The effect of sugammadex on postoperative cognitive function and recovery

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Pişkin,Özcan
Publication Date: 2016
Other Authors: Küçükosman,Gamze, Altun,Deniz Utku, Çimencan,Murat, Özen,Banu, Aydın,Bengü Gülhan, Okyay,Rahşan Dilek, Ayoğlu,Hilal, Turan,Işıl Özkoçak
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
Download full: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942016000400376
Summary: Abstract Background and objective: Sugammadex is the first selective relaxant binding agent. When compared with neostigmine, following sugammadex administration patients wake earlier and have shorter recovery times. In this study, we hypothesized that fast and clear awakening in patients undergoing general anesthesia has positive effects on cognitive functions in the early period after operation. Methods: Approved by the local ethical committee, 128 patients were enrolled in this randomized, prospective, controlled, double-blind study. Patients were allocated to either Sugammadex group (Group S) or the Neostigmine group (Group N). The primary outcome of the study was early postoperative cognitive recovery as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). After baseline assessment 12-24 h before the operation. After the operation, when the Modified Aldrete Recovery Score was ≥9 the MMSE and 1 h later the MoCA tests were repeated. Results: Although there was a reduction in MoCA and MMSE scores in both Group S and Group N between preoperative and postoperative scores, there was no statistically significant difference in the slopes (p > 0.05). The time to reach TOF 0.9 was 2.19 min in Group S and 6.47 min in Group N (p < 0.0001). Recovery time was 8.26 min in Group S and 16.93 min in Group N (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: We showed that the surgical procedure and/or accompanying anesthetic procedure may cause a temporary or permanent regression in cognitive function in the early postoperative period. However, better cognitive performance could not be proved in the Sugammadex compared to the Neostigmine.
id SBA-1_cf927e1722e28396cb10c92268eb1856
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-70942016000400376
network_acronym_str SBA-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The effect of sugammadex on postoperative cognitive function and recoverySugammadexNeostigminePostoperative cognitive dysfunctionMMSEMoCAAbstract Background and objective: Sugammadex is the first selective relaxant binding agent. When compared with neostigmine, following sugammadex administration patients wake earlier and have shorter recovery times. In this study, we hypothesized that fast and clear awakening in patients undergoing general anesthesia has positive effects on cognitive functions in the early period after operation. Methods: Approved by the local ethical committee, 128 patients were enrolled in this randomized, prospective, controlled, double-blind study. Patients were allocated to either Sugammadex group (Group S) or the Neostigmine group (Group N). The primary outcome of the study was early postoperative cognitive recovery as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). After baseline assessment 12-24 h before the operation. After the operation, when the Modified Aldrete Recovery Score was ≥9 the MMSE and 1 h later the MoCA tests were repeated. Results: Although there was a reduction in MoCA and MMSE scores in both Group S and Group N between preoperative and postoperative scores, there was no statistically significant difference in the slopes (p > 0.05). The time to reach TOF 0.9 was 2.19 min in Group S and 6.47 min in Group N (p < 0.0001). Recovery time was 8.26 min in Group S and 16.93 min in Group N (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: We showed that the surgical procedure and/or accompanying anesthetic procedure may cause a temporary or permanent regression in cognitive function in the early postoperative period. However, better cognitive performance could not be proved in the Sugammadex compared to the Neostigmine.Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia2016-08-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942016000400376Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.66 n.4 2016reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)instacron:SBA10.1016/j.bjane.2014.10.003info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessPişkin,ÖzcanKüçükosman,GamzeAltun,Deniz UtkuÇimencan,MuratÖzen,BanuAydın,Bengü GülhanOkyay,Rahşan DilekAyoğlu,HilalTuran,Işıl Özkoçakeng2016-07-21T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-70942016000400376Revistahttps://www.sbahq.org/revista/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sba2000@openlink.com.br1806-907X0034-7094opendoar:2016-07-21T00:00Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The effect of sugammadex on postoperative cognitive function and recovery
title The effect of sugammadex on postoperative cognitive function and recovery
spellingShingle The effect of sugammadex on postoperative cognitive function and recovery
Pişkin,Özcan
Sugammadex
Neostigmine
Postoperative cognitive dysfunction
MMSE
MoCA
title_short The effect of sugammadex on postoperative cognitive function and recovery
title_full The effect of sugammadex on postoperative cognitive function and recovery
title_fullStr The effect of sugammadex on postoperative cognitive function and recovery
title_full_unstemmed The effect of sugammadex on postoperative cognitive function and recovery
title_sort The effect of sugammadex on postoperative cognitive function and recovery
author Pişkin,Özcan
author_facet Pişkin,Özcan
Küçükosman,Gamze
Altun,Deniz Utku
Çimencan,Murat
Özen,Banu
Aydın,Bengü Gülhan
Okyay,Rahşan Dilek
Ayoğlu,Hilal
Turan,Işıl Özkoçak
author_role author
author2 Küçükosman,Gamze
Altun,Deniz Utku
Çimencan,Murat
Özen,Banu
Aydın,Bengü Gülhan
Okyay,Rahşan Dilek
Ayoğlu,Hilal
Turan,Işıl Özkoçak
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Pişkin,Özcan
Küçükosman,Gamze
Altun,Deniz Utku
Çimencan,Murat
Özen,Banu
Aydın,Bengü Gülhan
Okyay,Rahşan Dilek
Ayoğlu,Hilal
Turan,Işıl Özkoçak
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Sugammadex
Neostigmine
Postoperative cognitive dysfunction
MMSE
MoCA
topic Sugammadex
Neostigmine
Postoperative cognitive dysfunction
MMSE
MoCA
description Abstract Background and objective: Sugammadex is the first selective relaxant binding agent. When compared with neostigmine, following sugammadex administration patients wake earlier and have shorter recovery times. In this study, we hypothesized that fast and clear awakening in patients undergoing general anesthesia has positive effects on cognitive functions in the early period after operation. Methods: Approved by the local ethical committee, 128 patients were enrolled in this randomized, prospective, controlled, double-blind study. Patients were allocated to either Sugammadex group (Group S) or the Neostigmine group (Group N). The primary outcome of the study was early postoperative cognitive recovery as measured by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) and Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE). After baseline assessment 12-24 h before the operation. After the operation, when the Modified Aldrete Recovery Score was ≥9 the MMSE and 1 h later the MoCA tests were repeated. Results: Although there was a reduction in MoCA and MMSE scores in both Group S and Group N between preoperative and postoperative scores, there was no statistically significant difference in the slopes (p > 0.05). The time to reach TOF 0.9 was 2.19 min in Group S and 6.47 min in Group N (p < 0.0001). Recovery time was 8.26 min in Group S and 16.93 min in Group N (p < 0.0001). Conclusion: We showed that the surgical procedure and/or accompanying anesthetic procedure may cause a temporary or permanent regression in cognitive function in the early postoperative period. However, better cognitive performance could not be proved in the Sugammadex compared to the Neostigmine.
publishDate 2016
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2016-08-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942016000400376
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942016000400376
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjane.2014.10.003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.66 n.4 2016
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
instacron:SBA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
instacron_str SBA
institution SBA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sba2000@openlink.com.br
_version_ 1752126628967743488