Exportação concluída — 

Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections

Detalhes bibliográficos
Autor(a) principal: Rodrigues, Judite
Data de Publicação: 2017
Outros Autores: Dias, Sérgio
Tipo de documento: Artigo
Idioma: por
Título da fonte: Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
Texto Completo: https://doi.org/10.58050/comunicando.v6i1.226
Resumo: Twitter has become a space for political deliberation and confrontational positions, during election time. Therefore, the prime objective of this research focused on understanding which U.S. political force – republicans or democrats – had a more substantial presence on Twitter, during the presidential election of 2016. As we were trying to decipher this issue, we were also trying to understand the power of the hashtag in political communication on Twitter for each political perspective. For this, we collected and analysed 4399 tweets. In this paper, we observed that the presence of the republicans was more prominent than the democrats. However, the true voice of Twitter is the common citizen. We verified that, in this social media, the hashtag is much more than an aggregator of content. This mechanism of participation respects the objective of expressing a political position too.
id RCAP_d4dae7e1741be3c788af3dbc4d0268e9
oai_identifier_str oai:revistacomunicando.sopcom.pt:article/226
network_acronym_str RCAP
network_name_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository_id_str https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/7160
spelling Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential ElectionsRepublicanos e Democratas: quem tem Voz no Twitter? O caso das eleições presidenciais dos EUA em 2016Eleições presidenciais dos EUATwitterrepublicanosdemocratashashtagUS presidential electionsTwitterrepublicansdemocratshashtagTwitter has become a space for political deliberation and confrontational positions, during election time. Therefore, the prime objective of this research focused on understanding which U.S. political force – republicans or democrats – had a more substantial presence on Twitter, during the presidential election of 2016. As we were trying to decipher this issue, we were also trying to understand the power of the hashtag in political communication on Twitter for each political perspective. For this, we collected and analysed 4399 tweets. In this paper, we observed that the presence of the republicans was more prominent than the democrats. However, the true voice of Twitter is the common citizen. We verified that, in this social media, the hashtag is much more than an aggregator of content. This mechanism of participation respects the objective of expressing a political position too.O Twitter tornou-se num espaço de deliberação política e confronto de posições, em tempo de eleições. Neste sentido, a presente investigação tem como objetivo primordial perceber qual a força política dos EUA – republicanos ou democratas – que possuiu uma maior voz no debate político que se desenrolou no Twitter, durante o período das eleições presidenciais no país, em 2016. À medida que tentamos decifrar esta questão, procuramos também compreender qual o poder que a hashtag possui na comunicação política no Twitter para cada perspetiva partidária. Para tal, foi recolhida e analisada uma base de dados composta por 4399 tweets. Nesta investigação, foi possível concluir que a presença dos republicanos se sobrepõe à dos democratas. No entanto, a verdadeira voz que se faz ouvir na rede é a do cidadão comum. Verificamos ainda que, no Twitter , a hashtag é muito mais do que uma agregadora de conteúdos, pois é também através desta ferramenta que os utilizadores expressam a sua posição política.Sopcom2017-07-31info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersioninfo:eu-repo/semantics/articleapplication/pdfhttps://doi.org/10.58050/comunicando.v6i1.226https://doi.org/10.58050/comunicando.v6i1.226Revista Comunicando; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2017): Media and Citizenship: A Tribute to Paquete de Oliveira; 103 - 128Revista Comunicando; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2017): Medios de Comunicación y Ciudadanía: Homenaje a Paquete de Oliveira; 103 - 128Revista Comunicando; Vol. 6 N.º 1 (2017): Média e Cidadania: Um Tributo a Paquete de Oliveira; 103 - 1282182-4037reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiainstacron:RCAAPporhttps://www.revistacomunicando.sopcom.pt/index.php/comunicando/article/view/226https://www.revistacomunicando.sopcom.pt/index.php/comunicando/article/view/226/161Rodrigues, JuditeDias, Sérgioinfo:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess2024-12-14T08:24:17Zoai:revistacomunicando.sopcom.pt:article/226Portal AgregadorONGhttps://www.rcaap.pt/oai/openaireinfo@rcaap.ptopendoar:https://opendoar.ac.uk/repository/71602025-05-28T19:18:29.057101Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologiafalse
