Heating and dehumidification in production greenhouses at northern latitudes: energy use

Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kempkes, F.
Publication Date: 2017
Other Authors: de Zwart, H.F., Munoz, P., Montero, J.I., Baptista, F.J., Giuffrida, F., Gilli, C., Stepowska, A., Stanghellini, C.
Format: Article
Language: eng
Source: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Download full: http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21592
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1164.58
Summary: The majority of greenhouses in northern latitudes are heated, in the winter mainly for temperature control and year round to control humidity. Heating is accepted by most organic regulations in different countries; if heating efficiently and the energy source is predominantly renewable energy, heating fits well into the concept of organic production, since it is aligned with the idea of achieving maximum potential with available resources. It is a fact that energy use for humidity control is more important than for heating. Indeed, the improved thermal performance (insulation) of high-tech greenhouses has decreased heating requirements while decreasing the discharge pathways of vapour at the same time. The need to control humidity is especially important in organic greenhouses, given the limited options to fight fungal diseases once they develop. Excess vapour can be discharged in three ways: through exchange with dry outside air (ventilation), through condensation on a cold surface and through hygroscopic adsorption. Ventilation can be uncontrolled (natural) or controlled (forced), and in the latter case can be controlled by a heat exchanger, recovering sensible heat in the ventilated air. Even then, however, the latent heat contained in the vapour (the energy used for evaporation) will be lost. In those cases where the greenhouse is dehumidified by withdrawing internal moisture, the loss of latent heat via ventilation is prevented and condensation on an internal surface recovers the latent heat. Obviously, it costs energy to cool the condensation surface and/or regenerate the hygroscopic salt. Experiments with these systems have been performed during the last years. Some growers have installed these types of systems and they have been monitored for their effect on moisture control and energy saving. The results of these experiments and model calculations to compare them are presented. In case dehumidification systems are well controlled they can save significant amounts of the energy and with an increase of technology level the saving can be improved. There is no generally best possible solution for dehumidification. The optimum system and its operation is dependent on desired temperature and humidity level in the greenhouse.
id RCAP_dfffd1c6e9fa92a53074a76443ce6e22
oai_identifier_str oai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/21592
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Heating and dehumidification in production greenhouses at northern latitudes: energy useenergy efficiencysustainable productionhumidityenergy savingThe majority of greenhouses in northern latitudes are heated, in the winter mainly for temperature control and year round to control humidity. Heating is accepted by most organic regulations in different countries; if heating efficiently and the energy source is predominantly renewable energy, heating fits well into the concept of organic production, since it is aligned with the idea of achieving maximum potential with available resources. It is a fact that energy use for humidity control is more important than for heating. Indeed, the improved thermal performance (insulation) of high-tech greenhouses has decreased heating requirements while decreasing the discharge pathways of vapour at the same time. The need to control humidity is especially important in organic greenhouses, given the limited options to fight fungal diseases once they develop. Excess vapour can be discharged in three ways: through exchange with dry outside air (ventilation), through condensation on a cold surface and through hygroscopic adsorption. Ventilation can be uncontrolled (natural) or controlled (forced), and in the latter case can be controlled by a heat exchanger, recovering sensible heat in the ventilated air. Even then, however, the latent heat contained in the vapour (the energy used for evaporation) will be lost. In those cases where the greenhouse is dehumidified by withdrawing internal moisture, the loss of latent heat via ventilation is prevented and condensation on an internal surface recovers the latent heat. Obviously, it costs energy to cool the condensation surface and/or regenerate the hygroscopic salt. Experiments with these systems have been performed during the last years. Some growers have installed these types of systems and they have been monitored for their effect on moisture control and energy saving. The results of these experiments and model calculations to compare them are presented. In case dehumidification systems are well controlled they can save significant amounts of the energy and with an increase of technology level the saving can be improved. There is no generally best possible solution for dehumidification. The optimum system and its operation is dependent on desired temperature and humidity level in the greenhouse.ISHS2017-12-20T18:36:43Z2017-12-202017-01-01T00:00:00Zinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articlehttp://hdl.handle.net/10174/21592http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21592https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1164.58engKempkes, F., de Zwart, H.F., Munoz, P., Montero, J.I., Baptista, F.J., Giuffrida, F., Gilli, C., Stepowska, A. and Stanghellini, C. (2017). Heating and dehumidification in production greenhouses at northern latitudes: energy use. Acta Hortic. 1164, 445-452. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1164.58partilhar com ICAAMndndndndfb@uevora.ptndndndnd580Kempkes, F.de Zwart, H.F.Munoz, P.Montero, J.I.Baptista, F.J.Giuffrida, F.Gilli, C.Stepowska, A.Stanghellini, C.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-01-03T19:12:19Zoai:dspace.uevora.pt:10174/21592Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T12:14:22.681288Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Heating and dehumidification in production greenhouses at northern latitudes: energy use
title Heating and dehumidification in production greenhouses at northern latitudes: energy use
spellingShingle Heating and dehumidification in production greenhouses at northern latitudes: energy use
Kempkes, F.
