Population's adherence to the Portuguese Health Examination Survey: the perspective of fieldwork teams
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2015 |
Other Authors: | , , , , , , , , , |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/3202 |
Summary: | The participation of fieldwork teams is key to successful surveys implementation. Thus, the Portuguese National Health Examination Survey (INSEF) is involving fieldwork teams in survey quality control processes. The aim of this presentation is to report a midterm evaluation's results of the internal quality control concerning participants' recruitment strategies and how these influence participation rate. A focus group discussion was carried out with fieldwork teams (nurses, laboratory technicians and administrative staff) and regional coordinators in the North, Center and Algarve regions. Each focus group had between 8 to 14 participants with an average age of 47 years and a long professional experience with an average of 22 years. A slideshow presentation fostered the discussion of the survey process: strengths and weaknesses of training, recruitment, informed consent, physical exam, blood collection, interview and logistical issues. It also explored the teams' perceptions of local cultural attitudes and the strategies used within the fieldwork. A thematic content analysis was performed. According to fieldwork teams, higher participation rates depend on: invitation letter signed by personal General Practitioner; free clinical analysis; pride in being selected in a scientific study; study conducted by experienced health professionals; data collection in local health center, schedule flexibility, invitation and confirmatory telephone calls. Also important: population's size, cultural factors and fieldwork teams' years of experience. In two focus groups, opinions on invitation letters' legibility differed between socio-professional categories: nurses and administrative staff. Participation rate depends on fieldwork teams' credibility and local community. The use of qualitative methods such as focus group is important to improve survey processes and these can also give valuable input on fieldwork teams' engagement and motivation. |
id |
RCAP_f5f068c33ec9abd4c9f3e6e274aa49e5 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.insa.pt:10400.18/3202 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Population's adherence to the Portuguese Health Examination Survey: the perspective of fieldwork teamsHealth Examination SurveyPortuguese Health Examination SurveyFieldworkFocus GroupQualitative MethodsDeterminantes da Saúde e da DoençaINSEFInquérito Nacional de Saúde com Exame FísicoThe participation of fieldwork teams is key to successful surveys implementation. Thus, the Portuguese National Health Examination Survey (INSEF) is involving fieldwork teams in survey quality control processes. The aim of this presentation is to report a midterm evaluation's results of the internal quality control concerning participants' recruitment strategies and how these influence participation rate. A focus group discussion was carried out with fieldwork teams (nurses, laboratory technicians and administrative staff) and regional coordinators in the North, Center and Algarve regions. Each focus group had between 8 to 14 participants with an average age of 47 years and a long professional experience with an average of 22 years. A slideshow presentation fostered the discussion of the survey process: strengths and weaknesses of training, recruitment, informed consent, physical exam, blood collection, interview and logistical issues. It also explored the teams' perceptions of local cultural attitudes and the strategies used within the fieldwork. A thematic content analysis was performed. According to fieldwork teams, higher participation rates depend on: invitation letter signed by personal General Practitioner; free clinical analysis; pride in being selected in a scientific study; study conducted by experienced health professionals; data collection in local health center, schedule flexibility, invitation and confirmatory telephone calls. Also important: population's size, cultural factors and fieldwork teams' years of experience. In two focus groups, opinions on invitation letters' legibility differed between socio-professional categories: nurses and administrative staff. Participation rate depends on fieldwork teams' credibility and local community. The use of qualitative methods such as focus group is important to improve survey processes and these can also give valuable input on fieldwork teams' engagement and motivation.Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, IPRepositório Científico do Instituto Nacional de SaúdeGil, Ana PaulaSantos, Ana JoãoSantos, JoanaKislaya, IrinaRodrigues, Ana PaulaNamorado, SóniaGaio, VâniaBarreto, MartaLyshol, HeidiNunes, BaltazarDias, Carlos Matias2015-11-03T12:20:33Z2015-10-152015-10-15T00:00:00Zconference objectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/3202enginfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-02-26T14:11:25Zoai:repositorio.insa.pt:10400.18/3202Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T21:26:01.368817Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Population's adherence to the Portuguese Health Examination Survey: the perspective of fieldwork teams |