dc.title.none.fl_str_mv Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections
Republicanos e Democratas: quem tem Voz no Twitter? O caso das eleições presidenciais dos EUA em 2016
title Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections
spellingShingle Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections
Rodrigues, Judite
Eleições presidenciais dos EUA
Twitter
republicanos
democratas
hashtag
US presidential elections
Twitter
republicans
democrats
hashtag
title_short Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections
title_full Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections
title_fullStr Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections
title_full_unstemmed Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections
title_sort Republicans and Democrats: Who has a voice on Twitter? The case of the 2016 US Presidential Elections
author Rodrigues, Judite
author_facet Rodrigues, Judite
Dias, Sérgio
author_role author
author2 Dias, Sérgio
author2_role author
dc.contributor.author.fl_str_mv Rodrigues, Judite
Dias, Sérgio
dc.subject.por.fl_str_mv Eleições presidenciais dos EUA
Twitter
republicanos
democratas
hashtag
US presidential elections
Twitter
republicans
democrats
hashtag
topic Eleições presidenciais dos EUA
Twitter
republicanos
democratas
hashtag
US presidential elections
Twitter
republicans
democrats
hashtag
description Twitter has become a space for political deliberation and confrontational positions, during election time. Therefore, the prime objective of this research focused on understanding which U.S. political force – republicans or democrats – had a more substantial presence on Twitter, during the presidential election of 2016. As we were trying to decipher this issue, we were also trying to understand the power of the hashtag in political communication on Twitter for each political perspective. For this, we collected and analysed 4399 tweets. In this paper, we observed that the presence of the republicans was more prominent than the democrats. However, the true voice of Twitter is the common citizen. We verified that, in this social media, the hashtag is much more than an aggregator of content. This mechanism of participation respects the objective of expressing a political position too.
publishDate 2017
dc.date.none.fl_str_mv 2017-07-31
dc.type.status.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/publishedVersion
dc.type.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/article
format article
status_str publishedVersion
dc.identifier.uri.fl_str_mv https://doi.org/10.58050/comunicando.v6i1.226
https://doi.org/10.58050/comunicando.v6i1.226
url https://doi.org/10.58050/comunicando.v6i1.226
dc.language.iso.fl_str_mv por
language por
dc.relation.none.fl_str_mv https://www.revistacomunicando.sopcom.pt/index.php/comunicando/article/view/226
https://www.revistacomunicando.sopcom.pt/index.php/comunicando/article/view/226/161
dc.rights.driver.fl_str_mv info:eu-repo/semantics/openAccess
eu_rights_str_mv openAccess
dc.format.none.fl_str_mv application/pdf
dc.publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sopcom
publisher.none.fl_str_mv Sopcom
dc.source.none.fl_str_mv Revista Comunicando; Vol. 6 No. 1 (2017): Media and Citizenship: A Tribute to Paquete de Oliveira; 103 - 128
Revista Comunicando; Vol. 6 Núm. 1 (2017): Medios de Comunicación y Ciudadanía: Homenaje a Paquete de Oliveira; 103 - 128
Revista Comunicando; Vol. 6 N.º 1 (2017): Média e Cidadania: Um Tributo a Paquete de Oliveira; 103 - 128
2182-4037
reponame:Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
instname:FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron:RCAAP
instname_str FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
instacron_str RCAAP
institution RCAAP
reponame_str Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
collection Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP)
repository.name.fl_str_mv Repositórios Científicos de Acesso Aberto de Portugal (RCAAP) - FCCN, serviços digitais da FCT – Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia
repository.mail.fl_str_mv info@rcaap.pt
_version_ 1833598008427544576