Exportação concluída — 

The comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl and esmolol on prevention of hemodynamic response to intubation

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Gogus,Nermin
Data de Publicação: 2014
Outros Autores: Akan,Belgin, Serger,Nurten, Baydar,Mustafa
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
Texto Completo: http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942014000500314
Resumo: Background and objectives:Laryngoscopy and intubation can cause hemodynamic response. Various medications may be employed to control that response. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl and esmolol on hemodynamic response.Methods:Ninety elective surgery patients who needed endotracheal intubation who were in American Society of Anesthesiology I–II group and ages between 21 and 65 years were included in that prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressures, heart rates at the time of admittance at operation room were recorded as basal measurements. The patients were randomized into three groups: Group I (n = 30) received 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine with infusion in 10 min, Group II (n = 30) received 2 μg/kg fentanyl, Group III received 2 mg/kg esmolol 2 min before induction. The patients were intubated in 3 min. Systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressures and heart rates were measured before induction, before intubation and 1, 3, 5, 10 min after intubation.Results:When basal levels were compared with the measurements of the groups, it was found that 5 and 10 min after intubation heart rate in Group I and systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressures in Group III were lower than other measurements (p < 0.05).Conclusions:Dexmedetomidine was superior in the prevention of tachycardia. Esmolol prevented sytolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure increases following intubation. We concluded that further studies are needed in order to find a strategy that prevents the increase in systemic blood pressure and heart rate both.
id SBA-1_2880cc0b454a6e36bcd0261cb4bf2324
oai_identifier_str oai:scielo:S0034-70942014000500314
network_acronym_str SBA-1
network_name_str Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
repository_id_str
spelling The comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl and esmolol on prevention of hemodynamic response to intubationLaryngoscopyIntubationHemodynamic responseDexmedetomidineFentanylEsmololBackground and objectives:Laryngoscopy and intubation can cause hemodynamic response. Various medications may be employed to control that response. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl and esmolol on hemodynamic response.Methods:Ninety elective surgery patients who needed endotracheal intubation who were in American Society of Anesthesiology I–II group and ages between 21 and 65 years were included in that prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressures, heart rates at the time of admittance at operation room were recorded as basal measurements. The patients were randomized into three groups: Group I (n = 30) received 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine with infusion in 10 min, Group II (n = 30) received 2 μg/kg fentanyl, Group III received 2 mg/kg esmolol 2 min before induction. The patients were intubated in 3 min. Systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressures and heart rates were measured before induction, before intubation and 1, 3, 5, 10 min after intubation.Results:When basal levels were compared with the measurements of the groups, it was found that 5 and 10 min after intubation heart rate in Group I and systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressures in Group III were lower than other measurements (p < 0.05).Conclusions:Dexmedetomidine was superior in the prevention of tachycardia. Esmolol prevented sytolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure increases following intubation. We concluded that further studies are needed in order to find a strategy that prevents the increase in systemic blood pressure and heart rate both.Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia2014-10-01info:eu-repo/semantics/articleinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersiontext/htmlhttp://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942014000500314Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.64 n.5 2014reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)instacron:SBA10.1016/j.bjane.2013.10.012info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessGogus,NerminAkan,BelginSerger,NurtenBaydar,Mustafaeng2015-09-01T00:00:00Zoai:scielo:S0034-70942014000500314Revistahttps://www.sbahq.org/revista/https://old.scielo.br/oai/scielo-oai.php||sba2000@openlink.com.br1806-907X0034-7094opendoar:2015-09-01T00:00Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)false
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv The comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl and esmolol on prevention of hemodynamic response to intubation
title The comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl and esmolol on prevention of hemodynamic response to intubation
spellingShingle The comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl and esmolol on prevention of hemodynamic response to intubation
Gogus,Nermin
Laryngoscopy
Intubation
Hemodynamic response
Dexmedetomidine
Fentanyl
Esmolol
title_short The comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl and esmolol on prevention of hemodynamic response to intubation
title_full The comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl and esmolol on prevention of hemodynamic response to intubation
title_fullStr The comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl and esmolol on prevention of hemodynamic response to intubation
title_full_unstemmed The comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl and esmolol on prevention of hemodynamic response to intubation
title_sort The comparison of the effects of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl and esmolol on prevention of hemodynamic response to intubation
author Gogus,Nermin
author_facet Gogus,Nermin
Akan,Belgin
Serger,Nurten
Baydar,Mustafa
author_role author
author2 Akan,Belgin
Serger,Nurten
Baydar,Mustafa
author2_role author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Gogus,Nermin
Akan,Belgin
Serger,Nurten
Baydar,Mustafa
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Laryngoscopy
Intubation
Hemodynamic response
Dexmedetomidine
Fentanyl
Esmolol
topic Laryngoscopy
Intubation
Hemodynamic response
Dexmedetomidine
Fentanyl
Esmolol
description Background and objectives:Laryngoscopy and intubation can cause hemodynamic response. Various medications may be employed to control that response. In this study, we aimed to compare the effects of dexmedetomidine, fentanyl and esmolol on hemodynamic response.Methods:Ninety elective surgery patients who needed endotracheal intubation who were in American Society of Anesthesiology I–II group and ages between 21 and 65 years were included in that prospective, randomized, double-blind study. Systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressures, heart rates at the time of admittance at operation room were recorded as basal measurements. The patients were randomized into three groups: Group I (n = 30) received 1 μg/kg dexmedetomidine with infusion in 10 min, Group II (n = 30) received 2 μg/kg fentanyl, Group III received 2 mg/kg esmolol 2 min before induction. The patients were intubated in 3 min. Systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressures and heart rates were measured before induction, before intubation and 1, 3, 5, 10 min after intubation.Results:When basal levels were compared with the measurements of the groups, it was found that 5 and 10 min after intubation heart rate in Group I and systolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressures in Group III were lower than other measurements (p < 0.05).Conclusions:Dexmedetomidine was superior in the prevention of tachycardia. Esmolol prevented sytolic, diastolic, mean arterial pressure increases following intubation. We concluded that further studies are needed in order to find a strategy that prevents the increase in systemic blood pressure and heart rate both.
publishDate 2014
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2014-10-01
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942014000500314
url http://old.scielo.br/scielo.php?script=sci_arttext&pid=S0034-70942014000500314
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1016/j.bjane.2013.10.012
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv text/html
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia v.64 n.5 2014
reponame:Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
instname:Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
instacron:SBA
instname_str Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
instacron_str SBA
institution SBA
reponame_str Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
collection Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Revista Brasileira de Anestesiologia (Online) - Sociedade Brasileira de Anestesiologia (SBA)
repository.mail.fl_str_mv ||sba2000@openlink.com.br
_version_ 1752126628171874304