Impact of propagation model on capacity in small-cell networks
Main Author: | |
---|---|
Publication Date: | 2017 |
Other Authors: | , |
Language: | eng |
Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
Download full: | http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/7208 |
Summary: | This work evaluates the impact of different path loss models on capacity of small cell (SC) networks, including the relationship between cell size and capacity. We compare four urban path loss models: the urban/vehicular and pedestrian test environment from the ITU-R M. 1255 Report, and the two-slope Micro Urban Line-of-Sight (LoS) and Non-Line-of-Sight (NLoS) models from the ITU-R 2135 Report. We show that when using the ITU-R two-slope model that considers the existence of a break-point in the behaviour of path loss, for coverage distances, R, up to break-point distance divided by reuse factor, supported cell throughput, Rb-sup, is much lower than expected when traditional single-slope models are assumed. For Rs longer than dBP/rcc the results for Rb-sup increase with R, whereas they are steady or decrease with R when using the traditional single-slope propagation models. We conclude that the two-slope propagation model yields a significantly lower throughput per square km than a traditional one-slope model if and only if cell radius is small. |
id |
RCAP_df96702c32992c5fa2bda5fc64a6694e |
---|---|
oai_identifier_str |
oai:ubibliorum.ubi.pt:10400.6/7208 |
network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
spelling |
Impact of propagation model on capacity in small-cell networksLTE-AdvancedCarrier AggregationCNIRITU-R propagation modelRadio and network optimizationSystem capacitySpectrum sharingHetNetThis work evaluates the impact of different path loss models on capacity of small cell (SC) networks, including the relationship between cell size and capacity. We compare four urban path loss models: the urban/vehicular and pedestrian test environment from the ITU-R M. 1255 Report, and the two-slope Micro Urban Line-of-Sight (LoS) and Non-Line-of-Sight (NLoS) models from the ITU-R 2135 Report. We show that when using the ITU-R two-slope model that considers the existence of a break-point in the behaviour of path loss, for coverage distances, R, up to break-point distance divided by reuse factor, supported cell throughput, Rb-sup, is much lower than expected when traditional single-slope models are assumed. For Rs longer than dBP/rcc the results for Rb-sup increase with R, whereas they are steady or decrease with R when using the traditional single-slope propagation models. We conclude that the two-slope propagation model yields a significantly lower throughput per square km than a traditional one-slope model if and only if cell radius is small.IEEEuBibliorumSousa, SofiaVelez, FernandoPeha, Jon2019-08-28T11:28:08Z20172017-01-01T00:00:00Zconference objectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/7208eng10.23919/SPECTS.2017.8046782info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2025-03-11T14:37:36Zoai:ubibliorum.ubi.pt:10400.6/7208Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-29T01:19:44.407550Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Impact of propagation model on capacity in small-cell networks |
title |
Impact of propagation model on capacity in small-cell networks |
spellingShingle |
Impact of propagation model on capacity in small-cell networks Sousa, Sofia LTE-Advanced Carrier Aggregation CNIR ITU-R propagation model Radio and network optimization System capacity Spectrum sharing HetNet |
title_short |
Impact of propagation model on capacity in small-cell networks |
title_full |
Impact of propagation model on capacity in small-cell networks |
title_fullStr |
Impact of propagation model on capacity in small-cell networks |
title_full_unstemmed |
Impact of propagation model on capacity in small-cell networks |
title_sort |
Impact of propagation model on capacity in small-cell networks |
author |
Sousa, Sofia |
author_facet |
Sousa, Sofia Velez, Fernando Peha, Jon |
author_role |
author |
author2 |
Velez, Fernando Peha, Jon |
author2_role |
author author |
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv |
uBibliorum |
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Sousa, Sofia Velez, Fernando Peha, Jon |
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
LTE-Advanced Carrier Aggregation CNIR ITU-R propagation model Radio and network optimization System capacity Spectrum sharing HetNet |
topic |
LTE-Advanced Carrier Aggregation CNIR ITU-R propagation model Radio and network optimization System capacity Spectrum sharing HetNet |
description |
This work evaluates the impact of different path loss models on capacity of small cell (SC) networks, including the relationship between cell size and capacity. We compare four urban path loss models: the urban/vehicular and pedestrian test environment from the ITU-R M. 1255 Report, and the two-slope Micro Urban Line-of-Sight (LoS) and Non-Line-of-Sight (NLoS) models from the ITU-R 2135 Report. We show that when using the ITU-R two-slope model that considers the existence of a break-point in the behaviour of path loss, for coverage distances, R, up to break-point distance divided by reuse factor, supported cell throughput, Rb-sup, is much lower than expected when traditional single-slope models are assumed. For Rs longer than dBP/rcc the results for Rb-sup increase with R, whereas they are steady or decrease with R when using the traditional single-slope propagation models. We conclude that the two-slope propagation model yields a significantly lower throughput per square km than a traditional one-slope model if and only if cell radius is small. |
publishDate |
2017 |
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017 2017-01-01T00:00:00Z 2019-08-28T11:28:08Z |
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
conference object |
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
status_str |
publishedVersion |
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/7208 |
url |
http://hdl.handle.net/10400.6/7208 |
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
language |
eng |
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
10.23919/SPECTS.2017.8046782 |
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IEEE |
publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
IEEE |
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
instacron_str |
RCAAP |
institution |
RCAAP |
reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
_version_ |
1833600927130451968 |