Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of Choice for CABG in Brazil

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Loesch,Andrzej
Publication Date: 2019
Other Authors: Pinheiro,Bruno Botelho, Dashwood,Michael Richard
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382019000400017
Summary: Abstract The saphenous vein (SV) is the most commonly used conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and the second conduit of choice in Brazil and many other countries. The radial artery (RA) is suggested, by some, to be superior to SV grafts, although its use in the USA declined over a 10 year period. The patency of SV grafts (SVG) is improved when the vein is harvested with minimal trauma using the no-touch (NT) technique. This improved performance is due to the preservation of the outer pedicle surrounding the SV and reduction in vascular damage that occurs when using conventional techniques (CT) of harvesting. While the patency of NT SVGs has been shown superior to the RA at 36 months in one study, data from the RADIAL trial suggests the RA to be the superior conduit. When additional data using NT SVG is included in this trial the difference in risk of graft occlusion between the RA and SV grafts dissipates with there no longer being a significant difference in patency between conduits. The importance of preserving SV structure and the impact of NT harvesting on conduit choice for CABG patients are discussed in this short review.
id SBCCV-1_321b6f1b264d146caea4d16c9d038a07
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0102-76382019000400017
network_acronym_str SBCCV-1
network_name_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of Choice for CABG in BrazilHumansSaphenous VeinRadial ArteryCoronary Artery BypassAbstract The saphenous vein (SV) is the most commonly used conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and the second conduit of choice in Brazil and many other countries. The radial artery (RA) is suggested, by some, to be superior to SV grafts, although its use in the USA declined over a 10 year period. The patency of SV grafts (SVG) is improved when the vein is harvested with minimal trauma using the no-touch (NT) technique. This improved performance is due to the preservation of the outer pedicle surrounding the SV and reduction in vascular damage that occurs when using conventional techniques (CT) of harvesting. While the patency of NT SVGs has been shown superior to the RA at 36 months in one study, data from the RADIAL trial suggests the RA to be the superior conduit. When additional data using NT SVG is included in this trial the difference in risk of graft occlusion between the RA and SV grafts dissipates with there no longer being a significant difference in patency between conduits. The importance of preserving SV structure and the impact of NT harvesting on conduit choice for CABG patients are discussed in this short review.Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular2019-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382019000400017Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.34 n.4 2019reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)instacron:SBCCV10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0212info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessLoesch,AndrzejPinheiro,Bruno BotelhoDashwood,Michael Richardeng2019-11-28T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0102-76382019000400017Revistahttp://www.rbccv.org.br/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br1678-97410102-7638opendoar:2019-11-28T00:00Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of Choice for CABG in Brazil
title Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of Choice for CABG in Brazil
spellingShingle Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of Choice for CABG in Brazil
Loesch,Andrzej
Humans
Saphenous Vein
Radial Artery
Coronary Artery Bypass
title_short Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of Choice for CABG in Brazil
title_full Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of Choice for CABG in Brazil
title_fullStr Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of Choice for CABG in Brazil
title_full_unstemmed Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of Choice for CABG in Brazil
title_sort Why Use the Radial Artery? The Saphenous Vein is the Second Graft of Choice for CABG in Brazil
author Loesch,Andrzej
author_facet Loesch,Andrzej
Pinheiro,Bruno Botelho
Dashwood,Michael Richard
author_role author
author2 Pinheiro,Bruno Botelho
Dashwood,Michael Richard
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Loesch,Andrzej
Pinheiro,Bruno Botelho
Dashwood,Michael Richard
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Humans
Saphenous Vein
Radial Artery
Coronary Artery Bypass
topic Humans
Saphenous Vein
Radial Artery
Coronary Artery Bypass
description Abstract The saphenous vein (SV) is the most commonly used conduit for coronary artery bypass surgery (CABG) and the second conduit of choice in Brazil and many other countries. The radial artery (RA) is suggested, by some, to be superior to SV grafts, although its use in the USA declined over a 10 year period. The patency of SV grafts (SVG) is improved when the vein is harvested with minimal trauma using the no-touch (NT) technique. This improved performance is due to the preservation of the outer pedicle surrounding the SV and reduction in vascular damage that occurs when using conventional techniques (CT) of harvesting. While the patency of NT SVGs has been shown superior to the RA at 36 months in one study, data from the RADIAL trial suggests the RA to be the superior conduit. When additional data using NT SVG is included in this trial the difference in risk of graft occlusion between the RA and SV grafts dissipates with there no longer being a significant difference in patency between conduits. The importance of preserving SV structure and the impact of NT harvesting on conduit choice for CABG patients are discussed in this short review.
publishDate 2019
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2019-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382019000400017
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0102-76382019000400017
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.21470/1678-9741-2019-0212
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery v.34 n.4 2019
reponame:Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron:SBCCV
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
instacron_str SBCCV
institution SBCCV
reponame_str Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
collection Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular (SBCCV)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||rosangela.monteiro@incor.usp.br|| domingo@braile.com.br|| brandau@braile.com.br
_version_ 1752126600698134528