energy efficiency
sustainable production
humidity
energy saving
title_short Heating and dehumidification in production greenhouses at northern latitudes: energy use
title_full Heating and dehumidification in production greenhouses at northern latitudes: energy use
title_fullStr Heating and dehumidification in production greenhouses at northern latitudes: energy use
title_full_unstemmed Heating and dehumidification in production greenhouses at northern latitudes: energy use
title_sort Heating and dehumidification in production greenhouses at northern latitudes: energy use
author Kempkes, F.
author_facet Kempkes, F.
de Zwart, H.F.
Munoz, P.
Montero, J.I.
Baptista, F.J.
Giuffrida, F.
Gilli, C.
Stepowska, A.
Stanghellini, C.
author_role author
author2 de Zwart, H.F.
Munoz, P.
Montero, J.I.
Baptista, F.J.
Giuffrida, F.
Gilli, C.
Stepowska, A.
Stanghellini, C.
author2_role author
author
author
author
author
author
author
author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Kempkes, F.
de Zwart, H.F.
Munoz, P.
Montero, J.I.
Baptista, F.J.
Giuffrida, F.
Gilli, C.
Stepowska, A.
Stanghellini, C.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv energy efficiency
sustainable production
humidity
energy saving
topic energy efficiency
sustainable production
humidity
energy saving
description The majority of greenhouses in northern latitudes are heated, in the winter mainly for temperature control and year round to control humidity. Heating is accepted by most organic regulations in different countries; if heating efficiently and the energy source is predominantly renewable energy, heating fits well into the concept of organic production, since it is aligned with the idea of achieving maximum potential with available resources. It is a fact that energy use for humidity control is more important than for heating. Indeed, the improved thermal performance (insulation) of high-tech greenhouses has decreased heating requirements while decreasing the discharge pathways of vapour at the same time. The need to control humidity is especially important in organic greenhouses, given the limited options to fight fungal diseases once they develop. Excess vapour can be discharged in three ways: through exchange with dry outside air (ventilation), through condensation on a cold surface and through hygroscopic adsorption. Ventilation can be uncontrolled (natural) or controlled (forced), and in the latter case can be controlled by a heat exchanger, recovering sensible heat in the ventilated air. Even then, however, the latent heat contained in the vapour (the energy used for evaporation) will be lost. In those cases where the greenhouse is dehumidified by withdrawing internal moisture, the loss of latent heat via ventilation is prevented and condensation on an internal surface recovers the latent heat. Obviously, it costs energy to cool the condensation surface and/or regenerate the hygroscopic salt. Experiments with these systems have been performed during the last years. Some growers have installed these types of systems and they have been monitored for their effect on moisture control and energy saving. The results of these experiments and model calculations to compare them are presented. In case dehumidification systems are well controlled they can save significant amounts of the energy and with an increase of technology level the saving can be improved. There is no generally best possible solution for dehumidification. The optimum system and its operation is dependent on desired temperature and humidity level in the greenhouse.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-12-20T18:36:43Z
2017-12-20
2017-01-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21592
http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21592
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1164.58
url http://hdl.handle.net/10174/21592
https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1164.58
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv Kempkes, F., de Zwart, H.F., Munoz, P., Montero, J.I., Baptista, F.J., Giuffrida, F., Gilli, C., Stepowska, A. and Stanghellini, C. (2017). Heating and dehumidification in production greenhouses at northern latitudes: energy use. Acta Hortic. 1164, 445-452. DOI: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2017.1164.58
partilhar com ICAAM
nd
nd
nd
nd
fb@uevora.pt
nd
nd
nd
nd
580
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv ISHS
publisher.none.fl_str_mv ISHS
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833592650261856256