Uncertain risk assessment and management: case studies of the application of the precautionary principle in Portugal
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Publication Date: | 2018 |
| Language: | eng |
| Source: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| Download full: | https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-49932 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/16825 |
Summary: | The application of the precautionary principle in the assessment and management of uncertain and potentially serious risks to environment or to public health has shown some ambiguity in the interpretation of the concept of precaution, insufficient knowledge of the potential effects of activities that may cause risk and lack of mechanisms and operational frameworks to support decisions. The role of the decision-maker becomes more difficult due to the diversity of situations, the lack of precise regulations and the multiple interests involved (environmental, economic and social), in a context of uncertainty. In court disputes, in particular, judges find it difficult to conduct analyzes based on facts originating in branches of science other than legal science. Therefore, the conditions of application of the precautionary principle have been strongly conditioned by factors such as the objectives of decision-makers, their attitudes towards risk and the rules and decision criteria they use, hindering the functioning of administrative justice and generating discretion, ambiguity and unpredictability in the decision process. |
| id |
RCAP_d5b9457ce0e704129f2ed8de02bd59fe |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/16825 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
| network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
| spelling |
Uncertain risk assessment and management: case studies of the application of the precautionary principle in PortugalThe application of the precautionary principle in the assessment and management of uncertain and potentially serious risks to environment or to public health has shown some ambiguity in the interpretation of the concept of precaution, insufficient knowledge of the potential effects of activities that may cause risk and lack of mechanisms and operational frameworks to support decisions. The role of the decision-maker becomes more difficult due to the diversity of situations, the lack of precise regulations and the multiple interests involved (environmental, economic and social), in a context of uncertainty. In court disputes, in particular, judges find it difficult to conduct analyzes based on facts originating in branches of science other than legal science. Therefore, the conditions of application of the precautionary principle have been strongly conditioned by factors such as the objectives of decision-makers, their attitudes towards risk and the rules and decision criteria they use, hindering the functioning of administrative justice and generating discretion, ambiguity and unpredictability in the decision process.2018-12-04T10:23:23Z2018-01-01T00:00:00Z2018conference objectinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttps://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-49932http://hdl.handle.net/10071/16825engGonçalves, V.info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-07-07T02:27:00Zoai:repositorio.iscte-iul.pt:10071/16825Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T17:58:38.920174Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Uncertain risk assessment and management: case studies of the application of the precautionary principle in Portugal |
| title |
Uncertain risk assessment and management: case studies of the application of the precautionary principle in Portugal |
| spellingShingle |
Uncertain risk assessment and management: case studies of the application of the precautionary principle in Portugal Gonçalves, V. |
| title_short |
Uncertain risk assessment and management: case studies of the application of the precautionary principle in Portugal |
| title_full |
Uncertain risk assessment and management: case studies of the application of the precautionary principle in Portugal |
| title_fullStr |
Uncertain risk assessment and management: case studies of the application of the precautionary principle in Portugal |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Uncertain risk assessment and management: case studies of the application of the precautionary principle in Portugal |
| title_sort |
Uncertain risk assessment and management: case studies of the application of the precautionary principle in Portugal |
| author |
Gonçalves, V. |
| author_facet |
Gonçalves, V. |
| author_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Gonçalves, V. |
| description |
The application of the precautionary principle in the assessment and management of uncertain and potentially serious risks to environment or to public health has shown some ambiguity in the interpretation of the concept of precaution, insufficient knowledge of the potential effects of activities that may cause risk and lack of mechanisms and operational frameworks to support decisions. The role of the decision-maker becomes more difficult due to the diversity of situations, the lack of precise regulations and the multiple interests involved (environmental, economic and social), in a context of uncertainty. In court disputes, in particular, judges find it difficult to conduct analyzes based on facts originating in branches of science other than legal science. Therefore, the conditions of application of the precautionary principle have been strongly conditioned by factors such as the objectives of decision-makers, their attitudes towards risk and the rules and decision criteria they use, hindering the functioning of administrative justice and generating discretion, ambiguity and unpredictability in the decision process. |
| publishDate |
2018 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2018-12-04T10:23:23Z 2018-01-01T00:00:00Z 2018 |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
conference object |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-49932 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/16825 |
| url |
https://ciencia.iscte-iul.pt/id/ci-pub-49932 http://hdl.handle.net/10071/16825 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
eng |
| language |
eng |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
| instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| instacron_str |
RCAAP |
| institution |
RCAAP |
| reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
| _version_ |
1833597105118117888 |