Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It?
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2024 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , |
Format: | Article |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://hdl.handle.net/10316/114735 https://doi.org/10.1159/000528977 |
Summary: | Introduction: According to the guideline published by ESGE/UEG, a high-quality esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) implies the application of some criteria that enable better healthcare outcomes. Although intra-procedural performance measures are dependent on patient factors, there is no reference to sedation practices in the guideline mentioned above. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether deep sedation influences EGD performance measures established by ESGE/UEG. Methods: This was a crosssectional study, with a prospective enrollment, that considered for inclusion consecutive patients referred for EGD. Two questionnaires were used to assess performance measures and patient satisfaction after EGD. Results: Sedation had a statistically significant impact on most quality indicators, including complete examination (77.2% without sedation vs. 97.8% with sedation), inspection time (6.17 ± 3.45 vs. 8.39 ± 2.67 min), photodocumentation (78% vs. 97.8%), biopsies (39.3% vs. 60.7%), and patient satisfaction (5.42 ± 2.93 vs. 9.1 ± 1.19). The main reason for an incomplete procedure was patient intolerance (82.6%). Discussion: Deep sedation of patients submitted to EGD proved to be a determinant in the applicability of the ESGE/UEG quality indicators. Patient intolerance was eliminated in the group with sedation, enhancing procedure completeness, adequate pathology identification, management, and consequently, the effectiveness of the exam. Conclusion: Sedation administration should be considered in patients undergoing EGD since it ensures a high-quality procedure. |
id |
RCAP_f911dd1e775cba4bab1c5e215d5ff37a |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/114735 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It?Critérios de qualidade em endoscopia digestiva alta -poderá a sedação profunda influenciar a sua aplicação?Upper gastrointestinal endoscopyQuality standardsSedationEndoscopia Digestiva AltaCritérios de qualidadeSedaçãoIntroduction: According to the guideline published by ESGE/UEG, a high-quality esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) implies the application of some criteria that enable better healthcare outcomes. Although intra-procedural performance measures are dependent on patient factors, there is no reference to sedation practices in the guideline mentioned above. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether deep sedation influences EGD performance measures established by ESGE/UEG. Methods: This was a crosssectional study, with a prospective enrollment, that considered for inclusion consecutive patients referred for EGD. Two questionnaires were used to assess performance measures and patient satisfaction after EGD. Results: Sedation had a statistically significant impact on most quality indicators, including complete examination (77.2% without sedation vs. 97.8% with sedation), inspection time (6.17 ± 3.45 vs. 8.39 ± 2.67 min), photodocumentation (78% vs. 97.8%), biopsies (39.3% vs. 60.7%), and patient satisfaction (5.42 ± 2.93 vs. 9.1 ± 1.19). The main reason for an incomplete procedure was patient intolerance (82.6%). Discussion: Deep sedation of patients submitted to EGD proved to be a determinant in the applicability of the ESGE/UEG quality indicators. Patient intolerance was eliminated in the group with sedation, enhancing procedure completeness, adequate pathology identification, management, and consequently, the effectiveness of the exam. Conclusion: Sedation administration should be considered in patients undergoing EGD since it ensures a high-quality procedure.Introdução: Uma endoscopia digestiva alta (EDA) de qualidade proporciona melhores resultados em termos de saúde e implica a aplicação dos critérios descritos pelas recomendações da ESGE/UEG. Embora os critérios perprocedimento sejam dependentes da colaboração e tolerância do doente, não está explicito o papel da anestesia. Objetivos: Este estudo pretende avaliar se o recurso a anestesia influencia o cumprimento dos critérios de qualidade para a EDA publicados pela ESGE/UEG. Materiais e métodos: Estudo transversal, com recrutamento prospetivo, que incluiu pacientes consecutivamente encaminhados para realização de EDA. Foram utilizados 2 questionários para avaliar medidas de desempenho e satisfação dos pacientes após realização de EDA. Resultados: A anestesia teve um impacto estatisticamente significativo na maioria dos indicadores de qualidade: exame completo (77,2% sem anestesia vs. 97,8% com anestesia); tempo de inspeção (6,17 ± 3,45 vs. 8,39 ± 2,67 minutos); fotodocumentação (78% vs. 97,8%); biópsias (39,3% vs. 60,7%); satisfação do paciente (5,42 ± 2,93 vs. 9,1 ± 1,19). O principal