RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERL
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2017 |
Other Authors: | , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Coluna/Columna |
Download full: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512017000100056 |
Summary: | ABSTRACT Objective: To test the reliability of the new AO/2013 classification compared with AO/Magerl and TLICS. Methods: Four spine surgeons retrospectively and blindly evaluated imaging and clinical data from 98 patients with thoracolumbar fractures. Results: Using the Kappa coefficient, we obtained the best reproducibility for the AO/2013 classification compared to the other two, represented by Kappa coefficient of 0.690. We could also obtain, with good reproducibility among the evaluators (Kappa 0.690), the most common subtypes of AO/2013 classification with indication for surgery. Conclusion: We believe that the new AO/2013 classification has proven to be a good communication tool among spine surgeons with good reproducibility, but more studies should be conducted in several centers in order to be consolidated and so that the prognosis between the types of injury is better understood. |
id |
SBCO-1_2131ecff1d8c90cbec0eea38f63a9fbf |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S1808-18512017000100056 |
network_acronym_str |
SBCO-1 |
network_name_str |
Coluna/Columna |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERLSpinal fracturesSpineLumbar vertebraeThoracic vertebraeClassificationABSTRACT Objective: To test the reliability of the new AO/2013 classification compared with AO/Magerl and TLICS. Methods: Four spine surgeons retrospectively and blindly evaluated imaging and clinical data from 98 patients with thoracolumbar fractures. Results: Using the Kappa coefficient, we obtained the best reproducibility for the AO/2013 classification compared to the other two, represented by Kappa coefficient of 0.690. We could also obtain, with good reproducibility among the evaluators (Kappa 0.690), the most common subtypes of AO/2013 classification with indication for surgery. Conclusion: We believe that the new AO/2013 classification has proven to be a good communication tool among spine surgeons with good reproducibility, but more studies should be conducted in several centers in order to be consolidated and so that the prognosis between the types of injury is better understood.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512017000100056Coluna/Columna v.16 n.1 2017reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/s1808-185120171601162779info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMARQUES,CARLOS AUGUSTO COSTAGRAELLS,XAVIER SOLERKULCHESKI,ALYNSON LAROCCAMEURER,GUSTAVOBENATO,MARCELSANTORO,PEDRO GREINeng2017-04-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512017000100056Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2017-04-11T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERL |
title |
RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERL |
spellingShingle |
RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERL MARQUES,CARLOS AUGUSTO COSTA Spinal fractures Spine Lumbar vertebrae Thoracic vertebrae Classification |
title_short |
RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERL |
title_full |
RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERL |
title_fullStr |
RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERL |
title_full_unstemmed |
RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERL |
title_sort |
RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERL |
author |
MARQUES,CARLOS AUGUSTO COSTA |
author_facet |
MARQUES,CARLOS AUGUSTO COSTA GRAELLS,XAVIER SOLER KULCHESKI,ALYNSON LAROCCA MEURER,GUSTAVO BENATO,MARCEL SANTORO,PEDRO GREIN |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
GRAELLS,XAVIER SOLER KULCHESKI,ALYNSON LAROCCA MEURER,GUSTAVO BENATO,MARCEL SANTORO,PEDRO GREIN |
author2_role |
author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
MARQUES,CARLOS AUGUSTO COSTA GRAELLS,XAVIER SOLER KULCHESKI,ALYNSON LAROCCA MEURER,GUSTAVO BENATO,MARCEL SANTORO,PEDRO GREIN |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Spinal fractures Spine Lumbar vertebrae Thoracic vertebrae Classification |
topic |
Spinal fractures Spine Lumbar vertebrae Thoracic vertebrae Classification |
description |
ABSTRACT Objective: To test the reliability of the new AO/2013 classification compared with AO/Magerl and TLICS. Methods: Four spine surgeons retrospectively and blindly evaluated imaging and clinical data from 98 patients with thoracolumbar fractures. Results: Using the Kappa coefficient, we obtained the best reproducibility for the AO/2013 classification compared to the other two, represented by Kappa coefficient of 0.690. We could also obtain, with good reproducibility among the evaluators (Kappa 0.690), the most common subtypes of AO/2013 classification with indication for surgery. Conclusion: We believe that the new AO/2013 classification has proven to be a good communication tool among spine surgeons with good reproducibility, but more studies should be conducted in several centers in order to be consolidated and so that the prognosis between the types of injury is better understood. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-01-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512017000100056 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512017000100056 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/s1808-185120171601162779 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Coluna/Columna v.16 n.1 2017 reponame:Coluna/Columna instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO) instacron:SBCO |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO) |
instacron_str |
SBCO |
institution |
SBCO |
reponame_str |
Coluna/Columna |
collection |
Coluna/Columna |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126615512416256 |