EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germany

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Uçarer, Emek M.
Publication Date: 2022
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5296
Summary: The response to the so‐called refugee crisis of 2015 in the European Union was haphazard and inconsistent with the stated mission of solidarity. This article situates the EU’s response and its Common European Asylum System (CEAS) as defensive integration producing the lowest common denominator policies. It argues that the rise of right‐wing populism redefines solidarity in narrow and exclusionary terms, in contrast to the inclusive and global solidarity espoused by the EU. Drawing on Germany as a case study of how domestic populist pressures also rise to the European level, the article juxtaposes the demise of the EU’s temporary relocation system (an attempt at internal inclusive solidarity) and the success of the EU–Turkey deal (an attempt at externalization and risk avoidance), both initiatives led by Germany. Solidarity efforts championed by Germany were quickly stymied by (Central Eastern European) member states that not only rejected efforts at temporary solutions but blocked efforts to develop permanent mechanisms and a substantive CEAS reform.
id RCAP_e025146b2e50d87ff446b77e60da862c
oai_identifier_str oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5296
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germanyasylum; European Union; Germany; populism; solidarityThe response to the so‐called refugee crisis of 2015 in the European Union was haphazard and inconsistent with the stated mission of solidarity. This article situates the EU’s response and its Common European Asylum System (CEAS) as defensive integration producing the lowest common denominator policies. It argues that the rise of right‐wing populism redefines solidarity in narrow and exclusionary terms, in contrast to the inclusive and global solidarity espoused by the EU. Drawing on Germany as a case study of how domestic populist pressures also rise to the European level, the article juxtaposes the demise of the EU’s temporary relocation system (an attempt at internal inclusive solidarity) and the success of the EU–Turkey deal (an attempt at externalization and risk avoidance), both initiatives led by Germany. Solidarity efforts championed by Germany were quickly stymied by (Central Eastern European) member states that not only rejected efforts at temporary solutions but blocked efforts to develop permanent mechanisms and a substantive CEAS reform.Cogitatio2022-07-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5296oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5296Social Inclusion; Vol 10, No 3 (2022): A Common European Asylum System: Utopian or Dystopian Expectations?; 36-472183-2803reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/5296https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5296https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/5296/5296Copyright (c) 2022 Emek M. Uçarerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUçarer, Emek M.2022-12-20T11:00:20Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5296Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T10:44:00.598505Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germany
title EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germany
spellingShingle EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germany
Uçarer, Emek M.
asylum; European Union; Germany; populism; solidarity
title_short EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germany
title_full EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germany
title_fullStr EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germany
title_full_unstemmed EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germany
title_sort EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germany
author Uçarer, Emek M.
author_facet Uçarer, Emek M.
author_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Uçarer, Emek M.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv asylum; European Union; Germany; populism; solidarity
topic asylum; European Union; Germany; populism; solidarity
description The response to the so‐called refugee crisis of 2015 in the European Union was haphazard and inconsistent with the stated mission of solidarity. This article situates the EU’s response and its Common European Asylum System (CEAS) as defensive integration producing the lowest common denominator policies. It argues that the rise of right‐wing populism redefines solidarity in narrow and exclusionary terms, in contrast to the inclusive and global solidarity espoused by the EU. Drawing on Germany as a case study of how domestic populist pressures also rise to the European level, the article juxtaposes the demise of the EU’s temporary relocation system (an attempt at internal inclusive solidarity) and the success of the EU–Turkey deal (an attempt at externalization and risk avoidance), both initiatives led by Germany. Solidarity efforts championed by Germany were quickly stymied by (Central Eastern European) member states that not only rejected efforts at temporary solutions but blocked efforts to develop permanent mechanisms and a substantive CEAS reform.
publishDate 2022
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2022-07-27
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5296
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5296
url https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5296
identifier_str_mv oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5296
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/5296
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5296
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/5296/5296
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Emek M. Uçarer
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
rights_invalid_str_mv Copyright (c) 2022 Emek M. Uçarer
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Cogitatio
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Social Inclusion; Vol 10, No 3 (2022): A Common European Asylum System: Utopian or Dystopian Expectations?; 36-47
2183-2803
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833591177309323264