Export Ready — 

A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Tsan,Samuel Ern Hung
Publication Date: 2020
Other Authors: Ng,Ka Ting, Lau,Jiaying, Viknaswaran,Navian Lee, Wang,Chew Yin
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942020000600667
Summary: Abstract Objectives Positioning during endotracheal intubation (ETI) is critical to ensure its success. We aimed to determine if the ramping position improved laryngeal exposure and first attempt success at intubation when compared to the sniffing position. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched systematically from inception until January 2020. Our primary outcomes included laryngeal exposure as measured by Cormack-Lehane Grade 1 or 2 (CLG 1/2), CLG 3 or 4 (CLG 3/4), and first attempt success at intubation. Secondary outcomes were intubation time, use of airway adjuncts, ancillary maneuvers, and complications during ETI. Results Seven studies met our inclusion criteria, of which 4 were RCTs and 3 were cohort studies. The meta-analysis was conducted by pooling the effect estimates for all 4 included RCTs (n = 632). There were no differences found between ramping and sniffing positions for odds of CLG 1/2, CLG 3/4, first attempt success at intubation, intubation time, use of ancillary airway maneuvers, and use of airway adjuncts, with evidence of high heterogeneity across studies. However, the ramping position in surgical patients is associated with increased likelihood of CLG 1/2 (OR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.32, p = 0.004) and lower likelihood of CLG 3/4 (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.79, p = 0.004), moderate quality of evidence. Conclusion Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the ramping position may benefit surgical patients undergoing ETI by improving laryngeal exposure. Large scale well designed multicentre RCTs should be carried out to further elucidate the benefits of the ramping position in the surgical and intensive care unit patients.
id SBA-1_dce9434871511b05685fd66c90104833
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-70942020000600667
network_acronym_str SBA-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysisRamping positionSniffing positionEndotracheal intubationLaryngeal exposureIntubation successAbstract Objectives Positioning during endotracheal intubation (ETI) is critical to ensure its success. We aimed to determine if the ramping position improved laryngeal exposure and first attempt success at intubation when compared to the sniffing position. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched systematically from inception until January 2020. Our primary outcomes included laryngeal exposure as measured by Cormack-Lehane Grade 1 or 2 (CLG 1/2), CLG 3 or 4 (CLG 3/4), and first attempt success at intubation. Secondary outcomes were intubation time, use of airway adjuncts, ancillary maneuvers, and complications during ETI. Results Seven studies met our inclusion criteria, of which 4 were RCTs and 3 were cohort studies. The meta-analysis was conducted by pooling the effect estimates for all 4 included RCTs (n = 632). There were no differences found between ramping and sniffing positions for odds of CLG 1/2, CLG 3/4, first attempt success at intubation, intubation time, use of ancillary airway maneuvers, and use of airway adjuncts, with evidence of high heterogeneity across studies. However, the ramping position in surgical patients is associated with increased likelihood of CLG 1/2 (OR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.32, p = 0.004) and lower likelihood of CLG 3/4 (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.79, p = 0.004), moderate quality of evidence. Conclusion Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the ramping position may benefit surgical patients undergoing ETI by improving laryngeal exposure. Large scale well designed multicentre RCTs should be carried out to further elucidate the benefits of the ramping position in the surgical and intensive care unit patients.Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia2020-12-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942020000600667Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.70 n.6 2020reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)instacron:SBA10.1016/j.bjane.2020.10.007info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessTsan,Samuel Ern HungNg,Ka TingLau,JiayingViknaswaran,Navian LeeWang,Chew Yineng2021-01-29T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-70942020000600667Revistahttps://www.sbahq.org/revista/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sba2000@openlink.com.br1806-907X0034-7094opendoar:2021-01-29T00:00Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
spellingShingle A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
Tsan,Samuel Ern Hung
Ramping position
Sniffing position
Endotracheal intubation
Laryngeal exposure
Intubation success
title_short A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_fullStr A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
title_sort A comparison of ramping position and sniffing position during endotracheal intubation: a systematic review and meta-analysis
author Tsan,Samuel Ern Hung
author_facet Tsan,Samuel Ern Hung
Ng,Ka Ting
Lau,Jiaying
Viknaswaran,Navian Lee
Wang,Chew Yin
author_role author
author2 Ng,Ka Ting
Lau,Jiaying
Viknaswaran,Navian Lee
Wang,Chew Yin
author2_role author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Tsan,Samuel Ern Hung
Ng,Ka Ting
Lau,Jiaying
Viknaswaran,Navian Lee
Wang,Chew Yin
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Ramping position
Sniffing position
Endotracheal intubation
Laryngeal exposure
Intubation success
topic Ramping position
Sniffing position
Endotracheal intubation
Laryngeal exposure
Intubation success
description Abstract Objectives Positioning during endotracheal intubation (ETI) is critical to ensure its success. We aimed to determine if the ramping position improved laryngeal exposure and first attempt success at intubation when compared to the sniffing position. Methods PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL databases were searched systematically from inception until January 2020. Our primary outcomes included laryngeal exposure as measured by Cormack-Lehane Grade 1 or 2 (CLG 1/2), CLG 3 or 4 (CLG 3/4), and first attempt success at intubation. Secondary outcomes were intubation time, use of airway adjuncts, ancillary maneuvers, and complications during ETI. Results Seven studies met our inclusion criteria, of which 4 were RCTs and 3 were cohort studies. The meta-analysis was conducted by pooling the effect estimates for all 4 included RCTs (n = 632). There were no differences found between ramping and sniffing positions for odds of CLG 1/2, CLG 3/4, first attempt success at intubation, intubation time, use of ancillary airway maneuvers, and use of airway adjuncts, with evidence of high heterogeneity across studies. However, the ramping position in surgical patients is associated with increased likelihood of CLG 1/2 (OR = 2.05, 95% CI 1.26 to 3.32, p = 0.004) and lower likelihood of CLG 3/4 (OR = 0.49, 95% CI 0.30 to 0.79, p = 0.004), moderate quality of evidence. Conclusion Our meta-analysis demonstrated that the ramping position may benefit surgical patients undergoing ETI by improving laryngeal exposure. Large scale well designed multicentre RCTs should be carried out to further elucidate the benefits of the ramping position in the surgical and intensive care unit patients.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-12-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942020000600667
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942020000600667
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjane.2020.10.007
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.70 n.6 2020
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
instacron:SBA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
instacron_str SBA
institution SBA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sba2000@openlink.com.br
_version_ 1752126630892929024