A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2020 |
Other Authors: | , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) |
Download full: | http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942020000600667 |
Summary: | Abstract Objectives Positioning during endotracheal intubation (ETI) is critical to ensure its success. We aimed to determine if the ramping position improved laryngeal exposure and first attempt success at intubation when compared to the sniffing position. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched systematically from inception until January 2020. Our primary outcomes included laryngeal exposure as measured by Cormack-Lehane Grade 1 or 2 (CLG 1/2), CLG 3 or 4 (CLG 3/4), and first attempt success at intubation. Secondary outcomes were intubation time, use of airway adjuncts, ancillary maneuvers, and complications during ETI. Results Seven studies met our inclusion criteria, of which 4 were RCTs and 3 were cohort studies. The meta-analysis was conducted by pooling the effect estimates for all 4 included RCTs (n = 632). There were no differences found between ramping and sniffing positions for odds of CLG 1/2, CLG 3/4, first attempt success at intubation, intubation time, use of ancillary airway maneuvers, and use of airway adjuncts, with evidence of high heterogeneity across studies. However, the ramping position in surgical patients is associated with increased likelihood of CLG 1/2 (OR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.32, p = 0.004) and lower likelihood of CLG 3/4 (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.79, p = 0.004), moderate quality of evidence. Conclusion Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the ramping position may benefit surgical patients undergoing ETI by improving laryngeal exposure. Large scale well designed multicentre RCTs should be carried out to further elucidate the benefits of the ramping position in the surgical and intensive care unit patients. |
id |
SBA-1_dce9434871511b05685fd66c90104833 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:scielo:S0034-70942020000600667 |
network_acronym_str |
SBA-1 |
network_name_str |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) |
repository_id_str |
|
spelling |
A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysisRamping positionSniffing positionEndotracheal intubationLaryngeal exposureIntubation successAbstract Objectives Positioning during endotracheal intubation (ETI) is critical to ensure its success. We aimed to determine if the ramping position improved laryngeal exposure and first attempt success at intubation when compared to the sniffing position. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched systematically from inception until January 2020. Our primary outcomes included laryngeal exposure as measured by Cormack-Lehane Grade 1 or 2 (CLG 1/2), CLG 3 or 4 (CLG 3/4), and first attempt success at intubation. Secondary outcomes were intubation time, use of airway adjuncts, ancillary maneuvers, and complications during ETI. Results Seven studies met our inclusion criteria, of which 4 were RCTs and 3 were cohort studies. The meta-analysis was conducted by pooling the effect estimates for all 4 included RCTs (n = 632). There were no differences found between ramping and sniffing positions for odds of CLG 1/2, CLG 3/4, first attempt success at intubation, intubation time, use of ancillary airway maneuvers, and use of airway adjuncts, with evidence of high heterogeneity across studies. However, the ramping position in surgical patients is associated with increased likelihood of CLG 1/2 (OR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.32, p = 0.004) and lower likelihood of CLG 3/4 (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.79, p = 0.004), moderate quality of evidence. Conclusion Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the ramping position may benefit surgical patients undergoing ETI by improving laryngeal exposure. Large scale well designed multicentre RCTs should be carried out to further elucidate the benefits of the ramping position in the surgical and intensive care unit patients.Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia2020-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942020000600667Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.70 n.6 2020reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)instacron:SBA10.1016/j.bjane.2020.10.007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTsan,Samuel Ern HungNg,Ka TingLau,JiayingViknaswaran,Navian LeeWang,Chew Yineng2021-01-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-70942020000600667Revistahttps://www.sbahq.org/revista/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sba2000@openlink.com.br1806-907X0034-7094opendoar:2021-01-29T00:00Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)false |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title |
A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
spellingShingle |
A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis Tsan,Samuel Ern Hung Ramping position Sniffing position Endotracheal intubation Laryngeal exposure Intubation success |
title_short |
A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full |
A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_fullStr |
A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_full_unstemmed |
A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
title_sort |
A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis |
author |
Tsan,Samuel Ern Hung |
author_facet |
Tsan,Samuel Ern Hung Ng,Ka Ting Lau,Jiaying Viknaswaran,Navian Lee Wang,Chew Yin |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Ng,Ka Ting Lau,Jiaying Viknaswaran,Navian Lee Wang,Chew Yin |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Tsan,Samuel Ern Hung Ng,Ka Ting Lau,Jiaying Viknaswaran,Navian Lee Wang,Chew Yin |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Ramping position Sniffing position Endotracheal intubation Laryngeal exposure Intubation success |
topic |
Ramping position Sniffing position Endotracheal intubation Laryngeal exposure Intubation success |
description |
Abstract Objectives Positioning during endotracheal intubation (ETI) is critical to ensure its success. We aimed to determine if the ramping position improved laryngeal exposure and first attempt success at intubation when compared to the sniffing position. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched systematically from inception until January 2020. Our primary outcomes included laryngeal exposure as measured by Cormack-Lehane Grade 1 or 2 (CLG 1/2), CLG 3 or 4 (CLG 3/4), and first attempt success at intubation. Secondary outcomes were intubation time, use of airway adjuncts, ancillary maneuvers, and complications during ETI. Results Seven studies met our inclusion criteria, of which 4 were RCTs and 3 were cohort studies. The meta-analysis was conducted by pooling the effect estimates for all 4 included RCTs (n = 632). There were no differences found between ramping and sniffing positions for odds of CLG 1/2, CLG 3/4, first attempt success at intubation, intubation time, use of ancillary airway maneuvers, and use of airway adjuncts, with evidence of high heterogeneity across studies. However, the ramping position in surgical patients is associated with increased likelihood of CLG 1/2 (OR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.32, p = 0.004) and lower likelihood of CLG 3/4 (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.79, p = 0.004), moderate quality of evidence. Conclusion Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the ramping position may benefit surgical patients undergoing ETI by improving laryngeal exposure. Large scale well designed multicentre RCTs should be carried out to further elucidate the benefits of the ramping position in the surgical and intensive care unit patients. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-12-01 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942020000600667 |
url |
http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942020000600667 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.1016/j.bjane.2020.10.007 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
text/html |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.70 n.6 2020 reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) instacron:SBA |
instname_str |
Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) |
instacron_str |
SBA |
institution |
SBA |
reponame_str |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) |
collection |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA) |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
||sba2000@openlink.com.br |
_version_ |
1752126630892929024 |