motivo para um procedimento incompleto foi a intolerância do paciente (82,6%). Discussão: A sedação profunda dos doentes submetidos a EDA provou ser determinante na aplicabilidade dos critérios de qualidade da ESGE/UEG. Eliminando por completo a intolerância por parte do doente, proporcionou a realização de exames completos, com correta identificação e gestão de patologias, potenciando assim a efetividade do exame. Conclusão: A administração de anestesia deve ser ponderada, sempre que possível, nos doentes submetidos a EDA, visto que permite garantir a alta qualidade do procedimento.Karger2024info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/114735https://hdl.handle.net/10316/114735https://doi.org/10.1159/000528977eng2341-45452387-1954Correia, CatarinaAlmeida, NunoAndrade, RaquelSant’Anna, MarianaMacedo, CláudiaPerdigoto, David N.Gregório, CarlosFigueiredo, Pedro Narrainfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-04-08T09:39:12Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/114735Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T06:07:55.638019Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It? Critérios de qualidade em endoscopia digestiva alta -poderá a sedação profunda influenciar a sua aplicação? |
title |
Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It? |
spellingShingle |
Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It? Correia, Catarina Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy Quality standards Sedation Endoscopia Digestiva Alta Critérios de qualidade Sedação |
title_short |
Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It? |
title_full |
Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It? |
title_fullStr |
Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It? |
title_full_unstemmed |
Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It? |
title_sort |
Quality Standards in Upper Gastrointestinal Endoscopy: Can Deep Sedation Influence It? |
author |
Correia, Catarina |
author_facet |
Correia, Catarina Almeida, Nuno Andrade, Raquel Sant’Anna, Mariana Macedo, Cláudia Perdigoto, David N. Gregório, Carlos Figueiredo, Pedro Narra |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Almeida, Nuno Andrade, Raquel Sant’Anna, Mariana Macedo, Cláudia Perdigoto, David N. Gregório, Carlos Figueiredo, Pedro Narra |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Correia, Catarina Almeida, Nuno Andrade, Raquel Sant’Anna, Mariana Macedo, Cláudia Perdigoto, David N. Gregório, Carlos Figueiredo, Pedro Narra |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy Quality standards Sedation Endoscopia Digestiva Alta Critérios de qualidade Sedação |
topic |
Upper gastrointestinal endoscopy Quality standards Sedation Endoscopia Digestiva Alta Critérios de qualidade Sedação |
description |
Introduction: According to the guideline published by ESGE/UEG, a high-quality esophagogastroduodenoscopy (EGD) implies the application of some criteria that enable better healthcare outcomes. Although intra-procedural performance measures are dependent on patient factors, there is no reference to sedation practices in the guideline mentioned above. Objective: This study aimed to evaluate whether deep sedation influences EGD performance measures established by ESGE/UEG. Methods: This was a crosssectional study, with a prospective enrollment, that considered for inclusion consecutive patients referred for EGD. Two questionnaires were used to assess performance measures and patient satisfaction after EGD. Results: Sedation had a statistically significant impact on most quality indicators, including complete examination (77.2% without sedation vs. 97.8% with sedation), inspection time (6.17 ± 3.45 vs. 8.39 ± 2.67 min), photodocumentation (78% vs. 97.8%), biopsies (39.3% vs. 60.7%), and patient satisfaction (5.42 ± 2.93 vs. 9.1 ± 1.19). The main reason for an incomplete procedure was patient intolerance (82.6%). Discussion: Deep sedation of patients submitted to EGD proved to be a determinant in the applicability of the ESGE/UEG quality indicators. Patient intolerance was eliminated in the group with sedation, enhancing procedure completeness, adequate pathology identification, management, and consequently, the effectiveness of the exam. Conclusion: Sedation administration should be considered in patients undergoing EGD since it ensures a high-quality procedure. |
publishDate |
2024 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2024 |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
format |
article |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/114735 https://hdl.handle.net/10316/114735 https://doi.org/10.1159/000528977 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/114735 https://doi.org/10.1159/000528977 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
2341-4545 2387-1954 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Karger |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Karger |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833602586645626880 |