EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germany
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2022 |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | eng |
| Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| Download full: | https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5296 |
Summary: | The response to the so‐called refugee crisis of 2015 in the European Union was haphazard and inconsistent with the stated mission of solidarity. This article situates the EU’s response and its Common European Asylum System (CEAS) as defensive integration producing the lowest common denominator policies. It argues that the rise of right‐wing populism redefines solidarity in narrow and exclusionary terms, in contrast to the inclusive and global solidarity espoused by the EU. Drawing on Germany as a case study of how domestic populist pressures also rise to the European level, the article juxtaposes the demise of the EU’s temporary relocation system (an attempt at internal inclusive solidarity) and the success of the EU–Turkey deal (an attempt at externalization and risk avoidance), both initiatives led by Germany. Solidarity efforts championed by Germany were quickly stymied by (Central Eastern European) member states that not only rejected efforts at temporary solutions but blocked efforts to develop permanent mechanisms and a substantive CEAS reform. |
| id |
RCAP_e025146b2e50d87ff446b77e60da862c |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5296 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
| network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
| spelling |
EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germanyasylum; European Union; Germany; populism; solidarityThe response to the so‐called refugee crisis of 2015 in the European Union was haphazard and inconsistent with the stated mission of solidarity. This article situates the EU’s response and its Common European Asylum System (CEAS) as defensive integration producing the lowest common denominator policies. It argues that the rise of right‐wing populism redefines solidarity in narrow and exclusionary terms, in contrast to the inclusive and global solidarity espoused by the EU. Drawing on Germany as a case study of how domestic populist pressures also rise to the European level, the article juxtaposes the demise of the EU’s temporary relocation system (an attempt at internal inclusive solidarity) and the success of the EU–Turkey deal (an attempt at externalization and risk avoidance), both initiatives led by Germany. Solidarity efforts championed by Germany were quickly stymied by (Central Eastern European) member states that not only rejected efforts at temporary solutions but blocked efforts to develop permanent mechanisms and a substantive CEAS reform.Cogitatio2022-07-27info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5296oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5296Social Inclusion; Vol 10, No 3 (2022): A Common European Asylum System: Utopian or Dystopian Expectations?; 36-472183-2803reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPenghttps://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/5296https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5296https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/5296/5296Copyright (c) 2022 Emek M. Uçarerinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessUçarer, Emek M.2022-12-20T11:00:20Zoai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5296Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T10:44:00.598505Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germany |
| title |
EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germany |
| spellingShingle |
EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germany Uçarer, Emek M. asylum; European Union; Germany; populism; solidarity |
| title_short |
EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germany |
| title_full |
EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germany |
| title_fullStr |
EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germany |
| title_full_unstemmed |
EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germany |
| title_sort |
EU Asylum Governance and E(xc)lusive Solidarity: Insights From Germany |
| author |
Uçarer, Emek M. |
| author_facet |
Uçarer, Emek M. |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Uçarer, Emek M. |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
asylum; European Union; Germany; populism; solidarity |
| topic |
asylum; European Union; Germany; populism; solidarity |
| description |
The response to the so‐called refugee crisis of 2015 in the European Union was haphazard and inconsistent with the stated mission of solidarity. This article situates the EU’s response and its Common European Asylum System (CEAS) as defensive integration producing the lowest common denominator policies. It argues that the rise of right‐wing populism redefines solidarity in narrow and exclusionary terms, in contrast to the inclusive and global solidarity espoused by the EU. Drawing on Germany as a case study of how domestic populist pressures also rise to the European level, the article juxtaposes the demise of the EU’s temporary relocation system (an attempt at internal inclusive solidarity) and the success of the EU–Turkey deal (an attempt at externalization and risk avoidance), both initiatives led by Germany. Solidarity efforts championed by Germany were quickly stymied by (Central Eastern European) member states that not only rejected efforts at temporary solutions but blocked efforts to develop permanent mechanisms and a substantive CEAS reform. |
| publishDate |
2022 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2022-07-27 |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5296 oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5296 |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5296 |
| identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.cogitatiopress.com:article/5296 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/5296 https://doi.org/10.17645/si.v10i3.5296 https://www.cogitatiopress.com/socialinclusion/article/view/5296/5296 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Emek M. Uçarer info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| rights_invalid_str_mv |
Copyright (c) 2022 Emek M. Uçarer |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Cogitatio |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Social Inclusion; Vol 10, No 3 (2022): A Common European Asylum System: Utopian or Dystopian Expectations?; 36-47 2183-2803 reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
| instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| instacron_str |
RCAAP |
| institution |
RCAAP |
| reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
| _version_ |
1833591177309323264 |