title |
Population's adherence to the Portuguese Health Examination Survey: the perspective of fieldwork teams |
spellingShingle |
Population's adherence to the Portuguese Health Examination Survey: the perspective of fieldwork teams Gil, Ana Paula Health Examination Survey Portuguese Health Examination Survey Fieldwork Focus Group Qualitative Methods Determinantes da Saúde e da Doença INSEF Inquérito Nacional de Saúde com Exame Físico |
title_short |
Population's adherence to the Portuguese Health Examination Survey: the perspective of fieldwork teams |
title_full |
Population's adherence to the Portuguese Health Examination Survey: the perspective of fieldwork teams |
title_fullStr |
Population's adherence to the Portuguese Health Examination Survey: the perspective of fieldwork teams |
title_full_unstemmed |
Population's adherence to the Portuguese Health Examination Survey: the perspective of fieldwork teams |
title_sort |
Population's adherence to the Portuguese Health Examination Survey: the perspective of fieldwork teams |
author |
Gil, Ana Paula |
author_facet |
Gil, Ana Paula Santos, Ana João Santos, Joana Kislaya, Irina Rodrigues, Ana Paula Namorado, Sónia Gaio, Vânia Barreto, Marta Lyshol, Heidi Nunes, Baltazar Dias, Carlos Matias |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Santos, Ana João Santos, Joana Kislaya, Irina Rodrigues, Ana Paula Namorado, Sónia Gaio, Vânia Barreto, Marta Lyshol, Heidi Nunes, Baltazar Dias, Carlos Matias |
author2_role |
author author author author author author author author author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
Repositório Científico do Instituto Nacional de Saúde |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gil, Ana Paula Santos, Ana João Santos, Joana Kislaya, Irina Rodrigues, Ana Paula Namorado, Sónia Gaio, Vânia Barreto, Marta Lyshol, Heidi Nunes, Baltazar Dias, Carlos Matias |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Health Examination Survey Portuguese Health Examination Survey Fieldwork Focus Group Qualitative Methods Determinantes da Saúde e da Doença INSEF Inquérito Nacional de Saúde com Exame Físico |
topic |
Health Examination Survey Portuguese Health Examination Survey Fieldwork Focus Group Qualitative Methods Determinantes da Saúde e da Doença INSEF Inquérito Nacional de Saúde com Exame Físico |
description |
The participation of fieldwork teams is key to successful surveys implementation. Thus, the Portuguese National Health Examination Survey (INSEF) is involving fieldwork teams in survey quality control processes. The aim of this presentation is to report a midterm evaluation's results of the internal quality control concerning participants' recruitment strategies and how these influence participation rate. A focus group discussion was carried out with fieldwork teams (nurses, laboratory technicians and administrative staff) and regional coordinators in the North, Center and Algarve regions. Each focus group had between 8 to 14 participants with an average age of 47 years and a long professional experience with an average of 22 years. A slideshow presentation fostered the discussion of the survey process: strengths and weaknesses of training, recruitment, informed consent, physical exam, blood collection, interview and logistical issues. It also explored the teams' perceptions of local cultural attitudes and the strategies used within the fieldwork. A thematic content analysis was performed. According to fieldwork teams, higher participation rates depend on: invitation letter signed by personal General Practitioner; free clinical analysis; pride in being selected in a scientific study; study conducted by experienced health professionals; data collection in local health center, schedule flexibility, invitation and confirmatory telephone calls. Also important: population's size, cultural factors and fieldwork teams' years of experience. In two focus groups, opinions on invitation letters' legibility differed between socio-professional categories: nurses and administrative staff. Participation rate depends on fieldwork teams' credibility and local community. The use of qualitative methods such as focus group is important to improve survey processes and these can also give valuable input on fieldwork teams' engagement and motivation. |
publishDate |
2015 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2015-11-03T12:20:33Z 2015-10-15 2015-10-15T00:00:00Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
conference object |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/3202 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.18/3202 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, IP |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Instituto Nacional de Saúde Doutor Ricardo Jorge, IP |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833599274509664256 |