Bone Densitometry Versus Bone Histomorphometry in Renal Transplanted Patients: A Cross‐Sectional Study

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Ferreira, AC
Publication Date: 2021
Other Authors: Mendes, M, Silva, C, Cotovio, P, Aires, I, Navarro, D, Caeiro, F, Salvador, R, Correia, B, Cabral, G, Nolasco, F, Ferreira, A
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/4351
Summary: Bone loss leads to increase risk of fractures in renal transplantation. The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between bone densitometry (DXA) findings, bone histomorphometry and bone-related molecules 1-year after renal transplantation. We performed a cross-sectional study of de novo renal transplanted patients that agreed to perform a bone biopsy and a DXA examination 1 year after transplantation. All patients underwent a laboratory evaluation, bone biopsy, DXA examination and cardiac CT 1 year after transplantation. 67 patients were included, 16 had a normal examination, and 18 patients were classified as having osteoporosis by DXA. Correlations between bone mineral density and T-scores of total femur and femoral neck were the ones that best correlated with bone volume assessed by a bone biopsy. The sensitivity of DXA for osteoporosis diagnosis was 47.0%, and the specificity was 81.2%. The positive predictive value was 50.0%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 80.0%. DXA parameters also correlated with klotho and sclerostin serum levels. In this population, a normal examination excluded the presence of osteoporosis, helping in identifying patients that would not benefit from therapy. Overall, densitometry in total femur and femoral neck correlated well with bone volume measured by bone biopsy.
id RCAP_f188ad15153db8154a8f5e18b8e747fc
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorio.chlc.pt:10400.17/4351
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Bone Densitometry Versus Bone Histomorphometry in Renal Transplanted Patients: A Cross‐Sectional StudyAbsorptiometry, PhotonBone DensityCross-Sectional StudiesHCC NEFHumansFemur Neck / diagnostic imagingKidney Transplantation* / adverse effectsBone loss leads to increase risk of fractures in renal transplantation. The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between bone densitometry (DXA) findings, bone histomorphometry and bone-related molecules 1-year after renal transplantation. We performed a cross-sectional study of de novo renal transplanted patients that agreed to perform a bone biopsy and a DXA examination 1 year after transplantation. All patients underwent a laboratory evaluation, bone biopsy, DXA examination and cardiac CT 1 year after transplantation. 67 patients were included, 16 had a normal examination, and 18 patients were classified as having osteoporosis by DXA. Correlations between bone mineral density and T-scores of total femur and femoral neck were the ones that best correlated with bone volume assessed by a bone biopsy. The sensitivity of DXA for osteoporosis diagnosis was 47.0%, and the specificity was 81.2%. The positive predictive value was 50.0%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 80.0%. DXA parameters also correlated with klotho and sclerostin serum levels. In this population, a normal examination excluded the presence of osteoporosis, helping in identifying patients that would not benefit from therapy. Overall, densitometry in total femur and femoral neck correlated well with bone volume measured by bone biopsy.WileyRepositório da Unidade Local de Saúde São JoséFerreira, ACMendes, MSilva, CCotovio, PAires, INavarro, DCaeiro, FSalvador, RCorreia, BCabral, GNolasco, FFerreira, A2022-12-29T15:58:55Z20212021-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/4351eng10.1111/tri.13888info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-06T16:46:49Zoai:repositorio.chlc.pt:10400.17/4351Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T00:17:44.810522Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Bone Densitometry Versus Bone Histomorphometry in Renal Transplanted Patients: A Cross‐Sectional Study
title Bone Densitometry Versus Bone Histomorphometry in Renal Transplanted Patients: A Cross‐Sectional Study
spellingShingle Bone Densitometry Versus Bone Histomorphometry in Renal Transplanted Patients: A Cross‐Sectional Study
Ferreira, AC
Absorptiometry, Photon
Bone Density
Cross-Sectional Studies
HCC NEF
Humans
Femur Neck / diagnostic imaging
Kidney Transplantation* / adverse effects
title_short Bone Densitometry Versus Bone Histomorphometry in Renal Transplanted Patients: A Cross‐Sectional Study
title_full Bone Densitometry Versus Bone Histomorphometry in Renal Transplanted Patients: A Cross‐Sectional Study
title_fullStr Bone Densitometry Versus Bone Histomorphometry in Renal Transplanted Patients: A Cross‐Sectional Study
title_full_unstemmed Bone Densitometry Versus Bone Histomorphometry in Renal Transplanted Patients: A Cross‐Sectional Study
title_sort Bone Densitometry Versus Bone Histomorphometry in Renal Transplanted Patients: A Cross‐Sectional Study
author Ferreira, AC
author_facet Ferreira, AC
Mendes, M
Silva, C
Cotovio, P
Aires, I
Navarro, D
Caeiro, F
Salvador, R
Correia, B
Cabral, G
Nolasco, F
Ferreira, A
author_role author
author2 Mendes, M
Silva, C
Cotovio, P
Aires, I
Navarro, D
Caeiro, F
Salvador, R
Correia, B
Cabral, G
Nolasco, F
Ferreira, A
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Repositório da Unidade Local de Saúde São José
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Ferreira, AC
Mendes, M
Silva, C
Cotovio, P
Aires, I
Navarro, D
Caeiro, F
Salvador, R
Correia, B
Cabral, G
Nolasco, F
Ferreira, A
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Absorptiometry, Photon
Bone Density
Cross-Sectional Studies
HCC NEF
Humans
Femur Neck / diagnostic imaging
Kidney Transplantation* / adverse effects
topic Absorptiometry, Photon
Bone Density
Cross-Sectional Studies
HCC NEF
Humans
Femur Neck / diagnostic imaging
Kidney Transplantation* / adverse effects
description Bone loss leads to increase risk of fractures in renal transplantation. The aim of this study was to analyse the relationship between bone densitometry (DXA) findings, bone histomorphometry and bone-related molecules 1-year after renal transplantation. We performed a cross-sectional study of de novo renal transplanted patients that agreed to perform a bone biopsy and a DXA examination 1 year after transplantation. All patients underwent a laboratory evaluation, bone biopsy, DXA examination and cardiac CT 1 year after transplantation. 67 patients were included, 16 had a normal examination, and 18 patients were classified as having osteoporosis by DXA. Correlations between bone mineral density and T-scores of total femur and femoral neck were the ones that best correlated with bone volume assessed by a bone biopsy. The sensitivity of DXA for osteoporosis diagnosis was 47.0%, and the specificity was 81.2%. The positive predictive value was 50.0%, and the negative predictive value (NPV) was 80.0%. DXA parameters also correlated with klotho and sclerostin serum levels. In this population, a normal examination excluded the presence of osteoporosis, helping in identifying patients that would not benefit from therapy. Overall, densitometry in total femur and femoral neck correlated well with bone volume measured by bone biopsy.
publishDate 2021
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2021
2021-01-01T00:00:00Z
2022-12-29T15:58:55Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/4351
url http://hdl.handle.net/10400.17/4351
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv 10.1111/tri.13888
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Wiley
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833600476382232576