Export Ready — 

RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERL

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: MARQUES,CARLOS AUGUSTO COSTA
Publication Date: 2017
Other Authors: GRAELLS,XAVIER SOLER, KULCHESKI,ALYNSON LAROCCA, MEURER,GUSTAVO, BENATO,MARCEL, SANTORO,PEDRO GREIN
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Coluna/Columna
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512017000100056
Summary: ABSTRACT Objective: To test the reliability of the new AO/2013 classification compared with AO/Magerl and TLICS. Methods: Four spine surgeons retrospectively and blindly evaluated imaging and clinical data from 98 patients with thoracolumbar fractures. Results: Using the Kappa coefficient, we obtained the best reproducibility for the AO/2013 classification compared to the other two, represented by Kappa coefficient of 0.690. We could also obtain, with good reproducibility among the evaluators (Kappa 0.690), the most common subtypes of AO/2013 classification with indication for surgery. Conclusion: We believe that the new AO/2013 classification has proven to be a good communication tool among spine surgeons with good reproducibility, but more studies should be conducted in several centers in order to be consolidated and so that the prognosis between the types of injury is better understood.
id SBCO-1_2131ecff1d8c90cbec0eea38f63a9fbf
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S1808-18512017000100056
network_acronym_str SBCO-1
network_name_str Coluna/Columna
repository_id_str
spelling RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERLSpinal fracturesSpineLumbar vertebraeThoracic vertebraeClassificationABSTRACT Objective: To test the reliability of the new AO/2013 classification compared with AO/Magerl and TLICS. Methods: Four spine surgeons retrospectively and blindly evaluated imaging and clinical data from 98 patients with thoracolumbar fractures. Results: Using the Kappa coefficient, we obtained the best reproducibility for the AO/2013 classification compared to the other two, represented by Kappa coefficient of 0.690. We could also obtain, with good reproducibility among the evaluators (Kappa 0.690), the most common subtypes of AO/2013 classification with indication for surgery. Conclusion: We believe that the new AO/2013 classification has proven to be a good communication tool among spine surgeons with good reproducibility, but more studies should be conducted in several centers in order to be consolidated and so that the prognosis between the types of injury is better understood.Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna2017-01-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512017000100056Coluna/Columna v.16 n.1 2017reponame:Coluna/Columnainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)instacron:SBCO10.1590/s1808-185120171601162779info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessMARQUES,CARLOS AUGUSTO COSTAGRAELLS,XAVIER SOLERKULCHESKI,ALYNSON LAROCCAMEURER,GUSTAVOBENATO,MARCELSANTORO,PEDRO GREINeng2017-04-11T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S1808-18512017000100056Revistahttps://www.revistacoluna.org/ONGhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.phpcoluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br2177-014X1808-1851opendoar:2017-04-11T00:00Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERL
title RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERL
spellingShingle RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERL
MARQUES,CARLOS AUGUSTO COSTA
Spinal fractures
Spine
Lumbar vertebrae
Thoracic vertebrae
Classification
title_short RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERL
title_full RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERL
title_fullStr RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERL
title_full_unstemmed RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERL
title_sort RELIABILITY OF THE AO CLASSIFICATION OF THORACOLUMBAR FRACTURES COMPARED TO TLICS AND MAGERL
author MARQUES,CARLOS AUGUSTO COSTA
author_facet MARQUES,CARLOS AUGUSTO COSTA
GRAELLS,XAVIER SOLER
KULCHESKI,ALYNSON LAROCCA
MEURER,GUSTAVO
BENATO,MARCEL
SANTORO,PEDRO GREIN
author_role author
author2 GRAELLS,XAVIER SOLER
KULCHESKI,ALYNSON LAROCCA
MEURER,GUSTAVO
BENATO,MARCEL
SANTORO,PEDRO GREIN
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv MARQUES,CARLOS AUGUSTO COSTA
GRAELLS,XAVIER SOLER
KULCHESKI,ALYNSON LAROCCA
MEURER,GUSTAVO
BENATO,MARCEL
SANTORO,PEDRO GREIN
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Spinal fractures
Spine
Lumbar vertebrae
Thoracic vertebrae
Classification
topic Spinal fractures
Spine
Lumbar vertebrae
Thoracic vertebrae
Classification
description ABSTRACT Objective: To test the reliability of the new AO/2013 classification compared with AO/Magerl and TLICS. Methods: Four spine surgeons retrospectively and blindly evaluated imaging and clinical data from 98 patients with thoracolumbar fractures. Results: Using the Kappa coefficient, we obtained the best reproducibility for the AO/2013 classification compared to the other two, represented by Kappa coefficient of 0.690. We could also obtain, with good reproducibility among the evaluators (Kappa 0.690), the most common subtypes of AO/2013 classification with indication for surgery. Conclusion: We believe that the new AO/2013 classification has proven to be a good communication tool among spine surgeons with good reproducibility, but more studies should be conducted in several centers in order to be consolidated and so that the prognosis between the types of injury is better understood.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-01-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512017000100056
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S1808-18512017000100056
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1590/s1808-185120171601162779
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna v.16 n.1 2017
reponame:Coluna/Columna
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron:SBCO
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
instacron_str SBCO
institution SBCO
reponame_str Coluna/Columna
collection Coluna/Columna
repository.name.fl_str_mv Coluna/Columna - Sociedade Brasileira de Coluna (SBCO)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv coluna.columna@uol.com.br||revistacoluna@uol.com.br
_version_ 1752126615512416256