Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections
| Autor(a) principal: | |
|---|---|
| Data de Publicação: | 2017 |
| Outros Autores: | |
| Tipo de documento: | Artigo |
| Idioma: | por |
| Título da fonte: | Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| Texto Completo: | https://doi.org/10.58050/comunicando.v6i1.226 |
Resumo: | Twitter has become a space for political deliberation and confrontational positions, during election time. Therefore, the prime objective of this research focused on understanding which U.S. political force – republicans or democrats – had a more substantial presence on Twitter, during the presidential election of 2016. As we were trying to decipher this issue, we were also trying to understand the power of the hashtag in political communication on Twitter for each political perspective. For this, we collected and analysed 4399 tweets. In this paper, we observed that the presence of the republicans was more prominent than the democrats. However, the true voice of Twitter is the common citizen. We verified that, in this social media, the hashtag is much more than an aggregator of content. This mechanism of participation respects the objective of expressing a political position too. |
| id |
RCAP_d4dae7e1741be3c788af3dbc4d0268e9 |
|---|---|
| oai_identifier_str |
oai:revistacomunicando.sopcom.pt:article/226 |
| network_acronym_str |
RCAP |
| network_name_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository_id_str |
https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160 |
| spelling |
Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential ElectionsRepublicanos e Democratas: quem tem Voz no Twitter? O caso das eleições presidenciais dos EUA em 2016Eleições presidenciais dos EUATwitterrepublicanosdemocratashashtagUS presidential electionsTwitterrepublicansdemocratshashtagTwitter has become a space for political deliberation and confrontational positions, during election time. Therefore, the prime objective of this research focused on understanding which U.S. political force – republicans or democrats – had a more substantial presence on Twitter, during the presidential election of 2016. As we were trying to decipher this issue, we were also trying to understand the power of the hashtag in political communication on Twitter for each political perspective. For this, we collected and analysed 4399 tweets. In this paper, we observed that the presence of the republicans was more prominent than the democrats. However, the true voice of Twitter is the common citizen. We verified that, in this social media, the hashtag is much more than an aggregator of content. This mechanism of participation respects the objective of expressing a political position too.O Twitter tornou-se num espaço de deliberação política e confronto de posições, em tempo de eleições. Neste sentido, a presente investigação tem como objetivo primordial perceber qual a força política dos EUA – republicanos ou democratas – que possuiu uma maior voz no debate político que se desenrolou no Twitter, durante o período das eleições presidenciais no país, em 2016. À medida que tentamos decifrar esta questão, procuramos também compreender qual o poder que a hashtag possui na comunicação política no Twitter para cada perspetiva partidária. Para tal, foi recolhida e analisada uma base de dados composta por 4399 tweets. Nesta investigação, foi possível concluir que a presença dos republicanos se sobrepõe à dos democratas. No entanto, a verdadeira voz que se faz ouvir na rede é a do cidadão comum. Verificamos ainda que, no Twitter , a hashtag é muito mais do que uma agregadora de conteúdos, pois é também através desta ferramenta que os utilizadores expressam a sua posição política.Sopcom2017-07-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.58050/comunicando.v6i1.226https://doi.org/10.58050/comunicando.v6i1.226Revista Comunicando; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2017): Media and Citizenship: A Tribute to Paquete de Oliveira; 103 - 128Revista Comunicando; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2017): Medios de Comunicación y Ciudadanía: Homenaje a Paquete de Oliveira; 103 - 128Revista Comunicando; Vol. 6 N.º 1 (2017): Média e Cidadania: Um Tributo a Paquete de Oliveira; 103 - 1282182-4037reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.revistacomunicando.sopcom.pt/index.php/comunicando/article/view/226https://www.revistacomunicando.sopcom.pt/index.php/comunicando/article/view/226/161Rodrigues, JuditeDias, Sérgioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-12-14T08:24:17Zoai:revistacomunicando.sopcom.pt:article/226Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T19:18:29.057101Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse |
| dc.title.none.fl_str_mv |
Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections Republicanos e Democratas: quem tem Voz no Twitter? O caso das eleições presidenciais dos EUA em 2016 |
| title |
Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections |
| spellingShingle |
Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections Rodrigues, Judite Eleições presidenciais dos EUA republicanos democratas hashtag US presidential elections republicans democrats hashtag |
| title_short |
Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections |
| title_full |
Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections |
| title_fullStr |
Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections |
| title_full_unstemmed |
Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections |
| title_sort |
Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections |
| author |
Rodrigues, Judite |
| author_facet |
Rodrigues, Judite Dias, Sérgio |
| author_role |
author |
| author2 |
Dias, Sérgio |
| author2_role |
author |
| dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv |
Rodrigues, Judite Dias, Sérgio |
| dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv |
Eleições presidenciais dos EUA republicanos democratas hashtag US presidential elections republicans democrats hashtag |
| topic |
Eleições presidenciais dos EUA republicanos democratas hashtag US presidential elections republicans democrats hashtag |
| description |
Twitter has become a space for political deliberation and confrontational positions, during election time. Therefore, the prime objective of this research focused on understanding which U.S. political force – republicans or democrats – had a more substantial presence on Twitter, during the presidential election of 2016. As we were trying to decipher this issue, we were also trying to understand the power of the hashtag in political communication on Twitter for each political perspective. For this, we collected and analysed 4399 tweets. In this paper, we observed that the presence of the republicans was more prominent than the democrats. However, the true voice of Twitter is the common citizen. We verified that, in this social media, the hashtag is much more than an aggregator of content. This mechanism of participation respects the objective of expressing a political position too. |
| publishDate |
2017 |
| dc.date.none.fl_str_mv |
2017-07-31 |
| dc.type.status.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion |
| dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/article |
| format |
article |
| status_str |
publishedVersion |
| dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv |
https://doi.org/10.58050/comunicando.v6i1.226 https://doi.org/10.58050/comunicando.v6i1.226 |
| url |
https://doi.org/10.58050/comunicando.v6i1.226 |
| dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv |
por |
| language |
por |
| dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv |
https://www.revistacomunicando.sopcom.pt/index.php/comunicando/article/view/226 https://www.revistacomunicando.sopcom.pt/index.php/comunicando/article/view/226/161 |
| dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv |
info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess |
| eu_rights_str_mv |
openAccess |
| dc.format.none.fl_str_mv |
application/pdf |
| dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sopcom |
| publisher.none.fl_str_mv |
Sopcom |
| dc.source.none.fl_str_mv |
Revista Comunicando; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2017): Media and Citizenship: A Tribute to Paquete de Oliveira; 103 - 128 Revista Comunicando; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2017): Medios de Comunicación y Ciudadanía: Homenaje a Paquete de Oliveira; 103 - 128 Revista Comunicando; Vol. 6 N.º 1 (2017): Média e Cidadania: Um Tributo a Paquete de Oliveira; 103 - 128 2182-4037 reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia instacron:RCAAP |
| instname_str |
FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| instacron_str |
RCAAP |
| institution |
RCAAP |
| reponame_str |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| collection |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) |
| repository.name.fl_str_mv |
Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia |
| repository.mail.fl_str_mv |
info@rcaap.pt |
| _version_ |
1833598008427544576 |