Therapeutic inertia in osteoporosis in postmenopausal women

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Cruz da Silva, Mariana
Publication Date: 2024
Other Authors: Outeirinho, Conceição, Lopes, Nina, Gonçalves, Maria João, Mina, Isabel, Pimentel, Alexandra, Costa, Rodrigo, Bento, Inês, Calafate, Ana, Henriques, Manuel, Sottomayor, Henrique
Format: Article
Language: por
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v40i5.13974
Summary: Introduction: Osteoporosis (OP) is the most frequent metabolic bone disease, associated with fragility fractures and increased morbimortality. Despite population aging, there has been a downward trend in the implementation of anti-osteoporotic therapy. Objectives: To determine the therapeutic inertia in OP in postmenopausal women in primary health care. Verify whether age, T-score, the FRAX value, and anti-osteoporotic therapeutic inertia are associated. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study. Inclusion criteria: women aged between 55 and 85 coded with OP (ICPC-2 – L95) or fractures (ICPC-2 – L72-76) in the list of problems. A simple random sample was selected. Therapeutic inertia was defined based on the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology recommendations. Results: A sample of 217 patients was obtained. Therapeutic inertia was found in 17.5% of women, which increased to 48.6% in those who suffered fractures (p<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between the ages of patients with and without therapeutic inertia (77.5 vs 73.0, p<0.010). The median FRAX for major osteoporotic fracture (16.5 vs 9.65, p<0.001) and hip fracture (7.6 vs 3.3, p<0.001) was higher in the group with therapeutic inertia. The difference between T-score values ​​for the lumbar spine (2.45 vs 2.71) and the femoral neck (2.07 vs 2.02) did not reach statistical significance (p=0.299). Conclusion: This study highlights the application of the most recent national guidelines regarding osteoporosis treatment in the studied health care unit, but underlines the need for broader intervention in osteoporosis-related fractures and at older ages.
id RCAP_faebef4aa91cb2e2f335f55c7917275b
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/13974
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Therapeutic inertia in osteoporosis in postmenopausal womenInércia terapêutica na osteoporose em mulheres pós-menopáusicasOsteoporosisTherapeutic inertiaPrimary health careOsteoporoseInércia terapêuticaCuidados de saúde primáriosIntroduction: Osteoporosis (OP) is the most frequent metabolic bone disease, associated with fragility fractures and increased morbimortality. Despite population aging, there has been a downward trend in the implementation of anti-osteoporotic therapy. Objectives: To determine the therapeutic inertia in OP in postmenopausal women in primary health care. Verify whether age, T-score, the FRAX value, and anti-osteoporotic therapeutic inertia are associated. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study. Inclusion criteria: women aged between 55 and 85 coded with OP (ICPC-2 – L95) or fractures (ICPC-2 – L72-76) in the list of problems. A simple random sample was selected. Therapeutic inertia was defined based on the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology recommendations. Results: A sample of 217 patients was obtained. Therapeutic inertia was found in 17.5% of women, which increased to 48.6% in those who suffered fractures (p<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between the ages of patients with and without therapeutic inertia (77.5 vs 73.0, p<0.010). The median FRAX for major osteoporotic fracture (16.5 vs 9.65, p<0.001) and hip fracture (7.6 vs 3.3, p<0.001) was higher in the group with therapeutic inertia. The difference between T-score values ​​for the lumbar spine (2.45 vs 2.71) and the femoral neck (2.07 vs 2.02) did not reach statistical significance (p=0.299). Conclusion: This study highlights the application of the most recent national guidelines regarding osteoporosis treatment in the studied health care unit, but underlines the need for broader intervention in osteoporosis-related fractures and at older ages.Introdução: A osteoporose (OP) é a doença óssea metabólica mais frequente, associando-se a fraturas de fragilidade e aumento de morbimortalidade. Apesar do envelhecimento populacional tem-se verificado uma tendência decrescente na implementação de terapêutica antiosteoporótica.  Objetivos: Determinar a inércia terapêutica na OP em mulheres pós-menopáusicas ao nível dos cuidados de saúde primários. Verificar se existe associação entre a idade dos utentes, o T-score e o valor de FRAX e a inércia terapêutica antiosteoporótica. Métodos: Estudo observacional transversal. Critérios de inclusão: mulheres com idades entre os 55 e os 85 anos codificadas com OP (ICPC2 – L95) ou fraturas (ICPC2 – L72-76) na lista de problemas. Foi selecionada uma amostra aleatória simples. A inércia terapêutica foi definida com base nas recomendações da Sociedade Portuguesa de Reumatologia. Resultados: Obteve-se uma amostra de 217 utentes. Apurou-se inércia terapêutica em 17,5% das mulheres, valor que aumenta para 48,6% nas que sofreram fraturas (p<0,001). As idades diferem de forma estatisticamente significativa entre os utentes com e sem inércia terapêutica (77,5 vs 73,0, p<0,010). A mediana do FRAX para fratura osteoporótica major (16,5 vs 9,65, p<0,001) e fratura da anca (7,6 vs 3,3, p<0,001) foi superior no grupo com inércia terapêutica. Os valores de T-score da coluna lombar (2,45 vs 2,71) e do colo do fémur (2,07 vs 2,02) não diferiram de forma estatisticamente significativa (p=0,299). Conclusão: Este estudo realça a aplicação da evidência mais atual ao nível do tratamento da OP na unidade estudada, mas salienta a necessidade de maior intervenção na OP fraturária e em idades mais avançadas.Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar2024-11-06info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v40i5.13974https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v40i5.13974Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 40 No. 5 (2024): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 444-9Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 40 Núm. 5 (2024): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 444-9Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 40 N.º 5 (2024): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 444-92182-51812182-517310.32385/rpmgf.v40i5reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/13974https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/13974/11986Direitos de Autor (c) 2024 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiarinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessCruz da Silva, MarianaOuteirinho, ConceiçãoLopes, NinaGonçalves, Maria JoãoMina, IsabelPimentel, AlexandraCosta, RodrigoBento, InêsCalafate, AnaHenriques, ManuelSottomayor, Henrique2024-11-09T11:35:21Zoai:ojs.rpmgf.pt:article/13974Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T19:12:03.492538Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Therapeutic inertia in osteoporosis in postmenopausal women
Inércia terapêutica na osteoporose em mulheres pós-menopáusicas
title Therapeutic inertia in osteoporosis in postmenopausal women
spellingShingle Therapeutic inertia in osteoporosis in postmenopausal women
Cruz da Silva, Mariana
Osteoporosis
Therapeutic inertia
Primary health care
Osteoporose
Inércia terapêutica
Cuidados de saúde primários
title_short Therapeutic inertia in osteoporosis in postmenopausal women
title_full Therapeutic inertia in osteoporosis in postmenopausal women
title_fullStr Therapeutic inertia in osteoporosis in postmenopausal women
title_full_unstemmed Therapeutic inertia in osteoporosis in postmenopausal women
title_sort Therapeutic inertia in osteoporosis in postmenopausal women
author Cruz da Silva, Mariana
author_facet Cruz da Silva, Mariana
Outeirinho, Conceição
Lopes, Nina
Gonçalves, Maria João
Mina, Isabel
Pimentel, Alexandra
Costa, Rodrigo
Bento, Inês
Calafate, Ana
Henriques, Manuel
Sottomayor, Henrique
author_role author
author2 Outeirinho, Conceição
Lopes, Nina
Gonçalves, Maria João
Mina, Isabel
Pimentel, Alexandra
Costa, Rodrigo
Bento, Inês
Calafate, Ana
Henriques, Manuel
Sottomayor, Henrique
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Cruz da Silva, Mariana
Outeirinho, Conceição
Lopes, Nina
Gonçalves, Maria João
Mina, Isabel
Pimentel, Alexandra
Costa, Rodrigo
Bento, Inês
Calafate, Ana
Henriques, Manuel
Sottomayor, Henrique
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Osteoporosis
Therapeutic inertia
Primary health care
Osteoporose
Inércia terapêutica
Cuidados de saúde primários
topic Osteoporosis
Therapeutic inertia
Primary health care
Osteoporose
Inércia terapêutica
Cuidados de saúde primários
description Introduction: Osteoporosis (OP) is the most frequent metabolic bone disease, associated with fragility fractures and increased morbimortality. Despite population aging, there has been a downward trend in the implementation of anti-osteoporotic therapy. Objectives: To determine the therapeutic inertia in OP in postmenopausal women in primary health care. Verify whether age, T-score, the FRAX value, and anti-osteoporotic therapeutic inertia are associated. Methods: Cross-sectional observational study. Inclusion criteria: women aged between 55 and 85 coded with OP (ICPC-2 – L95) or fractures (ICPC-2 – L72-76) in the list of problems. A simple random sample was selected. Therapeutic inertia was defined based on the Portuguese Society of Rheumatology recommendations. Results: A sample of 217 patients was obtained. Therapeutic inertia was found in 17.5% of women, which increased to 48.6% in those who suffered fractures (p<0.001). There was a statistically significant difference between the ages of patients with and without therapeutic inertia (77.5 vs 73.0, p<0.010). The median FRAX for major osteoporotic fracture (16.5 vs 9.65, p<0.001) and hip fracture (7.6 vs 3.3, p<0.001) was higher in the group with therapeutic inertia. The difference between T-score values ​​for the lumbar spine (2.45 vs 2.71) and the femoral neck (2.07 vs 2.02) did not reach statistical significance (p=0.299). Conclusion: This study highlights the application of the most recent national guidelines regarding osteoporosis treatment in the studied health care unit, but underlines the need for broader intervention in osteoporosis-related fractures and at older ages.
publishDate 2024
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2024-11-06
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v40i5.13974
https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v40i5.13974
url https://doi.org/10.32385/rpmgf.v40i5.13974
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/13974
https://rpmgf.pt/ojs/index.php/rpmgf/article/view/13974/11986
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2024 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Direitos de Autor (c) 2024 Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Associação Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Portuguese Journal of Family Medicine and General Practice; Vol. 40 No. 5 (2024): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 444-9
Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 40 Núm. 5 (2024): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 444-9
Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; Vol. 40 N.º 5 (2024): Revista Portuguesa de Medicina Geral e Familiar; 444-9
2182-5181
2182-5173
10.32385/rpmgf.v40i5
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833597941354332160