Export Ready — 

Hydrodynamic Evaluations of Four Mock Femoral Venous Cannulas

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Şahin,Türker
Publication Date: 2018
Other Authors: Tezer,Murat, Cerit,Levent
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382018000500435
Summary: Abstract Objective: To report the results of four mock femoral venous cannulas and the hydrodynamical superiority of one of them, which is the completely punched (CP) model, upon the other three. Methods: Four simulated femoral venous cannulas (single-stage, two-stage, multi-stage, and CP model) were designed from a 1/4” x 1/16” x 68 cm polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubing line for testing. Holes on the PVC tubes were opened by a 5 mm aortic punch. In order to evaluate the cannulas' drainage performance, gelofusine was used as fluid. The fluid was drained for 60 seconds by gravitation and then measured for each model separately. Results: Mean drained volumes of single-stage, two-stage, and multi-stage cannulas were 2.483, 2.561, and 2.603 mL, respectively. However, the CP cannula provided us a mean drained volume of 2.988 mL. There were significant differences among the variables of the CP cannula and the other three mock cannulas concerning the drained fluid flow (P<0.01). Conclusion: In our study, the measured mean volumes showed us that more drainage surface area provides better fluid drainage.
id SBCCV-1_6b8790f6af7e86b32fc6d87f22c00a86
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-76382018000500435
network_acronym_str SBCCV-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Hydrodynamic Evaluations of Four Mock Femoral Venous CannulasCardiopulmonary BypassExtracorporeal CirculationBlood Flow VelocityAbstract Objective: To report the results of four mock femoral venous cannulas and the hydrodynamical superiority of one of them, which is the completely punched (CP) model, upon the other three. Methods: Four simulated femoral venous cannulas (single-stage, two-stage, multi-stage, and CP model) were designed from a 1/4” x 1/16” x 68 cm polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubing line for testing. Holes on the PVC tubes were opened by a 5 mm aortic punch. In order to evaluate the cannulas' drainage performance, gelofusine was used as fluid. The fluid was drained for 60 seconds by gravitation and then measured for each model separately. Results: Mean drained volumes of single-stage, two-stage, and multi-stage cannulas were 2.483, 2.561, and 2.603 mL, respectively. However, the CP cannula provided us a mean drained volume of 2.988 mL. There were significant differences among the variables of the CP cannula and the other three mock cannulas concerning the drained fluid flow (P<0.01). Conclusion: In our study, the measured mean volumes showed us that more drainage surface area provides better fluid drainage.Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular2018-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382018000500435Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.33 n.5 2018reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)instacron:SBCCV10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0036info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessŞahin,TürkerTezer,MuratCerit,Leventeng2019-02-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-76382018000500435Revistahttp://www.rbccv.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br1678-97410102-7638opendoar:2019-02-21T00:00Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Hydrodynamic Evaluations of Four Mock Femoral Venous Cannulas
title Hydrodynamic Evaluations of Four Mock Femoral Venous Cannulas
spellingShingle Hydrodynamic Evaluations of Four Mock Femoral Venous Cannulas
Şahin,Türker
Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Extracorporeal Circulation
Blood Flow Velocity
title_short Hydrodynamic Evaluations of Four Mock Femoral Venous Cannulas
title_full Hydrodynamic Evaluations of Four Mock Femoral Venous Cannulas
title_fullStr Hydrodynamic Evaluations of Four Mock Femoral Venous Cannulas
title_full_unstemmed Hydrodynamic Evaluations of Four Mock Femoral Venous Cannulas
title_sort Hydrodynamic Evaluations of Four Mock Femoral Venous Cannulas
author Şahin,Türker
author_facet Şahin,Türker
Tezer,Murat
Cerit,Levent
author_role author
author2 Tezer,Murat
Cerit,Levent
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Şahin,Türker
Tezer,Murat
Cerit,Levent
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Extracorporeal Circulation
Blood Flow Velocity
topic Cardiopulmonary Bypass
Extracorporeal Circulation
Blood Flow Velocity
description Abstract Objective: To report the results of four mock femoral venous cannulas and the hydrodynamical superiority of one of them, which is the completely punched (CP) model, upon the other three. Methods: Four simulated femoral venous cannulas (single-stage, two-stage, multi-stage, and CP model) were designed from a 1/4” x 1/16” x 68 cm polyvinyl chloride (PVC) tubing line for testing. Holes on the PVC tubes were opened by a 5 mm aortic punch. In order to evaluate the cannulas' drainage performance, gelofusine was used as fluid. The fluid was drained for 60 seconds by gravitation and then measured for each model separately. Results: Mean drained volumes of single-stage, two-stage, and multi-stage cannulas were 2.483, 2.561, and 2.603 mL, respectively. However, the CP cannula provided us a mean drained volume of 2.988 mL. There were significant differences among the variables of the CP cannula and the other three mock cannulas concerning the drained fluid flow (P<0.01). Conclusion: In our study, the measured mean volumes showed us that more drainage surface area provides better fluid drainage.
publishDate 2018
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2018-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382018000500435
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382018000500435
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0036
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.33 n.5 2018
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron:SBCCV
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron_str SBCCV
institution SBCCV
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br
_version_ 1752126600256684032