Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic review

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Souto-Miranda, S.
Publication Date: 2020
Other Authors: Jácome, C., Alves, A., Machado, A., Paixão, C., Oliveira, A., Marques, A.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10773/29800
Summary: Background Maximum inspiratory (Pimax) and expiratory (Pemax) mouth pressures are commonly used to detect respiratory muscle weakness resorting to predictive equations established for healthy people. There are several predictive equations, but they are widespread in the literature. This study aimed to review the existent predictive equations of maximum inspiratory (Pimax) and expiratory (Pemax) mouth pressures for adults. Additionally, we aimed to identify which ones were generated based on international standards. Methods A systematic review of predictive equations of Pimax and Pemax for healthy adults was conducted. A comprehensive search was performed of Cochrane Library, EBSCO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science to identify studies that presented at least one equation for Pimax or Pemax developed for healthy adults. The quality of studies was assessed by two reviewers with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (Quadas-2). Results Risk of bias was high in 8 of the 20 studies included. Forty-two Pimax and 34 Pemax equations were found, mostly using the variables age (n = 39), weight (n = 20) and height (n = 8). These equations explained 3 to 96% of the Pimax/Pemax variance. They were developed with individuals from 11 countries (Portugal not included). Twelve Pimax and eight Pemax equations complied with international standards. Conclusions This review gathered the predictive equations that have been developed for both Pimax and Pemax, however most were generated from unstandardized procedures. Future studies should explore the suitability of these equations for populations for which specific ones are not available, such as the Portuguese population, and develop new equations if necessary.
id RCAP_faee4baa9b2b3e949d25773ffd3014cc
oai_identifier_str oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/29800
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic reviewMaximal respiratory pressuresRespiratory function testsHealthy adultsStandardizationProceduresBackground Maximum inspiratory (Pimax) and expiratory (Pemax) mouth pressures are commonly used to detect respiratory muscle weakness resorting to predictive equations established for healthy people. There are several predictive equations, but they are widespread in the literature. This study aimed to review the existent predictive equations of maximum inspiratory (Pimax) and expiratory (Pemax) mouth pressures for adults. Additionally, we aimed to identify which ones were generated based on international standards. Methods A systematic review of predictive equations of Pimax and Pemax for healthy adults was conducted. A comprehensive search was performed of Cochrane Library, EBSCO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science to identify studies that presented at least one equation for Pimax or Pemax developed for healthy adults. The quality of studies was assessed by two reviewers with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (Quadas-2). Results Risk of bias was high in 8 of the 20 studies included. Forty-two Pimax and 34 Pemax equations were found, mostly using the variables age (n = 39), weight (n = 20) and height (n = 8). These equations explained 3 to 96% of the Pimax/Pemax variance. They were developed with individuals from 11 countries (Portugal not included). Twelve Pimax and eight Pemax equations complied with international standards. Conclusions This review gathered the predictive equations that have been developed for both Pimax and Pemax, however most were generated from unstandardized procedures. Future studies should explore the suitability of these equations for populations for which specific ones are not available, such as the Portuguese population, and develop new equations if necessary.Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia2020-11-12T19:24:40Z2020-08-31T00:00:00Z2020-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/29800eng2531-043710.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.03.003Souto-Miranda, S.Jácome, C.Alves, A.Machado, A.Paixão, C.Oliveira, A.Marques, A.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-05-06T04:28:29Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/29800Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T14:09:32.540263Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic review
title Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic review
spellingShingle Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic review
Souto-Miranda, S.
Maximal respiratory pressures
Respiratory function tests
Healthy adults
Standardization
Procedures
title_short Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic review
title_full Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic review
title_fullStr Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic review
title_full_unstemmed Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic review
title_sort Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic review
author Souto-Miranda, S.
author_facet Souto-Miranda, S.
Jácome, C.
Alves, A.
Machado, A.
Paixão, C.
Oliveira, A.
Marques, A.
author_role author
author2 Jácome, C.
Alves, A.
Machado, A.
Paixão, C.
Oliveira, A.
Marques, A.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Souto-Miranda, S.
Jácome, C.
Alves, A.
Machado, A.
Paixão, C.
Oliveira, A.
Marques, A.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Maximal respiratory pressures
Respiratory function tests
Healthy adults
Standardization
Procedures
topic Maximal respiratory pressures
Respiratory function tests
Healthy adults
Standardization
Procedures
description Background Maximum inspiratory (Pimax) and expiratory (Pemax) mouth pressures are commonly used to detect respiratory muscle weakness resorting to predictive equations established for healthy people. There are several predictive equations, but they are widespread in the literature. This study aimed to review the existent predictive equations of maximum inspiratory (Pimax) and expiratory (Pemax) mouth pressures for adults. Additionally, we aimed to identify which ones were generated based on international standards. Methods A systematic review of predictive equations of Pimax and Pemax for healthy adults was conducted. A comprehensive search was performed of Cochrane Library, EBSCO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science to identify studies that presented at least one equation for Pimax or Pemax developed for healthy adults. The quality of studies was assessed by two reviewers with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (Quadas-2). Results Risk of bias was high in 8 of the 20 studies included. Forty-two Pimax and 34 Pemax equations were found, mostly using the variables age (n = 39), weight (n = 20) and height (n = 8). These equations explained 3 to 96% of the Pimax/Pemax variance. They were developed with individuals from 11 countries (Portugal not included). Twelve Pimax and eight Pemax equations complied with international standards. Conclusions This review gathered the predictive equations that have been developed for both Pimax and Pemax, however most were generated from unstandardized procedures. Future studies should explore the suitability of these equations for populations for which specific ones are not available, such as the Portuguese population, and develop new equations if necessary.
publishDate 2020
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2020-11-12T19:24:40Z
2020-08-31T00:00:00Z
2020-08-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10773/29800
url http://hdl.handle.net/10773/29800
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 2531-0437
10.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.03.003
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833594348029083648