Comparison of Combinatorial and Continuous Frameworks for the Beam Angle Optimization Problem in IMRT
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2018 |
Other Authors: | , , , |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | https://hdl.handle.net/10316/80771 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95165-2_42 |
Summary: | Radiation therapy (RT) is used nowadays for the majority of cancer patients. A technologically advanced type of RT is IMRT { intensity-modulated radiation therapy. With this RT modality the cancerous cells of the patient can be irradiated using non-uniform radiation maps delivered from di erent beam directions. Although non-uniform radiation maps allow, by themselves, an enhanced sparing of the neighboring healthy organs while properly irradiating the tumor with the prescribed dose, selection of appropriate irradiation directions play a decisive role on these con icting tasks: deliver dose to the tumor while preventing (too much) dose to be deposited in the surrounding tissues. This paper focus on the problem of choosing the best set of irradiation directions, known as beam angle optimization (BAO) problem. Two completely di erent mathematical formulations of this problem can be found in the literature. A combinatorial formulation, widely used and addressed by many di erent algorithms and strategies, and a continuous formulation proposed by the authors and addressed by derivative-free algorithms. In this paper, a comparison of two of the most successful strategies to address each one of these formulations is done resorting to a set of ten clinical nasopharyngeal tumor cases already treated at the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Coimbra. |
id |
RCAP_ec16203ded2802d7bf5887fd958fb7c0 |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/80771 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Comparison of Combinatorial and Continuous Frameworks for the Beam Angle Optimization Problem in IMRTIMRT, Beam Angle Optimization, Combinatorial Optimization, Derivative-free OptimizationRadiation therapy (RT) is used nowadays for the majority of cancer patients. A technologically advanced type of RT is IMRT { intensity-modulated radiation therapy. With this RT modality the cancerous cells of the patient can be irradiated using non-uniform radiation maps delivered from di erent beam directions. Although non-uniform radiation maps allow, by themselves, an enhanced sparing of the neighboring healthy organs while properly irradiating the tumor with the prescribed dose, selection of appropriate irradiation directions play a decisive role on these con icting tasks: deliver dose to the tumor while preventing (too much) dose to be deposited in the surrounding tissues. This paper focus on the problem of choosing the best set of irradiation directions, known as beam angle optimization (BAO) problem. Two completely di erent mathematical formulations of this problem can be found in the literature. A combinatorial formulation, widely used and addressed by many di erent algorithms and strategies, and a continuous formulation proposed by the authors and addressed by derivative-free algorithms. In this paper, a comparison of two of the most successful strategies to address each one of these formulations is done resorting to a set of ten clinical nasopharyngeal tumor cases already treated at the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Coimbra.Springer2018book partinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionhttps://hdl.handle.net/10316/80771https://hdl.handle.net/10316/80771https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95165-2_42eng978-3-319-95164-5978-3-319-95165-2https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-95165-2_42Rocha, HumbertoDias, JoanaVentura, TiagoFerreira, BrígidaLopes, Maria do Carmoinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2021-08-24T10:08:18Zoai:estudogeral.uc.pt:10316/80771Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T05:26:39.827201Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Comparison of Combinatorial and Continuous Frameworks for the Beam Angle Optimization Problem in IMRT |
title |
Comparison of Combinatorial and Continuous Frameworks for the Beam Angle Optimization Problem in IMRT |
spellingShingle |
Comparison of Combinatorial and Continuous Frameworks for the Beam Angle Optimization Problem in IMRT Rocha, Humberto IMRT, Beam Angle Optimization, Combinatorial Optimization, Derivative-free Optimization |
title_short |
Comparison of Combinatorial and Continuous Frameworks for the Beam Angle Optimization Problem in IMRT |
title_full |
Comparison of Combinatorial and Continuous Frameworks for the Beam Angle Optimization Problem in IMRT |
title_fullStr |
Comparison of Combinatorial and Continuous Frameworks for the Beam Angle Optimization Problem in IMRT |
title_full_unstemmed |
Comparison of Combinatorial and Continuous Frameworks for the Beam Angle Optimization Problem in IMRT |
title_sort |
Comparison of Combinatorial and Continuous Frameworks for the Beam Angle Optimization Problem in IMRT |
author |
Rocha, Humberto |
author_facet |
Rocha, Humberto Dias, Joana Ventura, Tiago Ferreira, Brígida Lopes, Maria do Carmo |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Dias, Joana Ventura, Tiago Ferreira, Brígida Lopes, Maria do Carmo |
author2_role |
author author author author |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rocha, Humberto Dias, Joana Ventura, Tiago Ferreira, Brígida Lopes, Maria do Carmo |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
IMRT, Beam Angle Optimization, Combinatorial Optimization, Derivative-free Optimization |
topic |
IMRT, Beam Angle Optimization, Combinatorial Optimization, Derivative-free Optimization |
description |
Radiation therapy (RT) is used nowadays for the majority of cancer patients. A technologically advanced type of RT is IMRT { intensity-modulated radiation therapy. With this RT modality the cancerous cells of the patient can be irradiated using non-uniform radiation maps delivered from di erent beam directions. Although non-uniform radiation maps allow, by themselves, an enhanced sparing of the neighboring healthy organs while properly irradiating the tumor with the prescribed dose, selection of appropriate irradiation directions play a decisive role on these con icting tasks: deliver dose to the tumor while preventing (too much) dose to be deposited in the surrounding tissues. This paper focus on the problem of choosing the best set of irradiation directions, known as beam angle optimization (BAO) problem. Two completely di erent mathematical formulations of this problem can be found in the literature. A combinatorial formulation, widely used and addressed by many di erent algorithms and strategies, and a continuous formulation proposed by the authors and addressed by derivative-free algorithms. In this paper, a comparison of two of the most successful strategies to address each one of these formulations is done resorting to a set of ten clinical nasopharyngeal tumor cases already treated at the Portuguese Institute of Oncology of Coimbra. |
publishDate |
2018 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018 |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
book part |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/80771 https://hdl.handle.net/10316/80771 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95165-2_42 |
url |
https://hdl.handle.net/10316/80771 https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95165-2_42 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
978-3-319-95164-5 978-3-319-95165-2 https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-3-319-95165-2_42 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Springer |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833602355151503360 |