Enteric nutrition and esophageal impactation: what relationship.
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2010 |
| Other Authors: | , , , , |
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | por |
| Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| Download full: | https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/617 |
Summary: | In the intensive care unit (ICU), enteral feeding is the method of choice for providing adequate nutrition in intubated patients. The oesophageal impactation (EI) by enteric nutrition (EN) results from solidification of the solution in esophagus lumen with formation of bezoar and although rare, is gradually becoming more common in clinical practice. In recent years some have been diagnosed cases of enteric nutrition impact, in an ICU. The authors seek to better understand their risk factors in order to prevent its occurrence.Retrospective study of patients with endoscopic diagnosis of EI, in ICU, over a period of 3 years.There were 1367 patients in the ICU, 1003 did EN and 9 had a EI diagnosis. Mean age - 66 years, 7 males, all of them with invasive ventilation support. Mean ICU stay - 32 days, and EI at 20th day, 12 days after started EN. In all the cases, EN is due to the solidification of the EN solution in esophagus. 7 patients had esophageal reflux risk factors: 4 previously known and 3 identified after EI diagnosis. The endoscopic treatment was successful in 7 patients.The EI frequency is low. The ICU average delay (32 days) in this series is twice the total of patients admitted during this period (14,27 days), reflecting the greater severity of the patients studied. Several cases could be implicated in the etiology of that clinical entity. Whenever risk factors are present it should be considered both the endoscopic introduction of nasojejunal tube and specific positioning strategies, to prevent reflux and gastric estasis. Medical and endoscopic treatment solved the majority of related cases that are available in the literature; however, in some specific cases it was necessary to use surgical treatment. |
| id |
RCAP_df1dae28f1f8b97703edeb873e937228 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/617 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
| network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
| spelling |
Enteric nutrition and esophageal impactation: what relationship.Alimentação entérica e impactação alimentar esofágica: que relação?In the intensive care unit (ICU), enteral feeding is the method of choice for providing adequate nutrition in intubated patients. The oesophageal impactation (EI) by enteric nutrition (EN) results from solidification of the solution in esophagus lumen with formation of bezoar and although rare, is gradually becoming more common in clinical practice. In recent years some have been diagnosed cases of enteric nutrition impact, in an ICU. The authors seek to better understand their risk factors in order to prevent its occurrence.Retrospective study of patients with endoscopic diagnosis of EI, in ICU, over a period of 3 years.There were 1367 patients in the ICU, 1003 did EN and 9 had a EI diagnosis. Mean age - 66 years, 7 males, all of them with invasive ventilation support. Mean ICU stay - 32 days, and EI at 20th day, 12 days after started EN. In all the cases, EN is due to the solidification of the EN solution in esophagus. 7 patients had esophageal reflux risk factors: 4 previously known and 3 identified after EI diagnosis. The endoscopic treatment was successful in 7 patients.The EI frequency is low. The ICU average delay (32 days) in this series is twice the total of patients admitted during this period (14,27 days), reflecting the greater severity of the patients studied. Several cases could be implicated in the etiology of that clinical entity. Whenever risk factors are present it should be considered both the endoscopic introduction of nasojejunal tube and specific positioning strategies, to prevent reflux and gastric estasis. Medical and endoscopic treatment solved the majority of related cases that are available in the literature; however, in some specific cases it was necessary to use surgical treatment.In the intensive care unit (ICU), enteral feeding is the method of choice for providing adequate nutrition in intubated patients. The oesophageal impactation (EI) by enteric nutrition (EN) results from solidification of the solution in esophagus lumen with formation of bezoar and although rare, is gradually becoming more common in clinical practice. In recent years some have been diagnosed cases of enteric nutrition impact, in an ICU. The authors seek to better understand their risk factors in order to prevent its occurrence.Retrospective study of patients with endoscopic diagnosis of EI, in ICU, over a period of 3 years.There were 1367 patients in the ICU, 1003 did EN and 9 had a EI diagnosis. Mean age - 66 years, 7 males, all of them with invasive ventilation support. Mean ICU stay - 32 days, and EI at 20th day, 12 days after started EN. In all the cases, EN is due to the solidification of the EN solution in esophagus. 