Operational analysis and limitations of the VSI-Based multi-line FACTS controllers
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2006 |
Other Authors: | |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Sba: Controle & Automação Sociedade Brasileira de Automatica |
Download full: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-17592006000200005 |
Summary: | In this paper, the operational analysis and the main limitations of the VSI-based multi-line FACTS controllers, namely: the GIPFC (Generalized Interline Power Flow Controller) and the IPFC (Interline Power Flow Controller), are analyzed. The GIPFC & IPFC are amongst the newest devices within the FACTS technology. By utilizing these devices an enhanced and nearly instantaneous controllability over independent transmission systems, can be obtained. The steady-state analysis of a GIPFC & IPFC controlling two balanced independent AC systems, is initially modeled. The use of the instantaneous power theory along with the d-q orthogonal co-ordinates showed to be appropriate tools for assessing the GIPFC response towards the operation of both controlled systems. Yet, to observe its dynamic behavior and simultaneously validate the previous steady-state analysis, a phase-shift VSI-based GIPFC was implemented in the ATP program. Where applicable, a comparative evaluation between the GIPFC and the IPFC, is also presented. |
id |
SBA-2_b58b92d2050f7b45076fc9efc5688fe1 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0103-17592006000200005 |
network_acronym_str |
SBA-2 |
network_name_str |
Sba: Controle & Automação Sociedade Brasileira de Automatica |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
Operational analysis and limitations of the VSI-Based multi-line FACTS controllersFACTSGIPFCIPFCPower Flow ControlVSIIn this paper, the operational analysis and the main limitations of the VSI-based multi-line FACTS controllers, namely: the GIPFC (Generalized Interline Power Flow Controller) and the IPFC (Interline Power Flow Controller), are analyzed. The GIPFC & IPFC are amongst the newest devices within the FACTS technology. By utilizing these devices an enhanced and nearly instantaneous controllability over independent transmission systems, can be obtained. The steady-state analysis of a GIPFC & IPFC controlling two balanced independent AC systems, is initially modeled. The use of the instantaneous power theory along with the d-q orthogonal co-ordinates showed to be appropriate tools for assessing the GIPFC response towards the operation of both controlled systems. Yet, to observe its dynamic behavior and simultaneously validate the previous steady-state analysis, a phase-shift VSI-based GIPFC was implemented in the ATP program. Where applicable, a comparative evaluation between the GIPFC and the IPFC, is also presented.Sociedade Brasileira de Automática2006-06-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-17592006000200005Sba: Controle & Automação Sociedade Brasileira de Automatica v.17 n.2 2006reponame:Sba: Controle & Automação Sociedade Brasileira de Automaticainstname:Sociedade Brasileira de Automática (SBA)instacron:SBA10.1590/S0103-17592006000200005info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessVasquez-Arnez,R.L.Zanetta Jr.,L.C.eng2007-03-07T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0103-17592006000200005Revistahttps://www.sba.org.br/revista/PUBhttps://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||revista_sba@fee.unicamp.br1807-03450103-1759opendoar:2007-03-07T00:00Sba: Controle & Automação Sociedade Brasileira de Automatica - Sociedade Brasileira de Automática (SBA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Operational analysis and limitations of the VSI-Based multi-line FACTS controllers |
title |
Operational analysis and limitations of the VSI-Based multi-line FACTS controllers |
spellingShingle |
Operational analysis and limitations of the VSI-Based multi-line FACTS controllers Vasquez-Arnez,R.L. FACTS GIPFC IPFC Power Flow Control VSI |
title_short |
Operational analysis and limitations of the VSI-Based multi-line FACTS controllers |
title_full |
Operational analysis and limitations of the VSI-Based multi-line FACTS controllers |
title_fullStr |
Operational analysis and limitations of the VSI-Based multi-line FACTS controllers |
title_full_unstemmed |
Operational analysis and limitations of the VSI-Based multi-line FACTS controllers |
title_sort |
Operational analysis and limitations of the VSI-Based multi-line FACTS controllers |
author |
Vasquez-Arnez,R.L. |
author_facet |
Vasquez-Arnez,R.L. Zanetta Jr.,L.C. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Zanetta Jr.,L.C. |
author2_role |
author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Vasquez-Arnez,R.L. Zanetta Jr.,L.C. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
FACTS GIPFC IPFC Power Flow Control VSI |
topic |
FACTS GIPFC IPFC Power Flow Control VSI |
description |
In this paper, the operational analysis and the main limitations of the VSI-based multi-line FACTS controllers, namely: the GIPFC (Generalized Interline Power Flow Controller) and the IPFC (Interline Power Flow Controller), are analyzed. The GIPFC & IPFC are amongst the newest devices within the FACTS technology. By utilizing these devices an enhanced and nearly instantaneous controllability over independent transmission systems, can be obtained. The steady-state analysis of a GIPFC & IPFC controlling two balanced independent AC systems, is initially modeled. The use of the instantaneous power theory along with the d-q orthogonal co-ordinates showed to be appropriate tools for assessing the GIPFC response towards the operation of both controlled systems. Yet, to observe its dynamic behavior and simultaneously validate the previous steady-state analysis, a phase-shift VSI-based GIPFC was implemented in the ATP program. Where applicable, a comparative evaluation between the GIPFC and the IPFC, is also presented. |
publishDate |
2006 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2006-06-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-17592006000200005 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0103-17592006000200005 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1590/S0103-17592006000200005 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Automática |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Automática |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Sba: Controle & Automação Sociedade Brasileira de Automatica v.17 n.2 2006 reponame:Sba: Controle & Automação Sociedade Brasileira de Automatica instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Automática (SBA) instacron:SBA |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Automática (SBA) |
instacron_str |
SBA |
institution |
SBA |
reponame_str |
Sba: Controle & Automação Sociedade Brasileira de Automatica |
collection |
Sba: Controle & Automação Sociedade Brasileira de Automatica |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Sba: Controle & Automação Sociedade Brasileira de Automatica - Sociedade Brasileira de Automática (SBA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||revista_sba@fee.unicamp.br |
_version_ |
1754824564389445632 |