity and diversity of pathophysiological mechanisms, it is difficult to define prognostic factors that could guide therapy. Objectives: To identify the molecular prognostic factors that may be of interest in clinical practice and to synthesize the existing evidence. Material and methods: The search for the articles was carried out using the PubMed platform and the keywords “sporadic colorectal cancer and prognosis”, for articles published between 2014 and 2019. We selected all articles published on studies in humans and written in English or Portuguese. Of the 215 articles found, 35 articles were selected to perform this review. Results: Current evidence supports the use of four molecular markers in clinical practice − KRAS, NRAS and BRAF (EGFR signalling pathway) and the mismatch repair status. Conclusion: The use of molecular biomarkers in clinical practice to define prognosis is still little supported by the existent evidence. The studies are slightly contradictory, so new projects and international collaborations must be carried out in this area to obtain more robust evidence.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632020000400404
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S2237-93632020000400404
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.jcol.2020.06.010
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro) v.40 n.4 2020
reponame:Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
instacron:SBCP
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
instacron_str SBCP
institution SBCP
reponame_str Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
collection Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Journal of Coloproctology (Rio de Janeiro. Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Coloproctologia (SBCP)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sbcp@sbcp.org.br
_version_ 1752126479131475968