7 patients had esophageal reflux risk factors: 4 previously known and 3 identified after EI diagnosis. The endoscopic treatment was successful in 7 patients.The EI frequency is low. The ICU average delay (32 days) in this series is twice the total of patients admitted during this period (14,27 days), reflecting the greater severity of the patients studied. Several cases could be implicated in the etiology of that clinical entity. Whenever risk factors are present it should be considered both the endoscopic introduction of nasojejunal tube and specific positioning strategies, to prevent reflux and gastric estasis. Medical and endoscopic treatment solved the majority of related cases that are available in the literature; however, in some specific cases it was necessary to use surgical treatment.Ordem dos Médicos2010-04-14info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/617oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/617Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 23 No. 2 (2010): March-April; 183-90Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 23 N.º 2 (2010): Março-Abril; 183-901646-07580870-399Xreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/617https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/617/301Caldeira, AnaCasanova, PaulaSousa, RuiMartins, PauloBanhudo, AntónioPimentel, Jorgeinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2022-12-20T10:56:36Zoai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/617Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T10:36:27.269068Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Enteric nutrition and esophageal impactation: what relationship. Alimentação entérica e impactação alimentar esofágica: que relação? |
| title |
Enteric nutrition and esophageal impactation: what relationship. |
| spellingShingle |
Enteric nutrition and esophageal impactation: what relationship. Caldeira, Ana |
| title_short |
Enteric nutrition and esophageal impactation: what relationship. |
| title_full |
Enteric nutrition and esophageal impactation: what relationship. |
| title_fullStr |
Enteric nutrition and esophageal impactation: what relationship. |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Enteric nutrition and esophageal impactation: what relationship. |
| title_sort |
Enteric nutrition and esophageal impactation: what relationship. |
| author |
Caldeira, Ana |
| author_facet |
Caldeira, Ana Casanova, Paula Sousa, Rui Martins, Paulo Banhudo, António Pimentel, Jorge |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Casanova, Paula Sousa, Rui Martins, Paulo Banhudo, António Pimentel, Jorge |
| author2_role |
author author author author author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Caldeira, Ana Casanova, Paula Sousa, Rui Martins, Paulo Banhudo, António Pimentel, Jorge |
| description |
In the intensive care unit (ICU), enteral feeding is the method of choice for providing adequate nutrition in intubated patients. The oesophageal impactation (EI) by enteric nutrition (EN) results from solidification of the solution in esophagus lumen with formation of bezoar and although rare, is gradually becoming more common in clinical practice. In recent years some have been diagnosed cases of enteric nutrition impact, in an ICU. The authors seek to better understand their risk factors in order to prevent its occurrence.Retrospective study of patients with endoscopic diagnosis of EI, in ICU, over a period of 3 years.There were 1367 patients in the ICU, 1003 did EN and 9 had a EI diagnosis. Mean age - 66 years, 7 males, all of them with invasive ventilation support. Mean ICU stay - 32 days, and EI at 20th day, 12 days after started EN. In all the cases, EN is due to the solidification of the EN solution in esophagus. 7 patients had esophageal reflux risk factors: 4 previously known and 3 identified after EI diagnosis. The endoscopic treatment was successful in 7 patients.The EI frequency is low. The ICU average delay (32 days) in this series is twice the total of patients admitted during this period (14,27 days), reflecting the greater severity of the patients studied. Several cases could be implicated in the etiology of that clinical entity. Whenever risk factors are present it should be considered both the endoscopic introduction of nasojejunal tube and specific positioning strategies, to prevent reflux and gastric estasis. Medical and endoscopic treatment solved the majority of related cases that are available in the literature; however, in some specific cases it was necessary to use surgical treatment. |
| publishDate |
2010 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2010-04-14 |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/617 oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/617 |
| url |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/617 |
| identifier_str_mv |
oai:ojs.www.actamedicaportuguesa.com:article/617 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/617 https://www.actamedicaportuguesa.com/revista/index.php/amp/article/view/617/301 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Ordem dos Médicos |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 23 No. 2 (2010): March-April; 183-90 Acta Médica Portuguesa; Vol. 23 N.º 2 (2010): Março-Abril; 183-90 1646-0758 0870-399X reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
| instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| instacron_str |
RCAAP |
| institution |
RCAAP |
| reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
| _version_ |
1833591041598423040 |