Subject age in P300 BCI

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Dias, N. S.
Data de Publicação: 2005
Outros Autores: Mendes, P. M., Correia, J. H.
Idioma: eng
Título da fonte: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Texto Completo: http://hdl.handle.net/1822/1611
Resumo: This paper presents a study about the amplitude, latency and distribution of P300 in twelve healthy volunteers (5 women and 7 men, aged between 19-70, with a mean of 35.5 years) that were submitted to two Novelty Oddball Paradigms. The difference between them is on stimulus modalities, which are visual and auditory. Usually, a P300-based brain computer interface has visual stimuli but we are also interested in making analogies between the two modalities. In both test modalities were presented 3 types of stimuli: a ‘standard’ stimulus, a ‘target’ stimulus, to which the subject must respond, and a ‘novel’ stimulus. Most of the subjects were students and are naive to the purposes of the experiment. The subject is not warned about the ‘novel’. We recorded scalp potentials from 18 channels distributed in a standard configuration 10-20 system. Target P300 had more relevance than novel P300 for a BCI application. Results show relevant differences in amplitude and latency in P300 signal for different ages. The Older subjects (>51 years) show smaller P300 amplitudes than younger. Therefore, the subject age must be taken into account when a P300 BCI application is implemented.
id RCAP_d4e57f98366d69da35f038bf56e19785
oai_identifier_str oai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/1611
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Subject age in P300 BCIP300Brain computer interface BCIScience & TechnologyThis paper presents a study about the amplitude, latency and distribution of P300 in twelve healthy volunteers (5 women and 7 men, aged between 19-70, with a mean of 35.5 years) that were submitted to two Novelty Oddball Paradigms. The difference between them is on stimulus modalities, which are visual and auditory. Usually, a P300-based brain computer interface has visual stimuli but we are also interested in making analogies between the two modalities. In both test modalities were presented 3 types of stimuli: a ‘standard’ stimulus, a ‘target’ stimulus, to which the subject must respond, and a ‘novel’ stimulus. Most of the subjects were students and are naive to the purposes of the experiment. The subject is not warned about the ‘novel’. We recorded scalp potentials from 18 channels distributed in a standard configuration 10-20 system. Target P300 had more relevance than novel P300 for a BCI application. Results show relevant differences in amplitude and latency in P300 signal for different ages. The Older subjects (>51 years) show smaller P300 amplitudes than younger. Therefore, the subject age must be taken into account when a P300 BCI application is implemented.Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (FCT)IEEEUniversidade do MinhoDias, N. S.Mendes, P. M.Correia, J. H.2005-032005-03-01T00:00:00Zconference paperinfo:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersionapplication/pdfhttp://hdl.handle.net/1822/1611engINTERNATIONAL IEEE EMBS CONFERENCE ON NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2, Arlington, 2005 - "Proceedings". Piscataway : IEEE, 2005. p. 579-582.07803870901948-354610.1109/CNE.2005.1419690info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccessreponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAP2024-05-11T05:03:46Zoai:repositorium.sdum.uminho.pt:1822/1611Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T15:06:44.541103Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Subject age in P300 BCI
title Subject age in P300 BCI
spellingShingle Subject age in P300 BCI
Dias, N. S.
P300
Brain computer interface BCI
Science & Technology
title_short Subject age in P300 BCI
title_full Subject age in P300 BCI
title_fullStr Subject age in P300 BCI
title_full_unstemmed Subject age in P300 BCI
title_sort Subject age in P300 BCI
author Dias, N. S.
author_facet Dias, N. S.
Mendes, P. M.
Correia, J. H.
author_role author
author2 Mendes, P. M.
Correia, J. H.
author2_role author
author
dc.contributor.none.fl_str_mv Universidade do Minho
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Dias, N. S.
Mendes, P. M.
Correia, J. H.
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv P300
Brain computer interface BCI
Science & Technology
topic P300
Brain computer interface BCI
Science & Technology
description This paper presents a study about the amplitude, latency and distribution of P300 in twelve healthy volunteers (5 women and 7 men, aged between 19-70, with a mean of 35.5 years) that were submitted to two Novelty Oddball Paradigms. The difference between them is on stimulus modalities, which are visual and auditory. Usually, a P300-based brain computer interface has visual stimuli but we are also interested in making analogies between the two modalities. In both test modalities were presented 3 types of stimuli: a ‘standard’ stimulus, a ‘target’ stimulus, to which the subject must respond, and a ‘novel’ stimulus. Most of the subjects were students and are naive to the purposes of the experiment. The subject is not warned about the ‘novel’. We recorded scalp potentials from 18 channels distributed in a standard configuration 10-20 system. Target P300 had more relevance than novel P300 for a BCI application. Results show relevant differences in amplitude and latency in P300 signal for different ages. The Older subjects (>51 years) show smaller P300 amplitudes than younger. Therefore, the subject age must be taken into account when a P300 BCI application is implemented.
publishDate 2005
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2005-03
2005-03-01T00:00:00Z
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv conference paper
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv http://hdl.handle.net/1822/1611
url http://hdl.handle.net/1822/1611
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv eng
language eng
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv INTERNATIONAL IEEE EMBS CONFERENCE ON NEURAL ENGINEERING, 2, Arlington, 2005 - "Proceedings". Piscataway : IEEE, 2005. p. 579-582.
0780387090
1948-3546
10.1109/CNE.2005.1419690
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv IEEE
publisher.none.fl_str_mv IEEE
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833595107942596608