Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic review
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2020 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10773/29800 |
Summary: | Background Maximum inspiratory (Pimax) and expiratory (Pemax) mouth pressures are commonly used to detect respiratory muscle weakness resorting to predictive equations established for healthy people. There are several predictive equations, but they are widespread in the literature. This study aimed to review the existent predictive equations of maximum inspiratory (Pimax) and expiratory (Pemax) mouth pressures for adults. Additionally, we aimed to identify which ones were generated based on international standards. Methods A systematic review of predictive equations of Pimax and Pemax for healthy adults was conducted. A comprehensive search was performed of Cochrane Library, EBSCO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science to identify studies that presented at least one equation for Pimax or Pemax developed for healthy adults. The quality of studies was assessed by two reviewers with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (Quadas-2). Results Risk of bias was high in 8 of the 20 studies included. Forty-two Pimax and 34 Pemax equations were found, mostly using the variables age (n = 39), weight (n = 20) and height (n = 8). These equations explained 3 to 96% of the Pimax/Pemax variance. They were developed with individuals from 11 countries (Portugal not included). Twelve Pimax and eight Pemax equations complied with international standards. Conclusions This review gathered the predictive equations that have been developed for both Pimax and Pemax, however most were generated from unstandardized procedures. Future studies should explore the suitability of these equations for populations for which specific ones are not available, such as the Portuguese population, and develop new equations if necessary. |
id |
RCAP_faee4baa9b2b3e949d25773ffd3014cc |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ria.ua.pt:10773/29800 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic reviewMaximal respiratory pressuresRespiratory function testsHealthy adultsStandardizationProceduresBackground Maximum inspiratory (Pimax) and expiratory (Pemax) mouth pressures are commonly used to detect respiratory muscle weakness resorting to predictive equations established for healthy people. There are several predictive equations, but they are widespread in the literature. This study aimed to review the existent predictive equations of maximum inspiratory (Pimax) and expiratory (Pemax) mouth pressures for adults. Additionally, we aimed to identify which ones were generated based on international standards. Methods A systematic review of predictive equations of Pimax and Pemax for healthy adults was conducted. A comprehensive search was performed of Cochrane Library, EBSCO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science to identify studies that presented at least one equation for Pimax or Pemax developed for healthy adults. The quality of studies was assessed by two reviewers with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (Quadas-2). Results Risk of bias was high in 8 of the 20 studies included. Forty-two Pimax and 34 Pemax equations were found, mostly using the variables age (n = 39), weight (n = 20) and height (n = 8). These equations explained 3 to 96% of the Pimax/Pemax variance. They were developed with individuals from 11 countries (Portugal not included). Twelve Pimax and eight Pemax equations complied with international standards. Conclusions This review gathered the predictive equations that have been developed for both Pimax and Pemax, however most were generated from unstandardized procedures. Future studies should explore the suitability of these equations for populations for which specific ones are not available, such as the Portuguese population, and develop new equations if necessary.Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia2020-11-12T19:24:40Z2020-08-31T00:00:00Z2020-08-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10773/29800eng2531-043710.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.03.003Souto-Miranda, S.Jácome, C.Alves, A.Machado, A.Paixão, C.Oliveira, A.Marques, A.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-05-06T04:28:29Zoai:ria.ua.pt:10773/29800Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T14:09:32.540263Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic review |
title |
Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic review |
spellingShingle |
Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic review Souto-Miranda, S. Maximal respiratory pressures Respiratory function tests Healthy adults Standardization Procedures |
title_short |
Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic review |
title_full |
Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic review |
title_fullStr |
Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic review |
title_full_unstemmed |
Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic review |
title_sort |
Predictive equations of maximum respiratory mouth pressures: a systematic review |
author |
Souto-Miranda, S. |
author_facet |
Souto-Miranda, S. Jácome, C. Alves, A. Machado, A. Paixão, C. Oliveira, A. Marques, A. |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Jácome, C. Alves, A. Machado, A. Paixão, C. Oliveira, A. Marques, A. |
author2_role |
author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Souto-Miranda, S. Jácome, C. Alves, A. Machado, A. Paixão, C. Oliveira, A. Marques, A. |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Maximal respiratory pressures Respiratory function tests Healthy adults Standardization Procedures |
topic |
Maximal respiratory pressures Respiratory function tests Healthy adults Standardization Procedures |
description |
Background Maximum inspiratory (Pimax) and expiratory (Pemax) mouth pressures are commonly used to detect respiratory muscle weakness resorting to predictive equations established for healthy people. There are several predictive equations, but they are widespread in the literature. This study aimed to review the existent predictive equations of maximum inspiratory (Pimax) and expiratory (Pemax) mouth pressures for adults. Additionally, we aimed to identify which ones were generated based on international standards. Methods A systematic review of predictive equations of Pimax and Pemax for healthy adults was conducted. A comprehensive search was performed of Cochrane Library, EBSCO, PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science to identify studies that presented at least one equation for Pimax or Pemax developed for healthy adults. The quality of studies was assessed by two reviewers with the Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (Quadas-2). Results Risk of bias was high in 8 of the 20 studies included. Forty-two Pimax and 34 Pemax equations were found, mostly using the variables age (n = 39), weight (n = 20) and height (n = 8). These equations explained 3 to 96% of the Pimax/Pemax variance. They were developed with individuals from 11 countries (Portugal not included). Twelve Pimax and eight Pemax equations complied with international standards. Conclusions This review gathered the predictive equations that have been developed for both Pimax and Pemax, however most were generated from unstandardized procedures. Future studies should explore the suitability of these equations for populations for which specific ones are not available, such as the Portuguese population, and develop new equations if necessary. |
publishDate |
2020 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2020-11-12T19:24:40Z 2020-08-31T00:00:00Z 2020-08-31 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/29800 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10773/29800 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2531-0437 10.1016/j.pulmoe.2020.03.003 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sociedade Portuguesa de Pneumologia |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833594348029083648 |